Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.4k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
2k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
640
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2.1k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
700
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.3k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
400
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
VRID: View-Invariant Representation through Dual-Axis Transformation for Cross-iew Pose Estimation
satai
3
110
【Zozo Research 技術共有会】三次元領域の現在と展望
mickey_0226
3
670
Evaluation génomique des femelles laitières croisées : comprendre la méthode pour accompagner les éleveurs à son utilisation
institudelelevage
PRO
0
150
研究室単位での自律的 IPv6接続性確立に向けたAS共同運用モデルの提案と実証
reokashiwa
PRO
0
220
[SNLP2026] Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach
wataruuuuu
0
330
横浜市長(山中氏)の言動にかかる第三者による調査報告書
sishi2026
0
580
医療LLMの現在地〜最新研究から社会実装までを考える〜
kento1109
1
1.8k
L’albédo:levier d’atténuation du changement climatique dans les systèmes fourragers
institudelelevage
PRO
0
120
2025年度秋葉原ウォーカブルプロジェクト調査報告 「アキバらしいウォーカブル」とは何か
izumiyama_lab
1
240
PHTalks Bengaluru - SSRF When All Else Fails
dk999
0
1.2k
Pretrain Where? Investigating How Pretraining Data Diversity Impacts Geospatial Foundation Model Performance
satai
3
170
Apache Gravitinoで実現する Icebergカタログ統合とアクセスの一元化
matsumooon
0
570
Featured
See All Featured
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
96
14k
Max Prin - Stacking Signals: How International SEO Comes Together (And Falls Apart)
techseoconnect
PRO
0
480
Hiding What from Whom? A Critical Review of the History of Programming languages for Music
tomoyanonymous
3
1.3k
Tell your own story through comics
letsgokoyo
1
1.1k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
304
22k
コードの90%をAIが書く世界で何が待っているのか / What awaits us in a world where 90% of the code is written by AI
rkaga
63
46k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
508
140k
New Earth Scene 8
popppiees
4
2.6k
Mozcon NYC 2025: Stop Losing SEO Traffic
samtorres
1
570
Money Talks: Using Revenue to Get Sh*t Done
nikkihalliwell
0
510
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
528
40k
Marketing Yourself as an Engineer | Alaka | Gurzu
gurzu
0
320
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34