ormance time en- res: complex impera- hreading runtime, cked by tely. m’s exe- iples be- er-Client syntax, se appli- ime and entation, nt c across specify ncoming h a URL th while ncluding ed rout- r object. tric pro- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management Instead of writing code as a series of URL endpoints, Dog ap- plications are written as imperative control flows that directly allowing s through ion while m-specific ake hun- written in formance ntime en- ures: complex d impera- threading runtime, acked by itely. am’s exe- ciples be- ver-Client s syntax, rse appli- ntime and mentation, ent ic across s specify incoming th a URL ath while including ated rout- er object. ntric pro- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management Instead of writing code as a series of URL endpoints, Dog ap- plications are written as imperative control flows that directly allowing ns through tion while m-specific take hun- written in rformance untime en- ures: s complex nd impera- threading e runtime, backed by nitely. ram’s exe- nciples be- ver-Client ’s syntax, erse appli- ntime and mentation, ment gic across rs specify incoming ith a URL path while (including cated rout- ler object. entric pro- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management Instead of writing code as a series of URL endpoints, Dog ap- plications are written as imperative control flows that directly y allowing ons through ation while rm-specific t take hun- e written in erformance untime en- atures: ws complex nd impera- t threading he runtime, backed by finitely. gram’s exe- nciples be- rver-Client g’s syntax, verse appli- untime and ementation, ment ogic across ers specify n incoming with a URL path while (including cated rout- dler object. centric pro- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management Instead of writing code as a series of URL endpoints, Dog ap- plications are written as imperative control flows that directly by allowing ons through cation while orm-specific at take hun- e written in performance runtime en- eatures: ws complex and impera- ht threading the runtime, e backed by efinitely. gram’s exe- rinciples be- erver-Client og’s syntax, verse appli- runtime and lementation, ement logic across pers specify an incoming with a URL m path while s (including ticated rout- ndler object. -centric pro- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management Instead of writing code as a series of URL endpoints, Dog ap- by allowing tions through ication while form-specific hat take hun- be written in performance e runtime en- eatures: ows complex d and impera- ght threading y the runtime, re backed by definitely. ogram’s exe- principles be- Server-Client Dog’s syntax, diverse appli- g runtime and plementation, gement logic across opers specify an incoming c with a URL m path while ns (including sticated rout- andler object. e-centric pro- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 14 session["login_tries"] = 0 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management Instead of writing code as a series of URL endpoints, Dog ap- by allowing ctions through plication while tform-specific that take hun- be written in g performance ue runtime en- features: lows complex d and impera- ight threading y the runtime, are backed by definitely. rogram’s exe- principles be- Server-Client Dog’s syntax, diverse appli- g runtime and mplementation, gement p logic across lopers specify o an incoming ic with a URL em path while ons (including isticated rout- handler object. ce-centric pro- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 14 session["login_tries"] = 0 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management Instead of writing code as a series of URL endpoints, Dog ap- by allowing actions through plication while atform-specific that take hun- o be written in ng performance ue runtime en- e features: llows complex ed and impera- eight threading by the runtime, are backed by ndefinitely. program’s exe- e principles be- d Server-Client Dog’s syntax, l diverse appli- og runtime and mplementation, agement up logic across elopers specify to an incoming gic with a URL tem path while ions (including histicated rout- handler object. (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 13 if session["login_tries"] == nil then 14 session["login_tries"] = 0 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management nt by allowing ractions through uplication while latform-specific s that take hun- to be written in ng performance que runtime en- re features: allows complex red and impera- weight threading by the runtime, d are backed by indefinitely. program’s exe- re principles be- nd Server-Client f Dog’s syntax, al diverse appli- Dog runtime and implementation, nagement up logic across velopers specify to an incoming ogic with a URL stem path while tions (including phisticated rout- a handler object. (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 13 if session["login_tries"] == nil then 14 session["login_tries"] = 0 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management nt by allowing eractions through duplication while platform-specific ms that take hun- to be written in cing performance ique runtime en- ore features: allows complex ured and impera- weight threading d by the runtime, nd are backed by e indefinitely. a program’s exe- . ore principles be- and Server-Client of Dog’s syntax, ral diverse appli- Dog runtime and implementation, anagement k up logic across evelopers specify e to an incoming logic with a URL ystem path while ations (including ophisticated rout- a handler object. (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 12 else 13 if session["login_tries"] == nil then 14 session["login_tries"] = 0 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. Dog: Automatic State Management ile not sacrificing ent by allowing teractions through duplication while platform-specific ms that take hun- s to be written in ficing performance nique runtime en- core features: t allows complex tured and impera- tweight threading ed by the runtime, and are backed by se indefinitely. a program’s exe- s. core principles be- and Server-Client of Dog’s syntax, eral diverse appli- e Dog runtime and e implementation, anagement ak up logic across evelopers specify se to an incoming logic with a URL system path while cations (including ophisticated rout- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 11 redirect_to("/dashboard") 12 else 13 if session["login_tries"] == nil then 14 session["login_tries"] = 0 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. hile not sacrificing ment by allowing nteractions through e duplication while of platform-specific ams that take hun- es to be written in ficing performance unique runtime en- core features: at allows complex ctured and impera- htweight threading ged by the runtime, and are backed by use indefinitely. s a program’s exe- es. core principles be- g and Server-Client w of Dog’s syntax, veral diverse appli- he Dog runtime and ce implementation, G Management ak up logic across Developers specify nse to an incoming s logic with a URL system path while ications (including sophisticated rout- (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 11 redirect_to("/dashboard") 12 else 13 if session["login_tries"] == nil then 14 session["login_tries"] = 0 15 end 16 session["login_tries"] += 1 17 18 if session["login_tries"] >= 3 then 19 redirect_to("/forgot_password") 20 else 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password. Please try again." 22 render "login_form.html" 23 end 24 end 25 end 26 1 listen to everyone for logins 2 3 on each login do 4 user = person from login 5 repeat 3 times 6 if user: login.user has_password: login.pass then 7 signin: login.user 8 show_dashboard_for: user 9 else 10 message = "Wrong password. Try again." 11 show message to user 12 listen to user for logins 13 on login do 14 user = person from login 15 end 16 end 17 end 18 reset_password_for:user 19 end Figure 2. Server-side code to implement login logic. Workflow-centric programming allows for code to be written as a straightforward imper- ative control flow. State is manage implicitly by the program’s execution using familiar techniques like control structures and local variables. In resource-centric programming, state between individual server requests is manually preserved by storing data in the session. This style of server-side programming plays a specific and limited role: it inspects incoming HTTP requests and pro- duces an HTTP response. Multistep logic that spans multiple requests needs to manually store state so that the relevant in- formation is available during a future request-response cycle (Figure 2b shows an example using sessions). This manual bookkeeping complicates many development tasks, for ex- ample, ensuring confirmation before changing a user’s email address, choosing a different billing method before making an online purchase, or viewing the next page from paginated results. 13年12⽉月29⽇日星期⽇日
mrorz
cer
riofujimon
kennethanceyer
hal_spidernight
yusukebe
moro
yasei_no_otoko
twada
javiergs
minodriven
kaitokudou
usagimaru
tammielis
jnunemaker
eileencodes
moore
shpigford
tammyeverts
chriscoyier
jrom
vanstee
speakerdeck
marcelosomers
keavy
![Workflow-Centric Prog. (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 20 else 21 flash["message"]](https://files.speakerdeck.com/presentations/cf5726d0527e013107b14a5c2b062690/slide_9.jpg){kind=link}
![Concurrency (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong password.](https://files.speakerdeck.com/presentations/cf5726d0527e013107b14a5c2b062690/slide_32.jpg){kind=link}
![Blocking Execution (c) Workflow-Centric Code (Dog) 21 flash["message"] = "Wrong](https://files.speakerdeck.com/presentations/cf5726d0527e013107b14a5c2b062690/slide_35.jpg){kind=link}
