Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
Technology
190
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
More Decks by Matthias Le Brun
See All by Matthias Le Brun
GraphQL, Pothos & SQLite: a perfect match
bloodyowl
0
110
(why the hell did I) build a GraphQL client for the browser
bloodyowl
0
150
leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock @ jsheroes
bloodyowl
0
330
Leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock solid
bloodyowl
0
500
La drôle d'histoire de JavaScript
bloodyowl
0
400
Healthy Code Collaboration
bloodyowl
0
370
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
0
860
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
1
580
Migrating a large Reason+React codebase to hooks
bloodyowl
0
610
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
NDIAS CTF 2026 問題解説会資料
bata_24
0
150
AIエージェントとPhysical AIが拓く製造業の変革(ハノーバーメッセリキャップ)
iotcomjpadmin
0
190
技術・能力を向上する原理原則 #きのこセッションa #きのこ2026
bash0c7
0
190
從觀望到全公司落地:AI Agentic Coding 導入實戰 — 流程整合與安全治理
appleboy
0
320
#エンジニアBooks 30分でわかる 「技術記事を書く技術」 / engineer-books 2026-06-30
jnchito
1
150
認証認可だけじゃない! ID管理の構成要素と ライフサイクルを意識しよう
ritou
1
410
ご挨拶「10周年を迎える共創ラボのこれまでとこれから」
iotcomjpadmin
0
170
Foundry Toolkit + Lemonade Serverでローカルワークフロー開発
seosoft
0
110
AWS PrivateLink × SCIM で実現する セキュアで運⽤負荷の低い Databricks 基盤の構築
tsuda7
0
120
AI-DLCを “そのまま導入しなかった”話 ~組織に合わせてアジャストした 私たちの実践共有~
hiroramos4
PRO
1
480
AIペネトレーションテスト・ セキュリティ検証「AgenticSec」紹介資料
laysakura
2
7.8k
「軸足」は 固定しなくていい - 熱量と強みで描く、しなやかなキャリアの形
kakehashi
PRO
1
310
Featured
See All Featured
Agile Actions for Facilitating Distributed Teams - ADO2019
mkilby
0
210
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
1
500
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
274
21k
Navigating Weather and Climate Data
rabernat
0
260
The Organizational Zoo: Understanding Human Behavior Agility Through Metaphoric Constructive Conversations (based on the works of Arthur Shelley, Ph.D)
kimpetersen
PRO
0
370
Discover your Explorer Soul
emna__ayadi
2
1.2k
Build The Right Thing And Hit Your Dates
maggiecrowley
39
3.2k
コードの90%をAIが書く世界で何が待っているのか / What awaits us in a world where 90% of the code is written by AI
rkaga
62
44k
XXLCSS - How to scale CSS and keep your sanity
sugarenia
250
1.3M
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
16
2k
Measuring Dark Social's Impact On Conversion and Attribution
stephenakadiri
2
230
Groundhog Day: Seeking Process in Gaming for Health
codingconduct
0
230
Transcript
Boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl lead engineering manager chief shitpost office
the easiest way to provide banking features (accounts, payments, cards…) we're hiring! @
None
None
None
None
PREVIOUSLY ON Matthias tries to convert people to FP
Algebraic Data Types yay
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; };
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; error data ERROR NULL NULL DATA NULL NULL ERROR DATA
{ data: null; error: null; };
type Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>;
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; state ERROR DATA
API response API response
API response API response
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; 2 2 1 1 4 2 x = + =
Algebra it's just basic math™
+ x
quiz 157 x 8341 = ?
quiz 999 + 1 = ?
union types
monads functors
functor
monad
[1, 2, 3].map(x => x * 2) // [2, 4,
6] [1, 2, 3].flatMap(x => [x, x * 2]) // [1, 2, 2, 4, 3, 6]
map: <A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => B) => T<B>: flatMap:
<A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => T<B>) => T<B>;
None
null & undefined are bad
errors aren't always exceptions
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
THAT WAS Matthias tries to convert people to FP NOW
LET'S TALK ABOUT BOXED
✨ new job ✨ 2022
«we use TypeScript»
None
let's look at the ecosystem™
fp-ts
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), ) no autocomplete
on current value
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type not a good DX
export declare const chainFirstTaskK: <A, B>(f: (a: A) = >
T.Task<B>) = > <E>(first: TaskEither<E, A>) = > TaskEither<E, A> ah just what I was looking for
we've looked at the ecosystem™
«let's try to make these types work with a good
DX in a structurally typed language» — me, allegedly drunk
structural typing
class Some<A> {} class None {} const value: Some<string> =
new None();
what we need → good DX → interop with ts-pattern
→ fast
what we needed → chaining API → autocomplete → less
imports
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive discriminator in TS (aka poor man's nominal
types)
1st iteration: naive and we're storing the state in the
class instance
None
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
3rd iteration: make it fast
initial release
initial release
type Option<A> = Some<A> | None;
type Result<A, E> = Ok<A> | Error<E>;
type AsyncData<A> = | NotAsked | Loading | Done<A>;
Future<A>; better promises™ cancellable monadic leaves error state to Result
const parsed = input != null ? parseInput(input) : undefined;
const transformed = parsed != null ? transform(parsed) : undefined; const printed = transformed != null ? print(transformed) : undefined; const value = printed != null ? prettify(printed) : "fallback"; input .map(parseInput) .flatMap(transform) .map(print) .map(prettify) .getWithDefault("fallback");
user-testing
None
insights people need human-written docs → we doubled down on
examples & added search
insights don't try to replicate another language → give good
defaults for TS
Result< Data, ServerError > Result< A, ServerError | FinalizeError >
insights people are familiar with just a few data types
→ reduce confusion
insights people can be docs-first or type-first → experience needs
to be good for both
insights readability matters → chaining API was the way to
go
insights mapping on existing JS knowledge helps → if it
exists, name it the same way
insights pipe() syntax had impact on the runtime → expressiveness
is important
4th iteration implement the feedback rename some methods update some
defaults
5th iteration: what the actual fu
5th iteration: what the actual fu
recently fix the errors
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x blazing fast certi
fi ed™ ⚡
Boxed → github.com/swan-io/boxed → swan-io.github.io/boxed
None
$ yarn add @swan-io/boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl we're still hiring thank you! 🙏