Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Search
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Programming
15
1.6k
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Fluent 2015
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by benvinegar
See All by benvinegar
Getting the most out of JavaScript errors
benvinegar
1
340
JavaScript Error Reporting (and Why We Can't Have Nice Things)
benvinegar
0
230
FSTO: Re-evaluating Front-end Peformance Best Practices
benvinegar
9
1.1k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
オープンソースソフトウェアへの解像度🔬
utam0k
18
3.2k
TransformerからMCPまで(現代AIを理解するための羅針盤)
mickey_kubo
7
5.8k
スマホから Youtube Shortsを見られないようにする
lemolatoon
27
34k
ALL CODE BASE ARE BELONG TO STUDY
uzulla
28
6.8k
はじめてのDSPy - 言語モデルを『プロンプト』ではなく『プログラミング』するための仕組み
masahiro_nishimi
4
17k
CSC509 Lecture 08
javiergs
PRO
0
270
CSC509 Lecture 07
javiergs
PRO
0
250
퇴근 후 1억이 거래되는 서비스 만들기 | 내가 AI를 사용하는 방법
maryang
1
130
Devoxx BE - Local Development in the AI Era
kdubois
0
150
Blazing Fast UI Development with Compose Hot Reload (Bangladesh KUG, October 2025)
zsmb
2
430
Register is more than clipboard
satorunooshie
1
150
開発組織の戦略的な役割と 設計スキル向上の効果
masuda220
PRO
10
1.9k
Featured
See All Featured
Balancing Empowerment & Direction
lara
5
710
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
180
10k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
46
2.5k
Music & Morning Musume
bryan
46
6.9k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
799
220k
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
91
590k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
57
6k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
132
19k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
135
9.6k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
239
140k
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
315
140k
Transcript
re-evaluating front-end performance best practices
@bentlegen
None
None
car·go cult
cargo cult web performance
how does it happen?
deprecated … • books • blog posts • best practice
guides • StackOverflow answers • performance analysis tools • practices on live websites • conference talks like this one
the agenda • hostname sharding • for-loop array length caching
• dynamic script insertion
hostname sharding
in the beginning (HTTP 1.0)
with more connections 2 4 8 www www www
with hostname sharding 2 2 2 www www1, www2 www1
www2 www3 www4
still common Website # Static Hosts plus.google.com 4 tumblr.com 4
alibaba.com 4 theverge.com 4 ebay.com 6 businessinsider.com 6 netflix.com 11!
None
not a big deal anymore
browser connections/origin Browser # HTTP / origin Chrome 42 6
Firefox 37 8 Safari 7 6 IE 8, 9 6 IE 10 8 IE 11 13 bit.ly/rprf-bscope
chrome caps parallel image requests at 10 anyways bit.ly/rprf-bscope
rise of https stalled/ proxy negotiation dns! lookup connection +
tls/ssl time-to- first-byte download tls/ssl handshake
and http/2 will make all this irrelevant anyways
“2 domains for non-SPDY modern browsers” – Souders in 2013
bit.ly/rprf-2domains
etsy case study • 4 image domains → 2 •
50-80 ms faster for image heavy pages • 30-50 ms faster overall • up to 500ms faster on mobile bit.ly/rprf-etsy
the web’s moving on Website # Static Hosts netflix.com* 1
nytimes.com 1 youtube.com 2 twitter.com 2 facebook.com 2 pinterest.com 2 bbc.co.uk 2 etsy.com 3
looping
specifically array length caching in for loops
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i <
len; i++) { // do stuff } for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { // do stuff } vs
None
None
None
does it still hold?
cache vs no cache Chrome 42 Firefox 37 Safari 7
IE9+ IE8 ops/second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 78%
V8 (and other browsers) recognize this pattern bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
uncached version
cached version
“we should start assuming that our code is optimized” -
Vyacheslav Egorov, V8 bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
if you can trivially optimize it, the browser (probably) can
too
mobile disagrees, a little Chrome 41 (Android 5.1) Firefox 34
(Android 5.1) Safari (iOS 8) ops / second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 95%
if you think you’re going to get performance gains from
optimizing for loops you’re gonna have a bad time
dynamic script insertion
<script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script);
</script> vs <script src="/app.js"></script>
None
None
who does this? • analytics: GA, Mixpanel, Chartbeat, Wordpress •
widgets: Disqus, Facebook Comments • JS module loaders: RequireJS, LabJS • script managers: Google Tag Manager, Segment
small problem: CSS Object Model
CSS Object Model (CCSOM) <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! ! !
<script> window.getComputedStyle(document.body).margin; </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
CSSOM + dynamic script insertion <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! !
! <script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script); </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
dynamic script insertion scripts execute inline scripts can’t execute until
CSSOM ready; downloading is delayed
blocking 2nd script downloads after 1st executes 1st script preloaded
1st script executes
“Have we been doing it all wrong?” - Ilya Grigorik,
2014 bit.ly/rprf-injected
3rd option: async attribute <script async src="/app.js"></script>
ideal: async attribute both scripts execute all 3 resources download
in parallel
we should probably start using async
None
closing thoughts
don’t always believe what you read on the internet
benchmark your own stuff
benchmark your own stuff every year, apparently
always bet on browsers (and JS engines)
thanks
acknowledgements • performance research: Steve Souders, Ilya Grigorik, Guy Podjarny,
Vyacheslav Egorov, Jonathan Klein, Paul Irish, Nicholas Zakas • photos: Christian Junker, André Hofmeister, “My aim is true” • me: Ben Vinegar (@bentlegen) • office hours @ 1:30 PM today