Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Jasmine, BDD for JavaScript
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Chris Bushell
May 18, 2011
1
130
Jasmine, BDD for JavaScript
Prepared for the Melbourne Patterns Group
Chris Bushell
May 18, 2011
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Chris Bushell
See All by Chris Bushell
Test Automation for Packaged Systems: Yes You Can!
cbushell
0
64
Introduction to Pair Programming
cbushell
1
120
An Introduction to BDD
cbushell
5
170
An Introduction to HTTP
cbushell
2
130
Agile Test Automation
cbushell
2
180
Working Effectively With Legacy Code
cbushell
4
250
Branches Are For Trees. How to Develop Software Without Them
cbushell
1
120
State Pattern From GoF
cbushell
1
69
Continuous Integration, fast builds and Flot
cbushell
2
76
Featured
See All Featured
Claude Code どこまでも/ Claude Code Everywhere
nwiizo
64
53k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
333
24k
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
55
12k
How to Align SEO within the Product Triangle To Get Buy-In & Support - #RIMC
aleyda
1
1.4k
The B2B funnel & how to create a winning content strategy
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
300
Bridging the Design Gap: How Collaborative Modelling removes blockers to flow between stakeholders and teams @FastFlow conf
baasie
0
480
The Spectacular Lies of Maps
axbom
PRO
1
630
A better future with KSS
kneath
240
18k
Intergalactic Javascript Robots from Outer Space
tanoku
273
27k
Applied NLP in the Age of Generative AI
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.2k
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
274
21k
ラッコキーワード サービス紹介資料
rakko
1
2.7M
Transcript
BDD for JavaScript
A li1le history….
1995, Netscape, Mocha, LiveScript, JavaScript (aka ECMAScript)
None
1999, MicrosoD, XMLHTTPRequest
2004, GMail
2005, Jesse James Garret, Ajax: A New Approach to
Web ApplicaWons
None
2011, GitHub
Development has outpaced tesWng maturity
Why the tendency only to integraWon test our JavaScript?
An idea! Test driven JavaScript
Meet Jasmine…. and JsUnit and JsTestDriver
and Screw.Unit and JSMockito etc.
Why Jasmine? RSpec like syntax Super fast
Easy to integrate Runs anywhere JavaScript runs Supports tesWng of asynchronous code
So, show me….
Some extensions h1ps://github.com/mhevery/jasmine-‐node h1p://rudyla1ae.github.com/jasmine-‐species h1ps://github.com/pivotal/jasmine-‐ajax
Jasmine jQuery • Custom matchers • toHaveHtml(string)
• toBeHidden() • toBeSelected() • spyOnEvent($(‘#some element’), ‘click’) • An API for loading HTML fixtures • loadFixtures(‘myFixturesFile.html’);
Working with the DOM • DRY • Use
your applicaWon to generate the fixture data from actual views • Load the fixture using XHR • Example: h1ps://github.com/pivotaljb/js-‐ fixture-‐example
Watch out for…. • Syntax errors cause specs to
fail silently • Different browsers, different traces