Lock in $30 Savings on PRO—Offer Ends Soon! ⏳
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...
Search
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
460
Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.
Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Carlisle Rainey
See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
carlislerainey
0
240
Topic Sampling
carlislerainey
1
460
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
carlislerainey
0
93
Unnecessary
carlislerainey
0
580
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
carlislerainey
0
250
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
150
Logit Models in Small Samples
carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
carlislerainey
0
470
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
carlislerainey
0
530
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
日本語新聞記事を用いた大規模言語モデルの暗記定量化 / LLMC2025
upura
0
370
大規模言語モデルにおけるData-Centric AIと合成データの活用 / Data-Centric AI and Synthetic Data in Large Language Models
tsurubee
1
440
Time to Cash: The Full Stack Breakdown of Modern ATM Attacks
ratatata
0
170
令和最新技術で伝統掲示板を再構築: HonoX で作る型安全なスレッドフロート型掲示板 / かろっく@calloc134 - Hono Conference 2025
calloc134
0
440
LLM-jp-3 and beyond: Training Large Language Models
odashi
1
710
世界の人気アプリ100個を分析して見えたペイウォール設計の心得
akihiro_kokubo
PRO
63
35k
Sat2City:3D City Generation from A Single Satellite Image with Cascaded Latent Diffusion
satai
4
340
データサイエンティストをめぐる環境の違い2025年版〈一般ビジネスパーソン調査の国際比較〉
datascientistsociety
PRO
0
280
EcoWikiRS: Learning Ecological Representation of Satellite Images from Weak Supervision with Species Observation and Wikipedia
satai
3
430
AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label data
satai
3
540
VectorLLM: Human-like Extraction of Structured Building Contours via Multimodal LLMs
satai
4
510
Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Code Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Directions
fatemeh_fard
0
110
Featured
See All Featured
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
54
7.9k
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
273
21k
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
194
17k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
348
40k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
52
5.8k
The Invisible Side of Design
smashingmag
302
51k
Site-Speed That Sticks
csswizardry
13
1k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
27k
Optimising Largest Contentful Paint
csswizardry
37
3.5k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
191
16k
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
soudai
PRO
196
70k
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
12
1.3k
Transcript
Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle
Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY)
[email protected]
@carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob
“With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or
from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any
None
None
None
None
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% !
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share if
Mobilize Seat Share if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%
mobilization
electoral rules
competitiveness
data
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,
and code at crain.co/stratmob