Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Services, Architecture and Channels
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Programming
4
650
Services, Architecture and Channels
A talk I gave at DjangoCon Europe 2017 in Florence, Italy
Andrew Godwin
April 03, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
270
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
170
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
400
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
320
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
620
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
690
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
680
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
600
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
710
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Honoのおもしろいミドルウェアをみてみよう
yusukebe
1
210
さいきょうのレイヤードアーキテクチャについて考えてみた
yahiru
3
750
1年目の私に伝えたい!テストコードを怖がらなくなるためのヒント/Tips for not being afraid of test code
push_gawa
0
200
SpringBoot3.4の構造化ログ #kanjava
irof
2
1k
GitHub Actions × RAGでコードレビューの検証の結果
sho_000
0
270
Amazon Bedrock Multi Agentsを試してきた
tm2
1
290
仕様変更に耐えるための"今の"DRY原則を考える / Rethinking the "Don't repeat yourself" for resilience to specification changes
mkmk884
2
360
2,500万ユーザーを支えるSREチームの6年間のスクラムのカイゼン
honmarkhunt
6
5.3k
責務と認知負荷を整える! 抽象レベルを意識した関心の分離
yahiru
4
600
XStateを用いた堅牢なReact Components設計~複雑なClient Stateをシンプルに~ @React Tokyo ミートアップ #2
kfurusho
1
910
WebDriver BiDiとは何なのか
yotahada3
1
140
定理証明プラットフォーム lapisla.net
abap34
1
1.8k
Featured
See All Featured
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
38
7.1k
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
226
22k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
158
23k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
273
40k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
666
120k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
344
39k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
669
57k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
133
9.1k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
116
6k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
91
5.8k
The MySQL Ecosystem @ GitHub 2015
samlambert
250
12k
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
10
1.3k
Transcript
Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Apparently now does software architecture
The Monolith
The Monolith Only one version of any dependency Everything can
import everything Deployed all at once No separation Side-effects from other code
None
Services Code split up by purpose/team Defined cross-boundary API Deployed
separately Can use different versions of dependencies Isolated from each other
Why services?
Easier to manage Smaller, self-contained problems
Independent Scaling And easier performance analysis
Faster Individual Deployment Less to deploy at once
Complex Interdependencies Harder to deploy & track bugs
Requires great communication Teams need calling contracts and APIs
More points of failure Not just one set of homogenous
servers
No more quick hacks Separation forces a level of code
design
Switching To Services Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying
And Love The Monolith
Identify the "cut points" You might need to make some
Allocate inventory Calculate Price & Charge card Finalise order Make
Order Row &
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Make Order Row Allocate inventory Calculate Price Charge card Finalise
inventory Finalise order
Define APIs between services Behave like all other teams are
third-party
Separate Datastores & Servers Make them as separate as possible
Communication & Transport
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication (20 services?
190 connections!)
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct with discovery Orchestrator
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Centralised Routing Router
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus
Centralised Comms Tradeoffs Distributed Comms Single point of failure Nasty
partial failures
At-least-once delivery Tradeoffs At-most-once delivery Some messages duplicated Some messages
lost
First-In-First-Out Tradeoffs First-In-Last-Out Easily backlogged Wide range of latencies
Channels & ASGI
Channel Layer Interface Server Worker Server Process 1 ASGI ASGI
Asynchronous socket handling Synchronous Django project Interface Server Worker Server ASGI ASGI Worker Server ASGI Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Channel Layer
Service Client inventory.request response.aF53Vds21
At-most-once delivery ASGI's Tradeoffs You have to design for potential
loss Low-latency but non-persistent Good for protocols, bad for important task queues Capacity, Backpressure and FIFO Informs producers quickly about pileups in the queue
Top Service-Oriented Architecture Tips
Per-request "correlation IDs" Track a set of service calls through
the stack
Feature Flag message headers Bundle them in, don't have every
service query them
Source Of Truth Each data model has a service that
owns (& caches) it
Metrics. Metrics everywhere. Both performance and network health
Design for failure Don't assume two things will both succeed
DO NOT START OFF WITH SERVICES Write separate Python libraries
instead
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin