Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-bo...
Search
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Science
1
380
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-body wavefunction
Article, code and more:
http://qubism.wikidot.com/
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Piotr Migdał
See All by Piotr Migdał
Detecting trypophobia triggers (with deep learning)
pmigdal
1
290
Teaching Machine Learning
pmigdal
7
1.6k
A game needs to framework
pmigdal
1
200
Visualizing word coincidences
pmigdal
1
75
Dreams, Drugs and ConvNets
pmigdal
1
900
{Machine, Deep} Learning for software engineers
pmigdal
1
2.1k
Lightning talk - Teaching machine learning
pmigdal
0
1.7k
Interaktywna wizualizacja danych w d3.js
pmigdal
2
690
Gry naukowe, moja gra kwantowa
pmigdal
0
230
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
Quelles valorisations des logiciels vers le monde socio-économique dans un contexte de Science Ouverte ?
bluehats
1
470
「美は世界を救う」を心理学で実証したい~クラファンを通じた新しい研究方法
jimpe_hitsuwari
1
160
データマイニング - グラフデータと経路
trycycle
PRO
1
210
ド文系だった私が、 KaggleのNCAAコンペでソロ金取れるまで
wakamatsu_takumu
2
1.2k
機械学習 - 決定木からはじめる機械学習
trycycle
PRO
0
1k
凸最適化からDC最適化まで
santana_hammer
1
280
Celebrate UTIG: Staff and Student Awards 2025
utig
0
150
NASの容量不足のお悩み解決!災害対策も兼ねた「Wasabi Cloud NAS」はここがスゴイ
climbteam
0
120
科学で迫る勝敗の法則(電気学会・SICE若手セミナー講演 2024年12月) / The principle of victory discovered by science (Lecture for young academists in IEEJ-SICE))
konakalab
0
120
白金鉱業Meetup Vol.16_【初学者向け発表】 数理最適化のはじめの一歩 〜身近な問題で学ぶ最適化の面白さ〜
brainpadpr
11
2.3k
Trend Classification of InSAR Displacement Time Series Using SAE–CNN
satai
4
600
機械学習 - 授業概要
trycycle
PRO
0
230
Featured
See All Featured
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
110
20k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
460k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
39
3.6k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
799
220k
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
184
22k
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
marcduiker
31
2.2k
Intergalactic Javascript Robots from Outer Space
tanoku
272
27k
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
michaelherold
246
12k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.8k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
53k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
253
25k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
134
9.5k
Transcript
self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions QUBISM: presented by: Piotr Migdał
(ICFO, Barcelona)
Don’t take plots for granted!
None
None
bar chart - William Playfair (1786) scatter plot - Francis
Galton (a century later)
Dmitri Mendeleev | Periodic Table of Elements (1869) periodic table
- Dimitri Mendeleev (1869)
Back to the quantum world
↵|"i + |#i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i 2n complex parameters ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
None
None
00 01 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11
10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111...
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111... AFM: 010101... AFM: 101010...
Examples
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2 00 10 01
11
Dicke state (|0011i + |0101i +|0110i + |1001i +|1010i +
|1100i) / p 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 6 3 3
Dicke state particles zeros ones 8 4 4
Dicke state particles zeros ones 10 5 5
Dicke state particles zeros ones 12 6 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 14 7 7
Product state (↵|0i + |1i)n
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary
cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... X ~ Si
· ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (open boundary cond.)
It works for any qudit 1D spin chains
-- -0 -+ 0- 00 0+ +- +0 ++ +
qutrits (spin-1) 0 -
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki (| +i +
|00i + | + i)/ p 3 + 1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state particles 4 Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki +
1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 6
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 8
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 10
Alternative qubistic schemes
00 01 11 10 anti-ferromagnetic ferromagnetic
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
None
Product state
Product state Dicke half-filled
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state)
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state) Heisenberg
(ground state)
You can see entanglement
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled) A B B C 3 (entangled!)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank:
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A 5 (entangled!) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D E
{|0i, |1i}⌦4 {|+i, | i}⌦4 ⌦4 x ⌦4 z Schmidt
number: 1 2 2 3 4 |0000i |GHZi |Wi Dicke half-filling
Renyi fractal dimension (and box counting)
AKLT ground state also works for qutrits (e.g. spin-1) log(4)
log(3) ⇡ 1 . 26 and its fractal dimension
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field surface-like line-like point-like
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field = 1 surface-like line-like point-like
And how about going the other way?
Jose I. Latorre, arXiv:quant-ph/0510031 (2005) QPEG! matrix product states for
image compression JPEG?
Javier Rodriguez-Laguna Piotr Migdał Miguel Ibanez Berganza Maciej Lewenstein German
Sierra
http://qubism.wikidot.com/ Thanks! paper, code, etc: J.Rodriguez-Laguna, P. Migdał, M. Ibánez
Berganza, M. Lewenstein and G. Sierra. Qubism: self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions. New J. Phys. 14, 053028 (2012), arXiv:1112.3560.
None