Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Adequate Full Text Search
Search
Florian Gilcher
November 25, 2014
Programming
180
1
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Adequate Full Text Search
given at Elasticsearch UG in November 2014
Florian Gilcher
November 25, 2014
More Decks by Florian Gilcher
See All by Florian Gilcher
A new contract with users
skade
1
550
Using Rust to interface with my dive computer
skade
0
320
async/.await with async-std
skade
1
830
Training Rust
skade
1
150
Internet of Streams - IoT in Rust
skade
0
130
How DevRel is failing communities
skade
0
140
The power of the where clause
skade
0
730
Three Years of Rust
skade
1
250
Rust as a CLI language
skade
1
250
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
モジュールの視点からSwiftを読み解く #iosdc
s_shimotori
0
250
すこし踏み込む CancellationToken
htkym
2
1.5k
AI Agent時代のリアーキテクチャ戦略と実践
hokaccha
9
5.2k
iOSDC2026登壇資料.pdf
riofujimon
0
200
テストを司るデーモンに会いに行く 〜隔離した仮想マシンでテストを通すまで〜
h1d3mun3
1
590
モバイル交通系ICへのチャージ実例から考える、クロスプラットフォーム開発におけるiOS実機テスト設計とCI運用
yusuga
1
560
Heart of Swift Concurrency
koher
0
1.1k
SONY CISC-NEWS NWS-1750 + NWB-225 フレームバッファの NetBSD/news68k ドライバ実装 / OSC2026Hiroshima
tsutsui
0
160
thread_parallel_with_free-threaded_Python_and_NumPy.pdf
riku_sakamoto
0
370
AI が書く Go コードの品質を劇的に向上させる Linter: “declscope”
mpyw
0
440
UnityでSystem.Net.WebSocketsなWebSocketサーバが動かないのでUnity Monoのコードを覗いてみた / about implementing websocket server with unity mono
drumath2237
1
490
TiDB Cloudのカスタムコントローラーによるオートスケール対応
takaidohigasi
0
140
Featured
See All Featured
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
3
1.4k
Sam Torres - BigQuery for SEOs
techseoconnect
PRO
0
550
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
9
1.6k
Future Trends and Review - Lecture 12 - Web Technologies (1019888BNR)
signer
PRO
0
3.8k
Game over? The fight for quality and originality in the time of robots
wayneb77
1
290
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
960
Claude Code のすすめ
schroneko
67
230k
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
66
8.6k
Speed Design
sergeychernyshev
33
2.1k
sira's awesome portfolio website redesign presentation
elsirapls
0
430
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
100
6.3k
Building AI with AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
1.3k
Transcript
None
$ cat .profile GIT_AUTHOR_NAME=Florian Gilcher
[email protected]
TM_COMPANY=Asquera GmbH TWITTER_HANDLE=argorak GITHUB_HANDLE=skade
• Backend developer • Focused on infrastructure and databases
• Elasticsearch Usergroup • mrgn.in meetup • Rust Usergroup (co-org)
• organizer alumni eurucamp • organizer alumni JRubyConf.EU • Ruby Berlin board member
Adequate Full Text Search
The evaluation problem
Given almost no time and an unknown problem space, how
do I evaluate "fitness for purpose"?
You can't
Given almost no time and only a glimpse of the
problem space, how do I evaluate "fitness for purpose"?
How much of a glimpse do I need?
In this talk, I’ll present: • a solution unfit for
purpose • a solution fit for purpose, but only in cer- tain boundaries • a comparison to a fully fledged solution
To the daily practitioners: I’ll gloss over a lot of
points.
• Elasticsearch • PostgreSQL • MongoDB
Issue 1 Search systems are not binary. Faults in the
system degrade the quality of the system, rarely break it.
Issue 2 Full text searchers are far more focused on
inputs then on output.
Building Block 1 An inverted index
doc id content 0 "Überlin ist auf Twitter" 1 "Ich
bin auf Twitter" 2 "Ich folge Überlin"
terms document ids uberlin 0,2 twitter 0,1 bin 1 ich
1,2 auf 0,1
Initial search rules are easy: if one or more of
the terms to the left is searched for, find the document that matches. Count the matches.
Building Block 2 Textual input
Full text searchers generally work on real world text. Get
hold of as many samples as possible. If necessary, write some on your own.
Don’t use an random generator. Or spend your next weeks
writing a sophisticated one.
Your system should bring capabilities handling real world text.
Analysis
Analysis determines which terms end up at the left side
of the table in the first place.
analysis result "ich folge Überlin" whitespace "ich" "folge" "Überlin" lowercase
"ich" "folge" "überlin" normalize "ich" "folge" "uberlin" stemming "ich" "folg" "uberlin"
analysis result "ich folge ueberlin" whitespace "ich" "folge" "ueberlin" lowercase
"ich" "folge" "ueberlin" normalize "ich" "folge" "ueberlin" stemming "ich" "folg" "uberlin"
This step happens both on indexing and queries.
Manipulating analysis is the basis for manipulating matches.
Can I manipulate analysis?
MongoDB Only choose between language presets PostgreSQL Analysis happens through
normal PL/SQL functions Elasticsearch Analyser configura- tion with a wide vari- ety of choice
Ü
Does your system comfortably speak Unicode?
doc id field value 1 Test 2 test 3 Überlin
token doc ids test 1,2 uberlin 3
MongoDB
search term no. matches Test 2 test 2 Überlin 1
überlin 0
token doc ids test 1,2 Überlin 3
input result überlin überlin Überlin Überlin
MongoDB fails at the simplest case, lowercasing german umlauts, in
german settings.
The exact analysis behaviour is not user-controllable, for simplicities sake.
The suggestion is to preprocess yourself.
None
Further down the Unicode
How well does you system handle "creative" codes?
"\u0055\u0308" "\u0075\u0308"
"\u0055\u0308" #=> Ü "\u0075\u0308" #=> ü
PostgreSQL
postgres=# SELECT unaccent(U&’\0075\0308’); unaccent ———- ü (1 row)
PostgreSQL handles UCS-2 level 1, not UTF.
No combining chars.
“ we should really reject combining chars, but can’t do
that w/o breaking BC.”
sigh, Software
If you use PostgreSQL and text manipulation, you probably have
a bug in the hiding there.
UCS-2 for all textual data is a doable constraint, though.
input result überlin überlin Überlin überlin \u0055 \u0308 Invalid input
\u0075 \u0308 Invalid input
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch can handle all those cases and then some, using
the analysis-icu plugin.
Install it and use it.
curl -XGET ’localhost:9200/_analyze?\ tokenizer=\ icu_tokenizer\ &token_filters=\ icu_folding,icu_normalizer’\ -d ’Überlin’
input result überlin uberlin Überlin uberlin \u0055 \u0308 uberlin \u0075
\u0308 uberlin
The way the system supports you in safely inserting textual
input is of paramount importance!
Find the worst shenanegans of you language, try it out.
l’elision, c’est magnifique
Building Block 3 Scoring
Search is all about relevance and combinations thereof.
Was the match in the title or the body of
a document?
How many options do I have?
All three systems can weight matches on fields differently.
When can I decide those weights?
database index time query time MongoDB yes no PostgreSQL yes
no Elasticsearch yes yes
Weights during index time need a rebuild of the index
every time you change them.
If in doubt, choose query time weights.
Can I influence the scoring/ranking further?
database MongoDB no PostgreSQL yes, using PL/SQL functions Elasticsearch yes,
in many fashions (geo, distance, etc.)
Building Block 4 Documentation
I glossed over a lot of details.
How well is the process documented, internally and interface-wise?
database interface internal MongoDB good almost non-existent PostgreSQL great great
Elasticsearch great great
Can I grow beyond?
And this is where the fun starts and we stop.
What’s adequate?
• Allows to manipulate analysis • Assists with real world
input • Allows you to build combined, extensible queries • Good documentation
MongoDB is not fit for purpose with holes that can
only be fixed by careful preparation of that data.
That preparation needs lots of detail knowledge you probably don’t
want to aquire.
PostgreSQL is adequate and in the PostgreSQL tradition of stable,
well-documented features. It doesn’t win prices, but is workable and reliable.
A good solution if search is just a bystander. A
thousand times better than LIKE.
Elasticsearch is based on Lucene and comes with all the
goodies and also has great documentations and guides.
If search is at the core of your product, use
a proper search engine.
References on the meetup group tomorrow.
Thank you!
None
COURSES
Elasticsearch for managers: http://esmanagers2014.asquera.de/
None
December 2nd
Getting started workshop: http://purchases.elastic- search.com/class/elasticsearch/elk-work- shop/berlin-germany/2014-12-15
None
December 15th