Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Search
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Programming
15
1.6k
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Fluent 2015
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by benvinegar
See All by benvinegar
Getting the most out of JavaScript errors
benvinegar
1
320
JavaScript Error Reporting (and Why We Can't Have Nice Things)
benvinegar
0
210
FSTO: Re-evaluating Front-end Peformance Best Practices
benvinegar
9
930
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
PHPUnitしか使ってこなかった 一般PHPerがPestに乗り換えた実録
mashirou1234
0
420
いりゃあせ、PHPカンファレンス名古屋2025 / Welcome to PHP Conference Nagoya 2025
ttskch
1
190
PSR-15 はあなたのための ものではない? - phpcon2024
myamagishi
0
410
各クラウドサービスにおける.NETの対応と見解
ymd65536
0
250
Flatt Security XSS Challenge 解答・解説
flatt_security
0
740
ゼロからの、レトロゲームエンジンの作り方
tokujiros
3
1.1k
Package Traits
ikesyo
1
210
BEエンジニアがFEの業務をできるようになるまでにやったこと
yoshida_ryushin
0
200
Scaling your build logic
antalmonori
1
100
Amazon Nova Reelの可能性
hideg
0
200
[JAWS-UG横浜 #80] うわっ…今年のServerless アップデート、少なすぎ…?
maroon1st
0
110
Итераторы в Go 1.23: зачем они нужны, как использовать, и насколько они быстрые?
lamodatech
0
1.4k
Featured
See All Featured
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
305
30k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
116
6k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
53
13k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
34
3.1k
Bash Introduction
62gerente
610
210k
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
366
19k
Fashionably flexible responsive web design (full day workshop)
malarkey
406
66k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
348
20k
Build The Right Thing And Hit Your Dates
maggiecrowley
33
2.5k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
41
7.2k
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
67
4.5k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1030
460k
Transcript
re-evaluating front-end performance best practices
@bentlegen
None
None
car·go cult
cargo cult web performance
how does it happen?
deprecated … • books • blog posts • best practice
guides • StackOverflow answers • performance analysis tools • practices on live websites • conference talks like this one
the agenda • hostname sharding • for-loop array length caching
• dynamic script insertion
hostname sharding
in the beginning (HTTP 1.0)
with more connections 2 4 8 www www www
with hostname sharding 2 2 2 www www1, www2 www1
www2 www3 www4
still common Website # Static Hosts plus.google.com 4 tumblr.com 4
alibaba.com 4 theverge.com 4 ebay.com 6 businessinsider.com 6 netflix.com 11!
None
not a big deal anymore
browser connections/origin Browser # HTTP / origin Chrome 42 6
Firefox 37 8 Safari 7 6 IE 8, 9 6 IE 10 8 IE 11 13 bit.ly/rprf-bscope
chrome caps parallel image requests at 10 anyways bit.ly/rprf-bscope
rise of https stalled/ proxy negotiation dns! lookup connection +
tls/ssl time-to- first-byte download tls/ssl handshake
and http/2 will make all this irrelevant anyways
“2 domains for non-SPDY modern browsers” – Souders in 2013
bit.ly/rprf-2domains
etsy case study • 4 image domains → 2 •
50-80 ms faster for image heavy pages • 30-50 ms faster overall • up to 500ms faster on mobile bit.ly/rprf-etsy
the web’s moving on Website # Static Hosts netflix.com* 1
nytimes.com 1 youtube.com 2 twitter.com 2 facebook.com 2 pinterest.com 2 bbc.co.uk 2 etsy.com 3
looping
specifically array length caching in for loops
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i <
len; i++) { // do stuff } for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { // do stuff } vs
None
None
None
does it still hold?
cache vs no cache Chrome 42 Firefox 37 Safari 7
IE9+ IE8 ops/second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 78%
V8 (and other browsers) recognize this pattern bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
uncached version
cached version
“we should start assuming that our code is optimized” -
Vyacheslav Egorov, V8 bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
if you can trivially optimize it, the browser (probably) can
too
mobile disagrees, a little Chrome 41 (Android 5.1) Firefox 34
(Android 5.1) Safari (iOS 8) ops / second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 95%
if you think you’re going to get performance gains from
optimizing for loops you’re gonna have a bad time
dynamic script insertion
<script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script);
</script> vs <script src="/app.js"></script>
None
None
who does this? • analytics: GA, Mixpanel, Chartbeat, Wordpress •
widgets: Disqus, Facebook Comments • JS module loaders: RequireJS, LabJS • script managers: Google Tag Manager, Segment
small problem: CSS Object Model
CSS Object Model (CCSOM) <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! ! !
<script> window.getComputedStyle(document.body).margin; </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
CSSOM + dynamic script insertion <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! !
! <script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script); </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
dynamic script insertion scripts execute inline scripts can’t execute until
CSSOM ready; downloading is delayed
blocking 2nd script downloads after 1st executes 1st script preloaded
1st script executes
“Have we been doing it all wrong?” - Ilya Grigorik,
2014 bit.ly/rprf-injected
3rd option: async attribute <script async src="/app.js"></script>
ideal: async attribute both scripts execute all 3 resources download
in parallel
we should probably start using async
None
closing thoughts
don’t always believe what you read on the internet
benchmark your own stuff
benchmark your own stuff every year, apparently
always bet on browsers (and JS engines)
thanks
acknowledgements • performance research: Steve Souders, Ilya Grigorik, Guy Podjarny,
Vyacheslav Egorov, Jonathan Klein, Paul Irish, Nicholas Zakas • photos: Christian Junker, André Hofmeister, “My aim is true” • me: Ben Vinegar (@bentlegen) • office hours @ 1:30 PM today