Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Just because you can do something, doesn't mean...

Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should!

With all the advances of technology, sometimes our abilities to access data far exceeds guidelines that have been set for what we should or should not do as we develop applications. Where do the boundaries of what we can do cross the line of what we should do? What responsibility do we have towards the users of the applications that we create? Quite often the average user of web and mobile applications do not understand privacy policies, have no idea why the application needs certain information (sometimes it doesn't!), and are afraid to not give permissions because the app might not work. They also often have no idea how dangerous it can be to have all their information out there. Some professions have a governing agency to enforce compliance to an ethical standard, but there is no governing agency over software developers. Does this mean we have no responsibility to be ethical in the software that we create or do we need to hold ourselves to some standard? And what would that standard be? With new innovation such as drones and autonomous vehicles, it seems more important than ever to consider ethics in software development. This talk would not provide definitive solid answers to these questions because there is so much gray area in ethics, but it is more to get people thinking about what responsibilities we have as developers to the users of the software that we create.

Angel Thomas

January 10, 2019
Tweet

More Decks by Angel Thomas

Other Decks in Technology

Transcript

  1. About Me Angel Thomas Software Developer - Center for Information

    Management Chapter Founder - Girl Develop It - Toledo Chapter @starangel75
  2. ?

  3. Why is there such a gray area with ethics? Everyone

    sees the world from their own personal perspective There are many different ethical theories Confusion about how to apply ethics when there is conflict
  4. Ethical Theories Utilitarianism Virtue Ethics Ethics of Care Egoism Natural

    Law Social Contract Theory Moral Relativism Religion Deontology Hippocratic
  5. Utilitarianism Theory of normative ethics that the best moral action

    is one that maximizes utility Rule Utilitarianism: Behavior is determined based on principles or rules designed to promote utility Act Utilitarian: Evaluate result of specific actions rather than the rule itself
  6. Social Contract Theory Social contract theory is the view that

    a persons moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live
  7. Code of Ethics NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers Act

    for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees
  8. Code of Ethics NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers Act

    for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees Engineers shall perform services only in their areas of competence
  9. Code of Ethics NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers Act

    for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees Engineers shall perform services only in their areas of competence Engineers shall avoid all conduct or practice that deceives the public
  10. Scenarios: To fix a bug or to not fix a

    bug? Who is affected? Ethical standard applied Social contract Utilitarianism
  11. Scenarios: Code that does not adequately secure data Who is

    affected? Ethical standard applied Social Contract Theory Ethics of Care
  12. Scenarios: Foreseeing the future use of the code we write

    Who is affected? Ethical standard applied Ethics of Care Hippocratic
  13. Scenarios: Consideration of how code affects other people “Whether you're

    a woman, poor, an ethnic minority or just from the wrong side of the zip code, there's an algorithm to oppress you.” ~Noel Sharkey
  14. Egoism Egoism is the ethical theory that one’s self is,

    or should be the motivation for one’s actions
  15. Moral Relativism Moral Relativism (or Ethical Relativism) is the position

    that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal moral truths, but instead make claims relative to social, cultural, historical or personal circumstances
  16. Religion Most religions have an ethical component, often derived from

    purported supernatural revelation or guidance
  17. Natural Law Natural Law is an ethical theory that states

    that what is good and evil is derived from the rational nature of human beings
  18. Deontology Rule Deontology: Conformity to general moral principles based on

    logic determines ethicalness Act Deontology: Believe that the action itself determines ethicalness, despite the outcome
  19. Deontology cont. Kantian duty-based ethics: Requires that to be ethical

    must follow the categorical imperative which states that a rule is true in all situations Rossian duty-based ethics: Ethics are based on prima facia duties and actual duties
  20. Deontology - Kantian If you are not willing to apply

    a rule to everyone, including yourself, then it is not ethical If the ethical rule you claim to be following cannot be made universal, then it is not a valid moral rule
  21. Prima Facia Duties Self evident and obvious Fidelity Reparation Gratitude

    Justice Beneficence Self-Improvement Non-maleficence