7-15-24 - Quarkus Club - Quarkus for Spring Developers

Are you a Spring developer and interested in learning something new? In this session I will show concepts and conventions familiar to Spring developers and how those same concepts and conventions can be implemented in Quarkus, all while highlighting similarities and differences between them, including how testing is done. Additionally, I will highlight performance characteristics between them and prove, live, that you could save 50% in your operational costs and reduce your carbon emissions 2-3x simply by switching your Java runtime.

Transcript

1. @edeandrea for Developers Eric Deandrea Sr. Principal Developer Advocate Red Hat
2. @edeandrea Who’s on Stage Today? Eric Deandrea 🤘 25+ years software development experience Java Champion 🤘 Contributor to Open Source projects Quarkus Spring Boot, Spring Framework, Spring Security LangChain4j (& Quarkus LangChain4j) Wiremock Microcks 🤘 Published author
3. @edeandrea • How Quarkus enables modern Java development & the Kubernetes-native experience • Introduce familiar Spring concepts, constructs, & conventions and how they map to Quarkus • Emphasis on testing patterns & practices https://red.ht/quarkus-spring-devs
4. @edeandrea Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
5. @edeandrea Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
6. @edeandrea Monolith J2SE / J2EE Java / Jakarta EE Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
7. @edeandrea Monolith J2SE / J2EE Java / Jakarta EE Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
8. @edeandrea Monolith J2SE / J2EE Java / Jakarta EE Cloud-Native Microservices Spring Boot MicroProfile Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
9. @edeandrea Monolith J2SE / J2EE Java / Jakarta EE Cloud-Native Microservices Spring Boot MicroProfile Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
10. @edeandrea Monolith J2SE / J2EE Java / Jakarta EE Cloud-Native Microservices Spring Boot MicroProfile Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
11. @edeandrea Java / Jakarta EE J2SE / J2EE Monolith Cloud-Native Microservices Spring Boot MicroProfile Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
12. @edeandrea Java / Jakarta EE J2SE / J2EE Monolith Cloud-Native Microservices Serverless Event-Driven Microservices Cloud-Native Spring Boot MicroProfile Java, The Enterprise Workhorse
13. @edeandrea The Warmup Issue with Java Simon Ritter - Azul Systems - https://youtu.be/bWmuqh6wHgE (first 13 minutes)
14. @edeandrea Build Time Runtime Packaging (maven, etc) gradle…) Load config file from file system Parse it Classpath scanning to find annotated classes Attempt to load class to enable/disable features Build its model of the world. Start the management (thread, pool…) @ @ </> How Does a Framework Start?
15. @edeandrea The Quarkus Way Runtime Build Time @ @ </> Package model
16. @edeandrea JVM Build Time @ @ </> Package model Native The Quarkus Way enables Native Compilation
17. @edeandrea Unification of Imperative & Reactive Unification of Imperative and Reactive
18. @edeandrea 🤘Zero-config Live coding 🤘Auto-provision services 🤘Continuous testing 🤘Dev UI 🤘CLI Enhancing Developer Joy
19. @edeandrea IT’S STILL JAVA!
20. @edeandrea
21. @edeandrea Jam Time!
22. @edeandrea https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r22&test=db&f=zijunz-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-v2qiv3-xamxa7-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-zik0zj-1ekf&hw=ph&l=zik0vz-cn3 https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/key-findings-idc-red-hat-quarkus-lab-validation https://www.reddit.com/r/java/comments/o0ewar/do_quarkus_performance_benefits_scale Don’t Take My Word For It!
23. @edeandrea JVM Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 8.95 5.27 169.72% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 195.94 319.45 61.34% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 2,566 6,287 40.81% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 247.94 324.35 76.44% Av. throughput (req/sec) 31,753.08 7,886.45 402.63% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 58.27 13.62 427.98% Native Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 123.62 206.84 59.76% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 71.06 192.3 36.95% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 106.33 469.33 22.66% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 78.36 194.7 40.25% Av. throughput (req/sec) 18,022.79 6,729.3 267.83% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 69.6 17.5 397.81% Don’t Take My Word For It! Some real numbers (8 cores, 14GB RAM, GraalVM CE 21.0.2)
24. @edeandrea JVM Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 8.95 5.27 169.72% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 195.94 319.45 61.34% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 2,566 6,287 40.81% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 247.94 324.35 76.44% Av. throughput (req/sec) 31,753.08 7,886.45 402.63% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 58.27 13.62 427.98% Native Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 123.62 206.84 59.76% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 71.06 192.3 36.95% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 106.33 469.33 22.66% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 78.36 194.7 40.25% Av. throughput (req/sec) 18,022.79 6,729.3 267.83% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 69.6 17.5 397.81% Don’t Take My Word For It! Some real numbers (8 cores, 14GB RAM, GraalVM CE 21.0.2)
25. @edeandrea JVM Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 8.95 5.27 169.72% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 195.94 319.45 61.34% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 2,566 6,287 40.81% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 247.94 324.35 76.44% Av. throughput (req/sec) 31,753.08 7,886.45 402.63% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 58.27 13.62 427.98% Native Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 123.62 206.84 59.76% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 71.06 192.3 36.95% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 106.33 469.33 22.66% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 78.36 194.7 40.25% Av. throughput (req/sec) 18,022.79 6,729.3 267.83% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 69.6 17.5 397.81% Don’t Take My Word For It! Some real numbers (8 cores, 14GB RAM, GraalVM CE 21.0.2)
26. @edeandrea JVM Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 8.95 5.27 169.72% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 195.94 319.45 61.34% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 2,566 6,287 40.81% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 247.94 324.35 76.44% Av. throughput (req/sec) 31,753.08 7,886.45 402.63% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 58.27 13.62 427.98% Native Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 123.62 206.84 59.76% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 71.06 192.3 36.95% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 106.33 469.33 22.66% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 78.36 194.7 40.25% Av. throughput (req/sec) 18,022.79 6,729.3 267.83% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 69.6 17.5 397.81% Don’t Take My Word For It! Some real numbers (8 cores, 14GB RAM, GraalVM CE 21.0.2)
27. @edeandrea JVM Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 8.95 5.27 169.72% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 195.94 319.45 61.34% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 2,566 6,287 40.81% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 247.94 324.35 76.44% Av. throughput (req/sec) 31,753.08 7,886.45 402.63% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 58.27 13.62 427.98% Native Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 123.62 206.84 59.76% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 71.06 192.3 36.95% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 106.33 469.33 22.66% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 78.36 194.7 40.25% Av. throughput (req/sec) 18,022.79 6,729.3 267.83% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 69.6 17.5 397.81% Don’t Take My Word For It! Some real numbers (8 cores, 14GB RAM, GraalVM CE 21.0.2)
28. @edeandrea JVM Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 8.95 5.27 169.72% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 195.94 319.45 61.34% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 2,566 6,287 40.81% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 247.94 324.35 76.44% Av. throughput (req/sec) 31,753.08 7,886.45 402.63% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 58.27 13.62 427.98% Native Quarkus Spring Boot Ratio (Quarkus / SB) Framework version 3.12.1 3.3.1 Build time (s) 123.62 206.84 59.76% Av. RSS after startup (MB) 71.06 192.3 36.95% Av. time to 1st req (ms) 106.33 469.33 22.66% Av. RSS after 1st req (MB) 78.36 194.7 40.25% Av. throughput (req/sec) 18,022.79 6,729.3 267.83% Max throughput density (req/sec/MB) 69.6 17.5 397.81% Don’t Take My Word For It! Some real numbers (8 cores, 14GB RAM, GraalVM CE 21.0.2)
29. @edeandrea A Real Example
30. @edeandrea 🤘 Spring Boot 3 application contents: ◦ 38,673 classes ◦ 83,377 fields ◦ 276,625 methods ◦ Reflection: ◦ 10,960 classes ◦ 1,019 fields ◦ 12,853 methods A Real Example
31. @edeandrea 🤘 Spring Boot 3 application contents: ◦ 38,673 classes ◦ 83,377 fields ◦ 276,625 methods ◦ Reflection: ◦ 10,960 classes ◦ 1,019 fields ◦ 12,853 methods 🤘 Quarkus 3 application contents: ◦ 23,584 classes ◦ 47,091 fields ◦ 187,261 methods ◦ Reflection: ◦ 6,608 classes ◦ 192 fields ◦ 4,754 methods A Real Example
32. @edeandrea 🤘 Spring Boot 3 application contents: ◦ 38,673 classes ◦ 83,377 fields ◦ 276,625 methods ◦ Reflection: ◦ 10,960 classes ◦ 1,019 fields ◦ 12,853 methods 🤘 Quarkus 3 application contents: ◦ 23,584 classes ◦ 47,091 fields ◦ 187,261 methods ◦ Reflection: ◦ 6,608 classes ◦ 192 fields ◦ 4,754 methods 🤘 The Quarkus application has: ◦ 15,089 (39%) less classes ◦ 36,286 (44%) less fields ◦ 89,364 (32%) less methods ◦ 4,352 (40%) less classes using reflection ◦ 827 (81%) less fields using reflection ◦ 8,099 (63%) less methods using reflection A Real Example
33. @edeandrea https://www.redhat.com/en/resources/greener-java-applications-detail Setup 🤘 AWS (us-east-1) 🤘 SLA > 99% 🤘 800 req/sec over 20 days 🤘 50% load The Cost / Carbon Impact
35. @edeandrea https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-super-heroes Quarkus Superheroes
36. @edeandrea Thank You! https://speakerdeck.com/edeandrea/7-15-24-quarkus-club-quarkus-for-spring-developers