Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-bo...
Search
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Science
1
330
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-body wavefunction
Article, code and more:
http://qubism.wikidot.com/
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Piotr Migdał
See All by Piotr Migdał
Detecting trypophobia triggers (with deep learning)
pmigdal
1
250
Teaching Machine Learning
pmigdal
7
1.6k
A game needs to framework
pmigdal
1
180
Visualizing word coincidences
pmigdal
1
73
Dreams, Drugs and ConvNets
pmigdal
1
870
{Machine, Deep} Learning for software engineers
pmigdal
1
2.1k
Lightning talk - Teaching machine learning
pmigdal
0
1.7k
Interaktywna wizualizacja danych w d3.js
pmigdal
2
650
Gry naukowe, moja gra kwantowa
pmigdal
0
220
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
3次元点群を利用した植物の葉の自動セグメンテーションについて
kentaitakura
2
1.1k
テンソル分解による糖尿病の組織特異的遺伝子発現の統合解析を用いた関連疾患の予測
tagtag
2
130
構造設計のための3D生成AI-最新の取り組みと今後の展開-
kojinishiguchi
1
1.1k
Explanatory material
yuki1986
0
160
オンプレミス環境にKubernetesを構築する
koukimiura
0
180
地質研究者が苦労しながら運用する情報公開システムの実例
naito2000
0
140
山形とさくらんぼに関するレクチャー(YG-900)
07jp27
1
290
butterfly_effect/butterfly_effect_in-house
florets1
1
160
白金鉱業Meetup Vol.15 DMLによる条件付処置効果の推定_sotaroIZUMI_20240919
brainpadpr
2
750
統計的因果探索: 背景知識とデータにより因果仮説を探索する
sshimizu2006
3
800
Cross-Media Information Spaces and Architectures (CISA)
signer
PRO
3
31k
メール送信サーバの集約における透過型SMTP プロキシの定量評価 / Quantitative Evaluation of Transparent SMTP Proxy in Email Sending Server Aggregation
linyows
0
850
Featured
See All Featured
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
94
6.3k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
42
7.5k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
99
5.5k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
430
65k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
67
18k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
462
33k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
667
120k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
135
33k
Optimising Largest Contentful Paint
csswizardry
36
3.2k
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
172
14k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
54
5.4k
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
91
590k
Transcript
self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions QUBISM: presented by: Piotr Migdał
(ICFO, Barcelona)
Don’t take plots for granted!
None
None
bar chart - William Playfair (1786) scatter plot - Francis
Galton (a century later)
Dmitri Mendeleev | Periodic Table of Elements (1869) periodic table
- Dimitri Mendeleev (1869)
Back to the quantum world
↵|"i + |#i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i 2n complex parameters ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
None
None
00 01 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11
10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111...
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111... AFM: 010101... AFM: 101010...
Examples
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2 00 10 01
11
Dicke state (|0011i + |0101i +|0110i + |1001i +|1010i +
|1100i) / p 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 6 3 3
Dicke state particles zeros ones 8 4 4
Dicke state particles zeros ones 10 5 5
Dicke state particles zeros ones 12 6 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 14 7 7
Product state (↵|0i + |1i)n
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary
cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... X ~ Si
· ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (open boundary cond.)
It works for any qudit 1D spin chains
-- -0 -+ 0- 00 0+ +- +0 ++ +
qutrits (spin-1) 0 -
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki (| +i +
|00i + | + i)/ p 3 + 1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state particles 4 Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki +
1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 6
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 8
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 10
Alternative qubistic schemes
00 01 11 10 anti-ferromagnetic ferromagnetic
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
None
Product state
Product state Dicke half-filled
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state)
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state) Heisenberg
(ground state)
You can see entanglement
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled) A B B C 3 (entangled!)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank:
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A 5 (entangled!) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D E
{|0i, |1i}⌦4 {|+i, | i}⌦4 ⌦4 x ⌦4 z Schmidt
number: 1 2 2 3 4 |0000i |GHZi |Wi Dicke half-filling
Renyi fractal dimension (and box counting)
AKLT ground state also works for qutrits (e.g. spin-1) log(4)
log(3) ⇡ 1 . 26 and its fractal dimension
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field surface-like line-like point-like
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field = 1 surface-like line-like point-like
And how about going the other way?
Jose I. Latorre, arXiv:quant-ph/0510031 (2005) QPEG! matrix product states for
image compression JPEG?
Javier Rodriguez-Laguna Piotr Migdał Miguel Ibanez Berganza Maciej Lewenstein German
Sierra
http://qubism.wikidot.com/ Thanks! paper, code, etc: J.Rodriguez-Laguna, P. Migdał, M. Ibánez
Berganza, M. Lewenstein and G. Sierra. Qubism: self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions. New J. Phys. 14, 053028 (2012), arXiv:1112.3560.
None