Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
430

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
200
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
400
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
77
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
560
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
110
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
450
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
500

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
MGDSS：慣性式モーションキャプチャを用いたジェスチャによるドローンの操作 / ec75-yamauchi
Avatar for yumulab yumulab
0
120
[論文紹介] iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecasting
Avatar for shiba4839 shiba4839
0
150
SI-D案内資料_京都文教大学
Avatar for Ryoji Takeuchi ryojitakeuchi1116
0
1.3k
学生向けアンケート＜データサイエンティストについて＞
Avatar for The Japan DataScientist Society datascientistsociety
PRO
0
1.1k
PhD Defence: Considering Temporal and Contextual Information for Lexical Semantic Change Detection
Avatar for Taichi Aida a1da4
1
160
o1 pro mode の調査レポート
Avatar for smorce smorce
0
160
研究テーマのデザインと研究遂行の方法論
Avatar for Hisashi Ishihara hisashiishihara
5
1.1k
Mathematics in the Age of AI and the 4 Generation University
Avatar for Mohammed Hachama hachama
0
150
サーブレシーブ成功率は勝敗に影響するか？
Avatar for ぱんだ vball_panda
0
650
EarthMarker: A Visual Prompting Multimodal Large Language Model for Remote Sensing
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
3
190
さくらインターネット研究所 アップデート2025年
Avatar for MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsumoto_r
PRO
0
530
Weekly AI Agents News! 2月号 アーカイブ
Avatar for masatoto masatoto
1
160

Featured

See All Featured
Site-Speed That Sticks
Avatar for Harry Roberts csswizardry
6
540
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
Avatar for Des Traynor destraynor
231
53k
Practical Orchestrator
Avatar for Shlomi Noach shlominoach
187
11k
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
Avatar for Marc Duiker marcduiker
30
2k
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
Avatar for Michelle Schulp Hunt marktimemedia
30
2.3k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
Avatar for Dennis Kardys denniskardys
233
140k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
Avatar for Joseph Mastey jmmastey
42
7.5k
Typedesign – Prime Four
Avatar for Hannes Fritz hannesfritz
41
2.6k
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
Avatar for Harry Roberts csswizardry
23
1.6k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
Avatar for Laura Van Doore lauravandoore
462
33k
GitHub's CSS Performance
Avatar for Jon Rohan jonrohan
1031
460k
Unsuck your backbone
Avatar for Amy Palamountain ammeep
671
57k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob