Untangling the Spaghetti: Masterclass in ClickHouse SQL Optimization

Untangling the Spaghetti: Writing Clean and Efficient ClickHouse S L
Complex queries don't have to be a tangled mess. This presentation explores how to transform confusing "spaghetti queries" in ClickHouse into clean, maintainable, and high-performance SQL. We'll examine common anti-patterns, provide practical refactoring techniques, and share ClickHouse-specific optimizations to help you write SQL that's both readable and blazingly fast. by Shiv Iyer

Shiv Iyer Bio With over two decades of expertise in
Database Systems, Shiv Iyer has mastered Data Analytics, Data Warehousing, and ETL workflows. He has successfully built, optimized, and scaled high-performance data platforms across diverse industries including Airline Operations, Retail, BFSI, Social Media, Gaming, SaaS, E-Commerce, and Logistics/Supply Chain Management. Shiv's technical proficiency spans PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, ClickHouse, Trino, and various Columnar Database Systems, as well as cloud solutions including Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, and Databricks. He brings deep expertise in Database Systems Architecture & Engineering, Advanced SQL Engineering, Star Schema Models, and Data Modeling. Areas of specialization: Designing & Engineering Scalable Database Systems for high-throughput workloads Optimizing Performance through advanced SQL tuning, indexing, and storage strategies Building Robust Data Warehousing Solutions for enterprise analytics Architecting ETL Pipelines & Data Lakes for real-time and batch processing Solving Complex Data Challenges with innovative, cloud- native architectures

What is a "Spaghetti uery"? Overly complex S L Queries
that are difficult to understand at a glance, requiring significant mental effort to parse Hard to maintain Queries that become fragile, where small changes can lead to unexpected results or errors Performance challenges Inefficient queries that don't leverage ClickHouse's columnar architecture and optimization capabilities Collaboration barriers Code that's difficult for team members to understand and modify safely

Why ClickHouse Makes uery Structure Even More Important Massive Data
Scale ClickHouse is designed to process billions of rows and petabytes of data. At this scale, inefficient queries waste significant resources and time. Columnar Architecture ClickHouse's columnar storage requires different optimization strategies than row-based databases. Poorly structured queries often fail to leverage this architecture. Complex Analytics The types of analytical queries run on ClickHouse tend to be more complex by nature, making clean structure critical for both performance and maintenance.

Common Signs of Spaghetti ueries Excessive Nesting Multiple layers of
nested subqueries that create a maze-like structure, making it difficult to follow the query's logic flow and execution path. Long, Unbroken Code Lines SQL that stretches horizontally with minimal formatting, requiring horizontal scrolling and making it challenging to identify logical components. Unclear Naming Conventions Cryptic aliases like 't1', 't2' instead of meaningful names, or ambiguous column references that require tracing through the entire query to understand. Complex JOIN Chains Numerous tables joined together in non-intuitive ways, often with missing JOIN conditions or inefficient join strategies.

The Cost of Spaghetti ueries in ClickHouse Poor Performance Inefficient
execution plans that waste CPU and memory resources Increased Bugs Higher likelihood of logical errors and unexpected results Higher Costs Greater resource consumption leads to increased infrastructure expenses Development Delays More time spent debugging and understanding existing queries

Example: Nested Subquery Hell SELECT user_id, SUM(revenue) AS total_revenue FROM
( SELECT user_id, (SELECT SUM(price) FROM ( SELECT order_items.price, order_items.order_id FROM order_items WHERE order_items.order_id IN ( SELECT id FROM orders WHERE user_id = users.id ) ) AS user_items ) AS revenue FROM users WHERE ( SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE orders.user_id = users.id ) > 0 ) AS user_revenue GROUP BY user_id HAVING total_revenue > 100 ORDER BY total_revenue DESC LIMIT 100;

The JOIN Maze Excessive table joins Each additional join multiplies
complexity Unclear join relationships Hard to visualize the data flow Memory-intensive operations Can overwhelm available resources Optimization challenges Difficult for the query optimizer

Example: JOIN Overload SELECT u.name, COUNT(DISTINCT o.id) AS order_count, SUM(oi.price
* oi.quantity) AS total_spent, MAX(o.created_at) AS last_order_date, (SELECT AVG(r.rating) FROM reviews r WHERE r.user_id = u.id) AS avg_rating, CASE WHEN (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM cart_items ci JOIN carts c ON ci.cart_id = c.id WHERE c.user_id = u.id AND c.status = 'active') > 0 THEN true ELSE false END AS has_active_cart FROM users u LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id LEFT JOIN order_items oi ON o.id = oi.order_id LEFT JOIN products p ON oi.product_id = p.id LEFT JOIN categories c ON p.category_id = c.id LEFT JOIN payment_methods pm ON o.payment_method_id = pm.id WHERE u.created_at BETWEEN '2020-01-01' AND '2023-12-31' AND u.status = 'active' AND (o.status = 'completed' OR o.status IS NULL) AND (c.name = 'Electronics' OR c.name IS NULL) GROUP BY u.id, u.name HAVING order_count > 0 ORDER BY total_spent DESC LIMIT 100;

The Path to Cleaner ueries Identify Recognize problematic patterns in
your queries 2 Decompose Break complex queries into logical components Refactor Rewrite using cleaner structures and ClickHouse features Optimize Apply ClickHouse-specific optimizations

Common Table Expressions to the Rescue What are CTEs? Common
Table Expressions (WITH clauses) create named subqueries that can be referenced multiple times in your main query, improving readability and maintainability. Benefits in ClickHouse ClickHouse optimizes CTEs effectively, often reusing results when referenced multiple times. This can provide both performance and readability improvements. Modular uery Design CTEs enable you to build complex queries as a series of logical building blocks, making the query structure more intuitive and easier to understand.

Refactored Example: Using CTEs -- First get eligible orders WITH
user_orders AS ( SELECT orders.id, orders.user_id FROM orders JOIN users ON users.id = orders.user_id WHERE users.status = 'active' ), -- Then calculate revenue per order order_revenue AS ( SELECT user_orders.user_id, SUM(order_items.price) AS revenue FROM order_items JOIN user_orders ON order_items.order_id = user_orders.id GROUP BY user_orders.user_id ) -- Finally, get the aggregated results SELECT user_id, SUM(revenue) AS total_revenue FROM order_revenue GROUP BY user_id HAVING total_revenue > 100 ORDER BY total_revenue DESC LIMIT 100;

Breaking Down Complex Joins Identify core data sources Determine which
tables contain your fundamental data points Filter early Apply key filters to reduce data volume before joining 3 Group related joins Create logical CTEs for related table groups Aggregate intermediate results Summarize data at each logical step to reduce row counts

Refactored Example: Complex Joins to CTEs WITH user_base AS (
SELECT id, name, created_at, status FROM users WHERE created_at BETWEEN '2020-01-01' AND '2023-12-31' AND status = 'active' ), user_orders AS ( SELECT o.user_id, o.id AS order_id, o.created_at, o.status FROM orders o WHERE o.status = 'completed' ), order_details AS ( SELECT uo.user_id, uo.order_id, uo.created_at, SUM(oi.price * oi.quantity) AS order_total, p.category_id FROM user_orders uo JOIN order_items oi ON uo.order_id = oi.order_id JOIN products p ON oi.product_id = p.id GROUP BY uo.user_id, uo.order_id, uo.created_at, p.category_id ) -- Main query continues with remaining joins...

Leveraging ClickHouse-Specific Optimizations PREWHERE Clause Performs preliminary filtering to reduce
data scanned. Most effective when filtering eliminates most rows and involves a small subset of columns. FINAL Modifier Essential for tables with ReplacingMergeTree or other *MergeTree engines that store data in parts, ensuring only the final version of each row is retrieved. Materialized Views Pre-aggregated data structures that can dramatically speed up common query patterns by storing and incrementally updating derived results.

PREWHERE in Action SELECT user_id, event_time, event_type, page_url, device_type FROM
user_events WHERE toDate(event_time) BETWEEN '2023-01-01' AND '2023-01-31' AND event_type = 'click' Standard WHERE SELECT user_id, event_time, event_type, page_url, device_type FROM user_events PREWHERE toDate(event_time) BETWEEN '2023-01-01' AND '2023-01-31' WHERE event_type = 'click' Optimized PREWHERE PREWHERE applies the filtering condition before reading other columns, significantly reducing I/O when the filter eliminates many rows.

Using the FINAL Modifier 1 Problem: Duplicate Data ReplacingMergeTree tables
can contain multiple versions of rows until a merge happens 2 Without FINAL Query may return duplicate rows with different versions of the same logical record 3 With FINAL Forces ClickHouse to return only the most recent version of each logical row 4 Performance Tradeoff FINAL adds overhead but ensures data consistency - use selectively when needed

The FINAL Modifier Example SELECT user_id, session_id, last_activity FROM user_sessions
WHERE user_id = 12345 Standard uery May return multiple versions of the same session if merges haven't occurred recently SELECT user_id, session_id, last_activity FROM user_sessions FINAL WHERE user_id = 12345 With FINAL Returns exactly one row per unique combination of the sorting key (primary key), taking the most recent version according to the version column

Materialized Views for Common ueries Identify Common uery Patterns Look
for analytics queries that run frequently with similar aggregation patterns Design an Efficient Schema Structure the materialized view to optimize for the specific query patterns Create Materialized View Define the view with appropriate engine type and aggregation logic uery the View Use the materialized view instead of computing results from scratch

Materialized View Example -- Create a materialized view for faster
aggregations CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW daily_user_events ENGINE = SummingMergeTree() PARTITION BY toYYYYMM(day) ORDER BY (day, event_type, user_id) AS SELECT toDate(event_time) AS day, event_type, user_id, count() AS events_count FROM events GROUP BY day, event_type, user_id; -- Query the materialized view (much faster than calculating from raw events) SELECT day, sum(events_count) AS total_events FROM daily_user_events WHERE day BETWEEN '2023-01-01' AND '2023-01-31' GROUP BY day ORDER BY day;

Proper Indexing Strategies Skip Indices Advanced secondary indices for complex
filtering Projection Optimization Tuned for specific query patterns Sort Keys Strategic column ordering for common filters Partition Keys Fundamental data organization

Effective Table Design Example CREATE TABLE events ( event_date Date,
event_time DateTime, user_id UInt64, event_type String, page_url String, device_type String, country String, browser String, duration_ms UInt32 ) ENGINE = MergeTree() PARTITION BY toYYYYMM(event_date) ORDER BY (event_type, user_id, event_time) SETTINGS index_granularity = 8192; -- Add a secondary index for country filtering ALTER TABLE events ADD INDEX country_idx country TYPE set(0) GRANULARITY 4;

ClickHouse and Projections What are Projections? Projections are alternative physical
storage arrangements of the same data, optimized for different query patterns. They're conceptually similar to materialized views but are stored within the same table. When to Use Them Projections are ideal when you have multiple common query patterns that would benefit from different sort orders or aggregation structures but don't want to maintain separate materialized views. Performance Impact While projections add some storage overhead and write amplification, they can dramatically improve query performance for specific patterns by providing optimized data access paths.

Projection Example -- Create a table with default order by
user_id CREATE TABLE user_events ( event_date Date, event_time DateTime, user_id UInt64, event_type String, page_id UInt32 ) ENGINE = MergeTree() PARTITION BY toYYYYMM(event_date) ORDER BY (user_id, event_time); -- Add a projection optimized for queries by event_type ALTER TABLE user_events ADD PROJECTION event_type_proj ( SELECT * ORDER BY (event_type, event_time) ); -- Query will automatically use the projection when appropriate SELECT count() FROM user_events WHERE event_type = 'click' AND event_date BETWEEN '2023-01-01' AND '2023-01-31';

Formatting and Commenting for Readability Consistent Indentation Use 2-4 spaces
consistently Align clauses and expressions Indent subqueries and CTEs Meaningful Comments Explain complex logic Document performance considerations Note assumptions and edge cases Logical Line Breaks Break after major clauses (SELECT, FROM, WHERE) Separate complex expressions Group related conditions

Before: Poorly Formatted uery SELECT u.user_id,u.username,u.email,count(o.id) as order_count,sum(o.total_amount) as total_spent,max(o.created_at)
as last_order, (select count(*) from cart_items ci join carts c on ci.cart_id=c.id where c.user_id=u.user_id and c.status='active') as cart_items_count,avg(r.rating) as avg_rating, case when count(o.id)>10 then 'loyal' when count(o.id)>5 then 'regular' else 'new' end as user_segment from users u left join orders o on u.user_id=o.user_id left join reviews r on r.user_id=u.user_id where u.created_at>'2020-01-01' and (o.status='completed' or o.status is null) and u.status='active' group by u.user_id,u.username,u.email having total_spent>1000 order by total_spent desc limit 100;

After: Well-Formatted uery -- Find high-value users with their order
metrics and segmentation -- Note: Filters to active users who have spent over $1000 SELECT u.user_id, u.username, u.email, COUNT(o.id) AS order_count, SUM(o.total_amount) AS total_spent, MAX(o.created_at) AS last_order, -- Get current items in user's cart (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM cart_items ci JOIN carts c ON ci.cart_id = c.id WHERE c.user_id = u.user_id AND c.status = 'active') AS cart_items_count, AVG(r.rating) AS avg_rating, -- Segment users based on order frequency CASE WHEN COUNT(o.id) > 10 THEN 'loyal' WHEN COUNT(o.id) > 5 THEN 'regular' ELSE 'new' END AS user_segment FROM users u LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.user_id = o.user_id LEFT JOIN reviews r ON r.user_id = u.user_id WHERE u.created_at > '2020-01-01' AND (o.status = 'completed' OR o.status IS NULL) AND u.status = 'active' GROUP BY u.user_id, u.username, u.email HAVING total_spent > 1000 ORDER BY total_spent DESC LIMIT 100;

Clear Naming Conventions Table Aliases Use meaningful abbreviations that reflect
the table name, not just arbitrary letters like 't1', 't2'. For example, 'users' becomes 'u', 'order_items' becomes 'oi'. CTE Names Name CTEs to reflect their purpose and content, such as 'active_users', 'recent_orders', or 'revenue_by_category', making their role in the query instantly clear. Output Columns Always name calculated columns with clear, descriptive names using AS. Avoid returning unnamed expressions that make results difficult to interpret and reference.

Denormalization in ClickHouse The Traditional JOIN Problem Complex JOINs are
expensive in ClickHouse, especially with large tables, as they can require significant memory and CPU resources. They often counteract ClickHouse's columnar optimizations. Unlike traditional OLTP databases, ClickHouse is optimized for analytically processing denormalized data rather than maintaining normalized relational structures. ClickHouse Denormalization Strategy Pre-join related data during ingestion Store repeated data (dimensions) alongside facts Use materialized columns for derived values Accept storage increase for query performance Denormalization trades increased storage space for dramatically faster query performance - a worthwhile tradeoff in many analytical scenarios.

Denormalization Example -- Separate dimension tables CREATE TABLE users(...) CREATE
TABLE products(...) CREATE TABLE categories(...) -- Facts table with foreign keys CREATE TABLE events( event_id UInt64, event_time DateTime, user_id UInt64, product_id UInt64 ) Normalized Approach (Avoid) -- Denormalized events table CREATE TABLE events( event_id UInt64, event_time DateTime, -- Embedded user dimensions user_id UInt64, user_name String, user_country String, -- Embedded product dimensions product_id UInt64, product_name String, product_price Decimal(10,2), category_name String ) Denormalized Approach (Preferred)

Dictionary Tables for Dimension Data External Dictionary Concept Special data
structure optimized for lookups against dimension data like products, users, or geographical regions In-memory Performance Dictionaries are loaded into RAM for extremely fast access, dramatically outperforming JOIN operations Automatic Updates Configure dictionaries to refresh periodically from the source, keeping dimension data current without manual intervention Flexible Lookup Methods Support for various lookup algorithms including hash tables, trie structures, and complex key hierarchies

Dictionary Implementation Example -- Create XML configuration file: /etc/clickhouse-server/dict/products.xml products
localhost 9000 default retail products 300 product_id name String category String -- Query using the dictionary instead of JOIN SELECT e.event_id, e.product_id, dictGet('products', 'name', toUInt64(e.product_id)) AS product_name, dictGet('products', 'category', toUInt64(e.product_id)) AS category FROM events e WHERE e.event_date = today();

Array Join for Nested Data -- Table with array column
CREATE TABLE user_sessions ( user_id UInt64, session_id String, session_start DateTime, page_views Array(String), time_spent Array(UInt32) ) ENGINE = MergeTree() ORDER BY (user_id, session_start); Handling Array Data ClickHouse excels at storing and querying nested data structures like arrays. This is useful for storing multiple related items without separate tables. -- Query that unnests the arrays SELECT user_id, session_id, page_views AS page, time_spent AS duration FROM user_sessions ARRAY JOIN page_views, time_spent WHERE session_start >= today() - 7; Using ARRAY JOIN The ARRAY JOIN operation efficiently "unnests" array data for analysis, avoiding complex JOINs with separate tables.

Window Functions for Clean Analytics Running Aggregates Calculate cumulative sums,
moving averages, and running totals without complex self-joins or subqueries. Ranking Functions Efficiently compute ranks, dense ranks, and percentiles to analyze relative performance. Lag & Lead Analysis Compare current rows with previous or subsequent values for change detection and time-series analysis. Partitioning Flexibility Analyze data within specific groups or segments without separate grouping operations.

Window Functions Example -- Messy approach with self-join SELECT current.date,
current.revenue, current.revenue - previous.revenue AS daily_change FROM daily_sales current LEFT JOIN daily_sales previous ON current.date = previous.date + 1 ORDER BY current.date; -- Clean approach with window functions SELECT date, revenue, revenue - lag(revenue) OVER (ORDER BY date) AS daily_change, sum(revenue) OVER (ORDER BY date) AS running_total, avg(revenue) OVER ( ORDER BY date ROWS BETWEEN 6 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW ) AS weekly_moving_avg FROM daily_sales ORDER BY date;

Using Subqueries Effectively Filtering Subqueries Pre-filter large datasets before joining
or analysis Aggregation Subqueries Compute metrics needed for higher- level analysis Existence Checks Use IN/NOT IN for efficient membership testing Derived Tables Create logical intermediary result sets

Subqueries vs CTEs: When to Use Each Use CTEs When:
The same subquery is referenced multiple times The query structure is complex with multiple levels You want to build the query in logical, readable steps The intermediate result has a clear, conceptual meaning CTEs promote readability and maintainability. They give names to logical query components, making the structure easier to understand. Use Subqueries When: The subquery is used only once in a specific context The subquery is simple and tightly coupled to its containing query The subquery represents a calculation rather than a dataset You need correlated subqueries that reference outer query columns Sometimes inline subqueries can be more direct and efficient when their purpose is narrowly focused and closely tied to a specific operation.

Efficient Aggregations Pre-filter before aggregating Apply WHERE clauses before GROUP
BY to reduce the amount of data processed Use appropriate aggregation functions Choose specialized functions like sumIf() instead of sum(if()) Leverage approximate functions When absolute precision isn't required, use functions like approxCountDistinct() Consider multi-level aggregations Break complex aggregations into stages with intermediate CTEs

Optimized Aggregation Examples -- Single-stage complex aggregation SELECT toStartOfMonth(timestamp) AS
month, user_id, sum(if(event_type = 'purchase', amount, 0)) AS purchase_amount, count(if(event_type = 'view', 1, null)) AS view_count FROM events WHERE timestamp >= '2023-01-01' GROUP BY month, user_id HAVING purchase_amount > 0 Less Efficient -- Pre-filter and use specialized functions SELECT toStartOfMonth(timestamp) AS month, user_id, sumIf(amount, event_type = 'purchase') AS purchase_amount, countIf(event_type = 'view') AS view_count FROM events WHERE timestamp >= '2023-01-01' AND (event_type = 'purchase' OR event_type = 'view') GROUP BY month, user_id HAVING purchase_amount > 0 More Efficient

Multi-stage Aggregation for Complex Analytics First Stage: Filter & Base
Metrics Apply core filters and compute basic metrics at granular level 2 Second Stage: Intermediate Grouping Create logical data segments with intermediate aggregations Third Stage: Final Aggregation Compute high-level summary metrics and comparisons Final Stage: Sort & Limit Order results and apply limits for presentation

Multi-stage Aggregation Example -- First stage: Detailed event metrics by
day and product WITH daily_product_metrics AS ( SELECT toDate(event_time) AS day, product_id, countIf(event_type = 'view') AS views, countIf(event_type = 'add_to_cart') AS cart_adds, countIf(event_type = 'purchase') AS purchases FROM user_events WHERE event_time BETWEEN '2023-01-01' AND '2023-01-31' GROUP BY day, product_id ), -- Second stage: Calculate conversion rates by product product_conversion AS ( SELECT product_id, sum(views) AS total_views, sum(purchases) AS total_purchases, sum(purchases) / sum(views) AS view_to_purchase_rate FROM daily_product_metrics GROUP BY product_id HAVING total_views >= 100 ) -- Final stage: Get top products by conversion rate SELECT product_id, total_views, total_purchases, view_to_purchase_rate FROM product_conversion ORDER BY view_to_purchase_rate DESC LIMIT 20;

uery Testing and Validation Verify with Sample Data Test queries
with small, known datasets where you can manually verify results Compare with Previous Solutions Run refactored queries in parallel with original versions to ensure consistent results Profile uery Performance Use EXPLAIN and system.query_log to analyze execution plans and resource usage Incremental Complexity Build complex queries gradually, validating each component before combining

Using EXPLAIN for uery Analysis -- Analyze query execution plan
EXPLAIN pipeline SELECT toStartOfDay(timestamp) AS day, user_id, sumIf(amount, event_type = 'purchase') AS purchase_amount, countIf(event_type = 'view') AS view_count FROM events WHERE timestamp >= '2023-01-01' AND (event_type = 'purchase' OR event_type = 'view') GROUP BY day, user_id HAVING purchase_amount > 0 ORDER BY purchase_amount DESC LIMIT 100; -- Combines regular EXPLAIN with performance metrics EXPLAIN pipeline, indexes, actions SELECT ...

uery Log Analysis Examining Past uery Performance ClickHouse maintains detailed
logs of query execution in the system.query_log table, providing valuable insights for optimization. Key metrics to analyze include: Query duration Memory usage Rows read and processed CPU time consumed -- Find the slowest queries SELECT query_id, query, query_duration_ms, read_rows, read_bytes, memory_usage FROM system.query_log WHERE type = 'QueryFinish' AND event_time > now() - INTERVAL 1 DAY AND query NOT LIKE '%system.query_log%' ORDER BY query_duration_ms DESC LIMIT 10; Example uery Log Analysis

Using Temporary Tables for Complex Analytics 1 Final analytics query
Clean, focused computation from optimized temp tables Intermediate result storage Temporary tables holding derived datasets Pre-filtering and basic aggregation Initial data preparation and reduction Raw data sources Original large tables with detailed events

Temporary Tables Example -- Create a temporary table for filtered
events CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE filtered_events AS SELECT user_id, event_time, event_type, product_id, price FROM events WHERE event_date BETWEEN '2023-01-01' AND '2023-01-31' AND event_type IN ('view', 'add_to_cart', 'purchase'); -- Create a temporary table with user metrics CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE user_metrics AS SELECT user_id, countIf(event_type = 'view') AS view_count, countIf(event_type = 'purchase') AS purchase_count, sumIf(price, event_type = 'purchase') AS total_spent FROM filtered_events GROUP BY user_id; -- Final analytics query SELECT um.user_id, um.view_count, um.purchase_count, um.total_spent, um.purchase_count / um.view_count AS conversion_rate FROM user_metrics um WHERE um.view_count >= 10 ORDER BY conversion_rate DESC LIMIT 100;

Real-time uery Optimization Use LIMIT with SAMPLE When developing complex
queries, test with a sample of the data to get faster feedback cycles Optimize column selection Select only the specific columns needed rather than using SELECT * to reduce I/O Push predicates down Apply filters as early as possible in the query structure to reduce data volume early Monitor query cache Use and understand the query cache for repetitive analytics workloads

uery Review Checklist Structure & Readability Is the query properly
formatted with consistent indentation? 1. Are table and column aliases meaningful? 2. Is complex logic documented with comments? 3. Are CTEs used to break down complex operations? 4. Does the query flow in a logical order? 5. Performance & Efficiency Are filters applied as early as possible? 1. Is the query leveraging appropriate indexes? 2. Are JOINs necessary or can denormalization help? 3. Are ClickHouse-specific optimizations used where appropriate? 4. Has the query been tested with EXPLAIN? 5. Is query performance consistent with expectations? 6.

Team Development Strategies uery Libraries Maintain a repository of well-tested,
optimized query patterns that team members can reference and reuse. Document the purpose, assumptions, and performance characteristics of each query pattern. Peer Reviews Implement a code review process specifically for complex queries. Have experienced team members review for both functionality and efficiency before queries go to production. Style Guidelines Establish and enforce team-wide SQL formatting standards to ensure consistency across all queries. Use automated tools to check adherence to these standards when possible. Performance Baselines Define acceptable performance metrics for common query types. Regularly test against these baselines to catch performance regressions early in the development process.

Learning Resources Mastering ClickHouse SQL optimization is essential for building
high-performance data pipelines. The official ClickHouse documentation serves as your primary knowledge hub, offering comprehensive guides on query optimization techniques, from basic indexing strategies to advanced execution plans. For practical insights, turn to the ClickHouse blog where real-world optimization stories showcase how companies have achieved 10- 100x performance improvements through careful query restructuring. These case studies often include before-and-after query examples with detailed performance metrics that you can apply to your own challenges. Dive into the ClickHouse GitHub repository to examine production-ready code examples across diverse industries and use cases. The repository features annotated queries that highlight best practices for handling everything from time-series analytics to high-cardinality data scenarios. Connect with fellow practitioners on the ClickHouse community forum where you can post your queries for expert review, participate in optimization challenges, and join specialized discussion groups focused on performance tuning. This collaborative environment often reveals optimization techniques that aren't documented elsewhere and provides personalized guidance for your specific data patterns.

Key Takeaways 1 Break down complex queries Use Common Table
Expressions (CTEs) to decompose spaghetti queries into logical, understandable components Leverage ClickHouse optimizations Use ClickHouse-specific features like PREWHERE, materialized views, and dictionaries to maximize performance Format for readability Consistent formatting, meaningful names, and helpful comments make queries maintainable Design for analytics Consider denormalization and pre-aggregation to match ClickHouse's analytical strengths

Untangling the Spaghetti: Masterclass in ClickH...

Untangling the Spaghetti: Masterclass in ClickHouse SQL Optimization

More Decks by Shiv Iyer

Other Decks in Technology

Featured

Transcript