Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
Search
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Programming
7
450
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
RubyConf Argentina 2014
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Tweet
Share
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
JVM の仕組みを理解して PHP で実装してみよう
m3m0r7
PRO
1
250
事業戦略を理解してソフトウェアを設計する
masuda220
PRO
10
2.5k
イベントストーミングから始めるドメイン駆動設計
jgeem
3
500
『Python → TypeScript』オンボーディング奮闘記
takumi_tatsuno
1
140
TypeScript エンジニアが Android 開発の世界に飛び込んだ話
yuisakamoto
6
970
TVer iOSチームの共通認識の作り方 - Findy Job LT iOSアプリ開発の裏側 開発組織が向き合う課題とこれから
techtver
PRO
0
720
人には人それぞれのサービス層がある
shimabox
3
470
External SecretsのさくらProvider初期実装を担当しています
logica0419
0
250
Perlで痩せる
yuukis
1
660
マテリアルって何者?RealityKitで扱うマテリアル入門
nao_randd
0
140
イベントソーシングとAIの親和性ー物語とLLMに理解できるデータ
tomohisa
1
160
Efficiency and Rock 'n’ Roll (Really!)
hollycummins
0
600
Featured
See All Featured
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
68
18k
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
368
19k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
49
8.1k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
3.9k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
378
70k
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
267
13k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
134
9.3k
Music & Morning Musume
bryan
47
6.6k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
37
3.5k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
95
6.4k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
671
58k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
280
13k
Transcript
Look ma’, I know my algorithms!
Lucia Escanellas raviolicode
Attributions https://flic.kr/p/6DDvQP https://flic.kr/p/qv5Zp https://flic.kr/p/6SaZsP https://flic.kr/p/edauSN https://flic.kr/p/4uNfK8 https://flic.kr/p/o9ggdk https://flic.kr/p/6kfuHz https://flic.kr/p/5kBtbS
Speed Speed
Zen Elegance Elegance
Toolbox
Theory Theory
This example Not so common
FROM >30HS TO 18 S
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USING ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
Let’s have a look at the PROBLEM
Ordered array How many pairs (a,b) where a ≠ b
-100 <= a + b <= 100
Array: [-100, 1, 100]
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 1 = 99 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 100 = 0 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
1 + 100 = 101 NO
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Result: 2
First solution Combinations of 2 elements Filter by: -100 <=
a + b <= 100
def count! combinations = @numbers.combination(2).to_a! ! combinations! .map{ |a,b| a
+ b }! .select do |sum|! sum.abs <= THRESHOLD! end.size! end
10K takes 10s BUT 100M takes 30hs
Time to buy a NEW LAPTOP!
Big O notation How WELL an algorithm SCALES as the
DATA involved INCREASES
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Length stored in variable: O(1)
Graphical Math Properties Order Mathematical Properties
Remember: f < g => O(f + g) = O(g)
O(K . f) = O(f) O(1) < O(ln N) < O(N) < O(N2) < O(eN)
Ex: Binary Search Find 7 in [1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 5 2. 5 == 7 ? NO 3. 5 < 7 ? YES => Find 7 in [6, 7, 8] Step 1
! Find 7 in [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 7 2. 7 == 7 ? YES! FOUND IT!! Step 2
Ex: Binary Search Worst case: ceil ( Log2 N )
23 = 8 ONLY 3 steps
Typical examples Access to a Hash O(1) Binary search O(log
N) Sequential search O(N) Traverse a matrix NxN O(N2)
DON’T JUST BELIEVE ME fooplot.com
BUT raviolicode, I’m getting BORED
I WANT CONCURRENCY I WANT CONCURRENCY
wait… was it Concurrency? or Parallelism?
None
None
None
None
None
None
GIL+CPU-bound NO I/O OPERATIONS concurrency = OVERHEAD
NOT what I was expecting
Parallelism... Parallelism
None
What do we REALLY get? O(N2 / cores) = O(N
2 ) jRubyGo Scala
NO Spoilers O(N2) O(N.log(N)) O(N)
THINKING algorithms is as IMPORTANT as ANY OTHER technique
BYE.
Wait! It's still slow. Wait! It’s still SLOW
Given [1,2,3,4,5] Take 1, then print [5,4,3,2] Take 2, then
print [5,4,3] and so on…
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Looks like O(N)
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Behaves like O(N2)
Let’s Look at the DOCS Ruby-Doc.org ! #reverse
O(N) hidden! O(N)!
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end O(N2)!
Leaky abstractions LEAKY ABSTRACTIONS
All Non-trivial abstractions are LEAKY to some degree
ABSTRACTIONS DO NOT really SIMPLIFY as they were meant to
Knowing THE ALGORITHMS Behind everyday methods PAYS OFF
Thanks :) Thanks :)