Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Search
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Programming
0
93
Concurrency Basics for Elixir
Slides from internal presentation at
https://appunite.com
Maciej Kaszubowski
August 02, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Maciej Kaszubowski
See All by Maciej Kaszubowski
Error-free Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
240
Modular Design in Elixir (ElixirConf EU 2019)
mkaszubowski
2
550
The Big Ball of Nouns
mkaszubowski
0
86
Modular Design in Elixir
mkaszubowski
1
330
Our three years with Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
180
Distributed Elixir
mkaszubowski
0
92
Software Architecture
mkaszubowski
0
110
Let it crash - fault tolerance in Elixir/OTP
mkaszubowski
0
360
CRDTs - The science behind Phoenix Presence
mkaszubowski
2
240
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Synchronizationを支える技術
s_shimotori
1
150
Content Security Policy入門 セキュリティ設定と 違反レポートのはじめ方 / Introduction to Content Security Policy Getting Started with Security Configuration and Violation Reporting
uskey512
1
440
讓數據說話:用 Python、Prometheus 和 Grafana 講故事
eddie
0
350
カスタムしながら理解するGraphQL Connection
yanagii
1
1.2k
リリース8年目のサービスの1800個のERBファイルをViewComponentに移行した方法とその結果
katty0324
5
3.6k
破壊せよ!データ破壊駆動で考えるドメインモデリング / data-destroy-driven
minodriven
16
4.1k
ピラミッド、アイスクリームコーン、SMURF: 自動テストの最適バランスを求めて / Pyramid Ice-Cream-Cone and SMURF
twada
PRO
9
1k
Amazon Neptuneで始めてみるグラフDB-OpenSearchによるグラフの全文検索-
satoshi256kbyte
4
330
qmuntal/stateless のススメ
sgash708
0
120
Kotlin2でdataクラスの copyメソッドを禁止する/Data class copy function to have the same visibility as constructor
eichisanden
1
140
/←このスケジュール表に立ち向かう フロントエンド開発戦略 / A front-end development strategy to tackle a single-slash schedule.
nrslib
1
590
ECS Service Connectのこれまでのアップデートと今後のRoadmapを見てみる
tkikuc
2
210
Featured
See All Featured
The Invisible Side of Design
smashingmag
297
50k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
376
69k
Docker and Python
trallard
40
3.1k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
4
290
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
tammyeverts
41
2.1k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
280
13k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
37
1.8k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
626
61k
The MySQL Ecosystem @ GitHub 2015
samlambert
250
12k
Building an army of robots
kneath
302
42k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
88
5.7k
5 minutes of I Can Smell Your CMS
philhawksworth
202
19k
Transcript
Concurrency basics For Elixir-based Systems
None
So, what’s concurrency?
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads)
Sequential Execution (3 functions, 1 thread) Concurrent Execution (3 functions,
3 threads) Preemptive scheduling
Where’s the benefit?
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Sequential Execution time Waiting time
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time
CPU bound Re Re Re Res Re Res Re Re
I/O bound
Concurrent or Parallel What’s the difference?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads)
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2
root@kingschat-api-c8f8d6b76-4j65j:/app# nproc 12 root@tahmeel-api-prod-b5979bdc6-q5wz6:/# nproc 1 How many cores?
Concurrent Execution (3 functions, 3 threads) Parallel Execution (3 functions,
3 threads, 2 cores) core 1 core 2 (by default) One erlang scheduler per core
:observer_cli.start()
None
Req1 Req2 Req3 Resp Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Sequential Concurrent
Execution time Waiting time Req1 Resp Req2 Req3 Parallel
Sequential execution
Phoenix Request Req 1
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 2
Phoenix Request Resp
Phoenix Request Req 3
Phoenix Request Resp
Concurrent execution
Phoenix Request
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Resp Resp
Resp
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) R2 R1 R2
Time Execution time Waiting time
R1 APP Server DB Server (3 cores) Send resp R2
R3 R1 R2 R3 Time Execution time Waiting time
How much can we gain?
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law
Amdahl’s Law in a nutshell The more synchronisation, the less
benefit from multiple cores
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time Almost 100% parallel (almost no synchronisation) DB Server (3 cores)
But…
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not constant DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
Time Execution time Waiting time This is not infinite DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 Time
Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server Send resp R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
R4 R4 Time Execution time Waiting time DB Server (3 cores)
R1 APP Server R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R4 R4
Time Execution time Waiting time R5 R6 R7 R5 R6 R7 DB Server (3 cores)
Phoenix Request Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Req 1
Req 2 Req 3 Remember this?
This isn’t exactly true
None
Connection pool (Prevents from overworking the DB)
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
Pool Manager (Blocks until a free worker is available)
None
It gets worse
Pool Manager Mailbox Has to be synchronised
Pool Manager Message Passing Is just copying data in shared
memory
Pool Manager Remember semaphores?
Logger Metrics Sentry
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack
Network stack Sentry Metrics
OS Threads (Garbage Collection) Data Bus Virtual Machines Memory characteristics
(e.g. processor caches) … Other synchronisation points
That’s hard
That’s REALLY hard
That’s REALLY hard Seriously, people spend their entire careers on
this
So, what to do?
Measure
Measure Measure
Measure Measure Measure
Measure ON PRODUCTION
Measure ON PRODUCTION You WILL get false results on staging/locally
Measure Entire system You WILL get false results for single
functions
Measure ONLY IF YOU HAVE TRAFFIC
“premature optimization is the root of all evil”
If something takes X ms, it will always take X
ms.
Async execution cannot “remove” this time It can only hide
it
BACK PRESSURE
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer Stop
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer
Producent Consumer Consumer OK, give me more
Producent Consumer Consumer
None
Back pressure
Thanks!