Upgrade to PRO for Only $50/Year—Limited-Time Offer! 🔥
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
0
130
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
410
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
830
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
120
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
400
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
260
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
170
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
150
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
500
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
280
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
AIコーディングエージェント(NotebookLM)
kondai24
0
220
Jetpack XR SDKから紐解くAndroid XR開発と技術選定のヒント / about-androidxr-and-jetpack-xr-sdk
drumath2237
1
190
Patterns of Patterns
denyspoltorak
0
300
Giselleで作るAI QAアシスタント 〜 Pull Requestレビューに継続的QAを
codenote
0
290
令和最新版Android Studioで化石デバイス向けアプリを作る
arkw
0
440
DevFest Android in Korea 2025 - 개발자 커뮤니티를 통해 얻는 가치
wisemuji
0
170
マスタデータ問題、マイクロサービスでどう解くか
kts
0
120
AI前提で考えるiOSアプリのモダナイズ設計
yuukiw00w
0
190
AI Agent Tool のためのバックエンドアーキテクチャを考える #encraft
izumin5210
3
1.1k
SwiftUIで本格音ゲー実装してみた
hypebeans
0
490
ELYZA_Findy AI Engineering Summit登壇資料_AIコーディング時代に「ちゃんと」やること_toB LLMプロダクト開発舞台裏_20251216
elyza
2
590
組み合わせ爆発にのまれない - 責務分割 x テスト
halhorn
1
160
Featured
See All Featured
B2B Lead Gen: Tactics, Traps & Triumph
marketingsoph
0
32
Mind Mapping
helmedeiros
PRO
0
38
Breaking role norms: Why Content Design is so much more than writing copy - Taylor Woolridge
uxyall
0
120
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
286
14k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
26
3.3k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
6.8k
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
65
8.3k
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
60
37k
Measuring Dark Social's Impact On Conversion and Attribution
stephenakadiri
0
94
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
359
30k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
Efficient Content Optimization with Google Search Console & Apps Script
katarinadahlin
PRO
0
250
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!