of |rst|. You can use **bold** and *italics*, along with ``literals``. It’s quite similar to `Markdown`_ but much more extensible. CommonMark may one day approach this [1]_, but today is not that day. `docutils`__ does all this for us. .. |rst| replace:: **reStructuredText** .. _Markdown: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/ .. [1] https://talk.commonmark.org/t/444 .. __ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/
of |rst|. You can use **bold** and *italics*, along with ``literals``. It’s quite similar to `Markdown`_ but much more extensible. CommonMark may one day approach this [1]_, but today is not that day. `docutils`__ does all this for us. .. |rst| replace:: **reStructuredText** .. _Markdown: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/ .. [1] https://talk.commonmark.org/t/444 .. __ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/
reStructuredText. You can use bold and italics, along with literals. It’s quite similar to Markdown but much more extensible. CommonMark may one day approach this [1], but today is not that day. docutils does all this for us. [1] https://talk.commonmark.org/t/444/
play with directives and roles. We can do things like link to RFCs (:RFC:`2324`, anyone?) or generate some more advanced formatting (I do love me some H\ :sub:`2`\ O). .. warning:: The power can be intoxicating. Of course, all the stuff we showed previously *still works!*. The only limit is your imagination/interest.
play with directives and roles. We can do things like link to RFCs (:RFC:`2324`, anyone?) or generate some more advanced formatting (I do love me some H\ :sub:`2`\ O). .. warning:: The power can be intoxicating. Of course, all the stuff we showed previously *still works!*. The only limit is your imagination/interest.
with directives and roles. We can do things like link to RFCs (RFC 2324, anyone?) or generate some more advanced formatting (I do love me some H 2 O). Warning The power can be intoxicating. Of course, all the stuff we showed previously still works!. The only limit is your imagination/interest.
play with directives and roles. We can do things like link to RFCs (:RFC:`2324`, anyone?) or generate some more advanced formatting (I do love me some H\ :sub:`2`\ O). .. warning:: The power can be intoxicating. Of course, all the stuff we showed previously *still works!*. The only limit is your imagination/interest.
play with directives and roles. We can do things like link to RFCs (:RFC:`2324`, anyone?) or generate some more advanced formatting (I do love me some H\ :sub:`2`\ O). .. warning:: The power can be intoxicating. Of course, all the stuff we showed previously *still works!*. The only limit is your imagination/interest.
play with directives and roles. We can do things like link to RFCs (:RFC:`2324`, anyone?) or generate some more advanced formatting (I do love me some H\ :sub:`2`\ O). .. warning:: The power can be intoxicating. Of course, all the stuff we showed previously *still works!*. The only limit is your imagination/interest.
play with directives and roles. We can do things like link to RFCs (:RFC:`2324`, anyone?) or generate some more advanced formatting (I do love me some H\ :sub:`2`\ O). .. warning:: The power can be intoxicating. Of course, all the stuff we showed previously *still works!*. The only limit is your imagination/interest.
(#2463) -------------------------------------------------------- Opened by TimKam :: It would be great to have the keywords of `meta` directives included in the search index. Like this, one can help users who are searching for a synonym of the "correct" term through simply adding synonyms as keywords to a meta directive on the corresponding page. source/issues.rst
(#2463) -------------------------------------------------------- Opened by TimKam :: It would be great to have the keywords of `meta` directives included in the search index. Like this, one can help users who are searching for a synonym of the "correct" term through simply adding synonyms as keywords to a meta directive on the corresponding page. source/issues.rst
Opened by TimKam build/issues.html It would be great to have the keywords of `meta` directives included in the search index. Like this, one can help users who are searching for a synonym of the "correct" term through simply adding synonyms as keywords to a `meta` directive on the corresponding page.
yield '=' * len(title) yield '' yield '%s ::' % owner yield '' for line in body.splitlines(): yield ' %s' % line if line else '' ext/issue_directive.py
Opened by TimKam It would be great to have the keywords of `meta` directives included in the search index. Like this, one can help users who are searching for a synonym of the "correct" term through simply adding synonyms as keywords to a `meta` directive on the corresponding page. build/issues.html
Integrate source_suffix and source_parsers (#4474) • [RFC] Implement delayed resolution in TOC (#4475) • Not possible to update individual ‘po’ files (#4476) • Build fails during eclim (aur) build: Babel data files not available (#4481) • Proposal: Allow to switch parsers on parsing document (#4482) • Integrate source suffix and source parsers (#4483) • … build/index.html
• The Power of Sphinx - Integrating Jinja with RST -- Eric Holscher • Docutils Snippets -- Aurélien Gâteau • OpenStack + Sphinx In A Tree -- Stephen Finucane ()