Lock in $30 Savings on PRO—Offer Ends Soon! ⏳
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Node conf ar 2018.
Search
Willian Martins
October 19, 2018
Technology
0
600
Node conf ar 2018.
Willian Martins
October 19, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Willian Martins
See All by Willian Martins
Empirical Observations on the The Future of Scalable UI Architecture
wmsbill
0
150
Além do else! Categorizando Pokemóns com Pattern Matching no JavaScript
wmsbill
0
870
De volta ao Futuro do JS: As próximas features e propostas incríveis
wmsbill
0
100
Back to the future of JS II: Beyond what we can foresee
wmsbill
0
130
A, B, C. 1, 2, 3. Iterables you and me.
wmsbill
0
98
Back to the future of JS II: Beyond what we can foresee
wmsbill
0
120
Back to the future of JS.
wmsbill
0
11
Back to the future of JS
wmsbill
1
81
Back to the future of JS
wmsbill
2
280
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
打 造 A I 驅 動 的 G i t H u b ⾃ 動 化 ⼯ 作 流 程
appleboy
0
350
非CUDAの悲哀 〜Claude Code と挑んだ image to 3D “Hunyuan3D”を EVO-X2(Ryzen AI Max+395)で動作させるチャレンジ〜
hawkymisc
2
200
MySQLとPostgreSQLのコレーション / Collation of MySQL and PostgreSQL
tmtms
1
230
re:Invent2025 3つの Frontier Agents を紹介 / introducing-3-frontier-agents
tomoki10
0
230
文字列の並び順 / Unicode Collation
tmtms
3
610
チーリンについて
hirotomotaguchi
6
2k
WordPress は終わったのか ~今のWordPress の制作手法ってなにがあんねん?~ / Is WordPress Over? How We Build with WordPress Today
tbshiki
1
810
プロンプトやエージェントを自動的に作る方法
shibuiwilliam
13
11k
「図面」から「法則」へ 〜メタ視点で読み解く現代のソフトウェアアーキテクチャ〜
scova0731
0
320
2025年 開発生産「可能」性向上報告 サイロ解消からチームが能動性を獲得するまで/ 20251216 Naoki Takahashi
shift_evolve
PRO
1
200
AIの長期記憶と短期記憶の違いについてAgentCoreを例に深掘ってみた
yakumo
4
410
AIプラットフォームにおけるMLflowの利用について
lycorptech_jp
PRO
1
170
Featured
See All Featured
Context Engineering - Making Every Token Count
addyosmani
9
530
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
120
6.5k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
6.8k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
340
57k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
135
9.7k
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
269
13k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.6k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
120k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
659
61k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1371
200k
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
194
17k
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
190
11k
Transcript
¡Hola!
https://github.com/tc39/proposals
v. NodeConf Ar
@wmsbill What is this?
@wmsbill this in the global scope Browser - window Web
worker - self NodeJS - module.exports
@wmsbill this inside a function?
@wmsbill this inside a function?
@wmsbill What is this?
@wmsbill What is this?
@wmsbill this inside a function Browser - window NodeJS -
global object
@wmsbill this with new operator
@wmsbill this with new operator
@wmsbill this with strict mode
@wmsbill this with strict mode
@wmsbill Setting this value Function.prototype.call Function.prototype.apply Function.prototype.bind new operator Object
member function
@wmsbill Setting this value
@wmsbill How to make this predictable? Reasoning the value of
this is tricky Function.prototype.bind Arrow function () => {}
None
With .bind()
With Arrow
@wmsbill Calling a knowing function
@wmsbill Extracting a method from an object
None
@wmsbill Two syntaxes Unary : :context.method() Binary context: :method()
@wmsbill Unary syntax
@wmsbill Binary syntax
@wmsbill
@wmsbill
@wmsbill
@wmsbill Bind operator is good for virtual methods But relies
on this to be bound
@wmsbill Composing without this
@wmsbill
@wmsbill
None
@wmsbill Pipeline operator |> It is a syntax sugar for
function composition It creates a way to streamline a chain of functions
@wmsbill Pipeline operator |>
@wmsbill
@wmsbill
@wmsbill
@wmsbill Function with more params
@wmsbill Function with more params
@wmsbill Awaiting a function
@wmsbill Awaiting a function
@wmsbill Awaiting a function
@wmsbill Awaiting a function
@wmsbill Awaiting a function
None
@wmsbill Smart pipeline
@wmsbill Smart pipeline Two types bare style and topic style
() or [] are disallowed in bare style When () or [] is needed, topic style is used # token is subject to change
@wmsbill What about curry?
None
@wmsbill F# pipeline proposal Extends the minimal proposal with an
await step Await step waits for the resolution of the previous step
@wmsbill F# pipeline proposal
@wmsbill
@wmsbill Partial application f(…) arity = n; partialapp(f(…)) arity =
m; m < n
@wmsbill
@wmsbill
@wmsbill Partial application in ES Achievable by Function.prototype.bind .bind() binds
context and parameters
@wmsbill
@wmsbill What about currying? We can achieve partial application with
curry Curry ≠ Partial application Curry returns arity n-1
@wmsbill
@wmsbill Partial application with arrow function
None
@wmsbill Partial application proposal Creates two new parameters tokens ?
For single argument . . . for multiple parameters (not in the initial spec anymore)
@wmsbill Partial application syntax
@wmsbill With arbitrary parameter
None
@wmsbill Partial application in template string
@wmsbill Partial application in template string
None
@wmsbill The . . . token Spread the unbound parameters
Useful when you want to bound first or last parameter
@wmsbill The . . . token
@wmsbill The . . . token
@wmsbill Partial application + pipeline
@wmsbill Partial application + pipeline
@wmsbill Should I use all of it in production? These
proposal are in very early stage The adoption of one, may change the syntax/semantics of other Not production ready (yet)
https://medium.com/@wmsbill https://twitter.com/wmsbill
[email protected]
https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/10/taming-this-javascript-bind- operator/
¡Gracias!