Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
Technology
200
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
More Decks by Matthias Le Brun
See All by Matthias Le Brun
GraphQL, Pothos & SQLite: a perfect match
bloodyowl
0
130
(why the hell did I) build a GraphQL client for the browser
bloodyowl
0
160
leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock @ jsheroes
bloodyowl
0
340
Leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock solid
bloodyowl
0
530
La drôle d'histoire de JavaScript
bloodyowl
0
410
Healthy Code Collaboration
bloodyowl
0
380
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
0
860
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
1
590
Migrating a large Reason+React codebase to hooks
bloodyowl
0
630
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
全社に広がるMCPサーバーを、 どう安全に管理するか MCPass開発の舞台裏
mtpooh
3
280
2026-09-04 SRE Tech Talk #15 怠惰なTerraform / Lazy Terraform
masasuzu
0
180
多摩川(.dev)ランニング入門 / Tamagawa.dev#3
fujiwara3
3
340
Jetpack Compose で挑む新聞紙面UI ─ 複合ジェスチャー・ポリゴン記事領域・適応的ページ構成という3つの壁/droidkaigi2026
nikkei_engineer_recruiting
0
190
AI時代に、プロダクトの数だけ積み上がる所有コストをどうエンジニアリングするか / Engineering the Cost of Ownership
kzkmaeda
0
970
Sony-DroidKaigi2026
sony
1
310
KPIだけでは評価できないプロダクトが考えるべき Evalsという第二の評価系 / Beyond KPIs: Evals as a Second Evaluation Framework for Products #PdEConf
aki_iinuma
4
3.5k
AIで実装は速くなった。なのにプロダクトは速くならない。職能の壁を越えて価値のフローを設計する
nwiizo
6
6.9k
Webとヘルスデータ
yukukotani
0
170
生成AI時代の クレデンシャルとパーミッション設計
nrinetcom
PRO
3
1.5k
PM領域でのAI Agentの活用
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
270
GuardDuty 検知対応を DevOps Agent で効率化しようとしている話 / GuardDuty Investigations with DevOps Agent
masahirokawahara
1
300
Featured
See All Featured
The State of eCommerce SEO: How to Win in Today's Products SERPs - #SEOweek
aleyda
2
11k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
463
34k
End of SEO as We Know It (SMX Advanced Version)
ipullrank
3
4.4k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
55
10k
The Spectacular Lies of Maps
axbom
PRO
1
970
A brief & incomplete history of UX Design for the World Wide Web: 1989–2019
jct
2
490
Marketing Yourself as an Engineer | Alaka | Gurzu
gurzu
0
290
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
77
5.5k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
287
14k
AI: The stuff that nobody shows you
jnunemaker
PRO
9
970
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
35
2.8k
Applied NLP in the Age of Generative AI
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.4k
Transcript
Boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl lead engineering manager chief shitpost office
the easiest way to provide banking features (accounts, payments, cards…) we're hiring! @
None
None
None
None
PREVIOUSLY ON Matthias tries to convert people to FP
Algebraic Data Types yay
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; };
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; error data ERROR NULL NULL DATA NULL NULL ERROR DATA
{ data: null; error: null; };
type Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>;
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; state ERROR DATA
API response API response
API response API response
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; 2 2 1 1 4 2 x = + =
Algebra it's just basic math™
+ x
quiz 157 x 8341 = ?
quiz 999 + 1 = ?
union types
monads functors
functor
monad
[1, 2, 3].map(x => x * 2) // [2, 4,
6] [1, 2, 3].flatMap(x => [x, x * 2]) // [1, 2, 2, 4, 3, 6]
map: <A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => B) => T<B>: flatMap:
<A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => T<B>) => T<B>;
None
null & undefined are bad
errors aren't always exceptions
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
THAT WAS Matthias tries to convert people to FP NOW
LET'S TALK ABOUT BOXED
✨ new job ✨ 2022
«we use TypeScript»
None
let's look at the ecosystem™
fp-ts
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), ) no autocomplete
on current value
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type not a good DX
export declare const chainFirstTaskK: <A, B>(f: (a: A) = >
T.Task<B>) = > <E>(first: TaskEither<E, A>) = > TaskEither<E, A> ah just what I was looking for
we've looked at the ecosystem™
«let's try to make these types work with a good
DX in a structurally typed language» — me, allegedly drunk
structural typing
class Some<A> {} class None {} const value: Some<string> =
new None();
what we need → good DX → interop with ts-pattern
→ fast
what we needed → chaining API → autocomplete → less
imports
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive discriminator in TS (aka poor man's nominal
types)
1st iteration: naive and we're storing the state in the
class instance
None
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
3rd iteration: make it fast
initial release
initial release
type Option<A> = Some<A> | None;
type Result<A, E> = Ok<A> | Error<E>;
type AsyncData<A> = | NotAsked | Loading | Done<A>;
Future<A>; better promises™ cancellable monadic leaves error state to Result
const parsed = input != null ? parseInput(input) : undefined;
const transformed = parsed != null ? transform(parsed) : undefined; const printed = transformed != null ? print(transformed) : undefined; const value = printed != null ? prettify(printed) : "fallback"; input .map(parseInput) .flatMap(transform) .map(print) .map(prettify) .getWithDefault("fallback");
user-testing
None
insights people need human-written docs → we doubled down on
examples & added search
insights don't try to replicate another language → give good
defaults for TS
Result< Data, ServerError > Result< A, ServerError | FinalizeError >
insights people are familiar with just a few data types
→ reduce confusion
insights people can be docs-first or type-first → experience needs
to be good for both
insights readability matters → chaining API was the way to
go
insights mapping on existing JS knowledge helps → if it
exists, name it the same way
insights pipe() syntax had impact on the runtime → expressiveness
is important
4th iteration implement the feedback rename some methods update some
defaults
5th iteration: what the actual fu
5th iteration: what the actual fu
recently fix the errors
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x blazing fast certi
fi ed™ ⚡
Boxed → github.com/swan-io/boxed → swan-io.github.io/boxed
None
$ yarn add @swan-io/boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl we're still hiring thank you! 🙏