$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
How we test our projects
Search
Terry
November 18, 2012
Programming
29
1.9k
How we test our projects
Rubyconf China 2012
Terry
November 18, 2012
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Terry
See All by Terry
Building API For The REST of Us
poshboytl
8
720
RubyConf China Welcome Slides
poshboytl
1
83
Rails Girls Chengdu 2014
poshboytl
2
320
Refactoring Re-education
poshboytl
5
970
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
開発に寄りそう自動テストの実現
goyoki
1
360
Herb to ReActionView: A New Foundation for the View Layer @ San Francisco Ruby Conference 2025
marcoroth
0
240
Level up your Gemini CLI - D&D Style!
palladius
1
170
宅宅自以為的浪漫:跟 AI 一起為自己辦的研討會寫一個售票系統
eddie
0
470
『実践MLOps』から学ぶ DevOps for ML
nsakki55
2
550
AWS CDKの推しポイントN選
akihisaikeda
1
240
AIエージェントを活かすPM術 AI駆動開発の現場から
gyuta
0
230
tparseでgo testの出力を見やすくする
utgwkk
1
130
俺流レスポンシブコーディング 2025
tak_dcxi
13
7.7k
dotfiles 式年遷宮 令和最新版
masawada
1
670
AIコーディングエージェント(Manus)
kondai24
0
120
AIエンジニアリングのご紹介 / Introduction to AI Engineering
rkaga
2
1.1k
Featured
See All Featured
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.1k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
187
29k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
274
41k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
697
190k
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
marcduiker
35
2.3k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
35
3.3k
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
29
4.1k
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
128
54k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
162
23k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
285
14k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
379
70k
Transcript
None
whoami
None
太檑
Terry
@poshboytl
Co-founder of Pragmatic.ly
None
Creator of Railscasts-china.com
None
Survey
How many people write tests?
How many people use RSpec?
Tools we use
None
I love RSpec!
None
None
Bad boy!
None
x.should == y
None
None
Straightforward!
asset_equal y, x
None
None
This is just right!
Pillow War!
Peace! Choose what you like!
Try it, instead of following anybody.
Syntax
Syntax Sugar
Syntax Sugar DSL
Is syntax important?
None
None
None
Syntax is important, that’s the most important reason why we
love Ruby! It also can be the reason we love RSepc!
Syntax is important, that’s the most important reason why we
love Ruby! It also can be the reason we love RSepc! Terry Tai
Let’s talk about RSpec!
Our practices
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Setup phase contains two parts use ‘let’ to initialize data
‘before’ block to do some actions
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Why straightforward is important for us?
None
None
None
The sugar we don’t like very much
None
None
None
RSpec done
None
Problem of Fixtures
Hard to read Hard to write Hard to maintain
None
None
What’s the password?
What’s the password?
What’s the password? Add new records?
Fixtures separate the data and the tests
None
None
Bullshit!
None
What’s the advantage of fixtures?
It’s really fast!!
Some practices for Factory Girl
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Random data is a advantage of factory to fixtures
None
Update: If you wanna use LoremIpsum class still need the
gems like forgery or lorem-ipsum.
None
None
None
None
None
None
How we run tests?
You might see this
But...... I really don’t use it
Tell you a secret
I run my tests manually
Why?
probably, I type :w so frequently and quickly. LOL
probably, I type :w so frequently and quickly. LOL
None
None
None
Your APM should be high
Slayers Boxer Your APM should be high
Manually run ‘bundle exec rspec spec’ ?
No. It depends.
None
None
bundle exec rspec spec ruby -S rspec spec
Bundler still need time to load
When I can not use ‘bundle exec’ ?
None
None
no spec_helper
Two ways to run tests?
None
None
ruby -S rspec spec ?
bundle exec rspec spec ? ruby -S rspec spec ?
by Gray Bernhardt
None
About integration test
RSpec + Capybara(webkit)
Poltergeist looks nice will give it a try
I don’t love it so far Also don’t hate it
Still keep looking
Stub as little as possible only do for Current time
HTTP visiting ...
VCR
None
Use different fixture data in integration and unit tests
Integration tests are not for driving development
No mock or stub means slow You can use a
CI server run it for you
if project.open_source?
A hosted continuous integration service for the open source community.
else
None
integrity • light weight • It built by ruby (Means
you can hack!!!) • Works pretty well with git • Hook and API is weak
None
Hudson and Jenkins • They built by JAVA • Heavy
weight and powerful • a lot of plugins(git, github, emails, hipchat...) • Have nice API
We really did some interesting things with Hudson by HUBOT
http://terrytai.com/
JS tests
None
None
jasminerice gem for work with Rails asset pipeline
jasmine-sinon
None
By Ian: https://gist.github.com/4059889
None
None
None
None
None
Look at me, Terry. It’s not a JS conf, ok?
I’d better stop here
Oh, BTW
DHH is the hero in my heart
Thank you!