Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Monads in Scala
Search
Alexey Novakov
March 06, 2020
Programming
0
97
Monads in Scala
Monad as an abstract interface. Usage of Monads in Scala
Alexey Novakov
March 06, 2020
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Alexey Novakov
See All by Alexey Novakov
Особенности разработки Flink джобов на Scala
alexeyn
0
29
Streamhouse Architecture with Flink and Paimon
alexeyn
0
260
Flink Forward 2023: State of Scala API in Apache Flink
alexeyn
0
160
State of Scala API in Apache Flink
alexeyn
0
400
Deployment of Streaming Application with Ververica Platform on Kubernetes
alexeyn
0
220
Rapid Deployment with Apache Flink and Ververica Platform
alexeyn
0
150
Scalacon 2021 - Deep Learning in Scala
alexeyn
0
99
AWS Airflow and EMR
alexeyn
0
110
EMR Data Ingestion with Apache Hudi
alexeyn
0
41
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
CSC307 Lecture 02
javiergs
PRO
1
760
生成AI時代を勝ち抜くエンジニア組織マネジメント
coconala_engineer
0
40k
AIで開発はどれくらい加速したのか?AIエージェントによるコード生成を、現場の評価と研究開発の評価の両面からdeep diveしてみる
daisuketakeda
1
760
dchart: charts from deck markup
ajstarks
3
960
MDN Web Docs に日本語翻訳でコントリビュート
ohmori_yusuke
0
500
Patterns of Patterns
denyspoltorak
0
600
LLM Observabilityによる 対話型音声AIアプリケーションの安定運用
gekko0114
2
360
JETLS.jl ─ A New Language Server for Julia
abap34
2
480
AIの誤りが許されない業務システムにおいて“信頼されるAI” を目指す / building-trusted-ai-systems
yuya4
7
4.4k
余白を設計しフロントエンド開発を 加速させる
tsukuha
3
200
Data-Centric Kaggle
isax1015
2
560
例外処理とどう使い分ける?Result型を使ったエラー設計 #burikaigi
kajitack
16
5.5k
Featured
See All Featured
Design of three-dimensional binary manipulators for pick-and-place task avoiding obstacles (IECON2024)
konakalab
0
340
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
370
20k
AI in Enterprises - Java and Open Source to the Rescue
ivargrimstad
0
1.1k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
54k
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
55
12k
Un-Boring Meetings
codingconduct
0
180
HU Berlin: Industrial-Strength Natural Language Processing with spaCy and Prodigy
inesmontani
PRO
0
140
We Are The Robots
honzajavorek
0
130
Navigating the Design Leadership Dip - Product Design Week Design Leaders+ Conference 2024
apolaine
0
150
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.2k
Sam Torres - BigQuery for SEOs
techseoconnect
PRO
0
170
How Fast Is Fast Enough? [PerfNow 2025]
tammyeverts
3
420
Transcript
Monads in Scala Alexey Novakov, Ultra Tendency, 2020
"A monad is just a monoid in the category of
endofunctors”
“Monad is an abstract interface” Book: Functional Programming in Scala
(Red Book)
Option Either List Future Map Set Stream Vector Future Try
And others … Monads in standard Scala
flatMap unit a.k.a bind a.k.a pure What makes thing a
Monad? “apply” in Scala
class Box[A](v: A) { def flatMap[B](f: A => Box[B]): Box[B]
= f(v) } def map[B](f: A => B): Box[B] = flatMap(a => new Box(f(a))) A Monad modeled as a class minimum set
scala> new Box(1) res2: Box[Int] = 1 scala> res2.map(_ +
1) res3: Box[Int] = 2 scala> res3.flatMap(i => new Box(1 + i)) res5: Box[Int] = 3
scala> val l = List(1,2,3) l: List[Int] = List(1, 2,
3) scala> l.map(_ + 1) res0: List[Int] = List(2, 3, 4) scala> l.flatMap(i => List(i + 1)) res1: List[Int] = List(2, 3, 4) List
val isOn = Some(1) val isBlack = None def makeCoffee:
Option[String] = Some(1) scala> isOn .flatMap(_ => isBlack .flatMap(_ => makeCoffee)) res0: Option[String] = None Option stopped here
trait Functor[F[_]] { def map[A,B](fa: F[A])(f: A => B): F[B]
} trait Monad[F[_]] extends Functor[F] { def unit[A](a: => A): F[A] def flatMap[A,B](ma: F[A])(f: A => F[B]): F[B] def map[A,B](ma: F[A])(f: A => B): F[B] = flatMap(ma)(a => unit(f(a))) } Generic Monad another abstract interface
Monads are like burritos
“f” function application in flatMap & map depends on the
concrete Monad instance “f” applied when: - Option[A]: is Some(A) - Either[A, B]: is Right(B) - List[A]: is non-empty - Future[A]: is ready
Moreover, Monad laws are there
Monad law 1. Identity Example def f(x: Int): Option[Int] =
Some(x) scala> Some(1).flatMap(f) == f(1) res0: Boolean = true scala> f(1) == Some(1).flatMap(f) res1: Boolean = true
Monad law 1. Left Identity def f[A](x: A): Monad[A] =
??? flatMap(unit(x))(f) == f(x) Right Identity f(x) == flatMap(unit(x))(f)
Monad law 2. Associative Example def f1(a: Int): Option[Int] =
Some(a + 1) def f2(a: Int): Option[Int] = Some(a * 2) scala> Some(1).flatMap(f1).flatMap(f2) res0: Option[Int] = Some(4) scala> Some(1).flatMap(a => f1(a).flatMap(f2)) res1: Option[Int] = Some(4)
Monad law 2. Associative def f1[A](a: A): Monad[A] def f2[A](a:
A): Monad[A] if x is a Monad instance, flatMap(flatMap(x)(f1))(f2) == flatMap(x)(a => flatMap(f1(a))(f2))
Functor law 1. Identity map(x)(a => a) == x Example:
map(Some(1))(a => a) == Some(1) the same value returned
Functor law 2. Associative Example: val f1 = (n: Int)
=> n + 1 val f2 = (n: Int) => n * 2 map(map(Some(1))(f1))(f2) // Some(4) == map(Some(1))(f2 compose f1) // Some(4)
Functor law 2. Associative map(map(x)(f1))(f2) == map(x)(f2 compose f1) one
by one apply f1 then f2 in one step
None
final case class Coffee(name: String) val isOn = Some(1) val
coffeeName = Some("black") val makeCoffee = (name: String) => Some(Coffee(name)) for { _ <- isOn name <- coffeeName coffee <- makeCoffee(name) } yield coffee scala> Op)on[Coffee] = Some(Coffee(black)) Compose Option
case class Cluster(pods: Int) def validateNamespace(ns: String): Either[String, Unit] =
Right(()) def clusterExists(ns: String): Either[Cluster, Unit] = Right(()) def createCluster(ns: String, cluster: Cluster): Either[String, Cluster] = Right(Cluster(cluster.pods)) val ns = "my-cluster" for { _ <- validateNamespace(ns) _ <- clusterExists(ns).left.map(c => s"Cluster with ${c.pods} pods already exists") newCluster <- createCluster(ns, Cluster(4)) } yield newCluster Compose Either scala> Either[String,Cluster] = Right(Cluster(4))
scala> Either[String,Cluster] = LeC( Cluster namespace is not valid name,
choose another name ) def validNamespace(ns: String): Either[String, Unit] = if (ns == "my-cluster") Left( “Cluster namespace is not valid name, choose another name” ) else Right(())
for {…} yield is a syntactic sugar for a sequence
of calls: flatMap1(… + flatMapN(.. + map(…))) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powdered_sugar#/media/File:Powdered_Sugar_-_Macro.jpg
validNamespace("my-cluster") .flatMap(_ => clusterExists(ns) .left .map(c => s"Cluster with ${c.pods}
pods already exists” ).flatMap(_ => createCluster(ns, Cluster(4)) .map(newCluster => newCluster) ) ) Desugared
for { _ <- validNamespace("my-cluster") _ <- clusterExists(ns) .left.map(c =>
s"Cluster with ${c.pods} pods already exists") newCluster <- createCluster(ns, Cluster(4)) } yield newCluster Sugared
Caveat: different Monads do not compose.
def validateNamespace(ns: String): Either[String, Unit] def clusterExists(ns: String): Option[Either[String, Cluster]]
def createCluster(ns: String, cluster: Cluster): Either[String, Cluster] Problem for { _ <- validateNamespace(ns) cluster <- clusterExists(ns) updated <- createCluster(ns, cluster) } yield updated two monad stacks
updated <- createCluster(ns, cluster) ^ <pas)e>:4: error: type mismatch; found
: Either[String,Cluster] required: Cluster cluster <- clusterExists(ns) ^ <pas)e>:3: error: type mismatch; found : Op)on[Nothing] required: scala.u)l.Either[?,?] Op)on[Nothing] <: scala.u)l.Either[?,?]? false
Monad Transformers
- custom-written monad - specifically constructed for composition OptionT: Option
+ Any other Monad EitherT: Either + Any other Monad ReaderT: Reader + Any other Monad WriterT: Writer + Any other Monad … others
EitherT *Example: unwrap second stack * from cats.data.EitherT.scala final case
class EitherT[F[_], A, B](value: F[Either[A, B]]) { def flatMap[AA >: A, D]( f: B => EitherT[F, AA, D])( implicit F: Monad[F]): EitherT[F, AA, D] = EitherT(F.flatMap(value) { case l @ Left(_) => F.pure(l.rightCast) case Right(b) => f(b).value }) }
case class Cluster(pods: Int, updated: Long) def validateNamespace(ns: String): Either[String,
Unit] = Right(()) def clusterExists(ns: String): Option[Either[String, Cluster]] = Some(Right(Cluster(3, System.currentTimeMillis()))) def updateCluster(ns: String, cluster: Cluster): Either[String, Cluster] = Right(Cluster(cluster.pods, System.currentTimeMillis())) Usage
import cats.implicits._ import cats.data.EitherT val cluster = for { _
<- validateNamespace(ns).toEitherT[Option] cluster<- EitherT(clusterExists(ns)) updated <- updateCluster(ns, cluster).toEitherT[Option] } yield updated scala> cluster.value Some(Right(Cluster(3,1583095558496))) EitherT: Either + Option common ground
Error case def clusterExists(ns: String): Option[Either[String, Cluster]] = Left("Cluster is
invalid").some scala> cluster.value res4: Op)on[Either[String,Cluster]] = Some(LeC(Cluster is invalid))
Alexey Novakov email: - alexey.novakov at ultratendency.com - novakov.alex at
gmail.com Blog: https://medium.com/se-notes-by-alexey-novakov https://novakov-alexey.github.io/ Code: https://github.com/novakov-alexey Twitter: @alexey_novakov Thank you! Questions?