Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Monads you've already put in production (withou...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Tejas Dinkar
October 10, 2014
Technology
1.2k
1
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Monads you've already put in production (without knowing it)
Tejas Dinkar
October 10, 2014
More Decks by Tejas Dinkar
See All by Tejas Dinkar
Quick Wins for Page Speed
gja
0
160
Progressive Web Apps In Clojure(Script)
gja
4
2.5k
Lightning - Monads you already use (without knowing it)
gja
1
430
Native Extensions Served 3 Ways
gja
0
390
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
ZOZOTOWNの進化と信頼性を両立する負荷試験
zozotech
PRO
2
160
SREとQA 二人三脚で進めるSLO運用/sre-qa-slo
sugitak
0
490
ADDF - ループエンジニアリングするフレームワークを作ったら/I Didn't Set Out to Build Loop Engineering, But ADDF Did
fruitriin
0
120
cccccc
moznion
0
1.9k
End-to-Endで考える信頼性 —LINEアプリにおけるクライアント開発×SRE連携の実践
maruloop
4
4.1k
SRE依存からの脱却 運用を開 発チームへ移す、 フルサイ クル開 発体制の実践
joooee0000
0
2.7k
“それは自分の仕事じゃない"を越えて行け
yuukiyo
0
170
SRE本の知られざる名シーン / The Hidden Gems of Google SRE Book
nari_ex
1
380
型は壁、Rustでもバグを直すな、表現できなくせよ
nwiizo
13
2k
凡エンジニアがこの先生きのこるためには。〜TypeScript完全に理解したい〜
alchemy1115
2
180
AIと共生する開発者プラットフォーム:バクラクのモノレポ×マイクロサービス基盤
sakajunquality
2
3.5k
AI時代の開発生産性は、個人技からチーム設計へ
moongift
PRO
2
260
Featured
See All Featured
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
348
40k
Heart Work Chapter 1 - Part 1
lfama
PRO
8
36k
The AI Search Optimization Roadmap by Aleyda Solis
aleyda
1
6k
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
128
56k
Lightning Talk: Beautiful Slides for Beginners
inesmontani
PRO
2
600
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
133
19k
Applied NLP in the Age of Generative AI
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.4k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
163
24k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
413
23k
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
191
11k
KATA
mclloyd
PRO
35
15k
Google's AI Overviews - The New Search
badams
0
1.1k
Transcript
Monads you are already using in prod Tejas Dinkar nilenso
about.me • Hi, I’m Tejas • Nilenso: Partner • twitter:
tdinkar • github: gja
Serious Pony
Online Abuse
Trouble at the Koolaid Point http://seriouspony.com/trouble-at-the-koolaid-point/ https://storify.com/adriarichards/telling-my-troll-story-because- kathy-sierra-left-t
If you think you understand Monads, you don't understand Monads.
None
This talk is inaccurate and will make a mathematician cry
None
Goal of this talk For you to say “Oh yeah,
I’ve used that hack”
None
Monads • Programmable Semicolons • Used to hide plumbing away
from you • You can say Monads in almost any sentence and people will think you are smart
None
Values Value
Monads Value Box
Mysore Masala Monad M onad Value
Monads Value Box
Monads • Monads define two functions • return takes a
value and puts it in a box • bind takes a box & function f, returning f(value) • it is expected that the function returns a box
Value Value Another Value Value Function return bind
Our Function Signatures Value f(value)
Some math (√4) + 5
Some math (√4) + 5 3 or 7!
Value 4
Monad [4]
[alive, dead]
ruby! x = [1, 2, 3] y = x.map {
|x| x + 1 } # y = [2, 3, 4]
return Value Value return
return def m_return(x) [x] end # m_return(4) => [4]
The functions Value f(value)
Square Root fn def sqrt(x) s = Math.sqrt(x) [s, -s]
end # sqrt(4) => [2, -2]
Increment Fn def inc_5(x) [x + 5] end # inc_5(1)
=> [6]
Bind Functions Another Value Value Function bind
Bind Function x = m_return(4) y = x.????? { |p|
sqrt(p) } # I want [-2, 2]
Bind Function x = m_return(4) y = x.map {|p| sqrt(p)
} # y => [[2, -2]] # ^—— Box in a box?
Bind Function x = m_return(4) y = x.mapcat {|p| sqrt(p)
} # y => [2, -2]
Putting it together m_return(4) .mapcat {|p| sqrt(p)} .mapcat {|p| inc_5(p)}
# => [3, 7]
You have invented the List Monad, used to model non-determinism
Congrats
Turtles all the way down
A small constraint • Let’s do a bit of a
self imposed constraint on this • Functions must return either 0 or 1 elements • (we’ll only model positive integers here)
return - stays the same
bind - stays the same x = m_return(4) y =
x.mapcat { |p| inc_5(p) } # y => 9
Square Root Fn def sqrt(x) if (x < 0) return
[] #error else [Math.sqrt(x)] end end # sqrt(4) => [2] # sqrt(-1) => []
Describe in English There is a list passed to each
step Maybe this list has just one element, or Maybe it has none
None
The Maybe Monad • The intent is to short circuit
computation • The value of the `box’ is None, or Just(Value) • You can think of it as a type-safe nil / null
try def try(x, f) if x == nil return f(x)
else return nil end end # 4.try { |x| x + 5 } => 9 # nil.try {|x| x + 5 } => nil
None
Let’s start over • The Monad Laws • Left Identity
• Right Identity • Associativity
Left Identity m_return(a).bind(f) == f(a)
Right Identity m.bind(m_return) == m
Associativity m.bind(f).bind(g) == m.bind(x -> f(x).bind(g))
Store Computation
The State Monad • Rest of the world - State
Machine (sorta) • The value inside the box f(state) => [r new-state] • Particularly useful in pure languages like Haskell • Let’s build a stack
The functions Value f(value)
The functions (f(value) state) [new-value, new-state]
push def push(val) lambda { |state| new_state = state.push(val) [value,
new_state] } end
pop def pop() lambda { |state| val = state.pop() [val,
state] } end
def double_top() lambda { |state| top = state.pop() [2 *
top, state.push(2*top)] } end double_top
return def m_return(x) lambda { |state| [x, state] } end
bind def bind(mv, f) lambda { |state| v, temp_state =
mv(state) state_fn = f(v) state_fn(temp_state) } end
example # Not working code ! m_return(4) .bind(a -> push(a))
.bind(b -> push(b + 1)) .bind(c -> double_top()) .bind(d -> sum_top2()) .bind(e -> pop())
None
Associativity m.bind(f).bind(g) == m.bind(x => f(x).bind(g))
turn this # Not working code ! m_return(4) .bind(a ->
push(a)) .bind(b -> push(b + 1)) .bind(c -> double_top()) .bind(d -> sum_top2()) .bind(e -> pop())
into this m_return(4) .bind(a -> push(a) .bind(b -> push(b +
1) .bind(c -> double_top() .bind(d -> sum_top() .bind(e -> pop())))))
done with ruby
imagine # Not working code state_monad { a <- m_return(4)
b <- push(a) c <- push(b + 1) d <- double_top() e <- sum_top2() pop() }
Back to List m_return(4) .mapcat {|p| sqrt(p)} .mapcat {|p| inc_5(p)}
# => [3, 7]
Back to List m_return(4) .mapcat {|a| sqrt(a) .mapcat {|b| inc_5(b)}}
# => [3, 7]
Back to List list_monad { a <- m_return(4) b <-
sqrt(a) c <- inc_5(b) c }
On to Clojure • this is an example from clojure.net
• the state is a vector containing every function we’ve called so far
(defn inc-s [x] (fn [state] [(inc x) (conj state :inc)]))
in clojure (defn inc-s [x] (fn [state] [(inc x) (conj
state :inc)])) (defn do-things [x] (domonad state-m [a (inc-s x) b (double-s a) c (dec-s b) d (dec-s c)] d)) ! ((do-things 7) []) => [14 [:inc :double :dec :dec]]
state monad in Clojure (defmonad state-m "Monad describing stateful computations.
The monadic values have the structure (fn [old-state] [result new-state])." [m-result (fn m-result-state [v] (fn [s] [v s])) m-bind (fn m-bind-state [mv f] (fn [s] (let [[v ss] (mv s)] ((f v) ss)))) ])
state monad in Haskell inc = state (\st -> let
st' = st +1 in (st’,st')) inc3 = do x <- inc y <- inc z <- inc return z
Finally, IO
IOMonad • rand-int(100) is non deterministic !
ay-yo
IOMonad • rand-int(100) is non deterministic • rand-int(100, seed =
42) is deterministic • monadic value: f(world) => [value, world-after-io]
IOMonad • puts() just `appends to a buffer’ in the
real world • How does gets() return different strings? • gets() returns a fixed value based on the `world’
Image Credits http://www.myfoodarama.com/2010/11/masala- dosa.html http://www.clojure.net/2012/02/10/State/ http://www.cafepress.com/ +no_place_like_home_ruby_slippers_3x5_area_rug, 796646161 http://www.netizens-stalbans.co.uk/installs-and- upgrades.html.htm
http://www.hpcorporategroup.com/what-is-the-life- box.html
Thank You MANY QUESTIONS? VERY MONAD SO FUNCTIONAL Y NO
CLOJURE?
[email protected]
@tdinkar WOW WOW WOW MUCH EASY SUPER SIMPLE