Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
Search
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Programming
490
7
Share
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
RubyConf Argentina 2014
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
煩雑なSkills管理をSoC(関心の分離)により解決する――関心を分離し、プロンプトを部品として育てるためのOSSを作った話 / Solving Complex Skills Management Through SoC (Separation of Concerns)
nrslib
4
950
Coding as Prompting Since 2025
ragingwind
0
830
Agentic Elixir
whatyouhide
0
140
ソフトウェア設計の結合バランス #phperkaigi
kajitack
0
130
Going Multiplatform with Your Android App (Android Makers 2026)
zsmb
2
430
HTML-Aware ERB: The Path to Reactive Rendering @ RubyKaigi 2026, Hakodate, Japan
marcoroth
0
140
年間50登壇、単著出版、雑誌寄稿、Podcast出演、YouTube、CM、カンファレンス主催……全部やってみたので面白さ等を比較してみよう / I’ve tried them all, so let’s compare how interesting they are.
nrslib
4
790
How Swift's Type System Guides AI Agents
koher
0
270
How We Benchmarked Quarkus: Patterns and anti-patterns
hollycummins
1
140
Swift Concurrency Type System
inamiy
0
530
10年分の技術的負債、完済へ ― Claude Code主導のAI駆動開発でスポーツブルを丸ごとリプレイスした話
takuya_houshima
0
2.6k
GitHubCopilotCLIをはじめよう.pdf
htkym
0
190
Featured
See All Featured
A Soul's Torment
seathinner
6
2.7k
HU Berlin: Industrial-Strength Natural Language Processing with spaCy and Prodigy
inesmontani
PRO
0
320
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
75
12k
Chrome DevTools: State of the Union 2024 - Debugging React & Beyond
addyosmani
10
1.1k
Principles of Awesome APIs and How to Build Them.
keavy
128
17k
Claude Code のすすめ
schroneko
67
220k
What the history of the web can teach us about the future of AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
520
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
316
150k
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
72
12k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
How to Grow Your eCommerce with AI & Automation
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
170
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
54k
Transcript
Look ma’, I know my algorithms!
Lucia Escanellas raviolicode
Attributions https://flic.kr/p/6DDvQP https://flic.kr/p/qv5Zp https://flic.kr/p/6SaZsP https://flic.kr/p/edauSN https://flic.kr/p/4uNfK8 https://flic.kr/p/o9ggdk https://flic.kr/p/6kfuHz https://flic.kr/p/5kBtbS
Speed Speed
Zen Elegance Elegance
Toolbox
Theory Theory
This example Not so common
FROM >30HS TO 18 S
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USING ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
Let’s have a look at the PROBLEM
Ordered array How many pairs (a,b) where a ≠ b
-100 <= a + b <= 100
Array: [-100, 1, 100]
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 1 = 99 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 100 = 0 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
1 + 100 = 101 NO
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Result: 2
First solution Combinations of 2 elements Filter by: -100 <=
a + b <= 100
def count! combinations = @numbers.combination(2).to_a! ! combinations! .map{ |a,b| a
+ b }! .select do |sum|! sum.abs <= THRESHOLD! end.size! end
10K takes 10s BUT 100M takes 30hs
Time to buy a NEW LAPTOP!
Big O notation How WELL an algorithm SCALES as the
DATA involved INCREASES
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Length stored in variable: O(1)
Graphical Math Properties Order Mathematical Properties
Remember: f < g => O(f + g) = O(g)
O(K . f) = O(f) O(1) < O(ln N) < O(N) < O(N2) < O(eN)
Ex: Binary Search Find 7 in [1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 5 2. 5 == 7 ? NO 3. 5 < 7 ? YES => Find 7 in [6, 7, 8] Step 1
! Find 7 in [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 7 2. 7 == 7 ? YES! FOUND IT!! Step 2
Ex: Binary Search Worst case: ceil ( Log2 N )
23 = 8 ONLY 3 steps
Typical examples Access to a Hash O(1) Binary search O(log
N) Sequential search O(N) Traverse a matrix NxN O(N2)
DON’T JUST BELIEVE ME fooplot.com
BUT raviolicode, I’m getting BORED
I WANT CONCURRENCY I WANT CONCURRENCY
wait… was it Concurrency? or Parallelism?
None
None
None
None
None
None
GIL+CPU-bound NO I/O OPERATIONS concurrency = OVERHEAD
NOT what I was expecting
Parallelism... Parallelism
None
What do we REALLY get? O(N2 / cores) = O(N
2 ) jRubyGo Scala
NO Spoilers O(N2) O(N.log(N)) O(N)
THINKING algorithms is as IMPORTANT as ANY OTHER technique
BYE.
Wait! It's still slow. Wait! It’s still SLOW
Given [1,2,3,4,5] Take 1, then print [5,4,3,2] Take 2, then
print [5,4,3] and so on…
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Looks like O(N)
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Behaves like O(N2)
Let’s Look at the DOCS Ruby-Doc.org ! #reverse
O(N) hidden! O(N)!
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end O(N2)!
Leaky abstractions LEAKY ABSTRACTIONS
All Non-trivial abstractions are LEAKY to some degree
ABSTRACTIONS DO NOT really SIMPLIFY as they were meant to
Knowing THE ALGORITHMS Behind everyday methods PAYS OFF
Thanks :) Thanks :)