Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Search
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Programming
15
1.6k
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Fluent 2015
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by benvinegar
See All by benvinegar
Getting the most out of JavaScript errors
benvinegar
1
310
JavaScript Error Reporting (and Why We Can't Have Nice Things)
benvinegar
0
210
FSTO: Re-evaluating Front-end Peformance Best Practices
benvinegar
9
920
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
20年もののレガシープロダクトに 0からPHPStanを入れるまで / phpcon2024
hirobe1999
0
500
testcontainers のススメ
sgash708
1
120
rails statsで大解剖 🔍 “B/43流” のRailsの育て方を歴史とともに振り返ります
shoheimitani
2
940
なまけものオバケたち -PHP 8.4 に入った新機能の紹介-
tanakahisateru
1
120
Keeping it Ruby: Why Your Product Needs a Ruby SDK - RubyWorld 2024
envek
0
190
バグを見つけた?それAppleに直してもらおう!
uetyo
0
180
Kaigi on Railsに初参加したら、その日にLT登壇が決定した件について
tama50505
0
100
フロントエンドのディレクトリ構成どうしてる? Feature-Sliced Design 導入体験談
osakatechlab
8
4.1k
Итераторы в Go 1.23: зачем они нужны, как использовать, и насколько они быстрые?
lamodatech
0
820
暇に任せてProxmoxコンソール 作ってみました
karugamo
2
720
Scalaから始めるOpenFeature入門 / Scalaわいわい勉強会 #4
arthur1
1
330
From Translations to Multi Dimension Entities
alexanderschranz
2
130
Featured
See All Featured
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
28
8.3k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
341
39k
Done Done
chrislema
181
16k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
305
110k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1030
460k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
91
6.1k
Speed Design
sergeychernyshev
25
670
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
376
70k
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
65
11k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
232
17k
BBQ
matthewcrist
85
9.4k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
157
23k
Transcript
re-evaluating front-end performance best practices
@bentlegen
None
None
car·go cult
cargo cult web performance
how does it happen?
deprecated … • books • blog posts • best practice
guides • StackOverflow answers • performance analysis tools • practices on live websites • conference talks like this one
the agenda • hostname sharding • for-loop array length caching
• dynamic script insertion
hostname sharding
in the beginning (HTTP 1.0)
with more connections 2 4 8 www www www
with hostname sharding 2 2 2 www www1, www2 www1
www2 www3 www4
still common Website # Static Hosts plus.google.com 4 tumblr.com 4
alibaba.com 4 theverge.com 4 ebay.com 6 businessinsider.com 6 netflix.com 11!
None
not a big deal anymore
browser connections/origin Browser # HTTP / origin Chrome 42 6
Firefox 37 8 Safari 7 6 IE 8, 9 6 IE 10 8 IE 11 13 bit.ly/rprf-bscope
chrome caps parallel image requests at 10 anyways bit.ly/rprf-bscope
rise of https stalled/ proxy negotiation dns! lookup connection +
tls/ssl time-to- first-byte download tls/ssl handshake
and http/2 will make all this irrelevant anyways
“2 domains for non-SPDY modern browsers” – Souders in 2013
bit.ly/rprf-2domains
etsy case study • 4 image domains → 2 •
50-80 ms faster for image heavy pages • 30-50 ms faster overall • up to 500ms faster on mobile bit.ly/rprf-etsy
the web’s moving on Website # Static Hosts netflix.com* 1
nytimes.com 1 youtube.com 2 twitter.com 2 facebook.com 2 pinterest.com 2 bbc.co.uk 2 etsy.com 3
looping
specifically array length caching in for loops
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i <
len; i++) { // do stuff } for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { // do stuff } vs
None
None
None
does it still hold?
cache vs no cache Chrome 42 Firefox 37 Safari 7
IE9+ IE8 ops/second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 78%
V8 (and other browsers) recognize this pattern bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
uncached version
cached version
“we should start assuming that our code is optimized” -
Vyacheslav Egorov, V8 bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
if you can trivially optimize it, the browser (probably) can
too
mobile disagrees, a little Chrome 41 (Android 5.1) Firefox 34
(Android 5.1) Safari (iOS 8) ops / second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 95%
if you think you’re going to get performance gains from
optimizing for loops you’re gonna have a bad time
dynamic script insertion
<script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script);
</script> vs <script src="/app.js"></script>
None
None
who does this? • analytics: GA, Mixpanel, Chartbeat, Wordpress •
widgets: Disqus, Facebook Comments • JS module loaders: RequireJS, LabJS • script managers: Google Tag Manager, Segment
small problem: CSS Object Model
CSS Object Model (CCSOM) <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! ! !
<script> window.getComputedStyle(document.body).margin; </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
CSSOM + dynamic script insertion <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! !
! <script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script); </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
dynamic script insertion scripts execute inline scripts can’t execute until
CSSOM ready; downloading is delayed
blocking 2nd script downloads after 1st executes 1st script preloaded
1st script executes
“Have we been doing it all wrong?” - Ilya Grigorik,
2014 bit.ly/rprf-injected
3rd option: async attribute <script async src="/app.js"></script>
ideal: async attribute both scripts execute all 3 resources download
in parallel
we should probably start using async
None
closing thoughts
don’t always believe what you read on the internet
benchmark your own stuff
benchmark your own stuff every year, apparently
always bet on browsers (and JS engines)
thanks
acknowledgements • performance research: Steve Souders, Ilya Grigorik, Guy Podjarny,
Vyacheslav Egorov, Jonathan Klein, Paul Irish, Nicholas Zakas • photos: Christian Junker, André Hofmeister, “My aim is true” • me: Ben Vinegar (@bentlegen) • office hours @ 1:30 PM today