2x Shareholder Return Growth 4.3% 13.5 % 18.1 % 0.8% -1.8% 10.3% B2B digital leaders turn in stronger financial performance. Top-quartile digital B2B companies Rest of B2B sample Revenue growth, CAGR,2010-15 Operating profit (EBIT) Growth, CAGR, 2010-15 Return to shareholder (TRS) growth, CAGR, 2010-15 ~5X ~8X ~2X Firms with high performing IT organizations were twice as likely to exceed their profitability, market share, and productivity goals The State of DevOps, 2016 HIGH PERFORMING IT ORGANIZATIONS: ▪ 200x more frequent releases ▪ 24x faster at recovering from failures ▪ 3x lower change failure rate ▪ 255x shorter lead times No high velocity company has gotten there without automation as a foundation 2x
outcomes to deliver software at speed Deployment frequency Time from commit to deploy Mean time to resolve Time deploying remediation Change failure rate SPEED Measure of rate of software change EFFICIENCY Measure of effectiveness of software change RISK Measure of quality of software change Compliance audit frequency Idea Ship
that average time, max time, or other? For example, in our environment we currently deploy once a quarter. Some commits are made months before deployment and some are made days or hours before deployment. How do we measure that?" Source: https://blog.chef.io/2017/04/03/quantifying-devops-outcomes-increasing-speed Q&A from "Increasing Speed" webinar
minutes with Chef Focus on Speed Measuring the rate of software change HIGH IT PERFORMERS MEDIUM IT PERFORMERS LOW IT PERFORMERS On-demand Week - Month Month – 6 Month < 1 Hour Week - Month Month - 6 month USE CASES INCLUDE: ▪ Application Delivery ▪ Build Pipelines DEPLOYMENT FREQUENCY TIME FROM COMMIT TO DEPLOY
outcomes to deliver software at speed Deployment frequency Time from commit to deploy Mean time to resolve Time deploying remediation Change failure rate SPEED Measure of rate of software change EFFICIENCY Measure of effectiveness of software change RISK Measure of quality of software change Compliance audit frequency Idea Ship
outcomes to deliver software at speed Deployment frequency Time from commit to deploy Mean time to resolve Time deploying remediation Change failure rate SPEED Measure of rate of software change EFFICIENCY Measure of effectiveness of software change RISK Measure of quality of software change Compliance audit frequency Idea Ship
on Efficiency Measuring the effectiveness of software change HIGH IT PERFORMERS MEDIUM IT PERFORMERS LOW IT PERFORMERS 0-15% 31-45% * 16-30% < 1 Hour < 1 Day < 1 Day * USE CASES INCLUDE: ▪ Configuration Management ▪ Server Drift CHANGE FAILURE RATE MEAN TIME TO RESOLVE
REHEARSAL DELIVERED Does the latch open & close? Is it smooth? Can I lock it? Put it on a door. Does it work on that door? Try it on front door, back door, bathroom door, etc
REHEARSAL DELIVERED Does the latch open & close? Is it smooth? Can I lock it? Put it on a door. Does it work on that door? Try it on front door, back door, bathroom door, etc Put that latch on all doors in a house. Run all the tests.
REHEARSAL DELIVERED Does the latch open & close? Is it smooth? Can I lock it? Put it on a door. Does it work on that door? Try it on front door, back door, bathroom door, etc Put that latch on all doors in a house. Run all the tests. Install that latch on all doors in prod
on Efficiency Measuring the effectiveness of software change HIGH IT PERFORMERS MEDIUM IT PERFORMERS LOW IT PERFORMERS 0-15% 31-45% * 16-30% < 1 Hour < 1 Day < 1 Day * USE CASES INCLUDE: ▪ Configuration Management ▪ Server Drift CHANGE FAILURE RATE MEAN TIME TO RESOLVE
on Efficiency Measuring the effectiveness of software change HIGH IT PERFORMERS MEDIUM IT PERFORMERS LOW IT PERFORMERS 0-15% 31-45% * 16-30% < 1 Hour < 1 Day < 1 Day * USE CASES INCLUDE: ▪ Configuration Management ▪ Server Drift CHANGE FAILURE RATE MEAN TIME TO RESOLVE
placed on teams… …can be resolved by vertical integration and automation… …to deliver a future of developer services and software at speed SHARED SERVICES Vertical Integration is key to velocity A balance of increasing speed, improved efficiency and decreasing risk FOCUS ON RISK SHARED SERVICES LOB Line of Business LOB Line of Business LOB SHARED SERVICES LOB DEVELOPER SERVICES BUILD • DEPLOY • MANAGE • COLLABORATE
business requirements Developer Services Engineer Line of Business Development Team I provide services that developers and development teams use to build and deliver applications. Developer Services Teams Traditional Central IT System Administrator Centralized Enterprise IT Team I manage and deliver infrastructure required to run software in my organization. Enabling development teams to get insights into speed, efficiency and risk of delivery of their software Reducing risk to my organization from my infrastructure and software that runs on it Enabling development teams to ship software at speed while maintaining quality and reducing risk Reliably managing changes to infrastructure requirements Providing on-demand, self-service infrastructure and services tailored to developer needs Managing and lowering costs of running, configuring, and maintaining infrastructure DEPLOY MANAGE Don’t measure me on traditional IT metrics, but on the metrics of the business Jim Fowler, CIO, GE Capital BUILD Reducing friction by enabling full stack transparency and management capability with separation of duties Delivering configured infrastructure and handing off responsibility to development teams COLLABORATE