Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending S...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
Research
1.6k
0
Share
Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles
論文"Collaborative Topic Modeling for Recommending Scientific Articles"を読んだ際に使用したスライド
Shinichi Takayanagi
May 30, 2016
More Decks by Shinichi Takayanagi
See All by Shinichi Takayanagi
論文紹介「Evaluation gaps in machine learning practice」と、効果検証入門に関する昔話
stakaya
0
1.2k
バイブコーディングの正体——AIエージェントはソフトウェア開発を変えるか?
stakaya
5
1.7k
[NeurIPS 2023 論文読み会] Wasserstein Quantum Monte Carlo
stakaya
0
590
[KDD2021 論文読み会] ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forests
stakaya
2
2k
[ICML2021 論文読み会] Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift
stakaya
0
2.1k
[情報検索/推薦 各社合同 論文読み祭 #1] KDD ‘20 "Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Search"
stakaya
2
660
【2020年新人研修資料】ナウでヤングなPython開発入門
stakaya
29
22k
論文読んだ「Simple and Deterministic Matrix Sketching」
stakaya
1
1.2k
Quick Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) with R"
stakaya
3
380
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
存立危機事態の再検討
jimboken
0
270
"主観で終わらせない"定性データ活用 ― プロダクトディスカバリーを加速させるインサイトマネジメント / Utilizing qualitative data that "doesn't end with subjectivity" - Insight management that accelerates product discovery
kaminashi
16
24k
教師あり学習と強化学習で作る 最強の数学特化LLM
analokmaus
2
1k
LINEヤフー データサイエンス Meetup「三井物産コモディティ予測チャレンジ」の舞台裏-AlpacaTechパート
gamella
0
420
LLM Compute Infrastructure Overview
karakurist
2
1.2k
[Devfest Incheon 2025] 모두를 위한 친절한 언어모델(LLM) 학습 가이드
beomi
2
1.5k
An Open and Reproducible Deep Research Agent for Long-Form Question Answering
ikuyamada
0
420
羽田新ルート運用6年の検証
1manken
0
130
Sequences of Logits Reveal the Low Rank Structure of Language Models
sansantech
PRO
1
190
Thirty Years of Progress in Speech Synthesis: A Personal Perspective on the Past, Present, and Future
ktokuda
0
210
The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey
shunk031
4
870
Self-Hosted WebAssembly Runtime for Runtime-Neutral Checkpoint/Restore in Edge–Cloud Continuum
chikuwait
0
490
Featured
See All Featured
Public Speaking Without Barfing On Your Shoes - THAT 2023
reverentgeek
1
380
Building Experiences: Design Systems, User Experience, and Full Site Editing
marktimemedia
0
480
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
soudai
PRO
199
73k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
231
23k
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
770
How to Talk to Developers About Accessibility
jct
2
180
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
marcduiker
35
2.4k
The innovator’s Mindset - Leading Through an Era of Exponential Change - McGill University 2025
jdejongh
PRO
1
160
How to Build an AI Search Optimization Roadmap - Criteria and Steps to Take #SEOIRL
aleyda
1
2k
KATA
mclloyd
PRO
35
15k
Breaking role norms: Why Content Design is so much more than writing copy - Taylor Woolridge
uxyall
0
260
Transcript
RCO論文輪読会(2016/05/27) “Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles”(KDD2011) Chong Wang,
David M. Blei 高柳慎一
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. ABSTRACT 1
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 2
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 3
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 1. INTRODUCTION 4
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2. BACKGROUND & 2.1 Recommendation Tasks
5
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 6
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.1 Recommendation Tasks 7
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 8
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 9
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 10
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.2 Recommendation by Matrix Factorization 11
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 2.3 Probabilistic Topic Models 12
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの生成過程 13
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. LDAの特徴 14
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 15
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 16
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRの生成過程 17
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 3. COLLABORATIVE TOPIC REGRESSION 18
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. CTRのモデルのRegressionたる所以 19
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 20
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 21
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 簡単な証明 by iPad手書き 22
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 学習のさせ方 23
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 予測 24
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 4. EMPIRICAL STUDY 25
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. データの規模感 26
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 評価 27
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 28
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果 (ライブラリ内の論文数(Fig 5)・ある論文をLikeした数(Fig 6) 依存性) 29
数が増えると Recallが下がる (あまり有名な論文じゃ ないのを出すため) 数が増えると Recallが上がる (みんな見てる論文 だとCFがうまく動く)
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(ある2ユーザの好んだトピックを抽出) 30 トピックの潜 在ベクトルの 重みをランキ ングして抽出
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(オフセットの大きかった論文BEST 10) 31 ※内容よりもCFが効くケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(EMの論文がベイズ統計勢にもよく参照されている例) 32 ※内容よりもCFが効く ケースに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 結果(逆にトピックが広がらない例) 33 ※内容が支配的なケー スに相当
(C)Recruit Communications Co., Ltd. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 34