Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
440

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
430
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
81
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
570
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
460
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
510

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
引力・斥力を制御可能なランダム部分集合の確率分布
Avatar for Takahiro Kawashima wasyro
0
240
2021年度-基盤研究B-研究計画調書
Avatar for Y. Yamamoto trycycle
PRO
0
300
[論文紹介] Intuitive Fine-Tuning
Avatar for Ryokan RI ryou0634
0
110
Mechanistic Interpretability：解釈可能性研究の新たな潮流
Avatar for Koshiro Aoki koshiro_aoki
1
410
Generative Models 2025
Avatar for Hiroshi Takahashi takahashihiroshi
25
13k
生成的推薦の人気バイアスの分析：暗記の観点から / JSAI2025
Avatar for Shotaro Ishihara upura
0
260
EarthSynth: Generating Informative Earth Observation with Diffusion Models
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
260
SSII2025 [SS1] レンズレスカメラ
Avatar for 画像センシングシンポジウム ssii
PRO
2
1.1k
SSII2025 [SS2] 横浜DeNAベイスターズの躍進を支えたAIプロダクト
Avatar for 画像センシングシンポジウム ssii
PRO
7
4k
数理最適化に基づく制御
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
6
730
論文紹介：Not All Tokens Are What You Need for Pretraining
Avatar for Kosuke Nishida kosuken
0
170
近似動的計画入門
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
4
1k

Featured

See All Featured
Typedesign – Prime Four
Avatar for Hannes Fritz hannesfritz
42
2.8k
Visualization
Avatar for Eitan Lees eitanlees
148
16k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
Avatar for Jefferson Lam jeffersonlam
352
21k
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
Avatar for Garrett Dimon garrettdimon
PRO
32
1.6k
Build your cross-platform service in a week with App Engine
Avatar for Jose L jlugia
231
18k
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
Avatar for Matt Raible mraible
33
8.8k
Bash Introduction
Avatar for André Augusto Costa Santos 62gerente
615
210k
Fantastic passwords and where to find them - at NoRuKo
Avatar for Phil Nash philnash
52
3.4k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
Avatar for Gregor Martynus gr2m
95
14k
Thoughts on Productivity
Avatar for Jon Yablonski jonyablonski
70
4.8k
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
Avatar for Tammy Everts tammyeverts
49
3k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
512
110k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob