Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.3k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.8k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
620
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
680
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
28
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.3k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
400
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
AY 2026 Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - Workshop
ks91
PRO
0
150
The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey
shunk031
4
1.2k
重要だけど測れていないもの:高齢者ケアの見えない課題
theoriatec2024
0
450
HAKARI-Bench - 実運用視点での情報検索モデル評価ベンチマーク
hotchpotch
1
640
AIエージェント時代のLLM-jpモデルのあるべき姿
k141303
0
560
Sequences of Logits Reveal the Low Rank Structure of Language Models
sansantech
PRO
1
300
Fukui Shibiten 39 - AI Art
butchi
0
170
Vector Map as Language: Toward Unified Remote Sensing Vector Mapping
satai
3
160
PHTalks Bengaluru - SSRF When All Else Fails
dk999
0
970
人間中心の意思決定支援AI
yukinobaba
PRO
7
3.7k
進学校の生徒にはア行の苗字が多いのか
ozekinote
0
520
論文紹介:HalluCitation Matters
wasyro
0
130
Featured
See All Featured
The agentic SEO stack - context over prompts
schlessera
0
860
Building the Perfect Custom Keyboard
takai
2
830
Discover your Explorer Soul
emna__ayadi
2
1.2k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
630
63k
Highjacked: Video Game Concept Design
rkendrick25
PRO
1
430
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
danielanewman
31
3.3k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
9.2k
30 Presentation Tips
portentint
PRO
1
360
Leveraging Curiosity to Care for An Aging Population
cassininazir
1
460
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
57
7.1k
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
2
1.2k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
123
22k
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34