Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
640
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
260
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
160
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
390
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
310
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
610
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
660
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
670
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
590
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
690
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
fs2-io を試してたらバグを見つけて直した話
chencmd
0
240
Monixと常駐プログラムの勘どころ / Scalaわいわい勉強会 #4
stoneream
0
280
生成AIでGitHubソースコード取得して仕様書を作成
shukob
0
480
Jakarta EE meets AI
ivargrimstad
0
260
PHPで作るWebSocketサーバー ~リアクティブなアプリケーションを知るために~ / WebSocket Server in PHP - To know reactive applications
seike460
PRO
2
530
Semantic Kernelのネイティブプラグインで知識拡張をしてみる
tomokusaba
0
180
「とりあえず動く」コードはよい、「読みやすい」コードはもっとよい / Code that 'just works' is good, but code that is 'readable' is even better.
mkmk884
3
510
短期間での新規プロダクト開発における「コスパの良い」Goのテスト戦略」 / kamakura.go
n3xem
2
170
ChatGPT とつくる PHP で OS 実装
memory1994
PRO
2
110
情報漏洩させないための設計
kubotak
3
340
Fibonacci Function Gallery - Part 1
philipschwarz
PRO
0
220
menu基盤チームによるGoogle Cloudの活用事例~Application Integration, Cloud Tasks編~
yoshifumi_ishikura
0
110
Featured
See All Featured
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
79
8.7k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
53
13k
GraphQLとの向き合い方2022年版
quramy
44
13k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
50
6.1k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
sstephenson
159
15k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
32
6.3k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
154
24k
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
61
7.5k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1030
460k
StorybookのUI Testing Handbookを読んだ
zakiyama
27
5.3k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
175
9.4k
Speed Design
sergeychernyshev
25
670
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin