Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.2k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.8k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
610
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
680
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.3k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
390
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
Sequences of Logits Reveal the Low Rank Structure of Language Models
sansantech
PRO
1
270
FUSE-RSVLM: Feature Fusion Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensing
satai
3
870
定数整数除算・剰余算最適化再考
herumi
1
130
コーディングエージェントとABNを再考
hf149
2
720
「行ける・行けない表」による地域公共交通の性能評価
bansousha
0
160
社内データ分析AIエージェントを できるだけ使いやすくする工夫
fufufukakaka
1
1.1k
2026 東京科学大 情報通信系 研究室紹介 (大岡山)
icttitech
0
3.8k
Claude Code × autoresearch 実践
mathbullet
0
170
適応的スパムフィルタのための軽量な類似メッセージカウンタ / jsai2026-adaptive-spam-filter
monochromegane
0
3.7k
LLM の Attention 機構まとめ — 数式・計算量・メモリ
puwaer
8
2.2k
「AIとWhyを深堀る」をAIと深堀る
iflection
0
490
Unified Audio Source Separation (Defense Slides)
kohei_1979
1
620
Featured
See All Featured
Side Projects
sachag
455
43k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
234
17k
HU Berlin: Industrial-Strength Natural Language Processing with spaCy and Prodigy
inesmontani
PRO
0
410
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
304
22k
Heart Work Chapter 1 - Part 1
lfama
PRO
7
36k
How Fast Is Fast Enough? [PerfNow 2025]
tammyeverts
3
610
Lightning Talk: Beautiful Slides for Beginners
inesmontani
PRO
2
580
sira's awesome portfolio website redesign presentation
elsirapls
0
280
Have SEOs Ruined the Internet? - User Awareness of SEO in 2025
akashhashmi
0
370
How People are Using Generative and Agentic AI to Supercharge Their Products, Projects, Services and Value Streams Today
helenjbeal
1
220
Connecting the Dots Between Site Speed, User Experience & Your Business [WebExpo 2025]
tammyeverts
11
950
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.4k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34