(CAADP) launched in 2003 under the Maputo Declaration ▪ Kampala Declaration adopted by African Union (AU) HOSG in January ▪ 10-year plan for accelerating agrifood system transformation ▪ Reframes CAADP from narrow agricultural growth focus to agrifood system transformation ▪ AU Members States called to integrate Declaration into national policies, strategies, budgets, and national agrifood system investment plans (NAIPs)
design of evidence-based, Kampala- compliant NAIPs by conducting 3 diagnostics in Kenya and Togo 1. Kampala Status Assessment and Profile (SAP) 2. Kampala Goals and Milestones (KGM) 3. Kampala Policy and Program Opportunities (PPO) ▪ Provide solid evidence to guide prioritization of policies, programs, and investments ▪ Conducted in close collaboration with national stakeholders: Ministry of Agriculture, NAIP teams, development partners, other key stakeholders ▪ Funded by the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ)
Togo ▪ Launched NAIP 2 development in early 2025 (2025–2029) after Kampala Declaration to align national priorities with the Declaration’s goals and targets ▪ NAIP 1 (2019-2024) expired in Dec 2024 ▪ Ministry of Agriculture is leading NAIP development in consultation with: i. County governments ii. Consultants team iii. Analytical team iv. Technical Steering Committee ▪ Adopted new NAIP, the Agricultural Modernization Program (ProMAT 2025– 2034), before adoption of Kampala Declaration ▪ Togo wants to make sure NAIP is well- aligned with the Kampala Declaration ▪ NAIP development was led by Ministry of Agriculture with input from broad group of stakeholders
Findings Recommendations ▪ Undernourishment up from 18.3% (2013- 2015) to 27.8% (2020-2022) ▪ Post-harvest loss relatively high between 30-40% in 2015-2022 ▪ Increasing intra-African agrifood trade, agro-processing makes up 4% of manufacturing ▪ Share of government agriculture spending less than 10%, 4% in 2023 ▪ Agriculture joint sector review (JSR) not well institutionalized, ad hoc ▪ Invest in post-harvest practices, storage facilities, processing, and transportation ▪ Promote agro-processing ▪ Increase public agriculture expenditures (PAE), improve spending efficiency ▪ Create incentives to attract domestic and foreign private investment ▪ Strengthen agriculture JSR and integrate JSR and CAADP Biennial Review (BR)
as Usual Scenario Optimal Scenario ▪ Current expenditure mix is dominated by infrastructure expenditures (20% budget share) vs. (4% for Ag budget share) ▪ Within PAE, expenditures are mostly on infrastructure and subsidies which make approx. 70% of total PAE o Research and extension makes up only 17% of PAE ▪ If current trends continue, Kenya will not meet all Kampala commitments and most targets ▪ Optimal expenditure allocations that generate most inclusive growth ▪ Key sectors and subsectors that generate the most inclusive growth o Agriculture, agro-processing vs. non- agriculture (services and industry) o Subsectors: agriculture (livestock, staple crops, agro-processing, export crops) vs. non-agriculture (transport and market services) ▪ Kenya meets most Kampala goals and targets
VI Findings Recommendations ▪ Kenya has several coordination bodies across agrifood system space ▪ Ministry of Agriculture & several key ministries incld. Ministry of Cooperatives, Ministry of Environment & Forestry ▪ Agriculture Joint Sector Review is ad-hoc ▪ Non-state actors: Kenya Private Sector Alliance (KEPSA), Agricultural Society of Kenya's National Economic and Transformation (ASNET) ▪ Development Partners for Agriculture and Rural Development (KDPARD) ▪ Effectively align Kampala goals with ongoing NAIP development process ▪ Improve coordination among agrifood stakeholders ▪ Good practices in Rwanda: Holding regular and inclusive agriculture JSR ▪ Strengthen parliamentary oversight of agrifood policies ▪ Strengthen agriculture JSR and integrate JSR with CAADP Biennial Review (BR)
and country NAIP teams is a must! o Better understand country’s analytical needs and priorities o Review, validate, and refine diagnostics, ensure country ownership o Effective policy and investment prioritization based on diagnostics o Bridge data gaps, clarify and validate data sources ▪ Tailor analytics to country needs, context, and stage in the NAIP formulation ▪ Inclusive NAIP design process central for ownership, buy in, and accountability ▪ Need to align Kampala NAIP formulation and implementation process with other policy processes (e.g. UNFSS)
o Accelerate agrifood system transformation through inclusive, country-led, and evidence- based planning and implementation o Coalesce around a shared agenda and leverage synergies with other policy processes, improve policy coherence, and enhance accountability ▪ AKADEMIYA2063’s diagnostics support provides a proof of approach for an effective scaling and implementation of the CAADP Kampala Declaration in more countries
akademiya2063
rasmusluckow
paigeccino
brad_frost
addyosmani
tammyeverts
tenderlove
shlominoach
chriscoyier
lynnandtonic
erikaheidi
garrettdimon
