Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
0
100
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
270
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
580
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
87
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
360
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
200
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
110
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
110
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
390
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
240
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
ある日突然あなたが管理しているサーバーにDDoSが来たらどうなるでしょう?知ってるようで何も知らなかったDDoS攻撃と対策 #phpcon.2024
akase244
2
7.7k
ecspresso, ecschedule, lambroll を PipeCDプラグインとして動かしてみた (プロトタイプ) / Running ecspresso, ecschedule, and lambroll as PipeCD Plugins (prototype)
tkikuc
2
1.9k
ChatGPT とつくる PHP で OS 実装
memory1994
PRO
3
190
PSR-15 はあなたのための ものではない? - phpcon2024
myamagishi
0
410
Stackless и stackful? Корутины и асинхронность в Go
lamodatech
0
1.3k
Jaspr Dart Web Framework 박제창 @Devfest 2024
itsmedreamwalker
0
150
情報漏洩させないための設計
kubotak
5
1.3k
CQRS+ES の力を使って効果を感じる / Feel the effects of using the power of CQRS+ES
seike460
PRO
0
240
Fixstars高速化コンテスト2024準優勝解法
eijirou
0
190
20241217 競争力強化とビジネス価値創出への挑戦:モノタロウのシステムモダナイズ、開発組織の進化と今後の展望
monotaro
PRO
0
290
PHPUnitしか使ってこなかった 一般PHPerがPestに乗り換えた実録
mashirou1234
0
430
“あなた” の開発を支援する AI エージェント Bedrock Engineer / introducing-bedrock-engineer
gawa
6
560
Featured
See All Featured
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
427
64k
Optimising Largest Contentful Paint
csswizardry
33
3k
Adopting Sorbet at Scale
ufuk
74
9.2k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
46
7.2k
Agile that works and the tools we love
rasmusluckow
328
21k
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
356
29k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
176
9.5k
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
28
8.3k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
51
7.3k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
30
2.1k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
53
13k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
343
39k
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!