Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
REST - Valtech
Search
Mårten Gustafson
March 09, 2012
Programming
420
4
Share
REST - Valtech
Presentation on REST given at Valtech Stockholm.
Approx 60 minutes.
Mårten Gustafson
March 09, 2012
More Decks by Mårten Gustafson
See All by Mårten Gustafson
Github all the things!
chids
3
380
Bastardised Kanban
chids
0
1.5k
Heroku as a production platform
chids
0
210
DevOps @ KnowIT
chids
0
210
Opinions on DevOps
chids
2
650
The OPS side of DEV
chids
9
4.6k
[Swedish] NoSQL at Javaforum Stockholm
chids
2
200
Approaching and evaluating NoSQL
chids
3
200
Automation @ Hitta.se and why it happened
chids
1
300
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
我々はなぜ「層」を分けるのか〜「関心の分離」と「抽象化」で手に入れる変更に強いシンプルな設計〜 #phperkaigi / PHPerKaigi 2026
shogogg
2
780
Redox OS でのネームスペース管理と chroot の実現
isanethen
0
520
AI時代のシステム設計:ドメインモデルで変更しやすさを守る設計戦略
masuda220
PRO
7
1.2k
AI駆動開発がもたらすパラダイムシフト
ryosuke0911
0
110
へんな働き方
yusukebe
6
2.9k
Xdebug と IDE による デバッグ実行の仕組みを見る / Exploring-How-Debugging-Works-with-Xdebug-and-an-IDE
shin1x1
0
340
煩雑なSkills管理をSoC(関心の分離)により解決する――関心を分離し、プロンプトを部品として育てるためのOSSを作った話 / Solving Complex Skills Management Through SoC (Separation of Concerns)
nrslib
3
390
ポーリング処理廃止によるイベント駆動アーキテクチャへの移行
seitarof
3
1.3k
Vibe하게 만드는 Flutter GenUI App With ADK , 박제창, BWAI Incheon 2026
itsmedreamwalker
0
540
AWS re:Invent 2025の少し振り返り + DevOps AgentとBacklogを連携させてみた
satoshi256kbyte
2
140
Goの型安全性で実現する複数プロダクトの権限管理
ishikawa_pro
2
1.4k
今年もTECHSCOREブログを書き続けます!
hiraoku101
0
220
Featured
See All Featured
SEOcharity - Dark patterns in SEO and UX: How to avoid them and build a more ethical web
sarafernandez
0
160
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
528
40k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
304
21k
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
270
14k
Visual Storytelling: How to be a Superhuman Communicator
reverentgeek
2
490
Designing for Performance
lara
611
70k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
27k
Marketing Yourself as an Engineer | Alaka | Gurzu
gurzu
0
170
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
750
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
194
17k
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
thekraken
40
2.3k
Lightning talk: Run Django tests with GitHub Actions
sabderemane
0
160
Transcript
Hi! My name is Mårten Gustafson
I used to work here...
...now I work here... (and I brought give-away readers)
Representational State Transfer
Representational State Transfer
REST
RESTful
HTTP
means of INTEGRATING disparate stuff
(my DARK and shameful PAST) * 4 years of: **
IBM WebSphere ** ESB ** SOAP/WSDL ** Enterprisey * REST vs SOAP vs HTTP vs JMS vs WMQ vs PUB/SUB vs EDA vs HA vs D/R
INTEGRATIONs
APIs
INTERFACEs
UNIFORM * REST defines a uniform interface * As opposed
to SOAP, CORBA, etc
GET PUT POST DELETE - list all foo - 501
- create a new foo - 501 a/b/c/foo
GET PUT POST DELETE - details of {id} - update
the {id} - 501 - delete the {id} a/b/c/foo/{id}
VERBs
(OPTIONS) * not common (yet) * mention: pre-flight
GET * retrieve
HEAD * retrieve without content (ie metadata)
POST * create (without known id) or update (with/without -
unsafe)
PUT * update or create with known id (idempotent)
DELETE * remove
(TRACE) * ?
(CONNECT) * ?
IDEMPOTENT * Without side effects * Fine to call multiple
times
safe idempotent unsafe OPTIONS X (x) GET X (x) HEAD
X (x) POST X PUT X X DELETE X X TRACE X (x) CONNECT
DEVELOPing
WELL BEHAVED * be well behaved * read up on
HTTP/1.1
ETag * The most overlooked HTTP header in API design?
Allows concurrency control * if-match: “<etag>” * if-none-match: “<etag>” * 304 not modified * version number
VARY * Tell clients/caches which headers that forms the response
(ie what’s the cache-combo) * ie: Vary: Accept ( /foo/bar vs /foo/bar : XML vs JSON)
CACHE-CONTROL * age * no-cache * no-store
EXPIRES * Expire any cached copies after...
BENEFITs
CLIENTS PROXIES SERVERS LOAD BALANCERS * will all understand and
act accordingly * in addition cool modern software does HTTP/REST out-of-the-box (CouchDB, Riak)
PLANNING
URLs * What will your URL scheme look like *
How will it evolve * Identify natural points of extension/evolution
DNS * This is part of your URL * Think
about partitioning (subdomains) * Think about future transition, separation, isolation * Does Wildcard DNS make sense to you?
SECURITY * HTTPS + basic auth (one stop shop) *
API auth (client certificates, OAuth) * SSL cookies
VERSIONING * This is the hard part
http://api.foo/v1/bar application/xml + easy (ie browser compatible)
http://api.foo/v1/bar application/xml - URL changes with version - Breaks the
URL = resource REST thingy
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml - hard (ie NOT browser compatible)
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml + version is independent of URL
application/vnd.foo-v1+xml application/vnd.foo-v2+xml * Vary: “Accept”
REPRESENTATION
http://api.foo/bar application/xml + easy (ie browser compatible)
http://api.foo/bar.xml + even easier (ie really browser compatible) - more
info in URL
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml + representation is independent of URL
USABILITY
PROXIES
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
HATEOAS
WAT?!
LINKs * State transitions
MIMEs * Representations
LINK + MIME
CONTRACTS * What do we promise our clients? * Read
these: - http://martinfowler.com/bliki/TolerantReader.html - http://martinfowler.com/articles/consumerDrivenContracts.html
SERIALIZED FORM + Easy programming (initially, typed proxies) - Rigid
(will not bend, will break)
SCHEMAS * Good for automated testing * If you give
them away, assume people will generate proxies (and depend on serialized form) * Consider not providing any (or model them loose, xs:any etc - I’m not sure it’s a good idea)
GUARANTEES * Fields annotated with “#userid” will have the following
form * Attributes named “email” will conform standard X * This document contains one, and only one field annotated “#id”, which is the unique id for Y
ROBUSTNESS
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> * XPath
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> /user/name/last * Rigid
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last * Adaptive
* Might return multiple
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last[1] * Adaptive
* Only one
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> *
Annotated
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last[1]
* Still works
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //*[@id='#name.last'][1]
* Adaptive
<user> <id>1234</id> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </user> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still
works
<named> <first id="#name.first">Mårten</first> <last id="#name.last">Gustafson</last> </named> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still works
<yeah> <foo id="#name.first">Mårten</foo> <bar id="#name.last">Gustafson</bar> </yeah> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still works
INFORMATION MODELLING * This is hard, usually “versioning hard”
#name.first * Format * Values * Guarantees
URL DNS MIME LINKS PROXY
URL DNS MIME LINKS =CONTRACT
?
@martengustafson
[email protected]
http://marten.gustafson.pp.se/talks * Representations