Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Dr. Greenwell Matchaya: Data Challenges and Op...

AKADEMIYA2063
December 06, 2023
28

Dr. Greenwell Matchaya: Data Challenges and Opportunities for Food Systems Transformation in Africa

African Food Systems Transformation and the Post-Malabo Agenda

AKADEMIYA2063

December 06, 2023
Tweet

More Decks by AKADEMIYA2063

Transcript

  1. Senior International Researcher & ReSAKSS-ESA Lead, IWMI DATA CHALLENGES AND

    OPPORTUNITIES FOR FOOD SYSTEMS TRANSFORMATION IN AFRICA Dr. Greenwell Matchaya Based on Matchaya, Makombe and Mihaylova, 2023
  2. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Outline • Introduction • Data Requirements for Food

    Systems • Selected Data Initiatives and Databases and Their Strengths and Limitations • Key Food Systems Data Gaps and Challenges • Key Messages and Recommendations
  3. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Introduction and Objectives • Food systems are defined

    as the range of all actors and interactions along the food value chain— • From input supply and production to transportation, processing, retailing, wholesaling, and • preparation of foods, consumption, and disposal as well as the enabling policy environments and cultural norms pertaining to food (IFPRI, 2023). • Food systems transformation entails moving food system outcomes from a suboptimal state to a more optimal state • by having food system actors adapt their activities in response to changing policy signals (Ingram and Thornton 2022) • and thus help to ensure sustainable and resilient livelihoods and healthy, safe, nutritious, and affordable diets. • African food systems began to transform during the last decade in response to; • Higher agricultural productivity growth, rising per capita incomes, a growing middle class, and rapid urbanization; • Changes in food consumption patterns (dietary transformation) • and the growth of small and medium enterprises operating in downstream and midstream segments of food supply chains such as processing and distribution (Tschirley, Haggblade, and Reardon 2014; Reardon et al. 2015). • Transforming food systems requires a change in mindsets and in the behavior of food system actors as they adapt their food system activities and as they assess or reassess food system policies.
  4. • Transformation will require that data and analytics are available

    and accessible to drive innovation and guide decision- making by food system actors and across all food system activities, components, sectors, policies, and outcome areas (Nguyen 2018). • Sustainable food systems transformation demands timely, high-quality, and reliable data and analytics that span the entire food system to: • (1) inform adaptation of food system activities by food system actors; • (2) guide shared agendas, goals, and performance indicators around food systems; • (3) enable evidence-based design, coherence, coordination, implementation, assessment, and reform of food system policies; and • (4) guide review, dialogue, learning, monitoring, mutual accountability processes, and performance assessments of the transformation, including progress toward attaining desired outcomes. • However, the extent of data availability and gaps in data to inform food systems transformation remains an understudied area • Against this background, this chapter seeks to • (1) highlight the importance of timely and high-quality data for food systems transformation; • (2) examine the main data needs for food systems transformation; • (3) assess selected current data efforts in relation to food systems transformation needs; • (4) highlight data gaps, challenges, and opportunities in relation to food systems transformation; and • (5) provide recommendations for closing data gaps, addressing challenges, and harnessing opportunities in order to improve data for decision-making in food systems transformation.
  5. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Data Requirements for Food System action tracks and

    levers of change Action tracks Levers of change Access to safe and nutritious food for all Shift to sustainable consumption patterns Boost nature- positive production Advance equitable livelihoods Build resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks, and stress Human rights Gender equality and women’s empowerment Finance Innovation Access to nutrition information Prevalence of under-/over- nutrition Access to nutritious food Share of vegetables and fruits in diet Cost of a healthy diet Diet quality Nutrient supply and demand Food safety Food waste Postharvest food losses Affordability Sustainability of diets Food environment and policies Emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture Forest land being deforested for agriculture Food loss across supply chain Regeneration of ecosystems Biodiversity and habitat index Gene banks Water footprint of foodstuffs and commodities Income inequality Gap between farmgate price and wholesale price Gender equity Women’s empowerment Employment equity groups Wage equity Land tenure and security Water access Access to markets Storage infrastructure Social protection Financial inclusion Household resilience capacity Risk distribution by gender Access to macro- and microcredit financial services Government social security budget Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND-GAIN) Country Index Food production diversity Incidences of storm surges, floods, droughts, and disease Poverty and unemployment School enrollment Crop and livestock insurance Presence of food systems– related governance bodies and mechanisms Political governance indexes Transparency indexes Corruption indexes Land laws and institutions Coordination among government systems Skills in food systems Share of women empowered in agriculture (Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index) Youth as a share of population Youth in agriculture Gender inequality Share of youth in high-value value chains (e.g., macadamia nuts, cashew nuts, cotton, tea, coffee, ornamental plants, and others) Financial inclusion for food system players Share with access to finance Share with bank accounts Share with access to microfinance Loan availability Share of public spending on agriculture Agriculture foreign direct investment Agricultural patents Shares of improved crop varieties and livestock breeds in circulation Investment in leadership, technology, and human resource capability Investment in mechanization of production Scaling up of sustainable technologies such as cold chain Investment in nutritious dietary options
  6. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Indicators for food system outcomes, activities, and drivers

    Food system outcomes Food system activities Food system drivers Social welfare Food security Environmental security Production processing packaging distribution and retailing Food consumption Biophysical drivers Socioeconomic drivers Natural drivers Agricultural income per capita Employment rates Inequality Wealth Social capital Human capital Political capital Over-/under- nutrition Women-managed farm share Share of food income to women Share of women working in high- value crops Life expectancy Disease prevalence Food availability Amount of food production Amount of food trade Dietary diversity Food access Price of food Cost of a healthy diet Inequality in food access Share of land with fruits Share of land with vegetables Food security Food utilization Nutritional value; Proportion who consume nutritious foods Food safety Ecosystem flows Ecosystem stocks Ecosystem services available Access to natural capital Natural resources Inputs Fertilizer per hectare Labor productivity Land productivity Share of expenditure on agriculture Technology Agriculture patents, breeds, and varieties Irrigation Subsidies to agriculture Market systems Raw material availability Quality standards Storage infrastructure Labeling and tracing Strategic grain reserves Supply chain robustness Electricity availability and access Processing capacity Share with electricity Postharvest technology Food waste and loss Transport infrastructure Marketing boards / mechanisms Advertising prevalence Status of value chain development and transport networks Efficiency of food distribution systems Postharvest technology Food waste and loss Acquisition ease Preparation ease Nutrition content Food and nutrition education Food losses Food waste Access to a nutrient- adequate diet Cost of a healthy diet Land cover and soils Atmospheric composition Water availability and quality Climate variability Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND- GAIN) Country Index Nutrient availability and recycling Biodiversity Temperature changes Floods Agriculture subsidies Demographics Incomes Inequality Sociopolitical context Cultural context Science and technology Input markets Storage and transport infrastructure Farming practices Agriculture productivity Gender differences Agriculture research spending Policy environment Volcanoes Solar cycles Floods Droughts Pests and diseases
  7. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Highlights of Strengths and Weaknesses of popular Databases

    and Initiatives Data initiative / database Highlights of Strengths Highlights of Limitations FAOSTAT • Comprehensive in coverage of agriculture Statistics • Regular update of data • Strong in production and weak in data on other nodes of the value chain 50x30 Initiative • helps countries to produce high-quality data on the agricultural • Does not cover the entire food system Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) • Many relevant socioeconomic and demographic indicators • Limited country coverage Africa Information Highway • Covers all African countries • Some areas not covered, eg , for example, commodity transformation, transport, and retail National Statistics Office Databases • Considered as credible sources • most comprehensive in terms of indicators covered • Updates often hampered by public budgets • Often don’t cover other indicators on the value chain The Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics • Helps in production of high-quality official agricultural statistics in the countries, by training the NSOs and the line ministries • Not a database but an initiative- no data Dashboards • present complex and large amounts of data and easy-to-digest format • Many dashboards –harmonized- create confusion World Bank WDI Databases • Largest databases with internationally comparable data on development covering many countries • Data availability remains a challenge, especially in poor countries and for data that rely on household surveys CAADP- Related Databases • Broad set of indicators relevant for food system • Data quality issues, gaps
  8. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Selected Data Initiatives and Databases Coverage and limitations

    from a food systems perspective Data initiative / database Indicators not expressly covered FAOSTAT • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Financial inclusion; Food processing and packaging; Nutrition 50x30 Initiative • Agro-processing; Nutrition; Transportation ; Food security ; Nutritious diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food consumption ; Food waste Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss Africa Information Highway • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging’; Food distribution and retailing; Food consumption; Food waste and loss Côte d’Ivoire National Institute of Statistics • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss Egypt Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss Ghana Statistical Service • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss Malawi National Statistical Office • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss Mozambique National Institute of Statistics • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss Rwanda National Institute of Statistics • Agro-processing ; Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss International Debt Statistics • Agro-processing ; Transportation Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss; Nutrition Africa Development Indicators • Agro-processing Transportation ; Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss; Nutrition World Bank WDI Databases • Agro-processing ; Transportation Food and diet information; Food processing and packaging; Food distribution and retailing; Food waste and loss CAADP- Related Databases • Agro-processing; Food processing packaging; Food storage; Transportation; Food distribution and retailing
  9. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR • Many databases and initiatives • But none

    present all data needed • Each has strengths and limitations • Need to encourage popularization of databases
  10. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Key Messages • Food systems are complex, and

    each food system comprises actors, policies, institutions, and players that constantly interact in the course of carrying out their activities across the food system. • They comprise levers and drivers of change, as well as activities across all nodes of the food value chain. • These levers and drivers of change influence food system activities to generate food system outcomes. • Transforming food systems toward desired outcomes requires timely and quality data to guide decision-making by food system actors and across all food system activities, drivers, transformation pathways, and outcomes. • There is enormous demand for a broad range of data across food system activities, components, drivers, transformation pathways, and outcomes. • While efforts are underway to improve data availability and accessibility, data for many relevant indicators critical to informing food systems transformation are simply not yet available.
  11. • For example, across many of the data initiatives and

    databases reviewed, data on food storage, processing, packaging, distribution and transportation, retailing, and food waste and loss are largely not available. • Gender- and sex-disaggregated data are also largely not available across existing data initiatives and databases. • In addition, the quality of data across the data initiatives and database has been constrained by inadequate technical and institutional capacity to collect and analyze data; • lack of rigorous methodologies; and institutional, political, and financial obstacles that limit data collection, analysis, and accessibility. • In some cases databases are not well maintained, data are not well disseminated, and data for some of the key food system elements (e.g., food security and nutrition) are updated at longer than desired time intervals. • The national databases for the selected countries considered in this chapter also do not cover food system components such as food processing, agro-processing, food loss, food waste, transportation, and women’s empowerment. • While some of these types of data can be sourced from international databases, key databases such as FAOSTAT, WDI, and the AfDB’s AIH are not without their own limitations.
  12. #2023ReSAKSS #2023ATOR Recommendations • • Track key food system indicators:

    • including the national food systems transformation pathways and the UNFSS action tracks, the levers of change, and the drivers of food systems, as well as the outcomes and activities of the food systems. • And since no single data initiative or database at present can provide all the data needed, there is need for those leading the food systems transformation agenda in countries to raise awareness within each country on the available sources of data on food systems. • • Develop common indicators for tracking: • the AUC should consider leading an effort to develop common indicators for tracking and transforming food systems, which African countries report on periodically. • Furthermore, indicators should be expressly assigned for each of the five action tracks identified by the UNFSS Scientific Group. • Promote coordination among food system data users and suppliers: • The national JSRs being established in some African countries provide platforms for better data prioritization and planning within the national statistical system. • The local analytical networks being set up by ReSAKSS in several countries are helping to link data suppliers and users by connecting decision-makers to researchers
  13. Recommendations II Invest in strengthening data capacities and tools: •

    need for governments and development partners to invest in strengthening institutional and technical capacity for data collection, analysis, and use. • Capacities need to be strengthened across the data value chain, from data prioritization, production, and curation to analysis, interpretation, and use as well as investing in state-of-the-art data methodologies and tools. • Increase funding for data gathering and management Embed food system data efforts in NSOs: • For sustainability and quality assurance it is essential to embed all data efforts around food systems within NSOs to enhance data coordination. Coordinate and harmonize data dashboards: • leverage digital technologies to support decision-making in a timely manner using interactive and accessible formats. • coordinate and harmonize the dashboards to leverage synergies and complementarities among them. • Data platforms should also leverage big data, including remote sensing data and artificial intelligence and machine learning, to improve food system data analysis and decision-making.