of Hitched, a wedding planning site with 1M+ monthly users • Speak to ~250,000 UK couples getting married each year • 13+ years in digital content • Lead editorial & digital PR strategy • Obsessed with weddings + SEO • I know what gets published - and what gets deleted 👋
This month, I’ve received press releases about: • 🧴 A restock of ‘milky toner’ • 🩸 Flushable period pads for festivals • 🏠 Peugeot’s spring homeware collection • How to recover from a marathon • 🏡 Urgent questions homebuyers should ask • ✅ All of the above
I have 600+ unread emails right now - most of them are: • ❌ Irrelevant, time-sensitive product drops (that expire in a day) • ❌ Generic seasonal roundups (with no unique angle) • ❌ Random data dumps - often with no sources cited
• 🚫 Zero relevance to weddings • 👀 No sign they’ve read our content • 🤖 No personalisation • 📉 Dodgy data (Where’s the sample size? Who ran this?) • 📺 Newsjacking gone wrong - trending topic, no connection to weddings
worked on both sides, here’s what I see go wrong: 🧱 We’re not short on content we don’t need filler, we need fit ⚖ A link isn’t a favour it’s an exchange, and we need value too 👻 Ghost-pitches don’t land if you don’t know my name, my brand, or my niche, you’re out
actually open and read a pitch? • 💌 A clear, personalised subject line (not clickbait!) • 🔍 Mentions relevant content - show me you’ve done your homework • 👰 References the brand, the audience, and relevant search terms • 📊 Clean, credible data - sample size + source, or it’s a no
beyond the basics: • 🥇 First refusal offers - exclusive always wins • 🎯 An exclusive or unexpected angle • 🤝 A collaborative tone - not just a broadcast • 🔎 SEO awareness - e.g. “This ranks for Y, but could also rank for X…”
bad pitch I’ve received and turn it into something better... I fed ChatGPT several irrelevant press releases I’ve received and asked it to recreate one in the same style. • ⚠ Disclaimer: No PRs were harmed in the making of this! • 📝 Note: Don’t go after Jess at Crumb & Co - she doesn’t exist. 😉
stand out and not go straight to the bin: • 📊 Clearly cited, decent data - no vague claims, sources are solid • 🔍 Research - with a clear benefit to me and my audience • 🖼 Relevant imagery - adds value, not just fluff • Expert quote - actually leveraging the expert's authority, not just pushing a product
send, check: • 👤 Is it clear who you are pitching to? • 💌 Do you use their name? If not, can you find it? • 📢 Have you referenced the brand? • 💡 Have you made it clear how you can help them? • 🎯 Do you demonstrate an understanding of their audience or content?
check: • 🏷 Is it relevant to the brand’s niche? • Are you pitching marathon recovery aids to a wedding planning website? • 📊 Is the subject matter likely to be interesting to more than half of the brand’s audience?
• 📚 Have you cited your sources? • 📊 It’s not enough to include a vague percentage. • 🔎 Have you included the sample size, methodology, and date of the study? • 🗣 Who is the data from?
• ✉ What’s your subject line saying? • 🔍 Is it clear what the pitch is about? • 👤 Is it clear who the pitch is for? • 📥 Is it clear what the email contains?
check: • 🔍 Have you demonstrated familiarity? • 📝 Have you got a way for them to use the story in mind? • 📚 Do you show that you’ve looked at their content?
🎯 Was it really perfect for them, or was it a long shot? • 🧐 Be honest with yourself and don’t send follow-ups if it’s not dream content for the brand.
EVERYTHING If it’s not a perfect fit, don’t send it. Personalise or Piss Off Generic pitches don’t cut it when your inbox is full. Be Useful Give journalists what they can actually use, not what brands want to sell.