special case of SDWTs, so the literature is instructive • SDWT models can be helpful in assessing and understanding team performance • SDWTs can be introduced by advocates at a team level (not just executives), and understanding the end goal can help drive such changes
responsibility for managing themselves and the work they do with a minimum of direct supervision. [Team members] typically handle job assignments, plan and schedule work, make production- and service-related decisions, and take action on problems.”
most tech companies give their employees a certain degree of autonomy • But plenty of companies fail to create true SDWTs, so fail to realize the potential of their employees
teams require: • Authority to make decisions about their own work • Resources, i.e. the people and skills to do the work • Information to make informed decisions • Accountability for work done and decisions made Note that if any one of these is missing, any sense of empowerment is probably illusory.
command-and-control hierarchy, elaborate sign-off processes, or simply a way to assign blame when mistakes are made. In practice, a far more effective way to improve accountability is to: • clarify responsibilities; • create transparency. In Agile teams, transparency is achieved through iteration and regular communication (including stand-ups, demos and retrospectives).
can be more responsive • It allows for broader perspectives, improving decision making • It reduces the time for feedback from downstream processes, improving output quality
management perceptions, not reality): Theory X (autocratic) Theory Y (democratic) People are lazy People like to work People need to be controlled People have self-control People need to be motivated People motivate themselves Most people are not very smart People are smart People need encouragement to do good work People want to do a good job
that don’t always trust people. It’s particularly easy to fall into this trap when working with remote teams, or when communication breaks down. • Of course, not everyone has the best of intentions. • But assuming they do until proven otherwise will make it easier to engage in constructive dialog, and foster a more collaborative atmosphere.
style. Theory Y managers engender commitment instead. Control Paradigm Commitment Paradigm Elicits compliance Engenders commitment Believes supervision is necessary Believes education is necessary Focuses on hierarchy Focuses on customers Biased towards functional organisation Biased towards cross-functional org Emphasis on means Emphasis on ends Believes bosses should make decisions Believes team members should make decisions
“results oriented” for “control oriented”. To realise the benefits of a SDWT it’s important for management to choose the commitment paradigm, in order to: • allow team members to contribute to the fullest of their abilities • engender commitment and motivate the team • give everyone a chance to learn, develop and apply their skills
• Product Backlog, to facilitate prioritization and planning • Daily stand-up, to provide information and accountability • Product Owner, to identify customer needs and priorities • Scrum Master role, to facilitate, coach and design team practices
should focus not on decision making, but on boundary management • That is, the external limits of the team (whether physical or internal capabilities) with a view to improving and extending these boundaries
is based around trust and delegation, rather than hierarchy and control • SDWTs replace traditional hierarchies and bureaucracy with “hierarchy substitutes” • Instead of decision making, Team Leads focus on boundary management