Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
Search
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Programming
7
460
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
RubyConf Argentina 2014
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Tweet
Share
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
奥深くて厄介な「改行」と仲良くなる20分
oguemon
1
540
プロパティベーステストによるUIテスト: LLMによるプロパティ定義生成でエッジケースを捉える
tetta_pdnt
0
1.7k
Processing Gem ベースの、2D レトロゲームエンジンの開発
tokujiros
2
130
テストカバレッジ100%を10年続けて得られた学びと品質
mottyzzz
2
600
AWS発のAIエディタKiroを使ってみた
iriikeita
1
190
Ruby Parser progress report 2025
yui_knk
1
440
請來的 AI Agent 同事們在寫程式時,怎麼用 pytest 去除各種幻想與盲點
keitheis
0
120
Putting The Genie in the Bottle - A Crash Course on running LLMs on Android
iurysza
0
140
複雑なフォームに立ち向かう Next.js の技術選定
macchiitaka
2
130
AI Coding Agentのセキュリティリスク:PRの自己承認とメルカリの対策
s3h
0
230
Improving my own Ruby thereafter
sisshiki1969
1
160
GitHubとGitLabとAWS CodePipelineでCI/CDを組み比べてみた
satoshi256kbyte
4
240
Featured
See All Featured
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
332
24k
Balancing Empowerment & Direction
lara
3
620
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
53
7.8k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
2.8k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
347
40k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
45
7.7k
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
190
11k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
53k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
43
7.6k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
70
4.8k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
696
190k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
525
40k
Transcript
Look ma’, I know my algorithms!
Lucia Escanellas raviolicode
Attributions https://flic.kr/p/6DDvQP https://flic.kr/p/qv5Zp https://flic.kr/p/6SaZsP https://flic.kr/p/edauSN https://flic.kr/p/4uNfK8 https://flic.kr/p/o9ggdk https://flic.kr/p/6kfuHz https://flic.kr/p/5kBtbS
Speed Speed
Zen Elegance Elegance
Toolbox
Theory Theory
This example Not so common
FROM >30HS TO 18 S
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USING ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
Let’s have a look at the PROBLEM
Ordered array How many pairs (a,b) where a ≠ b
-100 <= a + b <= 100
Array: [-100, 1, 100]
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 1 = 99 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 100 = 0 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
1 + 100 = 101 NO
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Result: 2
First solution Combinations of 2 elements Filter by: -100 <=
a + b <= 100
def count! combinations = @numbers.combination(2).to_a! ! combinations! .map{ |a,b| a
+ b }! .select do |sum|! sum.abs <= THRESHOLD! end.size! end
10K takes 10s BUT 100M takes 30hs
Time to buy a NEW LAPTOP!
Big O notation How WELL an algorithm SCALES as the
DATA involved INCREASES
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Length stored in variable: O(1)
Graphical Math Properties Order Mathematical Properties
Remember: f < g => O(f + g) = O(g)
O(K . f) = O(f) O(1) < O(ln N) < O(N) < O(N2) < O(eN)
Ex: Binary Search Find 7 in [1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 5 2. 5 == 7 ? NO 3. 5 < 7 ? YES => Find 7 in [6, 7, 8] Step 1
! Find 7 in [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 7 2. 7 == 7 ? YES! FOUND IT!! Step 2
Ex: Binary Search Worst case: ceil ( Log2 N )
23 = 8 ONLY 3 steps
Typical examples Access to a Hash O(1) Binary search O(log
N) Sequential search O(N) Traverse a matrix NxN O(N2)
DON’T JUST BELIEVE ME fooplot.com
BUT raviolicode, I’m getting BORED
I WANT CONCURRENCY I WANT CONCURRENCY
wait… was it Concurrency? or Parallelism?
None
None
None
None
None
None
GIL+CPU-bound NO I/O OPERATIONS concurrency = OVERHEAD
NOT what I was expecting
Parallelism... Parallelism
None
What do we REALLY get? O(N2 / cores) = O(N
2 ) jRubyGo Scala
NO Spoilers O(N2) O(N.log(N)) O(N)
THINKING algorithms is as IMPORTANT as ANY OTHER technique
BYE.
Wait! It's still slow. Wait! It’s still SLOW
Given [1,2,3,4,5] Take 1, then print [5,4,3,2] Take 2, then
print [5,4,3] and so on…
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Looks like O(N)
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Behaves like O(N2)
Let’s Look at the DOCS Ruby-Doc.org ! #reverse
O(N) hidden! O(N)!
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end O(N2)!
Leaky abstractions LEAKY ABSTRACTIONS
All Non-trivial abstractions are LEAKY to some degree
ABSTRACTIONS DO NOT really SIMPLIFY as they were meant to
Knowing THE ALGORITHMS Behind everyday methods PAYS OFF
Thanks :) Thanks :)