Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
450

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
230
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
440
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
87
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
570
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
230
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
150
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
120
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
460
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
520

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
引力・斥力を制御可能なランダム部分集合の確率分布
Avatar for Takahiro Kawashima wasyro
0
260
令和最新技術で伝統掲示板を再構築: HonoX で作る型安全なスレッドフロート型掲示板 / かろっく@calloc134 - Hono Conference 2025
Avatar for calloc134 calloc134
0
230
機械学習と数理最適化の融合 (MOAI) による革新
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
1
400
国際論文を出そう！ICRA / IROS / RA-L への論文投稿の心構えとノウハウ / RSJ2025 Luncheon Seminar
Avatar for koide3 koide3
10
5.5k
Nullspace MPC
Avatar for MizuhoAOKI mizuhoaoki
1
200
大学見本市2025 JSTさきがけ事業セミナー「顔の見えないセンシング技術：多様なセンサにもとづく個人情報に配慮した人物状態推定」
Avatar for Mariko Isogawa miso2024
0
170
Hiding What from Whom? A Critical Review of the History of Programming languages for Music
Avatar for Tomoya Matsuura tomoyanonymous
0
200
2021年度-基盤研究B-研究計画調書
Avatar for Y. Yamamoto trycycle
PRO
0
350
Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden States
Avatar for Hiroto Kurita kurita
1
270
HoliTracer:Holistic Vectorization of Geographic Objects from Large-Size Remote Sensing Imagery
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
120
A scalable, annual aboveground biomass product for monitoring carbon impacts of ecosystem restoration projects
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
4
350
MIRU2025 チュートリアル講演「ロボット基盤モデルの最前線」
Avatar for Kento Kawaharazuka haraduka
15
8.9k

Featured

See All Featured
Balancing Empowerment & Direction
Avatar for Lara Hogan lara
5
690
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
Avatar for Bermon Painter bermonpainter
359
30k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
Avatar for Ryan Cromwell cromwellryan
135
9.6k
Making Projects Easy
Avatar for Brett Harned brettharned
120
6.4k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
Avatar for Laura Van Doore lauravandoore
36
6.9k
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
Avatar for Doug Neiner dougneiner
65
7.9k
Chrome DevTools: State of the Union 2024 - Debugging React & Beyond
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
9
910
KATA
Avatar for Megan Lloyd mclloyd
32
15k
Code Review Best Practice
Avatar for Trisha Gee trishagee
72
19k
Visualization
Avatar for Eitan Lees eitanlees
149
16k
Music & Morning Musume
Avatar for Bryan Veloso bryan
46
6.8k
The Invisible Side of Design
Avatar for Vitaly Friedman smashingmag
302
51k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob