Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
170
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
470
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
940
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
160
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
420
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
310
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
220
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
170
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
550
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
320
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
SONY CISC-NEWS NWS-1750 + NWB-225 フレームバッファの NetBSD/news68k ドライバ実装 / OSC2026Hiroshima
tsutsui
0
110
iOSDC Japan 2026 - Swiftで作って学ぼう!データベース自作入門
kaseken
2
160
The Past, Present, and Future of Enterprise Java
ivargrimstad
0
360
AIを上手に使っていこうとしたら越境せざるを得なくなった話 〜実践1年で見えた境界を越えなければならない理由と進め方〜 / Crossing borders with AI
tomoyakitaura
4
1.1k
そのリトライ、死んだコネクションを使い回していませんか ── GoのHTTPクライアントとHTTP/2を実プロダクト障害から学び直す
myus4a
0
130
大喜利で理解するLLM as a Judge / Understanding LLM-as-a-Judge through Ogiri
rockname
0
100
App Intentsのビルドプロセスを支える技術
kntkymt
0
370
JPUG勉強会 OSSデータベースの内部構造を理解しよう(第2回)
oga5
0
220
【DroidKaigi 2026】「アクセシビリティを利用するとき、 アクセシビリティもまたこちらを利用している」 〜マルウェアによる攻撃と防衛について〜
halunoyo
0
460
GKE で Pod の見方を変えたら、スケールアウト時の挙動を真に捉えられた話
stkk
0
120
DroidKaigi 2026 「個人開発という実験場: Android エンジニアが手にする4つの自由」
slashnephy
0
230
マイコン向けの軽量Ruby「PicoRuby」で各種デバイスを制御するネイティブアプリの実現手法
bash0c7
0
390
Featured
See All Featured
How to make the Groovebox
asonas
2
2.4k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
699
190k
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
128
56k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
7k
My Coaching Mixtape
mlcsv
0
310
Crafting Experiences
bethany
1
330
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
35
3.8k
Digital Ethics as a Driver of Design Innovation
axbom
PRO
1
420
SEO in 2025: How to Prepare for the Future of Search
ipullrank
3
3.8k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
306
120k
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
3
1.4k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
659
62k
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!