Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
160
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
470
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
930
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
160
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
420
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
300
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
210
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
170
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
550
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
320
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
go-spidermonkeyでAIエージェントのCode Modeを実装する
syumai
2
1.2k
「寝てても仕事が進む」Claude Codeで組む第二の脳
tomoyafujita2016
0
360
AWS Transform Customによる Spring Boot 2.xから4.xへのVerUp
satoshi256kbyte
2
100
複数の Claude Code が"放置"されてしまう問題をCLI ダッシュボードを自作して解決した話
sumihiro3
1
730
MySQLとPostgreSQLって何が違うの?
akagami
0
140
メールのエイリアス機能を履き違えない
isshinfunada
0
250
仕様書を書く前にハーネスを作る - Agent Native開発は「探索を速く、判定を固く」
gotalab555
4
1.8k
「つくるAI」だけではバグは見つからない ~テストに必要な「見つけるAI」を分離させる戦略~
mfunaki
0
180
Cloudflare is Agents
chimame
0
180
片田舎のおっさん、 Swift Buildのダイアモンド問題解決の不具合修正PRを出すが、解決方法がキャッシュをしないようにすることであり、ビルド時間が伸びると言われてマージされないので高速化もする/swiftbuild
yimajo
0
290
<title><a id="</title>君はこのHTMLをパースできるか"></a></title> #雑LT_study
pizzacat83
0
180
My Marp Sample
sinoue0108
0
120
Featured
See All Featured
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
331
25k
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
inesmontani
PRO
3
2.4k
Balancing Empowerment & Direction
lara
6
1.2k
Navigating the Design Leadership Dip - Product Design Week Design Leaders+ Conference 2024
apolaine
2
400
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1369
210k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
666
130k
The Spectacular Lies of Maps
axbom
PRO
1
940
HDC tutorial
michielstock
2
820
The #1 spot is gone: here's how to win anyway
tamaranovitovic
3
1.1k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
1
530
コードの90%をAIが書く世界で何が待っているのか / What awaits us in a world where 90% of the code is written by AI
rkaga
63
45k
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!