Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
History of a Thriving Codebase
Search
Peter Brown
September 21, 2013
Technology
2
420
History of a Thriving Codebase
Given at VT Code Camp 2013
Peter Brown
September 21, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Peter Brown
See All by Peter Brown
Extinguish the Fire with Ember.js
beerlington
6
490
Introduction to ClassyEnum and Friends
beerlington
1
250
Lighting Up with Ember.js
beerlington
8
560
Networking Refactored
beerlington
1
110
Intro to Object Oriented Programming in Ruby
beerlington
10
1.1k
Responsible Metaprogramming in Rails
beerlington
3
780
BTVWAG Survey Results
beerlington
1
210
Behavior Driven Development
beerlington
2
930
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Strands Agents & Bedrock AgentCoreを1分でおさらい
minorun365
PRO
6
290
Jamf Connect ZTNAとMDMで実現! 金融ベンチャーにおける「デバイストラスト」実例と軌跡 / Kyash Device Trust
rela1470
1
190
Intro to Software Startups: Spring 2025
arnabdotorg
0
230
o11yツールを乗り換えた話
tak0x00
2
840
大規模イベントに向けた ABEMA アーキテクチャの遍歴 ~ Platform Strategy 詳細解説 ~
nagapad
0
210
Rubyの国のPerlMonger
anatofuz
3
730
【CEDEC2025】『Shadowverse: Worlds Beyond』二度目のDCG開発でゲームをリデザインする~遊びやすさと競技性の両立~
cygames
PRO
1
340
Lambda management with ecspresso and Terraform
ijin
2
160
僕たちが「開発しやすさ」を求め 模索し続けたアーキテクチャ #アーキテクチャ勉強会_findy
bengo4com
0
2.3k
Foundation Model × VisionKit で実現するローカル OCR
sansantech
PRO
1
340
2025新卒研修・HTML/CSS #弁護士ドットコム
bengo4com
3
13k
VLMサービスを用いた請求書データ化検証 / SaaSxML_Session_1
sansan_randd
0
240
Featured
See All Featured
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
1.3k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
8
880
The MySQL Ecosystem @ GitHub 2015
samlambert
251
13k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
337
57k
Gamification - CAS2011
davidbonilla
81
5.4k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
431
65k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
117
6.3k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
95
14k
Exploring the Power of Turbo Streams & Action Cable | RailsConf2023
kevinliebholz
34
6k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
411
22k
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
73
5k
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
90
590k
Transcript
History of a Thriving Codebase VT Code Camp 2013
into the great wide open
my inspiration
Why version control?
collaborate • Work asynchronously • Reduce friction in teams •
Github was built around collaboration
Communicate • Poor communication causes project failure • Git helps
reduce effort to share ideas and build features
experiment • Experimentation is part of developer happiness • Git
encourages us to experiment via branches
gain Confidence • We need to be confident that things
will work far into the future • Git allows us to adapt to changing requirements
safety net • We make lots of mistakes • Git
allows us to gracefully recover
What is code history?
code History • A series of changes • Story about
how the code evolved • Lasts forever • Searchable • Never outdated
a series of Changes
a series of commits Last Commit
a series of commits
• SHA (unique identifier) • Snapshot / Set of changes
• Description • Date and time • Author • Other details (parents, etc) What is a commit
fixing typos
refactoring code
documentation
a new feature
Clean history
recording history
recording history
why record history? Learn from the past Adapt to the
future
but first a story...
FFFFFuuuuuuuuuu
What is clean history? • Production commits • Every commit
has meaning • Every commit adds value • Most commits are complete features, bug fixes, or refactors
reducing complexity KISS YAGNI DRY
why clean history? • Easier to track down why changes
were made • Easier to track down bugs and revert changes • Required in some OSS projects • Easier to backport changes
three types of commits • Progress commits • Merge commits
• Production commits
three types of commits • Progress commits • Merge commits
• Production commits History Not History
Progress commits • Used to develop a feature • Always
in a new branch • Track progress • Short-term safety net • Mutable and not permanent • Ok if tests are failing
Merge commits • Represent when a branch is merged •
Can be useful • Not required (fast forward merges)
Production Commits • Master branch • Tagged (sometimes) • “Immutable”
and “permanent” • These are your history • Tests should not be failing
crafting a commit message • git commit -v (verbose) •
Start with a short summary • Follow with a description of why the commit exists
short summary (<= 50 chars) describe “why” (72 column wrap)
tools for a clean history
branching
“we need a feature”
“Let’s branch first!”
“pick a descriptive name”
git branch git branch my_branch git checkout my_branch or... git
checkout -b my_branch
“now what?”
merge, delete, repeat git checkout master git merge my_branch git
branch -d my_branch (delete)
Branching protips • Always Be Branching • Use a descriptive
name • Reduce longevity of branches • Clean up when you’re done • Keep changes to a minimum
how do i maintain clean history with branches?
Rewriting history
ways to rewrite history • Amending commits • Rebasing •
Interactive Rebasing • Resetting
types of rebasing • git rebase master my_branch • git
rebase --onto master br1 br2 • git pull --rebase origin master • git rebase -i origin/master
rebasing Master Feature Branch
rebasing Master Feature Branch
rebasing Feature Branch Master
Squashing Commits Master Squashed Commits
squashing commits • Understand why you are squashing the commits
(is it a single feature, bug fix, etc?) • git fetch (to get master from origin) • git rebase -i origin/master
git log --oneline master..convert-hashes
git rebase -i origin/master
reword & fixup
None
None
After Before git log --oneline master..convert-hashes
rebasing protips • Always fetch before rebasing • Never rebase
a branch someone has based work off • Prolong squashing as long as possible • Don’t be discouraged
isn’t that dangerous?
how does it all fit together?
My workflows • Years of changing workflows • Started centralized
(subversion style) • Evolved to feature and release focus
general workflow • Create branch • Write code and commit
it • Open pull request (code review) • Squash commits (if needed) • Merge & tag • Ship it™
two types of workflows • Feature branch centric • Release
centric
feature workflow • Focused on branches for development • Master
== Production • Ideal for small projects, early development • Easy to introduce to new teams
feature workflow cont. •Branch from master • Write code •
Open pull request (code review) •Merge to master • Test in staging environment • Ship it™
feature workflow cont. Master
feature workflow cont. Master Feature Branch
feature workflow cont. Master Feature Branch
feature workflow cont. Master
release workflow • Also called “gitflow” • Centralized around tagged
releases • Ideal for larger projects, enterprise development • More complicated than feature branch workflow
release workflow Cont. • Introduces “development” and “release” branches •
Branch from development branch • Merge into development branch • Merge development into release • Tag it
release workflow cont. courtesy atlassian.com
clean history workflow • Every merge/tag has meaning • Every
merge/tag adds value • All merges/tags are complete features, bug fixes, or refactors
what can we do with a clean history?
Search commits
Search by message git log -p --grep "wtf"
Search by message
search by content git log -p -S 'wtf'
search by author git log -p --author='beerlington'
search by author
Search by date git log -p --since=2013-01-01 git log -p
--until=2013-09-01 or... Combine them!
track down bugs
git bisect Broken X
git bisect Bad Good ✓ X
git bisect Bad Good ? X ✓
git bisect Bad Good X ✓
git bisect Bad Good X ✓ ?
git bisect Bad Good X ✓ X
git bisect X X ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
git bisect • Determine how to verify the bug •
Find commit before bug was introduced • Find commit after bug was introduced • git bisect
git bisect
git bisect
git bisect
git bisect
git bisect protips • Automate with “run” option • The
cleaner the history, the easier and faster it is to bisect • git bisect visualize can show where you are in the process
who broke the build?
who broke the build?
How can I fix the code?
git blame git blame path/to/file git blame -L start,stop path/to/file
git blame
github blame
Gitk gitk path/to/file
git blame protips • Focus on why, not who •
Blame doesn’t fix bugs or ship code
what if something goes wrong?
amending commits
a wild typo appears :(
git commit --amend
reverting commits
which commit?
git revert xxxxx
git revert protips • Always write a good commit message
describing why the commit is being reverted. • Better for public commits than rebasing
restoring commits
git reflog • Records when tip of branches are updated
• Reset to, checkout or cherry-pick a commit to recover it
git reflog --date=relative Rebase began here
my commits! git cherry-pick acb1ffc (individual commits) or git reset
--hard af12217 (full recovery)
reflog protips • Git periodically purges the reflog • Only
available on local system (not distributed) • Commit early and often
"Clean history always looks like it was written by someone
who cares."
Resources https://www.atlassian.com/git/ http://try.github.io http://git-scm.com/docs/gittutorial
Thanks! @beerlington beerlington.com