Jul 2009 Sass 2.2 released Sass is born Hampton Catlin’s first commit. Nathan joins in by December. Compass is born Becomes the “Stdlib” of Sass. Made by Chris Eppstein.
Haml split Jul 2009 Sass 2.2 released Aug 2011 Rails 3.1 adopts Sass as the defacto way of writing CSS Sass 3 released Adds support for SCSS. Sep 2010 SassWatch is born Later finds gainful employment as @TheSassWay.
Aug 2011 Rails 3.1 adopts Sass as the defacto way of writing CSS Jan 2012 Hampton creates libsass (a blazing fast C version of Sass) Jan 2012 SassMeetup Seattle Becomes a force for good all over the internets. Sep 2010 SassWatch is born Later finds gainful employment as @TheSassWay.
adopts Sass as the defacto way of writing CSS Jan 2012 Hampton creates libsass (a blazing fast C version of Sass) Jan 2012 SassMeetup Seattle Becomes a force for good all over the internets. Aug 2012 SassCast Episode 1 Created by Dale Sande
moment which extend CSS to adopt a more programmatic syntax and function. It is my opinion that these are only really of benefit to people who haven’t yet mastered writing CSS properly... If you learn how to write your CSS sensibly... you will see little if any need for things like SAAS [sic] et al.” @csswizardry Harry Roberts January 2010
snippet in dreamweaver that I can pull out when I need to that gives me the code for rounded corners... This is a much more efficient way to handle the problem than having to write out the rule, and then declare it's variable and a further value, don't you think?” On mixins... – Russell B.
things accomplished with Sass could not have been accomplished using CSS. The hallmark of a useful library or tool is that it solves a problem. The issue I still have with Sass after reading this article is that there doesn't seem to be a problem TO solve. You don't have to repeat style rules! You can combine CSS rules with inheritance. ” On solving a real problem... – Chris B.
compliance between browsers, to which Sass is completely unrelated? Sass provides nothing but a complicated hand hold for beginners. More programmatic like? Why couldn’t they stick to a standard set of syntax rules? What is it with using a ‘!’ c’mon” On painful CSS? – Ddd