Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Move fast, don't break your API
Search
Amber Feng
September 30, 2014
Programming
18
53k
Move fast, don't break your API
Amber Feng
September 30, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Amber Feng
See All by Amber Feng
Pixels & Tactics
amfeng
1
9.9k
Building Stripe's API
amfeng
35
52k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
CSC307 Lecture 04
javiergs
PRO
0
650
AI & Enginnering
codelynx
0
110
Package Management Learnings from Homebrew
mikemcquaid
0
190
フルサイクルエンジニアリングをAI Agentで全自動化したい 〜構想と現在地〜
kamina_zzz
0
400
React 19でつくる「気持ちいいUI」- 楽観的UIのすすめ
himorishige
11
5.9k
AtCoder Conference 2025
shindannin
0
1k
インターン生でもAuth0で認証基盤刷新が出来るのか
taku271
0
190
CSC307 Lecture 07
javiergs
PRO
0
550
16年目のピクシブ百科事典を支える最新の技術基盤 / The Modern Tech Stack Powering Pixiv Encyclopedia in its 16th Year
ahuglajbclajep
5
980
CSC307 Lecture 08
javiergs
PRO
0
660
[KNOTS 2026登壇資料]AIで拡張‧交差する プロダクト開発のプロセス および携わるメンバーの役割
hisatake
0
240
Fragmented Architectures
denyspoltorak
0
140
Featured
See All Featured
Stewardship and Sustainability of Urban and Community Forests
pwiseman
0
110
Gemini Prompt Engineering: Practical Techniques for Tangible AI Outcomes
mfonobong
2
280
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
marcduiker
35
2.4k
Winning Ecommerce Organic Search in an AI Era - #searchnstuff2025
aleyda
0
1.8k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
We Are The Robots
honzajavorek
0
160
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
2.9k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
666
130k
Noah Learner - AI + Me: how we built a GSC Bulk Export data pipeline
techseoconnect
PRO
0
100
Mozcon NYC 2025: Stop Losing SEO Traffic
samtorres
0
140
The Curious Case for Waylosing
cassininazir
0
230
Building an army of robots
kneath
306
46k
Transcript
MOVE FAST, DON'T BREAK YOUR API AMBER FENG @amfeng
None
LET'S BUILD AN API!
post '/v1/charges' do card_number = params[:card_number] amount = params[:amount] charge
= create_charge(card_number, amount) json { id: charge.id, amount: charge.amount card_number: charge.redacted_card_number, success: charge.success } end
post '/v1/charges' do ... unless card_number.length == 16 return {error:
"Invalid card number."} end unless amount > 0 and amount <= CHARGE_MAX return {error: "Invalid amount."} end ... end
post '/v1/charges' do api_key = get_api_key user = User.find_by_key(api_key) unless
user return {error: "Invalid API key."} end ... end
curl https://stripe.com/v1/charges -u API_KEY -d card_number=4242424242424242 -d amount=100 => {
id: "ch_xxx", amount: 100, card_number: "*4242", success: true }
None
WHAT NEXT?
WHAT NEXT? MORE ENDPOINTS
WHAT NEXT? MORE ENDPOINTS MORE FUNCTIONALITY
WHAT NEXT? MORE ENDPOINTS MORE FUNCTIONALITY MORE CHANGES
WHAT NEXT? MORE ENDPOINTS MORE FUNCTIONALITY MORE CHANGES MORE PROBLEMS
LARGE, TANGLED CODEBASE
COPY-PASTA
ERROR-PRONE DEPENDENCIES
"CRAP, I FORGOT TO UPDATE THE DOCS!" — Everyone ever
HOW DO WE MAKE IT BETTER?
DESIGN FOR YOURSELF, TOO
SEPARATE DIFFERENT LAYERS OF LOGIC
Authentication Validation Endpoint-specific logic Constructing the response Error handling
Error handler Authenticator API logic
use ErrorHandler use Authenticator get '/v1/charges/:id' do user = env.user
id = params[:id] unless user.get_charge(id) raise UserError.new("No charge #{id}!") end end
APIMethods & APIResources
class ChargeCreateMethod < AbstractAPIMethod required :amount, :integer required :card_number, :string
resource ChargeAPIResource def execute create_charge(amount, card_number) end end
class ChargeAPIResource < AbstractAPIResource required :id, :string required :amount, :integer
required :card_number, :string required :success, :boolean def describe_card_number charge.redacted_card_number end end
post '/v1/charges' do APIMethod::ChargeCreateMethod.invoke end get '/v1/charges' do APIMethod::ChargeRetrieveMethod.invoke end
MAKE IT HARD TO MESS UP
class ChargeCreateMethod < AbstractAPIMethod required :amount, :integer required :card_number, :string
document :amount, "Amount, in cents." document :card_number, "The card number." ... end
HIDE BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
<todo: tweet>
def execute if !user.version_1? && params[:amount] raise UserError.new("Invalid param.") end
... if !user.version_1? response.delete(:amount) end end
GATES
- :version: 2014-09-24 :new_gates: - :gate: allows_amount :description: >- Sending
amount is now deprecated.
def execute if !user.gating(:allows_amount) && params[:amount] raise UserError.new("Invalid param.") end
... if !user.gating(:allows_amount) response.delete(:amount) end end
COMPATIBILITY LAYERS
Request compatibility API logic Construct API response Response compatibility
IN THE REAL WORLD
106 ENDPOINTS 65 VERSIONS 6 API CLIENTS
DESIGN FOR YOURSELF: SEPARATE LAYERS OF LOGIC MAKE IT HARD
TO MESS UP HIDE BACKWARDS COMPAT
WHAT ELSE?
NOT SURE. (WE'RE STILL FIGURING IT OUT AS WE GO.)
THANKS! (: @amfeng