Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Repres...

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey Carlisle Rainey
August 29, 2014
Research
0
440

Strategic Mobilization: Why Proportional Representation Decreases Voter Mobilization.

Avatar for Carlisle Rainey

Carlisle Rainey

August 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by Carlisle Rainey

See All by Carlisle Rainey
Topic Sampling @ SPSA 2024
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
200
Topic Sampling
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
1
420
ggcarly:theme_carly_presents()
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
79
Unnecessary
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
560
When BLUE Is Not Best: Non-Normal Errors and the Linear Model
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
210
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
140
Logit Models in Small Samples
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
110
When BLUE is Not Best
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
450
Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Avatar for Carlisle Rainey carlislerainey
0
510

Other Decks in Research

See All in Research
さくらインターネット研究所 アップデート2025年
Avatar for MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsumoto_r
PRO
0
650
EOGS: Gaussian Splatting for Efficient Satellite Image Photogrammetry
Avatar for SatAI.challenge satai
4
270
Type Theory as a Formal Basis of Natural Language Semantics
Avatar for Daiki Matsuoka daikimatsuoka
1
220
RHO-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Need
Avatar for Sansan R&D sansan_randd
1
110
線形判別分析のPU学習による 朝日歌壇短歌の分析
Avatar for MasaKat0 masakat0
0
130
Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) 入門 🚀
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
2
1k
SSII2025 [TS2] リモートセンシング画像処理の最前線
Avatar for 画像センシングシンポジウム ssii
PRO
7
2.8k
チャッドローン：LLMによる画像認識を用いた自律型ドローンシステムの開発と実験 / ec75-morisaki
Avatar for yumulab yumulab
1
460
作業記憶の発達的特性が言語獲得の臨界期を形成する（NLP2025）
Avatar for Masato Mita chemical_tree
2
610
3D Gaussian Splattingによる高効率な新規視点合成技術とその応用
Avatar for Hide Matsuki muskie82
5
2.6k
時系列データに対する解釈可能な 決定木クラスタリング
Avatar for MIKIO KUBO mickey_kubo
2
720
20250605_新交通システム推進議連_熊本都市圏「車1割削減、渋滞半減、公共交通2倍」から考える地方都市交通政策
Avatar for Traffic Brain trafficbrain
0
440

Featured

See All Featured
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
Avatar for Cassini Nazir cassininazir
367
26k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
Avatar for Caitie McCaffrey caitiem20
331
22k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
Avatar for John Nunemaker jnunemaker
PRO
58
9.4k
Music & Morning Musume
Avatar for Bryan Veloso bryan
46
6.6k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
Avatar for Laura Van Doore lauravandoore
462
33k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
Avatar for Addy Osmani addyosmani
331
24k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
Avatar for Joseph Mastey jmmastey
42
7.6k
Building a Modern Day 
E-commerce SEO Strategy
Avatar for Aleyda Solis aleyda
42
7.4k
Bash Introduction
Avatar for André Augusto Costa Santos 62gerente
614
210k
Being A Developer After 40
Avatar for Adrian Kosmaczewski akosma
90
590k
Unsuck your backbone
Avatar for Amy Palamountain ammeep
671
58k
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
Avatar for Noah Learner thekraken
39
1.9k

Transcript

  1. Strategic Mobilization Why Disproportional Districts Encourage Partisan Mobilization Efforts Carlisle

    Rainey! Assistant Professor University at Buffalo (SUNY) [email protected] @carlislerainey paper, data, and code at crain.co/stratmob

  2. “With proportional representation from the nation as a whole or

    from large electoral districts, parties have an incentive to mobilize everywhere. With single member districts some areas may be written off as hopeless.” –Powell (1982, p. 21)

  3. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation

  4. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any

  5. None
  6. None
  7. None
  8. None

  9. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  10. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional Competitive
 Plurality !

  11. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality !

  12. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  13. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  14. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  15. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  16. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  17. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  18. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% !

  19. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51%

  20. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  21. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  22. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  23. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% No Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Yes Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% Yes

  24. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  25. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  26. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100%

  27. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  28. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  29. District Current Vote Share Current Seat Share Vote Share
 if

    Mobilize Seat Share
 if Mobilize Gain Non-Competitive Plurality 20% 0% 22% 0% 0% Proportional 20% 20% 22% 22% 2% Competitive
 Plurality 49% 0% 51% 100% 100%

  30. mobilization

  31. electoral rules

  32. competitiveness

  33. data

  34. None
  35. None
  36. None
  37. None
  38. None
  39. None
  40. None

  41. incentive to mobilize everywhere proportional representation no any paper, data,

    and code at crain.co/stratmob