Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
690
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
320
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
210
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
450
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
360
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
680
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
730
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
730
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
660
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
770
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
未来を拓くAI技術〜エージェント開発とAI駆動開発〜
leveragestech
2
180
一人でAIプロダクトを作るための工夫 〜技術選定・開発プロセス編〜 / I want AI to work harder
rkaga
13
2.8k
『リコリス・リコイル』に学ぶ!! 〜キャリア戦略における計画的偶発性理論と変わる勇気の重要性〜
wanko_it
1
600
なぜ今、Terraformの本を書いたのか? - 著者陣に聞く!『Terraformではじめる実践IaC』登壇資料
fufuhu
4
660
Laravel Boost 超入門
fire_arlo
1
130
自作OSでDOOMを動かしてみた
zakki0925224
1
1.4k
🔨 小さなビルドシステムを作る
momeemt
2
530
為你自己學 Python - 冷知識篇
eddie
1
170
Nuances on Kubernetes - RubyConf Taiwan 2025
envek
0
190
CSC305 Summer Lecture 05
javiergs
PRO
0
110
The state patternの実践 個人開発で培ったpractice集
miyanokomiya
0
150
20250808_AIAgent勉強会_ClaudeCodeデータ分析の実運用〜競馬を題材に回収率100%の先を目指すメソッドとは〜
kkakeru
0
210
Featured
See All Featured
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
marktimemedia
31
2.5k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
100
5.7k
Build your cross-platform service in a week with App Engine
jlugia
231
18k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
411
22k
Balancing Empowerment & Direction
lara
2
590
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
139
34k
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
48
50k
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
10
1k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
39
3.6k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
110
20k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin