Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-bo...
Search
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Science
1
370
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-body wavefunction
Article, code and more:
http://qubism.wikidot.com/
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Piotr Migdał
See All by Piotr Migdał
Detecting trypophobia triggers (with deep learning)
pmigdal
1
270
Teaching Machine Learning
pmigdal
7
1.6k
A game needs to framework
pmigdal
1
190
Visualizing word coincidences
pmigdal
1
73
Dreams, Drugs and ConvNets
pmigdal
1
890
{Machine, Deep} Learning for software engineers
pmigdal
1
2.1k
Lightning talk - Teaching machine learning
pmigdal
0
1.7k
Interaktywna wizualizacja danych w d3.js
pmigdal
2
670
Gry naukowe, moja gra kwantowa
pmigdal
0
230
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
Hakonwa-Quaternion
hiranabe
1
110
データマイニング - グラフデータと経路
trycycle
PRO
1
130
ウェブ・ソーシャルメディア論文読み会 第25回: Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions (Nature, 2024)
hkefka385
0
110
機械学習 - K近傍法 & 機械学習のお作法
trycycle
PRO
0
1.1k
トラブルがあったコンペに学ぶデータ分析
tereka114
2
1.6k
MoveItを使った産業用ロボット向け動作作成方法の紹介 / Introduction to creating motion for industrial robots using MoveIt
ry0_ka
0
490
科学で迫る勝敗の法則(名城大学公開講座.2024年10月) / The principle of victory discovered by science (Open lecture in Meijo Univ. 2024)
konakalab
0
350
Factorized Diffusion: Perceptual Illusions by Noise Decomposition
tomoaki0705
0
390
Lean4による汎化誤差評価の形式化
milano0017
1
220
データベース01: データベースを使わない世界
trycycle
PRO
1
650
創薬における機械学習技術について
kanojikajino
16
5.3k
テンソル分解による糖尿病の組織特異的遺伝子発現の統合解析を用いた関連疾患の予測
tagtag
2
190
Featured
See All Featured
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
337
57k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
53
7.7k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
77
5.8k
Principles of Awesome APIs and How to Build Them.
keavy
126
17k
Designing for Performance
lara
609
69k
How to Ace a Technical Interview
jacobian
277
23k
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
thekraken
39
1.9k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
6.5k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
35
6.7k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
95
6.5k
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
15
1.5k
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
35
2.3k
Transcript
self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions QUBISM: presented by: Piotr Migdał
(ICFO, Barcelona)
Don’t take plots for granted!
None
None
bar chart - William Playfair (1786) scatter plot - Francis
Galton (a century later)
Dmitri Mendeleev | Periodic Table of Elements (1869) periodic table
- Dimitri Mendeleev (1869)
Back to the quantum world
↵|"i + |#i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i 2n complex parameters ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
None
None
00 01 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11
10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111...
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111... AFM: 010101... AFM: 101010...
Examples
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2 00 10 01
11
Dicke state (|0011i + |0101i +|0110i + |1001i +|1010i +
|1100i) / p 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 6 3 3
Dicke state particles zeros ones 8 4 4
Dicke state particles zeros ones 10 5 5
Dicke state particles zeros ones 12 6 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 14 7 7
Product state (↵|0i + |1i)n
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary
cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... X ~ Si
· ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (open boundary cond.)
It works for any qudit 1D spin chains
-- -0 -+ 0- 00 0+ +- +0 ++ +
qutrits (spin-1) 0 -
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki (| +i +
|00i + | + i)/ p 3 + 1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state particles 4 Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki +
1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 6
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 8
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 10
Alternative qubistic schemes
00 01 11 10 anti-ferromagnetic ferromagnetic
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
None
Product state
Product state Dicke half-filled
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state)
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state) Heisenberg
(ground state)
You can see entanglement
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled) A B B C 3 (entangled!)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank:
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A 5 (entangled!) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D E
{|0i, |1i}⌦4 {|+i, | i}⌦4 ⌦4 x ⌦4 z Schmidt
number: 1 2 2 3 4 |0000i |GHZi |Wi Dicke half-filling
Renyi fractal dimension (and box counting)
AKLT ground state also works for qutrits (e.g. spin-1) log(4)
log(3) ⇡ 1 . 26 and its fractal dimension
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field surface-like line-like point-like
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field = 1 surface-like line-like point-like
And how about going the other way?
Jose I. Latorre, arXiv:quant-ph/0510031 (2005) QPEG! matrix product states for
image compression JPEG?
Javier Rodriguez-Laguna Piotr Migdał Miguel Ibanez Berganza Maciej Lewenstein German
Sierra
http://qubism.wikidot.com/ Thanks! paper, code, etc: J.Rodriguez-Laguna, P. Migdał, M. Ibánez
Berganza, M. Lewenstein and G. Sierra. Qubism: self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions. New J. Phys. 14, 053028 (2012), arXiv:1112.3560.
None