Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Making Scores with HiScore
Search
Hakka Labs
February 13, 2015
Programming
3.5k
0
Share
Making Scores with HiScore
Video here:
Hakka Labs
February 13, 2015
More Decks by Hakka Labs
See All by Hakka Labs
New Workflows for Building Data Pipelines
hakka_labs
0
2.9k
Collaborative Topic Models for Users and Texts
hakka_labs
0
2.8k
Groupcache with Evan Owen
hakka_labs
2
5.4k
Testing Android at Spotify
hakka_labs
1
4.5k
It's Not a Bug, It's a Feature!
hakka_labs
0
3.2k
K-means Clustering to Understand Your Users
hakka_labs
0
2k
Building Amy: The Email-based Virtual Assistant by x.ai
hakka_labs
0
5k
Deep Learning and NLP Applications
hakka_labs
3
13k
Go and the Gophers
hakka_labs
2
11k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Oxlintとeslint-plugin-react-hooks 明日から始められそう?
t6adev
0
280
The Monolith Strikes Back: Why AI Agents ❤️ Rails Monoliths
serradura
0
340
Making the RBS Parser Faster
soutaro
0
490
感情を設計する
ichimichi
5
1.5k
CDK Deployのための ”反響定位”
watany
5
800
How Swift's Type System Guides AI Agents
koher
0
290
Programming with a DJ Controller — not vibe coding
m_seki
3
140
AI-DLC Deep Dive
yuukiyo
9
4.7k
AIと共に生きる技術選定 2026
sgash708
0
100
運転動画を検索可能にする〜Cosmos-Embed1とDatabricks Vector Searchで〜/cosmos-embed1-databricks-vector-search
studio_graph
0
400
ルールルルルルRubyの中身の予備知識 ── RubyKaigiの前に予習しなイカ?
ydah
1
210
第3木曜LT会 #28
tinykitten
PRO
0
110
Featured
See All Featured
技術選定の審美眼(2025年版) / Understanding the Spiral of Technologies 2025 edition
twada
PRO
118
110k
Fashionably flexible responsive web design (full day workshop)
malarkey
408
66k
HU Berlin: Industrial-Strength Natural Language Processing with spaCy and Prodigy
inesmontani
PRO
0
320
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
770
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
672
58k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
162
26k
How to optimise 3,500 product descriptions for ecommerce in one day using ChatGPT
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
3.5k
Game over? The fight for quality and originality in the time of robots
wayneb77
1
160
Navigating the Design Leadership Dip - Product Design Week Design Leaders+ Conference 2024
apolaine
0
270
Avoiding the “Bad Training, Faster” Trap in the Age of AI
tmiket
0
130
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
91
590k
From Legacy to Launchpad: Building Startup-Ready Communities
dugsong
0
200
Transcript
Making Scores with HiScore Abe Othman
None
None
None
None
HiScore is a python library for creating and maintaining scores
It uses a novel quasi-Kriging solution to a new methodology,
supervised scoring
What are scores?
Scores are a tool for domain experts to communicate their
expertise to a broad audience
88 51 27
} 58 Score Function Dimensions Score
There is no one correct scoring function
Scores are typically developed using the dual approach
1. Select a set of basis functions f(x ⃗) =
∑ γᵢφᵢ(x ⃗)
2. Adjust coefficients until things look right f(x ⃗) =
∑ γᵢφᵢ(x ⃗)
Dual scores ossify
Walkscore Problems Score of 100, but the highest crime in
SF
Supervised scoring: a primal approach
Experts start by labeling a reference set and the objects’
dimensions
Algorithm makes a scoring function that interpolates and obeys the
monotone relationship
Some nice features
Monotonicity is important for score acceptance and understanding
See a mis-scored point? Add it to the reference set
and re-run!
OK, but what algorithm?
Easy in one dimension
None
None
None
Hard in many dimensions
Failed approach: simplical interpolation
None
Failed approach: B-spline product bases
Supervised Scoring with Monotone Multidimensional Splines, AAAI 2014
Curse of dimensionality!
None
None
None
Failed approach: RBF with monotone row generation constraints
Failed approach: Neural Networks
None
None
Success: Beliakov
Reminder: Lipschitz Continuity |f(a)-f(b)| < C |a-b|
None
Monotone Lipschitz continuity
None
1. Project monotone Lipschitz cones from each point to generate
upper and lower bounds
2. Find the sup and inf constraints from the bounding
cones
3. Function value is halfway in-between the sup and inf
bounds
Beliakov example
Beliakov plateaux
Beliakov plateaux
How can we smooth and improve this?
Abandon Lipschitz, just project minimal cones from each point
None
`
HiScore solution
Using HiScore: Simplified Water Well Score
None
None
Two factors: Distance from nearest latrine and platform size
Label a reference set by taking high, middle and low
values in each dimension
Distance: 0m, 10m, 50m Size: 1SF, 25SF, 100SF
Score Distance Size 0 0 1 5 0 25 10
0 100 20 10 1 50 10 25 60 10 100 65 50 1 90 50 25 100 50 100 Monotone Relationship: (+, +)
import hiscore reference_set = {(0,1): 0, (0,25): 5, (0,100): 10,
(10,1): 20, (10,25): 50, … } mono_rel = [1,1] hiscore.create(reference_set, mono_rel, minval=0, maxval=100)
None
Complicate the model with additional factors
Avoid curse of dimensionality by building a tree
None
Possible to easily construct and understand scores with dozens of
input dimensions
Making dimensions monotone: blood pressure
None
S+ > 0 S- = 0 D+ > 0 D-
= 0 D+ = 0 D- > 0 S+ = 0 S- > 0
What do you want to score? github.com/aothman/ hiscore $ pip
install hiscore
Thanks!
[email protected]