Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Tracing for Granularity
Search
JBD
June 02, 2018
Programming
2
1.8k
Tracing for Granularity
JBD
June 02, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by JBD
See All by JBD
eBPF in Microservices Observability at eBPF Day
rakyll
1
2.1k
eBPF in Microservices Observability
rakyll
1
1.7k
OpenTelemetry at AWS
rakyll
1
1.9k
Debugging Code Generation in Go
rakyll
5
1.6k
Are you ready for production?
rakyll
8
2.8k
Servers are doomed to fail
rakyll
3
1.5k
Serverless Containers
rakyll
1
260
Critical Path Analysis
rakyll
0
620
Monitoring and Debugging Containers
rakyll
2
1.1k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
レガシープロジェクトで最大限AIの恩恵を受けられるようClaude Codeを利用する
tk1351
2
1.2k
新世界の理解
koriym
0
140
DockerからECSへ 〜 AWSの海に出る前に知っておきたいこと 〜
ota1022
5
1.8k
一人でAIプロダクトを作るための工夫 〜技術選定・開発プロセス編〜 / I want AI to work harder
rkaga
13
2.8k
Introduction to Git & GitHub
latte72
0
120
SOCI Index Manifest v2が出たので調べてみた / Introduction to SOCI Index Manifest v2
tkikuc
1
110
AIコーディングAgentとの向き合い方
eycjur
0
220
書き捨てではなく継続開発可能なコードをAIコーディングエージェントで書くために意識していること
shuyakinjo
1
310
「リーダーは意思決定する人」って本当?~ 学びを現場で活かす、リーダー4ヶ月目の試行錯誤 ~
marina1017
0
240
Claude Codeで実装以外の開発フロー、どこまで自動化できるか?失敗と成功
ndadayo
2
1.4k
KessokuでDIでもgoroutineを活用する / Go Connect #6
mazrean
0
110
Dart 参戦!!静的型付き言語界の隠れた実力者
kno3a87
0
210
Featured
See All Featured
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
190
11k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
34
3.1k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
229
22k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
26k
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
53
2.9k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
2.8k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
160
25k
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
10
1k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
70
19k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
23
3.6k
Designing for Performance
lara
610
69k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.4k
Transcript
tracing for granularity JBD, Google (@rakyll)
@rakyll
@rakyll tracing? What is tracing and why do we trace?
@rakyll
@rakyll clogged?
@rakyll leaking?
@rakyll path and direction?
@rakyll 100% availability (is a lie)
“ @rakyll A service is available if users cannot tell
there was an outage.
@rakyll Without an SLO, your team has no principled way
of saying what level of downtime is acceptable. • Error rate • Latency or throughput expectations Service Level Objectives (SLOs)
@rakyll 28 ms 100 ms 172 ms 56 ms 356
ms what user sees what else we can see sec.Check auth.AccessToken cache.Lookup spanner.Query GET /messages
@rakyll 182 ms 56 ms 245 ms what user sees
what else we can see sec.Check auth.AccessToken GET /messages 7 ms cache.Lookup
@rakyll latency...
@rakyll Go is the language to write servers. Many runtime
activities occur during the program execution: • scheduling • memory allocation • garbage collection Hard to associate a request with its impact on the runtime.
@rakyll clogged?
“ @rakyll There is no easy way to tell why
latency is high for certain requests. Is it due to GC, scheduler or syscalls? Can you review the code and tell us why? -SRE
@rakyll Execution tracer $ go tool trace • Reports fine-grained
runtime events in the lifetime of a goroutine. • Reports utilization of CPU cores. But cannot easily tell how handling a request impacts the runtime.
@rakyll 28 ms 100 ms 172 ms 56 ms 356
ms GET /messages auth.AccessToken cache.Lookup spanner.Query GET /messages
@rakyll 5 68µs 8 123µs networking serialization + deserialization garbage
collection blocking syscall what actually happens 172 ms auth.AccessToken
@rakyll 5 68µs 8 123µs epoll executing sys gc netwrite
@rakyll How? • Mark sections in code using runtime/trace. •
Enable execution tracer temporarily and record data. • Examine the recorded data.
@rakyll Go 1.11 introduces... • User regions, tasks and annotations.
• Association between user code and runtime. • Association with distributed traces.
@rakyll Go 1.11 runtime/trace import “runtime/trace” ctx, task := trace.NewTask(ctx,
“myHandler”) defer task.End() // Handler code here....
@rakyll region #1 task #1 Go 1.11 runtime/trace region #2
region #3 region #4 region #5 goroutine #1 goroutine #4 goroutine #5
@rakyll import _ "net/http/pprof" go func() { log.Println(http.ListenAndServe("localhost:6060", nil)) }()
@rakyll $ curl http://server:6060/debug/pprof/trace?seconds=5 -o trace.out $ go tool trace
trace.out 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Parsing trace... 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Splitting trace... 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Opening browser. Trace viewer is listening on http://127.0.0.1:51803
Execution tracer tasks for RPCs (/usertasks)
Execution tracer tasks for RPCs (/usertasks)
RPCs overlapping with garbage collection
Execution tracer regions (/userregions)
Region summary for conn.ready
@rakyll Record in production $ curl http://server/debug/pprof/trace?seconds=5 -o trace.out $
go tool trace trace.out
@rakyll Try It! Install the Go 1.11 beta1! golang.org/dl
@rakyll $ go get go.opencensus.io/trace import rt “runtime/trace” ctx, span
:= trace.StartSpan(ctx, “/messages”) defer span.End() rt.WithRegion(ctx, “foo”, func(ctx) { // Do something... })
@rakyll Limitations • Execution tracer cannot do accounting for cross-goroutine
operations automatically. • Exposition format is hard to parse if `go trace tool` is not used.
thank you! JBD, Google
[email protected]
@rakyll