Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Search
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
Technology
190
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
More Decks by Matthias Le Brun
See All by Matthias Le Brun
GraphQL, Pothos & SQLite: a perfect match
bloodyowl
0
120
(why the hell did I) build a GraphQL client for the browser
bloodyowl
0
160
leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock @ jsheroes
bloodyowl
0
340
Leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock solid
bloodyowl
0
510
La drôle d'histoire de JavaScript
bloodyowl
0
400
Healthy Code Collaboration
bloodyowl
0
370
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
0
860
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
1
580
Migrating a large Reason+React codebase to hooks
bloodyowl
0
610
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
キャリアLT会#3
beli68
2
270
インシデント事例と パッケージの全量解析に学ぶ ソフトウェアサプライチェーンの守り方 / supply-chain-attack-defense
flatt_security
0
1.1k
Webアプリ認証の全体像 / The Big Picture of Web App Authentication
kitano_yuichi
1
450
AI驚き屋発見器
yama3133
1
270
発表と総括 / Presentations and Summary
ks91
PRO
0
210
Playwright × AI Agent でE2Eテストはどう変わるか AI駆動テストの可能性と実用検証の結果
taiga7543
2
880
ダッシュボード"開発"について 〜使われるダッシュボードのつくりかた〜
kimichan
0
220
AIで楽になるはずが、なぜ疲れる?
kinopeee
0
100
テックカンファレンス三大ステークホルダーの文化人類学 ─ 違いを認め合う関係性作り
bash0c7
2
600
事業成長とAI活用を止めないデータ基盤アーキテクチャの設計思想
hiracky16
0
710
Git 研修【MIXI 26新卒技術研修】#2
mixi_engineers
PRO
1
190
現場との対話から始める “作る前に問い直す”業務改善
mochico50
2
300
Featured
See All Featured
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
275
41k
StorybookのUI Testing Handbookを読んだ
zakiyama
31
6.9k
How to build an LLM SEO readiness audit: a practical framework
nmsamuel
1
810
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
239
140k
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
21
1.6k
コードの90%をAIが書く世界で何が待っているのか / What awaits us in a world where 90% of the code is written by AI
rkaga
62
45k
The Curse of the Amulet
leimatthew05
2
13k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
82
6.5k
Deep Space Network (abreviated)
tonyrice
0
230
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
51
53k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
162
27k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
55
8.2k
Transcript
Boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl lead engineering manager chief shitpost office
the easiest way to provide banking features (accounts, payments, cards…) we're hiring! @
None
None
None
None
PREVIOUSLY ON Matthias tries to convert people to FP
Algebraic Data Types yay
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; };
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; error data ERROR NULL NULL DATA NULL NULL ERROR DATA
{ data: null; error: null; };
type Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>;
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; state ERROR DATA
API response API response
API response API response
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; 2 2 1 1 4 2 x = + =
Algebra it's just basic math™
+ x
quiz 157 x 8341 = ?
quiz 999 + 1 = ?
union types
monads functors
functor
monad
[1, 2, 3].map(x => x * 2) // [2, 4,
6] [1, 2, 3].flatMap(x => [x, x * 2]) // [1, 2, 2, 4, 3, 6]
map: <A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => B) => T<B>: flatMap:
<A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => T<B>) => T<B>;
None
null & undefined are bad
errors aren't always exceptions
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
THAT WAS Matthias tries to convert people to FP NOW
LET'S TALK ABOUT BOXED
✨ new job ✨ 2022
«we use TypeScript»
None
let's look at the ecosystem™
fp-ts
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), ) no autocomplete
on current value
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type not a good DX
export declare const chainFirstTaskK: <A, B>(f: (a: A) = >
T.Task<B>) = > <E>(first: TaskEither<E, A>) = > TaskEither<E, A> ah just what I was looking for
we've looked at the ecosystem™
«let's try to make these types work with a good
DX in a structurally typed language» — me, allegedly drunk
structural typing
class Some<A> {} class None {} const value: Some<string> =
new None();
what we need → good DX → interop with ts-pattern
→ fast
what we needed → chaining API → autocomplete → less
imports
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive discriminator in TS (aka poor man's nominal
types)
1st iteration: naive and we're storing the state in the
class instance
None
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
3rd iteration: make it fast
initial release
initial release
type Option<A> = Some<A> | None;
type Result<A, E> = Ok<A> | Error<E>;
type AsyncData<A> = | NotAsked | Loading | Done<A>;
Future<A>; better promises™ cancellable monadic leaves error state to Result
const parsed = input != null ? parseInput(input) : undefined;
const transformed = parsed != null ? transform(parsed) : undefined; const printed = transformed != null ? print(transformed) : undefined; const value = printed != null ? prettify(printed) : "fallback"; input .map(parseInput) .flatMap(transform) .map(print) .map(prettify) .getWithDefault("fallback");
user-testing
None
insights people need human-written docs → we doubled down on
examples & added search
insights don't try to replicate another language → give good
defaults for TS
Result< Data, ServerError > Result< A, ServerError | FinalizeError >
insights people are familiar with just a few data types
→ reduce confusion
insights people can be docs-first or type-first → experience needs
to be good for both
insights readability matters → chaining API was the way to
go
insights mapping on existing JS knowledge helps → if it
exists, name it the same way
insights pipe() syntax had impact on the runtime → expressiveness
is important
4th iteration implement the feedback rename some methods update some
defaults
5th iteration: what the actual fu
5th iteration: what the actual fu
recently fix the errors
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x blazing fast certi
fi ed™ ⚡
Boxed → github.com/swan-io/boxed → swan-io.github.io/boxed
None
$ yarn add @swan-io/boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl we're still hiring thank you! 🙏