Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
PyNNDescent: Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbors...
Search
Leland McInnes
July 16, 2021
Programming
0
1k
PyNNDescent: Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbors with Numba
A PDF version of slides for my SciPy 2021 talk on PyNNDescent.
Leland McInnes
July 16, 2021
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Leland McInnes
See All by Leland McInnes
Word and Document Embeddings
lmcinnes
0
140
Topological Data Analysis
lmcinnes
1
320
Ensemble Topic Modelling
lmcinnes
1
450
Learning Topology: topological methods for unsupervised learning
lmcinnes
2
3.5k
A Guide to Dimension Reduction
lmcinnes
3
1.3k
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
lmcinnes
2
2.5k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
なんでRustの環境構築してないのにRust製のツールが動くの? / Why Do Rust-Based Tools Run Without a Rust Environment?
ssssota
13
42k
3年ぶりにコードを書いた元CTOが Claude Codeと30分でMVPを作った話
maikokojima
0
630
contribution to astral-sh/uv
shunsock
0
530
Claude Agent SDK を使ってみよう
hyshu
0
1.4k
Developer Joy - The New Paradigm
hollycummins
1
360
登壇は dynamic! な営みである / speech is dynamic
da1chi
0
360
CSC509 Lecture 07
javiergs
PRO
0
240
TFLintカスタムプラグインで始める Terraformコード品質管理
bells17
2
360
技術的負債の正体を知って向き合う
irof
0
230
When Dependencies Fail: Building Antifragile Applications in a Fragile World
selcukusta
0
110
Server Side Kotlin Meetup vol.16: 内部動作を理解して ハイパフォーマンスなサーバサイド Kotlin アプリケーションを書こう
ternbusty
3
240
スマホから Youtube Shortsを見られないようにする
lemolatoon
27
34k
Featured
See All Featured
Fashionably flexible responsive web design (full day workshop)
malarkey
407
66k
Done Done
chrislema
185
16k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
46
2.5k
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
34
8.9k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
27k
Connecting the Dots Between Site Speed, User Experience & Your Business [WebExpo 2025]
tammyeverts
10
610
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
161
23k
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
72
11k
Side Projects
sachag
455
43k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
431
66k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
55
9.1k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
Transcript
Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbour Search with Numba
What are Nearest Neighbours?
Given a set of points with A distance measure between
them…
… and a new “query point” …
Find the closest points to the query point
Why Nearest Neighbors?
Nearest Neighbour computations are at the heart of many machine
learning algorithms
KNN-Classi fi ers KNN-Regressors
Clustering https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DBSCAN-Illustration.svg by Chire https://www. fl ickr.com/photos/trevorpatt/41875889652/in/photostream/ by Trevor Patt
HDBSCAN DBSCAN Single Linkage Clustering Spectral Clustering
Dimension Reduction http://lvdmaaten.github.io/tsne/ http://www-clmc.usc.edu/publications/T/tenenbaum-Science2000.pdf t-SNE Isomap Spectral Embedding UMAP
Recommender Systems Query Expansion
Why Approximate Nearest Neighbours?
Finding exact nearest neighbours is hard
Approximate nearest neighbour search trades accuracy for performance
How Do You Find Nearest Neighbors?
Using Trees
Hierarchically divide up the space into a tree
Bound the search using the tree structure (And the triangle
inequality)
KD-Tree
Ball Tree
Random Projection Tree
Using Graphs
How do you search for nearest neighbours of a query
using a graph? Malkov and Yashunin, 2018 Dong, Moses and Li, 2011 Iwasaki and Miyazaki, 2018
Start with a nearest neighbour graph of the training data
Assume we now want to fi nd neighbours of a query point
Choose a starting node in the graph (potentially randomly) as
a candidate node
None
Look at all nodes connected by an edge to the
best untried candidate node in the graph Add all these nodes to our potential candidate pool
None
Sort the candidate pool by closeness to the query point
Truncate the pool to the k best candidates
None
Return to the Expansion step unless we have already tried
all the candidates in the pool
Stop when there are no untried candidates in the pool
None
None
None
None
Looks inef fi cient Scales up well
None
Graph adapts to intrinsic dimension of the data
But how do we build the graph?!
The algorithm works (badly) even on a bad graph
Run one iteration of search for every node Update the
graph with new better neighbours Search is better on the improved graph
None
None
None
None
None
Perfect accuracy of neighbours is not assured We can get
an approximate knn-graph quickly
How Do You Make it Fast?
Algorithm tricks
Query node Expansion node Current neighbour
Neighbour A Neighbour B Common node
Hubs have a lot of neighbours!
None
None
Sample neighbours when constructing the graph Prune away edges before
performing searches
Necessary to fi nd green’s nearest neighbour Necessary to fi
nd blue’s nearest neighbour Not required since we can traverse through blue
For search remove the longest edges of any triangles in
the graph
Initialize with Random Projection Trees
Implementation tricks
None
Pro fi le and inspect llvm code for innermost functions
Type declarations and code choices can help the compiler a lot!
@numba.jit def euclidean(x, y): return np.sqrt(np.sum((x - y)**2)) Query benchmark
took 12s
@numba.jit(fastmath=True) def euclidean(x, y): result = 0.0 for i in
range(x.shape[0]): result += (x[i] - y[i])**2 return np.sqrt(result) Query benchmark took 8.5s
@numba.njit( numba.types.float32( numba.types.Array( numba.types.float32, 1, "C", readonly=True ), numba.types.Array( numba.types.float32,
1, "C", readonly=True ), ), fastmath=True, locals={ "result": numba.types.float32, "diff": numba.types.float32, "i": numba.types.uint16, }, ) def squared_euclidean(x, y): result = 0.0 dim = x.shape[0] for i in range(dim): diff = x[i] - y[i] result += diff * diff return result Query benchmark took 7.6s
Custom data structure implementations to help numba for often called
code
@numba.njit( "i4(f4[ :: 1],i4[ :: 1],f4,i4)", ) def simple_heap_push(priorities, indices,
p, n): ...
Numba has signi fi cant function call overhead with large
parameters Use closures over static data instead
@numba.njit() def frequently_called_function(param, large_readonly_data): ... val = access(large_readonly_data, param) ...
def create_frequently_called_function(large_readonly_data): @numba.njit() def closure(param): ... val = access(large_readonly_data, param) ... return closure
How Does it Compare?
Performance
We can test query performance using ann-benchmarks https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks
Consider the whole accuracy / performance trade-off space
vs
None
None
None
None
Caveats: •Newer algorithms and implementations •Hardware can makes a big
difference •No GPU support for pynndescent
Features
Out of the box support for a wide variety of
distance measures: Euclidean Cosine Hamming Manhattan Minkowski Chebyshev Jaccard Haversine Dice Wasserstein Hellinger Spearman Correlation Mahalanobis Canberra Bray-Curtis Angular TSSS +20 more measures https://towardsdatascience.com/9-distance-measures-in-data-science-918109d069fa By Maarten Grootendorst
Custom metrics in Python (using numba)
Support for sparse data
Drop-in replacement for sklearn KNeighborsTransformer
Summary
pip install pynndescent conda install pynndescent https://github.com/lmcinnes/pynndescent
[email protected]
@leland_mcinnes
Questions?
[email protected]
@leland_mcinnes