Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
The advantage of using ’Eff’ in Scala Project
Search
machu
June 28, 2019
Programming
2
13k
The advantage of using ’Eff’ in Scala Project
machu
June 28, 2019
Tweet
Share
More Decks by machu
See All by machu
NBAチームから学ぶ強いチームの作り方
machuz
0
45
Authorization to implement with Extensible Effect
machuz
0
420
アルプの 認証/認可分離戦略と手法
machuz
3
750
AuthzCtx - Alp社内共有会
machuz
0
74
アルプのEff独自エフェクト集 / Alp-original ’Eff’ pearls
machuz
1
2.1k
Scalebaseバックエンド構成について/the backend design of Scalebase
machuz
0
6.4k
SQL Meisterへの道 ~更新編~ / sql-meister-CUD
machuz
0
2.2k
SQL Meisterへの道 ~基礎〜参照編~ / sql-meister-R
machuz
0
2.6k
Authz
machuz
0
310
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Strands Agents で実現する名刺解析アーキテクチャ
omiya0555
1
110
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
3
290
Gemini CLIの"強み"を知る! Gemini CLIとClaude Codeを比較してみた!
kotahisafuru
2
720
Claude Code で Astro blog を Pages から Workers へ移行してみた
codehex
0
170
#QiitaBash TDDで(自分の)開発がどう変わったか
ryosukedtomita
1
240
プロダクトという一杯を作る - プロダクトチームが味の責任を持つまでの煮込み奮闘記
hiliteeternal
0
300
Gemini CLI のはじめ方
ttnyt8701
1
110
Git Sync を超える!OSS で実現する CDK Pull 型デプロイ / Deploying CDK with PipeCD in Pull-style
tkikuc
4
490
11年かかって やっとVibe Codingに 時代が追いつきましたね
yimajo
0
220
TypeScriptでDXを上げろ! Hono編
yusukebe
4
890
React は次の10年を生き残れるか:3つのトレンドから考える
oukayuka
41
16k
AIのメモリー
watany
11
1.1k
Featured
See All Featured
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.8k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
160
23k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
507
140k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
308
31k
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
10
1k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
110k
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
29
1.8k
Site-Speed That Sticks
csswizardry
10
730
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
140
7k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
223
9.7k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
351
21k
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
267
13k
Transcript
The advantage of using ’Eff’ in Scala Project Scala Matsuri
2019 @ma2k8 4DBMBϓϩδΣΫτͰ&⒎Λ༻͢Δར
About Me ▶Tsubasa Matsukawa - SWE&SRE at Recruit Marketing Partners
Co.,Ltd. & Quipper Co.,Ltd. @wing_007 ϦΫϧʔτϚʔέςΟϯάύʔτφʔζ݉2VJQQFSॴଐͰ 48&ͱ43&ྖҬΛ୲͍ͯ͠·͢ɻ
Our Products ▶Study Sapuri English - English learning app [
Web/iOS/Android ] ओʹελσΟαϓϦ&OHMJTIͷ։ൃΛ͍ͯ͠·͢ɻ ӳޠֶशʹڵຯ͕͋Δํੋඇ
Scala has an elegant syntactic sugar ‘for expression’. To make
the most of this force…. 4DBMBʹૉఢͳҥߏจGPS͕ࣜ͋Γ·͢ɻ ͦͷྗΛ࠷େݶར༻͢ΔͨΊʹɾɾɾ
We needed to decided which ‘types’ to primarily use to
when starting Scala projects. ࢲୡ4DBMBͷϓϩδΣΫτΛ։࢝͢ΔࡍɺओʹͲͷʮܕʯΛ ༻͢Δͷ͔ΛܾΊΔඞཁ͕͋Γ·͢ɻ
These ‘types’ are often chosen. ▶Future[A] ▶Future[Try[A]] ▶Future[E Either A]
▶EitherT[Future, E, A] ※There is also case that uses "Task" instead of "Future" ͜ͷΑ͏ͳܕ͕Α͘બΕΔͰ͠ΐ͏ɻ 'VUVSFͷΘΓʹ5BTLΛ͏͜ͱ͋Γ·͢
Our team is trying…. Eff[R, A] ࢲୡͷνʔϜͰ&⒎Λࢼ͍ͯ͠·͢
Each pros and cons were…? ͦΕͧΕͷϝϦοτσϝϦοτʁ
Future[A]
▶ Easy ॴ؆୯͞ʹਚ͖·͢ɻ Pros of Future[A]
Cons of Future[A] ▶ Rough error handling. ▶ Semaphore hard.
※Task solve Semaphore problem. ॴηϚϑΥͷ੍ޚ͕͍͠ͱɺ ΤϥʔϋϯυϦϯά͕େࡶʹ͔͠ߦ͑ͳ͍Ͱ͢ɻ
Future[Try[A]] ɹ
Pros of Future[Try[A]] ▶ Error handling is possible. ॴΤϥʔϋϯυϦϯά͕ՄೳʹͳΔͰ͢ɻ
Cons of Future[Try[A]] ▶ Only throwable can be used ▶
Syntax is not simple(Coding 'try ~ catch' every time is very troublesome. ॴΤϥʔϋϯυϦϯάʹ༻Ͱ͖Δܕ͕ 5ISPXBCMFʹݶΔͱγϯλοΫε͕ෳࡶʹͳΔͰ͢ɻ
Personally, I often use ‘Try’ when wrapping Java libraries, but
since I convert to ‘Either’, they do not appear in signatures. ݸਓతʹ5SZ+BWBϥΠϒϥϦͷ8SBQͰΑ͍͘·͕͢ɺ &JUIFSܕʹม͠ɺγάχνϟʹग़͠·ͤΜɻ
Future[E Either A]
Pros of Future[E Either A] ▶ Flexible Error handling is
possible. ▶ E is ADT can be flexible expression. ▶ Every time force error handling. ॴ5SZΑΓॊೈͳΤϥʔϋϯυϦϯά͕ ՄೳʹͳΔͰ͢ɻ
Cons of Future[E Either A] ▶ Rough error handling. ▶
Every time need to match the type even if you don't need error handling. ॴΤϥʔϋϯυϦϯά͕ ෆཁͳՕॴͰܕ߹Θ͕ͤඞཁʹͳΔͰ͢ɻ
EitherT[Future, E, A]
Pros of EitherT[Future, E, A] ▶ Can solve part of
the complexity of nesting. ॴ͋Δఔωετͯ͠ GPSࣜΛγϯϓϧʹอͯΔͰ͢ɻ
Cons of EitherT[Future, E, A] ▶ It gets slower as
types are stacked. ▶ May change results in evaluation order. ▶ Too many lift. ॴɺධՁॱͰ݁Ռ͕มΘΔՄೳੑ͕͋ΓɺϞφυ ελοΫʹ٧Ήܕ͕૿͑Δͱɺܕ߹Θ͕ͤࡶʹͳΔͰ͢ɻ
Eff[R, A]
Pros of Eff[R, A] ▶ ‘Eff’ can solve other ‘types’
disadvantage. ▶ Simple syntax. ▶ Can simply use various effects. ▶ Can solved performance problem when types are stacked. ▶ A result doesn't change for the order of evaluation. &⒎͜Ε·Ͱհͨ͠ܕͷσϝϦοτͷ େ෦ΛղফͰ͖·͢ɻ
Cons of Eff[R, A] ▶’Eff’ is very simple syntax. But
not easy. ▶ difficult effects wire. ▶ Anything is lazy evaluation. ▶ Complexity of type specification. &⒎ͷσϝϦοτɺ؆୯Ͱͳ͍Ͱ͢ɻ ͋Δఔͷ׳ΕඞཁͰ͠ΐ͏ɻ
Our project used ‘Eff’ on clean architecture. զʑͷϓϩδΣΫτͰɺ$MFBO"SDIJUFDUVSFͰઃܭ͠ɺ Ҿ͖ճ͢ܕʹ&⒎Λ༻͢ΔߏΛಋೖ͍ͯ͠·͢ɻ
͜ͷΑ͏ʹෳͷޮՌΛϑϥοτʹهड़Ͱ͖ΔͷͰɺ γϯϓϧʹهड़Ͱ͖͍ͯ·͢ɻ
How to use ‘Eff’ &⒎ͷ͍ํ Library: https://github.com/atnos-org/eff
Define ADT "%5Λఆٛ͠·͢ɻ
Define Smart-constructer "%5Λ&⒎ʹੵΉεϚʔτίϯετϥΫλΛఆٛ͠·͢ɻ
ੵΜͩ"%5Λղऍ͢ΔΠϯλϓϦλΛఆٛ͠·͢ɻ Define Interpreter
Ready to use ‘Eff’. ͜ΕͰ&⒎Λར༻͢Δ४උ͕Ͱ͖·ͨ͠ɻ
&⒎Λར༻ͨ͠ϓϩάϥϜΛॻ͖·͢ɻ Write program!!
ΠϯλϓϦλʹ͔͚ͯ&⒎Λ࣮ߦ͠·͢ɻ SVO99ͷؔͦΕͧΕJNQMJDJUDPOWFSTJPOͰੜͯ͠·͢ɻ Run program!!
‘Eff’ is Good! &⒎͍͍ͧʂʢհهࣄͱίʔυαϯϓϧష͓͖ͬͯ·͢ Introduction article: https://tech.recruit-mp.co.jp/server-side/post-18728/ɹ Code sample: https://github.com/ma2k8/eff-arch-example
Thanks! ͋Γ͕ͱ͏͍͟͝·ͨ͠ʂ