Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Failing in Rust
Search
Armin Ronacher
April 24, 2018
Programming
5
990
Failing in Rust
A quick talk at a meetup about using failure.
Armin Ronacher
April 24, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Armin Ronacher
See All by Armin Ronacher
Agentic Coding: The Future of Software Development with Agents
mitsuhiko
0
360
Do Dumb Things
mitsuhiko
0
770
No Assumptions
mitsuhiko
0
270
The Complexity Genie
mitsuhiko
0
250
The Catch in Rye: Seeding Change and Lessons Learned
mitsuhiko
0
360
Runtime Objects in Rust
mitsuhiko
0
370
Rust at Sentry
mitsuhiko
0
520
Overcoming Variable Payloads to Optimize for Performance
mitsuhiko
0
240
Rust API Design Learnings
mitsuhiko
0
600
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
自動テストのアーキテクチャとその理由ー大規模ゲーム開発の場合ー
segadevtech
0
420
pnpm に provenance のダウングレード を検出する PR を出してみた
ryo_manba
1
180
3年ぶりにコードを書いた元CTOが Claude Codeと30分でMVPを作った話
maikokojima
0
750
業務でAIを使いたい話
hnw
0
230
GitHub Copilotを使いこなせ!/mastering_github_copilot!
kotakageyama
2
760
実践Claude Code:20の失敗から学ぶAIペアプログラミング
takedatakashi
18
9.5k
外接に惑わされない自システムの処理時間SLIをOpenTelemetryで実現した話
kotaro7750
0
160
Swift Concurrency 年表クイズ
omochi
3
220
The Past, Present, and Future of Enterprise Java
ivargrimstad
0
510
Developer Joy - The New Paradigm
hollycummins
1
400
Inside of Swift Export
giginet
PRO
1
340
20251016_Rails News ~Rails 8.1の足音を聴く~
morimorihoge
3
910
Featured
See All Featured
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
348
40k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
120
6.4k
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.1k
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.3k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
697
190k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
162
25k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
508
140k
Building Adaptive Systems
keathley
44
2.8k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
6.7k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
72
4.9k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
57
6.6k
Transcript
Failing in Rust Armin @mitsuhiko Ronacher
None
800°C 36° 2' 0.4662" N 118° 15' 38.7792" W 795°C
789°C 797°C 793°C 805°C 782°C we show you your crashes
— Robert F. Kennedy “Only those who dare to fail
greatly can ever achieve greatly.”
Why do we care?
Errors are Important • Errors are part of your API
• Exceptions let you forget about this easily • A lot more relevant when you can catch them and there are multiple versions of libraries involved
ways to fail greatly
Mechanisms •Result<T, E> •Option<T> •panic!
Result Propagation vs Panic • Results/Options are for handling •
panics are for recovering at best
Examples of Panics • out of bound access • runtime
Examples of Option • safe signalling absence of data •
"the one obvious error"
— Douglas Adams
But when you do •panic!("…"); •unreachable!();
let's talk results
But if you don't panic … how do you result?
fn square_a_number() -> Result<f32, E> { let num = get_a_random_float()?;
Ok(num * num) }
let val = expr?;
let val = match Try::into_result(expr) { Ok(v) => v, Err(e)
=> return Try::from_error(From::from(e)); };
error propagation can be hooked!
The Err in Result can be anything :-/
So let's use some traits for Err
pub trait Error: Debug + Display { fn description(&self) ->
&str; fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Error>; }
impl Error + 'static { pub fn downcast_ref<T>(&self) -> Option<&T>
where T: Error + 'static; }
— Charles Darwin “To kill std::error is as good a
service as, and sometimes even better than, the establishing of a new trait”
Problems • Generic errors give no guarantees • no Send
/ Sync / Debug • causes() returns non static errors • description() is useless • no backtraces
Enter Failure
— Winston Churchill “Success consists of going from std::error to
failure without loss of enthusiasm”
some std errors are fails nice! impl<E> Fail for E
where E: StdError + Send + Sync + 'static
failure 0.1 ➠ failure 1.0
pub trait Fail: Display + Debug + Send + Sync
+ 'static { fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Fail>; fn backtrace(&self) -> Option<&Backtrace>; fn context<D>(self, context: D) -> Context<D> where D: Display + Send + Sync + 'static, Self: Sized; }
Fail can be derived
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure;
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure
{ backtrace: failure::Backtrace, }
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure
{ backtrace: failure::Backtrace, #[fail(cause)] io_cause: ::std::io::Error, }
Fail & Error
Fail ⟷ Error
Fail for libraries Error for applications
What's in the Package
Main Functionality • Fail trait • Error type • Context
Bonus Points • Fail works with no_std • Fail works
with many std::errors • error-chain is deprecating itself for failure • actix and others are already using it!
— rustc an Error is not a Fail
failure 0.1: error.cause() failure 1.0: error.as_fail() Error to &Fail
Examples
#[derive(Debug, Fail, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)] #[fail(display = "invalid value
for project id")] pub struct ProjectIdParseError; Parse Errors
#[derive(Debug, Fail)] pub enum DsnParseError { #[fail(display = "no valid
url provided")] InvalidUrl, #[fail(display = "no valid scheme")] InvalidScheme, #[fail(display = "username is empty")] NoUsername, #[fail(display = "no project id")] NoProjectId, #[fail(display = "invalid project id")] InvalidProjectId(#[fail(cause)] ProjectIdParseError), } Complex Parse Errors
fn parse(url: Url) -> Result<Dsn, DsnParseError> { let project_id: i64
= url.path() .trim_matches('/') .parse() .map_err(DsnParseError::InvalidProjectId)?; Ok(Dsn { project_id }) } Mapping Errors
#[derive(Debug, Fail, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)] pub enum ErrorKind
{ #[fail(display = "governor spawn failed")] TroveGovernSpawnFailed, #[fail(display = "governor shutdown failed")] TroveGovernShutdownFailed, } Error Kinds
#[derive(Debug)] pub struct Error { inner: Context<ErrorKind>, } Custom Errors
impl Fail for Error { fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Fail> {
self.inner.cause() } fn backtrace(&self) -> Option<&Backtrace> { self.inner.backtrace() } } impl fmt::Display for Error { fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result { fmt::Display::fmt(&self.inner, f) } } Error Pass Through
pub fn run(config: Config) -> Result<(), Error> { let trove
= Arc::new(Trove::new(config)); trove.govern().context(ErrorKind::TroveGovernSpawnFailed)?; // … } Example Usage
use failure::{Error, ResultExt}; pub fn attach_logfile(&mut self, logfile: &str) ->
Result<(), Error> { let f = fs::File::open(logfile) .context("Could not open logfile")?; let reader = BufReader::new(f); for line in reader.lines() { let line = line?; User Facing with Error
A person who never made a mistake never had to
write an error API
?