Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
My Problem, My Solution
Search
Penelope Phippen
September 12, 2014
Technology
1
52
My Problem, My Solution
A talk about typing I gave at Frozen Rails 2014
Penelope Phippen
September 12, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Penelope Phippen
See All by Penelope Phippen
Introducing Rubyfmt
penelope_zone
0
550
How RSpec Works
penelope_zone
0
6.5k
Quick and easy browser testing using RSpec and Rails 5.1
penelope_zone
1
79
Teaching RSpec to play nice with Rails
penelope_zone
2
130
Little machines that eat strings
penelope_zone
1
87
What is processor (brighton ruby edition)
penelope_zone
0
97
What is processor?
penelope_zone
1
350
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
penelope_zone
0
250
Agile, etc.
penelope_zone
2
210
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
サーバシステムを無理なくコンテナ移行する際に伝えたい4つのポイント/Container_Happy_Migration_Method
ozawa
1
100
ソフトウェア開発現代史: なぜ日本のソフトウェア開発は「滝」なのか?製造業の成功体験とのギャップ #jassttokyo
takabow
2
1.6k
Enterprise AI in 2025?
pamelafox
0
110
セマンティックレイヤー入門
ikkimiyazaki
8
3.3k
AWS のポリシー言語 Cedar を活用した高速かつスケーラブルな認可技術の探求 #phperkaigi / PHPerKaigi 2025
ytaka23
8
1.5k
AIエージェント完全に理解した
segavvy
4
280
製造業の会計システムをDDDで開発した話
caddi_eng
3
990
モンテカルロ木探索のパフォーマンスを予測する Kaggleコンペ解説 〜生成AIによる未知のゲーム生成〜
rist
4
1.1k
Proxmox VE超入門 〜 無料で作れるご自宅仮想化プラットフォームブックマークする
devops_vtj
0
170
Explainable Software Engineering in the Public Sector
avandeursen
0
370
ウェブアクセシビリティとは
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
310
RAGの基礎から実践運用まで:AWS BedrockとLangfuseで実現する構築・監視・評価
sonoda_mj
0
440
Featured
See All Featured
A designer walks into a library…
pauljervisheath
205
24k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
53
5.4k
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
thekraken
36
1.7k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
7
620
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
28
1.6k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
94
13k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
137
6.9k
Principles of Awesome APIs and How to Build Them.
keavy
126
17k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
411
22k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1030
460k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
110k
GraphQLとの向き合い方2022年版
quramy
45
14k
Transcript
The maybe monad as a replacement for nil
My Problem My Solution
Everyone Stand Up
None
a!/samphippen
My Problem
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type
Types
What is a type?
What is a data type?
A type is a set of possible values and operations
Class
Terms are literally interchangeable in Ruby
Terms are literally interchangeable in Ruby Konstantin
Fixnum
✕
+
/
—
1.class # => Fixnum
You know what all these things do
1+1 # => 2
Array
count
each
In Ruby some types are interchangeable
Typeclass
A set of types and common operations
There is some expectation of what the operations will do
Duck typing
All number types in Ruby form a typeclass
Fixnum Float BigDecimal
Numeric Op Numeric = Numeric
Positive Numeric + Positive Numeric = Positive Numeric =
Also collections
Hash Set Array
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking
This term has two meanings
Compile time type checking
public static final List<string> seriouslyiamsoboredwh ocares
Like in Java
Clearly we don’t do this in Ruby
So what do I mean?
ActiveRecord::Base #find_by
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) pony.neigh
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
The problem here is two return types
nil Pony < AR::Base
We’re forced to add a type check
Also, I think this is the wrong type check
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if !pony.nil? pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
A more explicit type check
But still wrong
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if !pony.nil? pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony.respond_to?(:neigh) pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
This type checking adds unnecessary complexity to our app
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Antithesis
I am using it to mean “DOING IT WRONG”
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Object oriented programming
Konstantin Haase says:
Data abstraction and control abstraction
Alan Kay says:
Everything is an object
Objects communicate by sending and receiving messages
def bees if :bar == a.foo else end end
def bees a.foo nil end
Tell don’t ask
Objects have their own memory (in terms of objects).
Data hiding
Every object is an instance of a class (which must
be an object).
The class holds the shared behavior for its instances (in
the form of objects in a program list)
To eval a program list, control is passed to the
first object and the remainder is treated as its message.
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
My Problem
My Problem
My Solution
Just always make your methods return things of a consistent
type class
Thanks!
No obviously there’s more
Third party APIs do this all the time
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
The problem here is two return types
As a client of this API I am forced to
add a type check
nil is such a common case
How do we fix it?
Null object pattern
I think this one is quite well known
class Pony def horse_power 0.5 end end
Pony.find_by( :key => value ) || NullPony.new
class NullPony def horse_power 0 end end
NullPony quacks the same as Pony
Solves the typing problem
Summing over ponies will only count Pony objects
0 might be the wrong default
Pony * NullPony = 0
Decided the default for horse_power when defining the class
Change is inevitable
Can’t predict how NullPony will be used in the future
Maybe Typeclass
Solves same problem
Allows for runtime defaults
#map(&blk) -> Maybe #value_or(a) -> a
class Just def initialize(value) @value = value end def map(&blk)
def value_or(x) Just.new(blk.call(@value)) @value end end end
class Nothing def map(&blk) self end def value_or(x) x end
end
A consistent interface for dealing with missing values
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
[Maybe, Nothing, Maybe]
call map on all of them
collapse with value_or
To Recap:
Null object can replace nils if you know the defaults
at class definition time
Maybe if you want defaults at run time
Your job is not to make Alan Kay happy
RSpec RSpec ! ! RSpec 3
tinyurl.com/ samfr2014
Let’s have some questions a!/samphippen
[email protected]