Two Main Ethical Issues in Educational Research, and How May These Be Addressed. Journal on Educational Psychology, 8(3), 1-14. • AERA (2011). AERA Code of Ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145–156. • Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291–1315. • Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature News, 533(7604), 452. • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, N.Y., Oxford University Press. • BERA (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, fourth edition. • Chauvette, A., Schick-Makaroff, K., & Molzahn, A. E. (2019). Open data in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 18, 1–6. • Fraser, S. (2004). Doing research with children and young people. London: Sage Publications. • Gordon, M., Viganola, D., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Dreber, A., Goldfedder, B., Holzmeister, F., Johannesson, M., Liu, Y., Twardy, C., Wang, J., & Pfeiffer, T. (2020). Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme. Royal Society Open Science, 7(7), 200566. • Harcourt, D., & Sargeant, J. (2011). The challenges of conducting ethical research with children. Education Inquiry, 2(3), 421-436 • Makel, M. C., Hodges, J., Cook, B. G., & Plucker, J. A. (2021). Both questionable and open research practices are prevalent in education research. Educational Researcher, online first, 1–12. • Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316. • Mayne, F., Howitt, C., & Rennie, L. (2018). Rights, power and agency in early childhood research design: Developing a rights-based research ethics and participation planning framework. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 43(3), 4-14. • Miller, B., Keane, C., & O'Toole, M. (2003). Encyclopedia and dictionary of medicine, nursing, and allied health (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders. • Minocher, R., Atmaca, S., Bavero, C., McElreath, R., & Beheim, B. (2020, June 24). Reproducibility improves exponentially over 63 years of social learning research. • National Science Foundation & Institute for Education Sciences. (2018). Companion guidelines on replication & reproducibility in education research. • Nowok, B., Raab, G. M., & Dibben, C. (2016). synthpop: Bespoke creation of synthetic data in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 74, 1–26. • Otrel-Cass, K., Andrée, M., & Ryu, M. (2020). Examining Ethics in Contemporary Science Education Research. Springer Nature Switzerland. • Quintana, D. S. (2020). A synthetic dataset primer for the biobehavioural sciences to promote reproducibility and hypothesis generation. eLife, 9, e53275. • Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7), 726–728.