Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Manual Summarization vs AI Text Summarizer

Manual Summarization vs AI Text Summarizer

Contrasting AI & human summarizers: AI excels in scale, lacks customization. Humans offer accuracy, personalized insights, and subjectivity.

Expeditext

April 10, 2024
Tweet

More Decks by Expeditext

Other Decks in Technology

Transcript

  1. Accuracy: Although AI text summarizers are widely used for automated

    summarization, their accuracy can vary depending on the text complexity and the quality of algorithms. On the other hand, human summarizers offer a significant level of accuracy, especially when dealing with intricate or technical content. Customization: Human summarizers can provide more personalized summaries by leveraging their understanding of the text, resulting in unique and special summaries. In contrast, AI summarizers often produce generic summaries and lack the level of customization achievable by humans.
  2. Subjectivity: Human summarizers bring their individual perspectives into the summarization

    process, which can introduce subjectivity. Unlike human summarizers, AI text summarizers tend to be more objective and may not capture nuanced meanings as effectively. Scalability: AI text summarizers excel in scalability, making them ideal for processing large volumes of text quickly and accurately. While manual summarization is effective in getting to the core of the content, it is not as scalable due to the time and effort required for each document's summarization.