Architecting Uninterrupted Data Ecosystems: Enterprise Strategies for High Availability and Disaster Recovery in Modern Data Platforms

High Availability & Disaster Recovery for Modern Data Platforms This
presentation will guide you through architecting resilient systems with Oracle, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Trino, MongoDB, Redis, Milvus, and MinIO. Learn how to minimize downtime, ensure continuous operation, and recover from catastrophic events. We'll cover RTO/RPO, DC configurations, monitoring, and data retention. Recovery Time Objective (RTO) & Recovery Point Objective (RPO) Recovery Time Objective (RTO) defines the maximum acceptable delay before service is restored after an outage. Lower RTO requires more investment in redundant systems. Recovery Point Objective (RPO) specifies the maximum acceptable data loss, influencing backup frequency and data replication strategies. Balancing these objectives is crucial for cost-effective resilience. Data Center (DC) Configurations, Monitoring, & Data Retention Data Center (DC) configurations for high availability often involve active-active or active-passive setups. Active-active distributes load across multiple DCs, while active-passive uses a standby DC for failover. Effective monitoring is essential, with automated alerts for performance degradation or system failures. Robust data retention policies are vital, balancing compliance needs with storage costs. by Shiv Iyer

Presentation Agenda Introduction to High Availability (HA) and Disaster Recovery
(DR) Setting the stage with definitions and importance. Deep Dive into HA/DR Strategies for Each Technology Detailed exploration of implementation for Oracle, PostgreSQL, etc. RTO/RPO Considerations for Two-Datacenter Deployments Defining recovery objectives and strategies. Centralized Monitoring and Logging Best practices for consolidated system oversight.

Understanding High Availability (HA) Definition Minimizing downtime and ensuring continuous
operation of critical systems and applications. High Availability aims to keep services operational even when individual components fail. HA is measured as a percentage of uptime, often expressed in "nines" (e.g., "five nines" means 99.999% availability, allowing for only 5.26 minutes of downtime per year). Modern enterprise systems typically target between 99.9% and 99.999% availability depending on criticality. Benefits of High Availability Business continuity during hardware/software failures Protection against single points of failure Improved user experience and customer satisfaction Minimized financial impact from service disruptions Key Components Redundancy: Having multiple instances of each component. Failover Mechanisms: Automated processes for switching to backup components. Monitoring: Continuously tracking system health and performance. Load Balancing: Distributing workloads across multiple resources. Data Replication: Maintaining synchronized copies of data across systems. Implementation Challenges Increased system complexity and maintenance overhead Higher infrastructure and operational costs Potential for split-brain scenarios in distributed systems Ensuring data consistency across replicated components Balancing availability requirements with performance considerations

Understanding Disaster Recovery (DR) Definition Recovering from catastrophic events that
affect the primary datacenter. DR involves replicating data and systems to a separate location for business continuity. Unlike HA which handles component failures, DR addresses facility-wide outages from natural disasters, power failures, or cyber attacks. Benefits of Disaster Recovery Protection against major catastrophic events Compliance with regulatory requirements Preservation of business reputation Mitigation of financial losses during outages Key Components Data Replication: Copying data to a secondary site. Failover Datacenter: A standby datacenter ready to take over operations. Recovery Procedures: Documented steps for restoring services. DR Testing: Regular validation of recovery capabilities. Backup Systems: Secondary infrastructure for critical applications. Implementation Challenges Implementing DR introduces complexities including significant infrastructure costs, data consistency challenges, network bandwidth requirements, and the need for regular testing and verification. Balancing recovery speed with cost- efficiency remains a primary concern for most organizations. Types of DR Solutions Options range from cold standby (backup facilities with minimal ongoing costs but slower recovery) to hot standby (fully operational duplicate systems with rapid failover capabilities but higher costs).

Key Metrics: RTO and RPO When designing high availability and
disaster recovery solutions, organizations must define two critical time-based metrics that guide infrastructure and process decisions: 1 Recovery Time Objective The maximum acceptable time period within which a business process or system must be restored after an outage to avoid unacceptable consequences. Lower RTO values require more investment in redundancy, automation, and robust failover mechanisms. Near-zero RTO requires fully redundant systems with automatic failover Measured in seconds, minutes, hours, or days depending on criticality Directly impacts business continuity planning and system architecture 2 Recovery Point Objective The maximum acceptable amount of data loss measured in time, indicating the point in time to which data must be recovered after an incident. Lower RPO values necessitate more frequent data replication, synchronous mirroring, or continuous backup solutions. Zero RPO requires synchronous replication with transaction guarantees Common values range from seconds to hours depending on data criticality Determines replication frequency and backup schedule requirements These metrics serve as the foundation for designing resilient data platforms and should be established through business impact analysis based on operational requirements, regulatory compliance, and cost considerations.

Two-Datacenter Topology Active/Passive One datacenter actively serves traffic while the
other remains on standby. Failover is initiated to the passive datacenter in case of primary site failure. Simplifies data consistency but underutilizes resources. This configuration prioritizes simplicity and reliability over resource efficiency. The passive site maintains synchronized data but doesn't serve production workloads until activated during a failover event. Advantages: Lower complexity, reduced risk of data conflicts, simplified monitoring and maintenance procedures. Disadvantages: Higher cost per transaction due to idle infrastructure, longer recovery times during failover events, and potential for significant resource underutilization. Typically implemented with asynchronous replication and scheduled data synchronization to minimize impact on production performance while maintaining acceptable RPO values. Active/Active Both datacenters serve traffic simultaneously, requiring load balancing and data synchronization mechanisms. Offers better resource utilization but increases complexity. More complex but efficient use of resources. This configuration distributes workloads across multiple sites, enabling geographic load distribution and higher availability during partial outages. Requires sophisticated data consistency mechanisms to prevent conflicts. Advantages: Maximum resource utilization, improved geographic performance, enhanced resilience against partial failures, and potentially lower overall infrastructure costs. Disadvantages: Increased operational complexity, potential for data conflicts requiring resolution mechanisms, more complex networking requirements, and sophisticated monitoring needs. Implementation typically involves global load balancers, conflict resolution protocols, and often requires application-level awareness of multi-datacenter architecture to handle distributed transactions properly.

Oracle: High Availability 1 Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) An
active/active database cluster that allows multiple instances to access the same database concurrently, providing high availability and scalability. RAC employs a shared disk architecture with Cache Fusion technology to synchronize data across nodes, enabling transparent application failover with near-zero downtime. 2 Oracle Data Guard Provides physical or logical standby databases for disaster recovery. Data Guard ensures data protection and minimal downtime during planned and unplanned outages. It supports multiple protection modes including Maximum Protection, Maximum Availability, and Maximum Performance, allowing organizations to balance data protection with performance requirements. 3 Oracle GoldenGate Enables real-time data replication for both HA and DR scenarios. GoldenGate supports heterogeneous environments and ensures data consistency across different databases. Its modular architecture includes Extract, Data Pump, and Replicat processes that work together to capture, route, and apply changes with minimal impact on source systems. 4 Oracle Flashback Technology Provides a set of features to view and recover data from logical corruptions or user errors. Flashback Query, Table, Database, and Transaction capabilities enable administrators to quickly restore service by rewinding data to a point in time before the error occurred, significantly reducing recovery time compared to traditional restore operations. 5 Oracle Automatic Storage Management (ASM) A volume manager and file system specifically designed for Oracle database files that provides a foundation for high availability. ASM simplifies storage management, optimizes performance through automatic data distribution, and enhances availability through mirroring and failure group protection mechanisms.

Oracle: RTO/RPO RAC Data Guard GoldenGate Flashback Technology RAC RTO
in seconds for node failures. With Data Guard, site failures can be recovered in minutes. Uses active/active database clusters to minimize downtime and maintain consistent data access during outages. During partial node failures, Oracle automatically redistributes workload to surviving nodes, ensuring continuous operation. For complete node failures, Clusterware automates recovery processes, reducing manual intervention and maintaining application availability. Data Guard RPO near zero with synchronous replication. Asynchronous replication leads to an RPO of minutes. Offers fast recovery times and minimal data loss with automated failover mechanisms. Maximum Protection mode ensures zero data loss but may impact performance. Maximum Availability balances protection with performance, while Maximum Performance optimizes throughput at the cost of potentially increased RPO. Fast-Start Failover enables automatic standby database activation with configurable failure detection thresholds. GoldenGate Provides flexible RTO from seconds to minutes depending on configuration. RPO ranges from near-zero to seconds with proper tuning of capture and apply processes. Offers bidirectional replication capabilities allowing rapid failover and failback operations with minimal data reconciliation. Conflict detection and resolution features help maintain data integrity during recovery operations, reducing operational complexity during disaster scenarios. Flashback Technology RTO measured in minutes for most logical corruption scenarios. No direct impact on RPO as it addresses user errors rather than system failures. Flashback Database can rapidly restore entire databases to previous points in time without lengthy restore operations. Flashback Table and Flashback Drop capabilities enable targeted recovery of specific objects, minimizing recovery scope and reducing downtime during partial data corruption incidents.

Oracle: DC/DR Configuration 1 Consistent Node Configuration Ensure identical node
configurations in both primary and DR sites. This consistency simplifies failover and reduces compatibility issues. Regular testing of the failover process is essential to ensure its effectiveness and reliability. 2 Network Infrastructure Implement a comprehensive network infrastructure between sites, including redundant connections with sufficient bandwidth to handle peak replication traffic. Configure Fast-Start Failover (FSFO) with an Observer process deployed on a separate host to monitor the primary and standby databases and trigger automatic failover when predefined conditions are met. 3 Parameter Synchronization Database initialization parameters must be synchronized between primary and standby environments, with special attention to memory allocation, processes, and storage configurations. For maximum protection, implement multiple standby databases4one synchronous standby for zero data loss and additional asynchronous standbys for geographic distribution. 4 Advanced Strategies Leverage Oracle Site Guard for orchestrating the complete site-level switchover or failover, including the application tier. Implement Data Guard Broker to simplify management and monitoring of the Data Guard configuration through a centralized interface. For environments with extremely high availability requirements, consider combining RAC with Data Guard to provide protection against both node and site failures.

Oracle: Centralized Monitoring 1 Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM) Provides comprehensive
monitoring and management capabilities for Oracle environments. OEM enables proactive monitoring, performance diagnostics, and automated management tasks. This tool provides a unified platform for managing Oracle databases, middleware, and applications. Key features include real-time performance dashboards, alert notifications, and health monitoring across the entire database fleet. OEM's Cloud Control interface allows administrators to view and manage multiple database environments from a single console, significantly reducing operational overhead. 2 AWR (Automatic Workload Repository) Used for performance diagnostics and tuning. AWR collects and analyzes performance statistics, providing insights into database workload and potential bottlenecks. These reports help DBAs identify and resolve performance issues, ensuring optimal database performance. AWR snapshots capture key performance metrics at regular intervals, enabling historical analysis and trend identification. The comparative analysis feature allows DBAs to evaluate performance differences between time periods, making it easier to isolate the root cause of emerging problems. 3 Oracle Metrics Server Collects and centralizes performance metrics from database instances across the enterprise. This lightweight collection mechanism feeds data to visualization tools and alerting systems. The Metrics Server supports both push and pull collection methods to accommodate various network security configurations. Integration with popular monitoring platforms like Grafana and Prometheus extends Oracle's monitoring capabilities, allowing organizations to incorporate database metrics into their existing operational dashboards. 4 Autonomous Database Monitoring For cloud deployments, Oracle's Autonomous Database provides built-in monitoring capabilities with AI-driven recommendations. The system continuously monitors database health, automatically detecting anomalies and potential issues before they impact performance. Self-healing capabilities can resolve many common issues without administrator intervention, while the service console provides comprehensive visibility into resource utilization, performance metrics, and security compliance status.

Oracle: Data Retention AWR Retention Configure AWR retention to a
minimum of 45 days to maintain a comprehensive performance history for trend analysis and diagnostics. The default 8-day retention is insufficient for identifying long-term patterns and seasonal variations in workload. Extended AWR history supports capacity planning and performance optimization efforts while providing historical context for troubleshooting. Redo Log Retention Implement retention policies for archived redo logs to enable point-in-time recovery. Redo logs are crucial for recovering transactions and maintaining data consistency. Consider using Oracle Recovery Manager (RMAN) to automate the backup and retention of redo logs according to business requirements. In high-transaction environments, implement a tiered storage strategy where recent redo logs are kept on fast storage while older logs are moved to lower-cost storage options. Additionally, establish retention requirements for the following components: Audit Logs Maintain database audit logs for at least 12 months to satisfy common compliance requirements and security investigations ADDM Reports Preserve Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor reports alongside AWR snapshots for comprehensive performance analysis Alert Logs Configure alert log rotation with appropriate retention periods (minimum 90 days) to track critical database events RMAN Backups Implement a retention policy that maintains daily backups for 30 days, weekly backups for 3 months, and monthly backups for 1 year These settings ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, support long-term performance monitoring, and provide sufficient data for forensic analysis when needed. Regularly review and adjust retention policies based on evolving business needs, storage constraints, and compliance requirements.

PostgreSQL: High Availability 1 Streaming Replication Offers asynchronous or synchronous
replication to standby servers, ensuring data redundancy and availability. Synchronous replication guarantees data consistency but may impact performance. Asynchronous replication provides lower latency but may result in minor data loss during failover. Choose the replication method based on your application's RTO and RPO requirements. Configure synchronous_commit parameter to control the trade-off between performance and data protection. Values range from 'off' (fastest but unsafe) to 'remote_apply' (most conservative). Implement replication slots to prevent the primary server from removing WAL files still needed by standbys. For maximum availability, deploy multiple standby servers across different availability zones or data centers. Consider implementing Logical Replication for selective table replication, schema upgrades, and cross-version migration scenarios. Proper monitoring of replication lag is critical for maintaining expected RPO objectives and should be incorporated into your monitoring solution with appropriate alerting thresholds. 2 Patroni An HA framework for PostgreSQL with automated failover capabilities. Patroni simplifies the deployment and management of highly available PostgreSQL clusters. Patroni uses a distributed consensus mechanism to elect a leader and manage failover. It integrates with etcd, Consul, or ZooKeeper for leader election and configuration management. Patroni also provides tools for managing switchover and failover processes. Patroni supports multiple watchdog mechanisms including software- based fencing and hardware-based solutions to prevent split-brain scenarios. Deployment best practices include configuring a minimum of three nodes for the DCS (Distributed Consensus Store) to maintain quorum during partial network failures. Patroni's REST API enables programmatic control of the cluster, facilitating integration with orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. Advanced features include automatic reinitiation of failed nodes, customizable health checks to detect application-specific failures, and controlled maintenance modes that allow for safe patching and upgrades. The Patroni configuration can be tuned to match specific RTO requirements through parameters like loop_wait, retry_timeout, and ttl settings. 3 Connection Pooling Use pgBouncer or similar tools for efficient connection management. Connection pooling reduces the overhead of establishing new connections, improving performance and scalability. PgBouncer supports different pooling modes such as session, transaction, and statement pooling. Proper configuration of connection pooling parameters is crucial for optimal performance. PgBouncer offers lightweight proxy architecture with minimal memory footprint (typically less than 2MB per connection). It supports online reconfiguration without dropping active connections and provides connection queuing to handle traffic spikes without overloading the database. For high availability, deploy multiple pgBouncer instances behind a load balancer with appropriate health checks. Alternative solutions include Pgpool- II, which offers additional features like query caching, load balancing across multiple PostgreSQL servers, and automated failover management. For containerized environments, consider Odyssey or PgBouncer containers orchestrated within Kubernetes for auto-scaling and self- healing capabilities. Monitor connection pools for saturation and configure appropriate pool sizes based on workload characteristics and available PostgreSQL max_connections.

PostgreSQL: RTO/RPO 1 Streaming Replication Provides an RPO near zero
with synchronous replication. Asynchronous replication results in an RPO of minutes. Synchronous replication ensures minimal data loss but may increase latency. For mission-critical workloads, configure with synchronous_commit=remote_write to balance performance and data safety. Multi-node synchronous replication with quorum commit provides additional resilience against node failures while maintaining strict RPO commitments. 2 Patroni Enables an RTO in seconds to minutes, depending on the failover configuration. Patroni automates the failover process, reducing downtime and ensuring continuous operation. Patroni's configurable parameters like loop_wait, retry_timeout, and maximum_lag_on_failover allow fine-tuning of failover behavior to match specific RTO requirements. Automated health checks detect failures quickly, while the REST API enables programmatic control during recovery operations. 1 Additional Recovery Solutions Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR): Provides an RPO determined by WAL archiving frequency, typically minutes. Recovery time varies based on backup size and storage performance. 2 Logical Replication: Offers selective replication capabilities with an RPO of seconds to minutes. Can be used for zero-downtime upgrades and cross- version migrations to minimize RTO during planned maintenance. 3 Standby Clusters: Maintain geographically distributed standby clusters using tools like Patroni and BDR for multi-region disaster recovery with configurable RTO/RPO balancing. PostgreSQL's flexible architecture allows organizations to implement tiered recovery strategies with different RTO/RPO targets for various data classes and business requirements. Proper monitoring and regular recovery testing are essential to validate that actual metrics meet designed objectives.

PostgreSQL: DC/DR Configuration 1 Standby Servers and Failover Deploy standby
servers in the DR site, mirroring the primary configuration to ensure consistency and compatibility. Implement automated failover mechanisms using Patroni or similar tools to minimize downtime during site failures. Regularly test the failover process to validate its effectiveness and reliability. Proper planning ensures smooth recovery operations. 2 Replication and Network Configure WAL archiving with appropriate retention policies to support point-in-time recovery across data centers. Set up dedicated replication networks between sites with sufficient bandwidth and low latency to maintain synchronization quality. Implement PostgreSQL's synchronous replication for critical workloads requiring zero data loss, or asynchronous replication for reduced performance impact. 3 Witness Node and Load Balancing Consider deploying a witness node in a third location to prevent split-brain scenarios during network partitions. Integrate with load balancers and connection poolers like PgBouncer to provide transparent redirection during failovers. Document recovery procedures thoroughly, including manual intervention steps for scenarios where automation fails. 4 Multi-Region and Monitoring For multi-region deployments, implement Postgres- BDR (Bi-Directional Replication) or similar solutions to support active-active configurations. Monitor replication lag continuously and establish alert thresholds to detect potential synchronization issues before they impact recovery capabilities. Ensure consistent configuration management across all environments using infrastructure-as-code practices to prevent configuration drift.

PostgreSQL: Centralized Monitoring 1 pg_stats and System Catalogs Leverage the
built-in statistics collector for basic performance monitoring. pg_stats provides insights into query performance and resource utilization. It tracks various database activities, helping to identify potential bottlenecks and performance issues. Regularly query system catalogs like pg_stat_activity, pg_stat_database, and pg_stat_user_tables to monitor active connections, transaction throughput, and table- level statistics. These native tools require minimal setup and provide essential real-time operational data. 2 Prometheus and Grafana Integrate with a popular open-source monitoring stack for detailed monitoring and alerting. Prometheus collects metrics, while Grafana provides visualization and alerting capabilities. This combination offers a comprehensive view of system health and performance. Deploy the postgres_exporter agent on each database node to expose PostgreSQL metrics to Prometheus. Configure Grafana dashboards to visualize key performance indicators like connection counts, query latency, buffer utilization, and replication lag between primary and standby servers. 3 PostgreSQL Logs Analysis Implement centralized log collection using tools like Filebeat, Fluentd, or Logstash to aggregate PostgreSQL logs across all environments. Configure log parsing to extract structured data from log entries, enabling advanced analysis and correlation. Forward processed logs to Elasticsearch or a similar system for indexing and visualization. Set up alerts for critical events such as checkpoint failures, replication errors, or long-running queries to proactively address potential issues before they impact availability. 4 Specialized Database Monitoring Consider dedicated PostgreSQL monitoring solutions like pganalyze, pgMonitor, or Datadog that provide deeper insights into database health and performance. These tools offer specialized features for query performance analysis, index optimization recommendations, and capacity planning. Implement custom scripts and checks to monitor PostgreSQL-specific metrics such as bloat, vacuum status, and transaction ID wraparound. Integrate these with your existing monitoring infrastructure to provide a comprehensive view of your entire PostgreSQL environment.

PostgreSQL: Data Retention Table-Level Retention Strategies Implement partitioning for high-volume
tables to facilitate efficient data archiving and pruning. Use time-based partitioning to automatically manage retention windows, making it easier to drop older partitions when data expires. Consider implementing automated partition management tools like pg_partman to reduce administrative overhead. Compliance Considerations Document retention policies to demonstrate regulatory compliance. Different data categories may require varying retention periods based on business requirements, industry standards, and legal obligations. Implement row-level security and data masking for sensitive information that must be retained for extended periods. Log Management Configure log_rotation_age and log_rotation_size parameters to control log file rotation Archive completed log files to external storage systems for long-term retention Set up automated cleanup processes for logs that exceed your retention period Consider using pgBadger for log analysis before archiving or purging Database Statistics Retention Adjust pg_stat_statements.max to control the number of tracked queries. Schedule regular maintenance to reset statistics tables like pg_stat_statements, pg_stat_activity, and other system catalogs that accumulate data over time. Implement custom scripts to extract and archive important historical statistics before purging. Automation Tools Leverage tools like pgAgent or standard cron jobs to schedule regular maintenance tasks such as VACUUM FULL, table optimization, and statistics reset. Consider implementing custom retention policies using PostgreSQL's event triggers to automate data lifecycle management across your database ecosystem. Configure detailed logging with appropriate retention policies to meet compliance and auditing requirements. Use pg_stat_statements to track query performance, and set retention policies to manage the size of the statistics data. Regularly review and adjust these policies to balance storage usage and data availability. Careful planning is key for effective database management.

ClickHouse: High Availability ReplicatedMergeTree A table engine for data replication
across multiple nodes, providing fault tolerance and high availability. ReplicatedMergeTree ensures that data is automatically replicated across multiple nodes. It maintains identical copies of data on different servers, automatically recovering from failures and synchronizing data after node restoration. ClickHouse Keeper A coordination service for managing replicas and ensuring data consistency. ClickHouse Keeper is based on the Raft consensus algorithm. Manages metadata and coordination between nodes. It provides higher performance than ZooKeeper and is fully integrated with ClickHouse, simplifying deployment and maintenance of highly available clusters. Sharding Distributes data across multiple nodes for scalability and high availability. Sharding improves query performance by parallel processing. Distributes data horizontally across multiple nodes. This distribution allows queries to be processed in parallel and ensures no single node becomes a bottleneck, while maintaining availability if individual shards fail. Distributed Table Engine Acts as a proxy to sharded and replicated tables, providing a unified view of distributed data. The Distributed engine automatically routes queries to appropriate shards and handles partial query failures, allowing the system to remain operational even when some nodes are unavailable. Multi-Master Replication Supports writing to any replica, with eventual consistency across the cluster. This architecture eliminates single points of failure for write operations and increases system resilience. Conflicts are resolved using ClickHouse's internal timestamp-based resolution mechanisms. Automatic Failover When node failures occur, ClickHouse can automatically redirect queries to available replicas. Combined with proper monitoring and orchestration tools, this enables seamless recovery from hardware or network failures without manual intervention, maintaining consistent service availability.

ClickHouse: RTO/RPO 1 ReplicatedMergeTree Offers a configurable RPO based on
replication lag, with near-zero RPO achievable. Provides robust data durability and minimal data loss in the event of a failure. The level of data redundancy is configurable based on business requirements and infrastructure capabilities. Synchronous replication can be enabled for critical data, ensuring all replicas acknowledge writes before responding to clients. This guarantees RPO values approaching zero at the cost of some performance overhead. For less critical workloads, asynchronous replication provides better performance with slightly higher RPO values. 2 Automated Failover RTO depends on failover automation, typically minutes. Enables rapid recovery from node failures. Automated failover is crucial for maintaining service availability and minimizing business impact during outages. ClickHouse's distributed architecture allows for fast detection of failed nodes and automatic rerouting of queries to healthy replicas. When combined with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, RTO can be further reduced through automated pod scheduling and health checks. Most organizations achieve RTOs of 2-5 minutes with proper configuration. 3 Disaster Recovery Considerations Cross-datacenter replication can be configured to protect against regional failures. ClickHouse supports both synchronous and asynchronous replication between datacenters, allowing flexibility in balancing performance against RPO requirements. Typical cross-region RPO ranges from seconds to minutes depending on network latency and configuration. 4 Monitoring Impact on RTO/RPO Proper monitoring of replication lag metrics is essential for maintaining desired RPO values. Alerting on increased replication delays enables proactive intervention before RPO commitments are breached. Regular testing of failover procedures helps validate actual RTO values against targets and identifies optimization opportunities.

ClickHouse: DC/DR Configuration Data Availability & Fault Tolerance Distribute replicas
across primary and DR sites to ensure data availability and fault tolerance. Configuration should include at least three replicas per shard with a minimum of two datacenters to protect against site-wide failures. Proper network configuration between sites is crucial for maintaining acceptable replication performance. Asynchronous Replication for DR Use asynchronous replication for DR to minimize latency and maintain data consistency. ClickHouse's ReplicatedMergeTree engine facilitates this by allowing replicas to catch up with primary nodes without impacting production workloads. For critical data, consider implementing synchronous replication between select nodes within the primary datacenter while maintaining asynchronous replication to the DR site. Distributed Tables & Failover Leverage ClickHouse's distributed tables to abstract the underlying replication topology from applications. This provides seamless failover capabilities and enables transparent query routing to available replicas during disaster scenarios. Configure ZooKeeper ensembles in each datacenter to manage metadata replication and coordination between ClickHouse nodes. Monitoring, Testing, & Automation Regular monitoring and testing are essential for verifying the DR setup. Implement scheduled failover drills to validate RTO/RPO commitments and identify potential bottlenecks. Document recovery procedures thoroughly and automate them where possible to minimize human error during actual disaster events. Tiered Storage Strategy Proper design ensures minimal impact from site outages. Consider implementing a tiered storage strategy where hot data remains fully replicated across all sites while historical data follows a more cost-effective replication pattern. This balances performance needs against infrastructure costs while maintaining business continuity requirements.

ClickHouse: Centralized Monitoring ClickHouse Metrics Leverage built-in metrics for monitoring
performance and identifying potential issues. These metrics provide insights into query performance, resource utilization, and system health. They are essential for proactive monitoring and troubleshooting. Critical metrics to monitor include query execution times, memory usage, background merges, disk I/O operations, replication delays, and ZooKeeper connectivity. Historical tracking of these metrics helps establish baselines and identify anomalies before they impact production workloads. Use system tables like system.metrics, system.events, and system.asynchronous_metrics to access real-time performance data. These tables expose hundreds of internal metrics that can be queried directly using SQL, enabling custom monitoring solutions tailored to specific deployment requirements. Prometheus and Grafana Integrate with Prometheus and Grafana for detailed monitoring and alerting. This combination enables comprehensive monitoring of ClickHouse clusters, providing real-time insights into performance and system health. This integration helps identify and resolve performance bottlenecks. Configure the ClickHouse-Prometheus exporter to collect metrics at regular intervals. Establish alert thresholds for critical metrics such as query latency, replica lag, disk usage, and memory consumption. Implement tiered alerting to differentiate between warnings and critical conditions requiring immediate attention. Create dedicated Grafana dashboards for different aspects of the ClickHouse environment, including query performance, replication status, hardware resources, and cluster health. These dashboards should provide both high-level overview and detailed drill-down capabilities for efficient troubleshooting. Log Aggregation Implement a centralized logging solution such as the ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) or Loki to aggregate and analyze ClickHouse logs across all nodes. Configure log parsers to extract structured data from ClickHouse logs, enabling advanced search and visualization capabilities. Anomaly Detection Develop anomaly detection mechanisms that leverage machine learning algorithms to identify unusual patterns in performance metrics. This approach can detect subtle issues that might go unnoticed with traditional threshold-based monitoring, such as gradual performance degradation or irregular query patterns indicative of potential security concerns. Monitoring Strategy Establish a comprehensive monitoring strategy that combines real-time alerting, historical trend analysis, and automated remediation for common issues. Regular review of monitoring effectiveness and continuous refinement of alert thresholds ensures the monitoring system evolves alongside the ClickHouse deployment.

ClickHouse: Data Retention 1 TTL and Data Governance Utilize TTL
(Time To Live) expressions to define data retention policies at the table level, ensuring compliance with data governance requirements. ClickHouse offers flexible TTL mechanisms that can operate on individual columns or entire tables, supporting both deletion and automatic movement of data to less expensive storage tiers. TTL expressions can be configured using various time- based conditions, such as "TTL timestamp_column + INTERVAL 3 MONTH" to automatically remove data older than three months. For more complex scenarios, implement multi-level TTL policies where data progressively moves through storage tiers before final deletion. 2 Logging and Materialized Views Implement retention policies for ClickHouse server logs to manage storage and facilitate troubleshooting. Configure log rotation based on file size and time periods, ensuring that sufficient log history is maintained for incident analysis while preventing excessive disk space consumption. Leverage ClickHouse's materialized views with TTL to create data aggregation and archiving workflows, where detailed data is summarized before deletion. This approach preserves analytical capabilities while reducing storage requirements. 3 Audit and Recovery For compliance-sensitive environments, implement audit mechanisms to track data deletion events, ensuring all retention actions are properly documented. Consider implementing soft deletion strategies for critical data, allowing for recovery within a designated grace period. 4 Review and Optimization Regularly review and adjust these policies to balance storage usage and data availability based on evolving business needs and usage patterns. Schedule periodic assessments of retention policy effectiveness, analyzing storage trends and access patterns to optimize retention settings. Effective planning supports optimal performance while maintaining regulatory compliance and controlling infrastructure costs throughout the data lifecycle.

Trino: High Availability 1 Multiple Coordinators Deploy multiple coordinators for
redundancy, ensuring that the query processing continues even if one coordinator fails. This setup prevents single points of failure and improves overall system resilience. Implement a load balancer in front of the coordinators to distribute client connections and provide automatic failover capabilities. 2 Worker Node Redundancy Distribute worker nodes across multiple availability zones to protect against zonal failures. Worker node redundancy ensures that compute resources are available even if one availability zone becomes unavailable. Configure the system to dynamically adjust to node failures by redistributing query workloads to healthy nodes. 3 Stateless Architecture Leverage Trino's stateless architecture, which allows worker nodes to be easily added or removed without significant disruption to ongoing operations. This architecture facilitates horizontal scaling and enables graceful recovery from node failures, contributing to system reliability. 4 Fault-Tolerant Query Execution Implement Trino's fault-tolerant execution mechanisms that can recover from individual task failures without requiring full query restart. This capability minimizes query failures due to transient issues and enhances overall performance in environments with occasional resource constraints. 5 Connection Pooling Utilize connection pooling mechanisms to manage and optimize database connections between Trino and underlying data sources. This approach reduces connection overhead and improves resilience against connection-related failures that might otherwise impact query processing.

Trino: RTO/RPO Recovery Time Objective (RTO) Achieve an RTO of
2-10 minutes, depending on the coordinator failover time and deployment architecture. The automated failover mechanism ensures minimal downtime during coordinator transitions. Properly configured load balancers and health checks can further reduce RTO by quickly detecting coordinator failures and redirecting traffic to healthy nodes. Implementation of connection retries at the client level also helps maintain service continuity during failover events. 1 Single coordinator failure: 2-5 minutes 2 Multiple coordinator failure: 5-10 minutes 3 Worker node failures: Negligible impact with proper redundancy Regular failover drills and automated testing can help optimize RTO and ensure the reliability of recovery procedures during actual incidents. Consider implementing warm standby coordinators for mission-critical deployments to further reduce recovery time. Recovery Point Objective (RPO) Maintain an RPO of 0-5 minutes, primarily based on source data system replication (e.g., HDFS, S3, relational databases). The underlying data source replication strategy ultimately determines potential data loss during recovery scenarios. Trino itself doesn't store data persistently but acts as a query engine over existing data sources. Therefore, RPO considerations must account for the replication mechanisms of each connected data source: 1 Object storage (S3, GCS): Typically near-zero RPO 2 HDFS clusters: 0-5 minutes depending on NameNode configuration 3 Relational databases: Varies based on replication setup For mission-critical analytics, implement more frequent data replication at the source and consider write-ahead logging where applicable. Regularly test recovery procedures to validate that RPO objectives are consistently met across all data sources. Both RTO and RPO metrics should be continuously monitored and regularly tested through simulated failure scenarios to ensure they meet business requirements. Documentation of recovery procedures and automated runbooks can further improve actual recovery performance during incidents.

Trino: DC/DR Configuration Deploy a Trino cluster across both datacenters
to provide redundancy and disaster recovery capabilities. Ensure that data sources are replicated to the DR site. Consider using a distributed file system with cross-datacenter replication capabilities. Regularly test the failover process to validate the configuration. For optimal resilience, implement an active-active configuration with coordinators distributed across both datacenters. This ensures query processing capability remains available even if one datacenter experiences an outage. Configure your load balancer to route queries to the nearest available coordinator while monitoring health status. Key implementation considerations include: Cross-DC Network Optimization Implement dedicated high-bandwidth, low-latency network connections between datacenters to minimize query coordination overhead and data transfer times. Stateless Coordinator Design Leverage Trino's stateless architecture by configuring coordinators that can seamlessly take over for each other, with automatic discovery of worker nodes across datacenters. Catalog Configuration Maintain identical catalog configurations across all coordinators to ensure consistent access to data sources regardless of which datacenter handles the query. For disaster recovery planning, document comprehensive failover procedures including network routing changes, health check criteria, and post-recovery validation steps. Implement automated monitoring solutions that track query performance metrics across datacenters to quickly identify and respond to degradation events.

Trino: Centralized Monitoring 1 Trino Web UI Utilize the Trino
Web UI for basic monitoring of query execution and resource utilization. The Web UI provides real-time insights into query performance, allowing operators to track active, queued, and completed queries with detailed execution statistics. Key features include visualization of query plans, resource allocation tracking, and worker node status monitoring. The interface allows administrators to identify bottlenecks, troubleshoot failed queries, and diagnose common performance problems through execution visualization. For operational teams, the Web UI offers the ability to cancel problematic queries, view historical query patterns, and monitor cluster-wide resource utilization. This built-in monitoring capability serves as the first line of defense for maintaining optimal cluster performance. 2 Prometheus and Grafana Integrate with Prometheus and Grafana for advanced monitoring and alerting capabilities. This combination provides comprehensive monitoring of Trino clusters, allowing for proactive identification and resolution of performance issues across multiple dimensions. Key metrics to monitor include query throughput, execution time, CPU utilization, memory usage, JVM heap statistics, and GC pauses. Prometheus enables long-term storage of these metrics with efficient querying capabilities, while Grafana provides customizable dashboards that offer both high-level cluster health views and detailed performance diagnostics. Implement alerting rules based on performance thresholds to notify operations teams before issues impact users. For cross-datacenter deployments, incorporate network latency and cross-DC query metrics to ensure optimal routing decisions. Regular dashboard reviews help identify capacity planning needs and potential optimization opportunities. Additional monitoring solutions like Datadog, New Relic, or open-source ELK stacks can complement these approaches, especially in environments with diverse technology stacks. For comprehensive monitoring, track not only Trino cluster health but also the status of connected data sources to quickly identify whether performance issues originate within Trino or in the underlying data systems.

Trino: Data Retention Data retention in Trino environments is primarily
managed by the underlying data sources, such as HDFS, S3, or other storage systems. Since Trino operates as a query engine rather than a storage system, it delegates actual data persistence to these connected systems. Query History and Logs Configure retention policies for query logs to facilitate auditing, performance analysis, and troubleshooting Consider storing historical query metadata in a dedicated database for long-term analysis Implement log rotation strategies to manage storage requirements while maintaining accessibility Implementation Considerations Data source replication strategy must be configured appropriately to ensure data durability across failure scenarios. For critical datasets, implement multiple retention tiers with varying retention periods: 1 Hot tier Recent and frequently accessed data (30-90 days) 2 Warm tier Less frequently accessed data (3- 12 months) 3 Cold tier Historical data for compliance and occasional analysis (1+ years) Best Practices Regularly review retention policies to align with business requirements, compliance needs, and storage costs. Automate data lifecycle management where possible, and document retention strategies to ensure consistency across environments. Consider implementing metadata-driven retention policies that adapt based on data usage patterns and importance.

MongoDB: High Availability Replica Sets Automatic failover and data replication
ensure high availability and data durability. Replica sets are a group of MongoDB instances that maintain the same data. The primary node handles all write operations, while secondary nodes replicate data and can take over if the primary fails. A minimum of three nodes is recommended for production deployments. Sharded Clusters Distribute data across multiple shards for scalability and high availability. Sharded clusters consist of multiple replica sets. Data is divided into shards based on the shard key, allowing horizontal scaling and workload distribution across multiple servers. Config Servers Config servers store metadata about the cluster's data distribution. They are implemented as a replica set to ensure high availability of the cluster's metadata layer, preventing a single point of failure for configuration information. MongoDB Atlas MongoDB's cloud service provides automated high availability features including cross-region replication, automated backups, and self-healing infrastructure. Atlas offers 99.995% uptime SLAs for production deployments across multiple availability zones. Write Concerns Configurable write concerns allow applications to specify the level of acknowledgment required from replica set members before considering a write operation successful, balancing between data safety and performance.

MongoDB: RTO/RPO Replica Sets Achieve an RPO near zero with
majority write concern. RTO in seconds. Synchronous replication provides minimal data loss. With write concern "majority", MongoDB ensures that data is replicated to a majority of nodes before acknowledging the write operation, protecting against data loss during failover events. Automatic failover typically completes within 10-30 seconds, depending on heartbeat settings and election timeout configurations. This can be optimized by tuning these parameters based on network conditions. Sharded Clusters RTO depends on shard failover time, typically minutes. Failover time varies. Ensure that all shards have a secondary replica set. Each shard experiences its own independent failover process, which can lead to varied recovery times. For consistent performance, maintain balanced data distribution across shards. Config server replica sets are critical - their unavailability can affect the entire cluster. They should be configured with the same high-availability considerations as data-bearing replica sets. Additional RTO/RPO Considerations 1 Backup and Restoration Point-in-time recovery using oplog can achieve RPO measured in seconds. Full database restores typically have RTO measured in hours, depending on data volume and available network bandwidth. 2 Cross-Region Replication Asynchronous replication across regions may introduce an RPO of minutes. Configure priority settings to prefer local failover when possible to minimize RTO during regional outages. 3 Read Preference Settings Configure application read preferences to balance between consistency and availability. During failover events, "primaryPreferred" can maintain read operations with minimal disruption.

MongoDB: DC/DR Configuration Distribute members of the replica set across
datacenters to protect against site failures. Deploy a secondary replica set in the DR site for disaster recovery. Ensure that network latency between datacenters is minimal. Regular testing of failover processes ensures effectiveness. MongoDB has built in capabilities for replica sets. 1 Deployment Patterns For two-datacenter deployments, follow the "majority in primary DC" pattern with at least 3 voting members (2 in primary DC, 1 in secondary DC) to maintain automatic failover capabilities. For three-datacenter setups, distribute voting members evenly (typically 1-1- 1 or 2-2-1) to maximize resilience against regional outages. 2 Network Configuration Implement dedicated, high-bandwidth, low-latency connections between datacenters to minimize replication lag. Configure MongoDB's compression settings to reduce network bandwidth requirements for cross-datacenter traffic. Monitor network metrics regularly to identify potential bottlenecks before they affect performance. 3 Failover Orchestration Document and automate the failover procedure using scripts or orchestration tools. Implement proper connection string configuration with multiple seed servers across datacenters to ensure client applications can reconnect during failover events. Consider using MongoDB Atlas for managed multi-region deployments with automated failover procedures. 4 Data Consistency Controls Use write concerns with journal:true to ensure durability across datacenter boundaries. Configure read preferences at the application level to direct read operations to appropriate replicas based on latency and consistency requirements. For critical operations, implement retry logic with exponential backoff in application code.

MongoDB: Centralized Monitoring MongoDB Atlas Use the cloud-based monitoring and
management service for comprehensive visibility into your MongoDB deployments. MongoDB Atlas offers centralized monitoring and management with real-time performance metrics, customizable alerts, and interactive dashboards. Real-time monitoring of query performance, database operations, and hardware metrics Customizable alerts based on performance thresholds and database events Automated security scanning and enforcement of best practices Performance advisor with actionable recommendations Atlas is particularly beneficial for organizations looking to reduce operational overhead and leverage a fully managed service with built-in monitoring capabilities across multiple cloud providers. MongoDB Ops Manager An on-premise monitoring solution for managing MongoDB deployments. MongoDB Ops Manager is designed for self- managed deployments where regulatory compliance or security policies require keeping data within your own infrastructure. Comprehensive backup automation with point-in-time recovery options Deployment automation for configuration changes and version upgrades Fine-grained performance metrics with historical data retention Customizable dashboards for different operational roles Ops Manager provides enterprise-grade monitoring tools with similar capabilities to Atlas but deployed within your controlled environment, making it ideal for regulated industries or organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements. Both monitoring solutions integrate with popular enterprise monitoring platforms like Prometheus, Grafana, and ELK stack through APIs. For hybrid deployments, organizations can use a combination of Atlas and Ops Manager to maintain consistent monitoring practices across different environments.

MongoDB: Data Retention Implement TTL (Time To Live) indexes to
automatically remove data after a specified time, ensuring compliance with data retention policies. This mechanism helps maintain performance while adhering to regulatory requirements by efficiently managing database size. TTL Implementation Strategies Define TTL at collection level based on document field timestamps Configure background cleanup process for optimal performance impact Consider partitioning collections by date for more granular retention control Implement rolling backups before TTL deletion for short-term recovery options Comprehensive Audit Framework MongoDB Enterprise provides robust auditing capabilities that record database operations, authentication attempts, and schema changes. These audit logs are critical for: Tracking user access patterns and potential security breaches Documenting compliance with regulatory frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and SOX Supporting forensic analysis during security incidents Verifying proper enforcement of data governance policies Best Practices for Retention Governance Establish clear retention schedules aligned with business requirements and legal obligations Implement automated archiving solutions for data that requires long-term storage Regularly review and document retention decisions through cross-functional governance committees Validate retention enforcement through periodic compliance audits Maintain comprehensive documentation of all retention policies for regulatory inquiries Organizations should develop a data classification framework that drives retention decisions, ensuring that high-value and regulated data receives appropriate protection while avoiding unnecessary storage costs for transient information.

Redis: High Availability Redis Sentinel Automatic failover and monitoring provide
high availability and data durability. Redis Sentinel continuously monitors the health of master and replica nodes, detecting failures and initiating automatic failover procedures without human intervention. It offers configuration management, client notifications about topology changes, and is designed as a distributed system that can withstand partial network failures. Redis Cluster Sharding and data replication across multiple nodes for scalability and high availability. Redis Cluster partitions data across multiple Redis nodes, ensuring no single point of failure while supporting horizontal scaling. Each master node in the cluster can have multiple replica nodes that maintain synchronized copies of the master's data, providing redundancy and improved read scalability through distributing read operations across replicas. Replication Strategies Redis employs asynchronous replication where masters continue processing commands while replicating to slaves in the background. This architecture allows replicas to serve read-only queries, offloading read operations from the master and improving overall system performance. Replica persistence can be configured differently from masters to optimize for either performance or durability based on specific use cases. AOF Persistence Append-Only File (AOF) persistence logs every write operation received by the server, which can be replayed at server startup to reconstruct the dataset. Redis can be configured to sync data to disk after every command, every second, or let the operating system handle it. This provides tunable durability guarantees that complement the replication strategies to ensure data is never lost even during complete system failures.

Redis: RTO/RPO Redis Sentinel Achieve an RTO in seconds with
proper configuration of quorum settings and health check intervals. RPO depends on replication lag between master and replica nodes. Configure asynchronous replication to minimize data loss while balancing performance requirements. Replication lag may occur due to network latency or high write throughput. Make sure to monitor replication lag using Redis INFO commands or specialized monitoring tools. Consider implementing minimal protection against data divergence by setting min-slaves-to-write and min- slaves-max-lag parameters. For critical applications, you can decrease quorum values for faster recovery but this increases the risk of split-brain scenarios. A typical configuration of three Sentinel instances with a quorum of 2 provides a balanced approach between availability and consistency. Redis Cluster RTO depends on shard failover, which is typically in the range of minutes. Fast failover is crucial for maintaining service availability, especially for applications with strict uptime requirements. The cluster-node-timeout parameter directly affects failover speed and should be tuned based on your infrastructure. Data loss can be minimized with proper configuration of replica nodes per shard and write acknowledgment policies. Implementing Redis persistence mechanisms like RDB snapshots or AOF logs provides additional protection against data loss during failover events. Consider network partition handling through the cluster- require-full-coverage setting, which determines whether the cluster continues operation when shards become unreachable. For multi-datacenter deployments, carefully plan cross-datacenter replication to ensure RPO requirements are met during regional outages.

Redis: DC/DR Configuration Deployment Strategy Deploy Redis Sentinel or Redis
Cluster across both datacenters to ensure redundancy and disaster recovery capabilities. Use asynchronous replication for DR to minimize latency and maintain data consistency. Make sure to replicate data for disaster recovery purposes. You must configure proper retention and snapshots for DR. Implementation Details For Redis Sentinel deployments, place Sentinel instances in both datacenters with a quorum that can survive the loss of a single datacenter. Configure master/replica relationships that span datacenters, with replicas promoted to masters automatically during failover events. Implement Redis persistence with both RDB snapshots and AOF logs for maximum durability. For Redis Cluster deployments, distribute primary and replica shards across datacenters, ensuring each shard has at least one replica in the secondary datacenter. Configure cluster- node-timeout carefully to balance between quick failover and avoiding unnecessary failovers during temporary network issues. Set up cross-datacenter replication with appropriate bandwidth allocation to prevent replication lag. Advanced Considerations Consider implementing Redis Enterprise for mission-critical workloads, which offers active-active geo-distribution with conflict- free replicated data types (CRDTs) to handle concurrent writes across datacenters. For applications requiring stronger consistency guarantees, use WAIT commands to ensure synchronous replication of critical operations, though this will impact latency. Backup and Recovery Implement automated backup procedures that regularly copy Redis data to durable storage in both datacenters. Configure Redis background saving processes to minimize performance impact during snapshot creation. Test failover procedures regularly to validate your disaster recovery strategy and measure actual RTO/RPO metrics under realistic conditions.

Redis: Centralized Monitoring 1 Redis INFO Command Use the Redis
INFO command for basic monitoring information. This command provides real-time insights into memory usage, connected clients, and performance metrics. It separates data into sections like server, clients, memory, persistence, and stats for comprehensive system overview. Key metrics to monitor include used_memory, used_memory_peak, connected_clients, total_commands_processed, and keyspace statistics. Regular polling of these metrics helps establish performance baselines and identify potential bottlenecks or memory leaks before they become critical issues. 2 Prometheus and Grafana Integrate with Prometheus and Grafana for detailed monitoring and alerting. Prometheus collects time-series metrics through the redis_exporter while Grafana provides customizable dashboards for visualization and trend analysis. This combination enables real-time monitoring of Redis performance across multiple instances and clusters. Configure alerts based on key thresholds such as memory fragmentation ratio, command latency, and replication lag. Historical data retention in Prometheus allows for performance trending and capacity planning, while Grafana dashboards can be shared across teams for improved operational visibility. 3 Redis Enterprise and Third-Party Tools Redis Enterprise provides built-in monitoring capabilities with a comprehensive web interface for cluster management and performance monitoring. It includes detailed analytics on throughput, latency, and resource utilization across shards and nodes. Consider supplementary monitoring tools like Redis Sentinel for availability monitoring, RedisInsight for GUI- based monitoring and analysis, or cloud provider monitoring services if using managed Redis. Implement centralized log aggregation using ELK stack or similar solutions to correlate Redis logs with application events for troubleshooting complex issues.

Redis: Data Retention Key Expiration Strategies Set expiration times (TTL)
for keys to automatically remove data after a specified duration. Redis supports both absolute timeouts (EXPIRE) and timestamp-based expiration (EXPIREAT). You can also use PEXPIRE for millisecond precision when needed. For collections, consider targeted approaches like ZREMRANGEBYSCORE for sorted sets to remove only specific elements based on scoring criteria. Persistence Options Configure RDB snapshots or AOF (Append-Only File) for data recovery. RDB creates point-in-time snapshots at configured intervals, offering good performance with minimal impact. AOF logs every write operation for more comprehensive recovery, with configurable fsync policies (always, everysec, no) to balance between durability and performance. Hybrid Persistence Leverage both RDB and AOF simultaneously for optimal protection. The combined approach provides quick restarts with RDB while maintaining the durability of AOF. You can take frequent snapshots and also configure automatic AOF rewriting to manage file size growth over time. Memory Management Implement maxmemory policy with appropriate eviction strategies (noeviction, allkeys-lru, volatile-lru, allkeys- random, volatile-random, volatile-ttl) to handle scenarios when memory limits are reached. Monitor memory usage patterns to fine-tune these policies for your specific workload characteristics. Best Practices Be careful when setting persistence to your data, as it can impact performance. Schedule RDB snapshots during low-traffic periods when possible. For critical data, consider using Redis Enterprise or implementing Redis Sentinel/Cluster with replicas to ensure high availability alongside your persistence strategy. Regularly test recovery procedures to validate your data retention approach.

Milvus: High Availability 1 Distributed Architecture Milvus is designed for
distributed deployment, ensuring scalability and fault tolerance. The architecture separates compute and storage layers, allowing independent scaling of resources based on workload demands. Components like query nodes, data nodes, and proxy nodes can be deployed across multiple machines to eliminate single points of failure and maintain continuous operations even during partial outages. 2 Replication and Sharding Data replication across multiple nodes ensures data durability and high availability. Milvus maintains configurable replica counts (typically 2-3) for each segment, allowing the system to serve queries even if some nodes become unavailable. Sharding enables horizontal scalability and improved performance by distributing data collections across multiple nodes, balancing the workload efficiently. 3 Component Redundancy Milvus achieves resilience through redundant deployment of key components. The coordinator service group (root coordinator, data coordinator, query coordinator) can be deployed with multiple instances to ensure continuous metadata management. Meta storage components like etcd should be deployed in clusters of at least three nodes to maintain quorum during failures. 4 Service Discovery and Health Monitoring Milvus implements robust service discovery mechanisms to automatically detect and adapt to changes in the cluster topology. Health checks continuously monitor component status, allowing the system to route requests away from failing nodes. This self-healing capability minimizes downtime and maintains consistent performance during infrastructure fluctuations. 5 Load Balancing Request distribution across multiple query nodes ensures optimal resource utilization and prevents any single node from becoming a bottleneck. Dynamic load balancing capabilities allow Milvus to adapt to changing query patterns and data volumes, maintaining consistent performance as your deployment scales from gigabytes to petabytes of vector data.

Milvus: RTO/RPO RTO (Recovery Time Objective) Achieve an RTO of
minutes, depending on node failover time. Failover time depends on configuration and deployment architecture. Minimize downtime through proper redundancy planning and automated recovery processes. Standard configurations typically achieve 5-15 minute recovery times Optimized setups with automated failover can reduce RTO to under 5 minutes Factors affecting RTO include cluster size, data volume, and network latency Automation significantly improves RTO metrics by eliminating manual intervention during recovery scenarios. Implement health checks with appropriate timeout settings to balance quick failure detection against false positives. RPO (Recovery Point Objective) Maintain an RPO of minutes, based on replication lag. Replication lag is the amount of time that replication falls behind primary nodes. Synchronous replication ensures minimal data loss but may impact performance. Default configurations typically achieve RPO of 1-5 minutes Synchronous replication can reduce RPO to near-zero at the cost of latency Asynchronous replication offers better performance with slightly higher RPO Regular monitoring of replication lag is essential for maintaining RPO targets. Implement alerts for when replication delays exceed threshold values. Tune segment flush intervals and compaction policies to balance performance against potential data loss scenarios. Both RTO and RPO metrics should be regularly tested through simulated failure scenarios to validate that theoretical values match actual recovery capabilities. Document and refine recovery procedures based on test results to continuously improve resilience.

Milvus: DC/DR Configuration Deploy a Milvus cluster across both datacenters
to ensure redundancy and disaster recovery capabilities. This cross-datacenter deployment should maintain data consistency while allowing for geographic distribution of workloads. The primary datacenter handles regular operations while the secondary site remains in standby mode, ready to take over if needed. Primary/Secondary Architecture Establish a primary Milvus cluster in the main datacenter with full read/write capabilities. Configure a secondary cluster in the DR site that receives regular updates through replication. Ensure that etcd, Minio/S3, and metadata components are properly synchronized between sites. Data Replication Strategy Implement asynchronous replication for vector data and metadata between datacenters. Configure object storage replication (MinIO or S3) with appropriate retention policies. Set up log shipping for transaction records to maintain consistency during recovery operations. Network Configuration Establish dedicated high- bandwidth, low-latency connections between datacenters. Configure proper firewalls and security groups to allow only necessary traffic. Implement DNS-based service discovery to facilitate seamless client redirection during failover events. Regular testing of the failover process is critical to ensure smooth transition during actual disasters. Schedule quarterly DR drills to validate recovery procedures and train team members on emergency protocols. Document each step of the failover and failback procedures, including specific commands and expected outcomes. A properly implemented DR strategy directly supports business continuity by minimizing downtime and preventing data loss. Consider implementing automated health checks that can trigger alerts or even automatic failover when predefined thresholds are crossed. Establish clear RTO and RPO metrics for the Milvus deployment and ensure your configuration can meet these requirements. For both primary and DR sites, maintain detailed documentation of the hardware specifications, network topology, and configuration parameters. Implement version control for configuration files to track changes over time. Regular audits should be conducted to ensure configuration drift doesn't compromise recovery capabilities.

Milvus: Centralized Monitoring Integrate Milvus with industry-standard monitoring tools like
Prometheus and Grafana to establish comprehensive observability across your vector database deployment. Prometheus efficiently captures and stores time-series metrics, while Grafana transforms this data into intuitive, customizable dashboards for real-time visualization. A robust monitoring framework provides visibility into system health, enables proactive maintenance, and significantly reduces mean-time-to-resolution during incidents. For distributed deployments, consider implementing a federated monitoring approach where metrics from multiple datacenters are aggregated into a centralized dashboard for holistic oversight. Key Metrics to Monitor Track critical performance indicators including query latency, throughput, memory usage, CPU utilization, collection sizes, and index building status. Monitor node health across coordinators, data nodes, and query nodes to ensure optimal cluster performance. Alerting Configuration Implement multi-level alerting thresholds for early detection of potential issues. Configure notifications via email, Slack, or PagerDuty to ensure timely response to performance degradation, resource constraints, or component failures. Implementation Steps Deploy the Prometheus server with appropriate scrape configurations for Milvus endpoints. Install and configure Grafana with pre-built Milvus dashboards. Ensure proper retention policies for historical metrics to support trend analysis and capacity planning.

Milvus: Data Retention Configure retention policies for vector data in
object storage to manage storage costs and comply with data governance requirements. Implementing well-defined retention strategies ensures optimal performance while maintaining regulatory compliance. 1 Retention Strategy Components Define clear lifecycle policies for collections based on usage patterns and business value 2 Implementation Considerations Leverage Milvus's native time-to-live (TTL) mechanisms to automatically manage entity expiration within collections. Configure object storage retention rules that align with your organizational data governance framework while optimizing for cost efficiency. 3 Monitoring Retention Processes Implement monitoring for retention job execution, storage utilization trends, and policy compliance. Regular audits should verify that deletion processes are functioning correctly and that retained data remains accessible throughout its designated lifecycle. A comprehensive retention strategy balances performance optimization, cost management, and compliance requirements while supporting the evolving needs of your vector database applications. Review and update your retention policies quarterly to adapt to changing business requirements and regulatory landscapes.

MinIO: High Availability 1 Erasure Coding Provides data redundancy and
fault tolerance, ensuring data durability even in the event of multiple node failures. Data is split across multiple nodes with configurable parity blocks (N+K scheme). Parity information allows for reconstruction of data even when up to half of the drives fail, depending on the erasure coding configuration. MinIO supports both Reed- Solomon and Cauchy encoding algorithms for optimal performance and data protection. 2 Distributed Architecture Scale horizontally across multiple nodes to handle large data volumes and ensure high availability. The distributed system design eliminates single points of failure while maintaining consistent object storage semantics. Scaling handles large data volumes through seamless addition of new nodes. Ensures high availability through automated failover mechanisms and leader election protocols. Increases storage capacity without service interruption through non- disruptive expansion capabilities. 3 Active-Active Replication Supports multi-site deployments with active-active replication for geographic redundancy. Objects can be automatically replicated between multiple MinIO clusters in different regions or data centers. This configuration provides protection against site- wide failures and enables local access for improved performance. Bucket replication policies can be fine-tuned based on object patterns, prefixes, or tags to optimize bandwidth utilization.

MinIO: RTO/RPO Erasure Coding Maintain an RPO near zero with
erasure coding's built-in redundancy mechanisms. Data is distributed across multiple nodes with parity information, allowing for immediate reconstruction even when multiple drives fail simultaneously. The RTO is typically measured in minutes, depending on the scale of node recovery needed and the specific erasure coding configuration (N+K scheme) implemented. More parity blocks provide faster recovery but require additional storage overhead. When a node failure occurs, MinIO automatically initiates the healing process using parity information to reconstruct missing data without manual intervention. This self-healing capability ensures continuous data availability while maintaining system integrity throughout the recovery process. Site Replication Replicate data between geographically distributed MinIO clusters for dramatically improved RPO and RTO metrics. Active-active configuration ensures that all sites maintain synchronized data states, reducing potential data loss windows to seconds. Site replication provides protection against regional disasters by maintaining multiple independent copies of data across different physical locations. This architecture allows for immediate failover capabilities with RPO approaching zero and RTO measured in seconds rather than minutes. Advanced replication policies allow for fine-tuned control over which objects are replicated based on bucket policies, object patterns, or metadata tags. This selective replication approach optimizes bandwidth utilization while ensuring critical data maintains the highest availability standards across all deployment sites.

MinIO: DC/DR Configuration A comprehensive approach to implementing MinIO across
multiple datacenters requires careful planning and execution: Deploy MinIO Clusters Install and configure independent MinIO clusters in both primary and secondary datacenters with identical erasure coding settings. Ensure hardware specifications are consistent across environments to maintain performance parity during failover scenarios. Configure Site Replication Establish bidirectional site replication between datacenters using MinIO's native replication capabilities. Create appropriate bucket policies to determine which data is synchronized, and configure bandwidth limits to prevent network saturation during replication events. Test Configuration Validate the replication setup by uploading test files to both sites and confirming synchronization. Monitor replication logs and metrics to ensure proper data transfer between datacenters and verify that metadata consistency is maintained throughout the process. Simulate Failover Conduct planned failover drills regularly by redirecting client traffic to the secondary site. Document response times and identify potential bottlenecks in the failover process. Test both site-level and node-level failure scenarios to ensure comprehensive protection. Measure Recovery Metrics Evaluate actual RTO and RPO values during test scenarios and compare against business requirements. Adjust replication frequency and networking configurations as needed to meet or exceed recovery objectives specified in organizational SLAs. Site replication dramatically lowers the RPO by maintaining near-real-time data consistency between datacenters. For optimal resilience, complement technical implementations with documented recovery procedures, regular testing schedules, and a comprehensive backup strategy that addresses potential data corruption scenarios which simple replication cannot mitigate.

MinIO: Centralized Monitoring MinIO Console Use the web-based UI for
comprehensive monitoring and management of your MinIO deployment. The intuitive interface allows administrators to manage buckets, users, and policies with ease. The console provides real-time insights into system health, including disk usage, network throughput, and request latency. Administrators can quickly identify bottlenecks and performance issues through visual representations of key metrics. Beyond monitoring, the console offers robust configuration capabilities for tuning replication settings, managing access controls, and implementing bucket lifecycle policies to optimize storage costs and performance. Set up custom alerts for critical events such as disk space warnings, failed replications, or unauthorized access attempts to ensure proactive management of your object storage infrastructure. Prometheus and Grafana Integrate MinIO with Prometheus and Grafana to establish enterprise-grade monitoring and visualization capabilities. MinIO exposes over 200 metrics via its Prometheus- compatible endpoint, enabling detailed analysis of system performance. Key metrics include request rates, error counts, disk I/O statistics, and replication status across your distributed deployment. These metrics can be aggregated across multiple clusters for centralized monitoring of your entire storage fleet. Grafana dashboards allow for customizable visualization of historical trends and real-time performance data. Create tailored views for different stakeholder groups, from technical operators to business owners. Implement alerting rules based on defined thresholds to automatically notify operations teams of potential issues before they impact system availability or performance, supporting your disaster recovery preparedness strategy.

MinIO: Data Retention Configure retention policies for objects using object
lifecycle management to optimize storage utilization, control costs, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. MinIO's bucket lifecycle management provides a flexible framework for implementing sophisticated data retention strategies across your organization's object storage infrastructure. 1 Lifecycle Management Rules Implement rule-based policies that automatically transition objects between storage tiers or delete them based on predefined criteria such as object age, size, tags, or access patterns. This automation reduces operational overhead while ensuring consistent enforcement of retention policies across all storage buckets. 2 Compliance Capabilities MinIO supports WORM (Write Once Read Many) functionality through object locking features that prevent modification or deletion of objects for specified periods. This capability is essential for meeting regulatory requirements such as SEC 17a-4, HIPAA, GDPR, and other compliance standards that mandate data immutability and controlled retention. 3 Tiered Retention Strategy Develop a multi-tiered retention approach that balances immediate accessibility with long-term storage economics. Frequently accessed data can remain in high-performance tiers, while rarely accessed data can transition to more cost-effective storage classes or be archived according to business requirements. 4 Monitoring and Auditing Utilize MinIO's comprehensive logging and audit capabilities to maintain detailed records of all object lifecycle events, including transitions, expirations, and deletions. These audit trails provide documentation of compliance with internal policies and external regulations while facilitating capacity planning and cost optimization efforts. By implementing a well-designed data retention strategy with MinIO, organizations can effectively balance performance requirements, compliance obligations, and storage costs while ensuring that valuable data is preserved for appropriate timeframes and unnecessary data is systematically removed.

Centralized Monitoring Best Practices 1 Unified Dashboard Visualize metrics from
all systems in one place. Make sure to visualize all your metrics. You need a centralized place for all dashboards. Use Grafana or similar tools to visualize your data. Data visualization helps to provide better insights into system performance, resource utilization, and potential bottlenecks before they become critical issues. 2 Alerting Configure alerts for critical events and performance thresholds. Configure alerting for all your data points. You can configure alerts in Grafana, Prometheus, and other tools. This will notify when critical events occur. Implement multi-channel notifications (email, SMS, Slack) with escalation policies to ensure the right team members are informed based on alert severity and resolution timeframes. 3 Log Aggregation Collect logs from all systems for centralized analysis (e.g., Elasticsearch). Log aggregation helps to centralize log data. You should use a log aggregation tool. This helps to centralize all log data across systems. Implement structured logging practices to make log data more searchable and analyzable, enabling faster troubleshooting and root cause analysis during incidents. 4 Anomaly Detection Implement machine learning algorithms to automatically detect unusual patterns in your monitoring data. Anomaly detection can identify subtle system issues before they trigger traditional threshold- based alerts. Tools like Elasticsearch's Machine Learning, Prometheus Anomaly Detector, or dedicated services like AWS CloudWatch Anomaly Detection provide powerful capabilities to detect performance degradation and potential security incidents. 5 Correlation Analysis Establish relationships between metrics and events across different systems to understand cascading failures and root causes. Correlation analysis helps teams quickly identify whether an issue in one system is causing problems in another. Use tools that can automatically correlate related events across your infrastructure to reduce troubleshooting time and enable faster incident resolution. 6 Synthetic Monitoring Deploy end-to-end tests that simulate user interactions with your systems. Synthetic monitoring provides an outside-in view of application performance and availability from a user perspective. Regularly scheduled tests can verify critical user journeys and business transactions are working correctly, complementing your infrastructure and service-level monitoring.

Data Retention Strategies Define Retention Policies Define retention policies based
on compliance and business needs. All retention policies should align with business goals and regulatory requirements such as GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, or industry-specific regulations. It is important to maintain compliance to avoid hefty fines and reputational damage. Compliance minimizes potential legal risk and demonstrates good data governance. Consider creating tiered retention policies where different data types have varying retention periods based on their sensitivity, business value, and regulatory requirements. Automate Data Deletion Automate data deletion or archiving to manage storage costs and ensure compliance. Automation minimizes human error and ensures consistent application of policies across all systems. Automating tasks also improves outcomes and frees up IT resources for more strategic initiatives. Implement a combination of archiving for historical data that may still provide business value and permanent deletion for data that has no further use. Consider using data lifecycle management tools that can automatically move data between storage tiers based on age and access patterns before final deletion or archiving. Regularly Review Policies Regularly review and update retention policies to adapt to changing business requirements and regulatory landscapes. Business requirements evolve as organizations grow and pivot. Review policies quarterly or at least annually to ensure they remain relevant. Adapt policies to changing business needs, new data types, and emerging regulations. Establish a cross-functional review committee including IT, legal, compliance, and business stakeholders to ensure all perspectives are considered when updating policies. Document all policy changes and maintain an audit trail of when and why modifications were made. Implement Classification Systems Develop a comprehensive data classification system that categorizes information based on sensitivity, business value, and regulatory requirements. This classification should drive retention decisions and security controls. Automated classification tools can help scale this process across large data volumes. Ensure that classification metadata stays with the data throughout its lifecycle, enabling intelligent policy application regardless of where the data resides. Regularly validate classification accuracy through sampling and auditing procedures. Create Defensible Deletion Processes Establish defensible deletion processes that document the justification for data removal. These processes should include appropriate approvals, validation that retention periods have expired, verification that no legal holds apply, and comprehensive logging of all deletion activities. The ability to demonstrate a consistent, reasonable approach to data deletion is crucial for legal and compliance purposes. Consider implementing a "deletion committee" for reviewing and approving bulk deletion operations affecting sensitive or high-value data.

Conclusion High Availability and Disaster Recovery are essential for modern
data platforms. Each technology has unique HA/DR capabilities that must be carefully evaluated against business requirements. When implemented correctly, robust HA/DR strategies ensure business continuity, minimize data loss, and maintain service levels even during catastrophic events. Technology Overview Throughout this presentation, we've examined multiple technologies including Oracle, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Trino, MongoDB, Redis, Milvus, and MinIO. Each offers distinct approaches to resilience, with varying capabilities for replication, failover, and disaster recovery. Organizations must select solutions that align with their specific RTO/RPO objectives while considering implementation complexity and operational costs. Implementation Steps Establish clear business requirements and translate them into technical specifications. 1. Document your architecture thoroughly and test failover procedures regularly. 2. Plan your environment considering network latency, data consistency, and monitoring capabilities. 3. Key Considerations Implementation depends on careful planning and the technology stack, but also requires skilled teams, adequate training, and executive support. Remember that HA/DR is not a one-time project but an ongoing program that requires continuous improvement as technologies evolve and business needs change. By adopting the strategies and best practices outlined in this presentation, organizations can build resilient data platforms that support critical business operations under virtually any circumstances.

Q&A Thank you for your attention during our presentation on
High Availability and Disaster Recovery for Modern Data Platforms. We now welcome your questions on any aspect of the material covered today. Feel free to ask about: Specific technologies discussed (Oracle, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Trino, MongoDB, Redis, Milvus, MinIO) Implementation strategies for High Availability or Disaster Recovery RTO/RPO optimization techniques Data center topology considerations Centralized monitoring approaches Data retention best practices To ask a question, please raise your hand or use the chat function if attending virtually. We'll address as many questions as possible in the time remaining, and our team will be available after the session for any follow-up discussions. If we're unable to address your question today, please feel free to reach out via email, and we'll provide a thorough response within 48 hours.

Architecting Uninterrupted Data Ecosystems: Ent...

Architecting Uninterrupted Data Ecosystems: Enterprise Strategies for High Availability and Disaster Recovery in Modern Data Platforms

More Decks by Shiv Iyer

Other Decks in Technology

Featured

Transcript