Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Failing in Rust
Search
Armin Ronacher
April 24, 2018
Programming
5
970
Failing in Rust
A quick talk at a meetup about using failure.
Armin Ronacher
April 24, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Armin Ronacher
See All by Armin Ronacher
Do Dumb Things
mitsuhiko
0
500
No Assumptions
mitsuhiko
0
150
The Complexity Genie
mitsuhiko
0
180
The Catch in Rye: Seeding Change and Lessons Learned
mitsuhiko
0
310
Runtime Objects in Rust
mitsuhiko
0
350
Rust at Sentry
mitsuhiko
0
440
Overcoming Variable Payloads to Optimize for Performance
mitsuhiko
0
200
Rust API Design Learnings
mitsuhiko
0
550
The Snowball Effect of Open Source
mitsuhiko
0
350
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
REST API設計の実践 – ベストプラクティスとその落とし穴
kentaroutakeda
2
260
ts-morph実践:型を利用するcodemodのテクニック
ypresto
1
500
What Spring Developers Should Know About Jakarta EE
ivargrimstad
1
430
複雑なフォームを継続的に開発していくための技術選定・設計・実装 #tskaigi / #tskaigi2025
izumin5210
12
5.9k
私のRubyKaigi 2025 Kaigi Effect / My RubyKaigi 2025 Kaigi Effect
chobishiba
1
200
AI Coding Agent Enablement in TypeScript
yukukotani
15
6.2k
PT AI без купюр
v0lka
0
160
JSAI2025 RecSysChallenge2024 優勝報告
unonao
1
310
ドメイン駆動設計とXPで支える子どもの未来 / Domain-Driven Design and XP Supporting Children's Future
nrslib
0
350
ビカム・ア・コパイロット
ymd65536
1
190
AI時代のリアーキテクチャ戦略 / Re-architecture Strategy in the AI Era
dachi023
0
180
CQRS/ESのクラスとシステムフロー ~ RailsでフルスクラッチでCQRSESを組んで みたことから得た学び~
suzukimar
0
180
Featured
See All Featured
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
68
11k
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
PRO
19
1.2k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
656
60k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
56
9.4k
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
91
590k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
184
28k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
298
21k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
253
25k
BBQ
matthewcrist
88
9.6k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
671
58k
Docker and Python
trallard
44
3.4k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
37
3.5k
Transcript
Failing in Rust Armin @mitsuhiko Ronacher
None
800°C 36° 2' 0.4662" N 118° 15' 38.7792" W 795°C
789°C 797°C 793°C 805°C 782°C we show you your crashes
— Robert F. Kennedy “Only those who dare to fail
greatly can ever achieve greatly.”
Why do we care?
Errors are Important • Errors are part of your API
• Exceptions let you forget about this easily • A lot more relevant when you can catch them and there are multiple versions of libraries involved
ways to fail greatly
Mechanisms •Result<T, E> •Option<T> •panic!
Result Propagation vs Panic • Results/Options are for handling •
panics are for recovering at best
Examples of Panics • out of bound access • runtime
Examples of Option • safe signalling absence of data •
"the one obvious error"
— Douglas Adams
But when you do •panic!("…"); •unreachable!();
let's talk results
But if you don't panic … how do you result?
fn square_a_number() -> Result<f32, E> { let num = get_a_random_float()?;
Ok(num * num) }
let val = expr?;
let val = match Try::into_result(expr) { Ok(v) => v, Err(e)
=> return Try::from_error(From::from(e)); };
error propagation can be hooked!
The Err in Result can be anything :-/
So let's use some traits for Err
pub trait Error: Debug + Display { fn description(&self) ->
&str; fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Error>; }
impl Error + 'static { pub fn downcast_ref<T>(&self) -> Option<&T>
where T: Error + 'static; }
— Charles Darwin “To kill std::error is as good a
service as, and sometimes even better than, the establishing of a new trait”
Problems • Generic errors give no guarantees • no Send
/ Sync / Debug • causes() returns non static errors • description() is useless • no backtraces
Enter Failure
— Winston Churchill “Success consists of going from std::error to
failure without loss of enthusiasm”
some std errors are fails nice! impl<E> Fail for E
where E: StdError + Send + Sync + 'static
failure 0.1 ➠ failure 1.0
pub trait Fail: Display + Debug + Send + Sync
+ 'static { fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Fail>; fn backtrace(&self) -> Option<&Backtrace>; fn context<D>(self, context: D) -> Context<D> where D: Display + Send + Sync + 'static, Self: Sized; }
Fail can be derived
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure;
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure
{ backtrace: failure::Backtrace, }
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure
{ backtrace: failure::Backtrace, #[fail(cause)] io_cause: ::std::io::Error, }
Fail & Error
Fail ⟷ Error
Fail for libraries Error for applications
What's in the Package
Main Functionality • Fail trait • Error type • Context
Bonus Points • Fail works with no_std • Fail works
with many std::errors • error-chain is deprecating itself for failure • actix and others are already using it!
— rustc an Error is not a Fail
failure 0.1: error.cause() failure 1.0: error.as_fail() Error to &Fail
Examples
#[derive(Debug, Fail, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)] #[fail(display = "invalid value
for project id")] pub struct ProjectIdParseError; Parse Errors
#[derive(Debug, Fail)] pub enum DsnParseError { #[fail(display = "no valid
url provided")] InvalidUrl, #[fail(display = "no valid scheme")] InvalidScheme, #[fail(display = "username is empty")] NoUsername, #[fail(display = "no project id")] NoProjectId, #[fail(display = "invalid project id")] InvalidProjectId(#[fail(cause)] ProjectIdParseError), } Complex Parse Errors
fn parse(url: Url) -> Result<Dsn, DsnParseError> { let project_id: i64
= url.path() .trim_matches('/') .parse() .map_err(DsnParseError::InvalidProjectId)?; Ok(Dsn { project_id }) } Mapping Errors
#[derive(Debug, Fail, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)] pub enum ErrorKind
{ #[fail(display = "governor spawn failed")] TroveGovernSpawnFailed, #[fail(display = "governor shutdown failed")] TroveGovernShutdownFailed, } Error Kinds
#[derive(Debug)] pub struct Error { inner: Context<ErrorKind>, } Custom Errors
impl Fail for Error { fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Fail> {
self.inner.cause() } fn backtrace(&self) -> Option<&Backtrace> { self.inner.backtrace() } } impl fmt::Display for Error { fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result { fmt::Display::fmt(&self.inner, f) } } Error Pass Through
pub fn run(config: Config) -> Result<(), Error> { let trove
= Arc::new(Trove::new(config)); trove.govern().context(ErrorKind::TroveGovernSpawnFailed)?; // … } Example Usage
use failure::{Error, ResultExt}; pub fn attach_logfile(&mut self, logfile: &str) ->
Result<(), Error> { let f = fs::File::open(logfile) .context("Could not open logfile")?; let reader = BufReader::new(f); for line in reader.lines() { let line = line?; User Facing with Error
A person who never made a mistake never had to
write an error API
?