Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
700
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
360
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
270
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
480
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
380
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
700
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
760
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
760
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
720
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
800
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
モデル駆動設計をやってみようワークショップ開催報告(Modeling Forum2025) / model driven design workshop report
haru860
0
300
GISエンジニアから見たLINKSデータ
nokonoko1203
0
190
C-Shared Buildで突破するAI Agent バックテストの壁
po3rin
0
420
リリース時」テストから「デイリー実行」へ!開発マネージャが取り組んだ、レガシー自動テストのモダン化戦略
goataka
0
150
組み合わせ爆発にのまれない - 責務分割 x テスト
halhorn
1
170
令和最新版Android Studioで化石デバイス向けアプリを作る
arkw
0
470
tsgolintはいかにしてtypescript-goの非公開APIを呼び出しているのか
syumai
7
2.4k
実はマルチモーダルだった。ブラウザの組み込みAI🧠でWebの未来を感じてみよう #jsfes #gemini
n0bisuke2
3
1.4k
Graviton と Nitro と私
maroon1st
0
150
新卒エンジニアのプルリクエスト with AI駆動
fukunaga2025
0
240
Deno Tunnel を使ってみた話
kamekyame
0
290
PostgreSQLで手軽にDuckDBを使う!DuckDB&pg_duckdb入門/osc25hi-duckdb
takahashiikki
0
230
Featured
See All Featured
Building AI with AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
600
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
77
5.2k
How to build an LLM SEO readiness audit: a practical framework
nmsamuel
1
590
How to Align SEO within the Product Triangle To Get Buy-In & Support - #RIMC
aleyda
1
1.4k
The AI Revolution Will Not Be Monopolized: How open-source beats economies of scale, even for LLMs
inesmontani
PRO
3
2.8k
Game over? The fight for quality and originality in the time of robots
wayneb77
1
72
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
527
40k
Leo the Paperboy
mayatellez
0
1.3k
Exploring anti-patterns in Rails
aemeredith
2
220
Amusing Abliteration
ianozsvald
0
79
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
41
3.8k
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
32
2.8k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin