Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Design Systems and Component Based Frontend
Search
Bilal Çınarlı
June 27, 2019
Programming
170
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Design Systems and Component Based Frontend
Bilal Çınarlı
June 27, 2019
More Decks by Bilal Çınarlı
See All by Bilal Çınarlı
Efficieny and Scaling in Frontend
bcinarli
0
52
Navigating with Unknowns
bcinarli
1
49
Story of a Boring Work
bcinarli
0
29
Refactoring Frontend
bcinarli
0
57
Accessible By Default!
bcinarli
0
110
Aninda Yüklenen Uygulamalar
bcinarli
0
150
Iletisimin Mühendisligi
bcinarli
0
68
Independently together: better developer experience & App performance
bcinarli
1
550
Developer Experience: How happy are your engineers?
bcinarli
0
290
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
型も通る、synthも通る、それでも危ない 〜AIのCDKの権限とコストを機械で検証する〜 / It Passes Type Checks, It Passes Synth Checks, but It’s Still Risky — Automatically Verifying Permissions and Costs in AI’s CDK —
seike460
PRO
1
480
「正の参照」と 「負の導出」で組む ハーネスエンジニアリング
cottpan
1
150
torikago - Ruby::Boxで照らすモジュラモノリスの実行境界
se4weed
1
260
属人化した知識を、 AIが辿れる地図にする
pkshadeck
PRO
1
120
Google Apps Script で Ruby を動かす
kawahara
0
120
数百円から始めるRuby電子工作
tarosay
0
120
20260722_microCMSで考える、AI時代のコンテンツ運用設計
yosh1
0
170
Laravel Boostに学ぶ、AIにPHPを書かせる技術 〜OSSの実装から蒸留するエージェント制御の王道〜
kentaroutakeda
3
560
ソフトウェア設計に溶けるインフラ ― AWS CDK のインフラ認識論
konokenj
3
700
Build-to-own AI: Agentic Development for Humans
inesmontani
PRO
0
120
Built Our Own Background Agent at LayerX #aidevex_findy
layerx
PRO
9
3.8k
継続モナドとリアクティブプログラミング
yukikurage
3
660
Featured
See All Featured
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
67
56k
How to Talk to Developers About Accessibility
jct
2
450
Paper Plane (Part 1)
katiecoart
PRO
1
9.9k
Building an army of robots
kneath
306
46k
Future Trends and Review - Lecture 12 - Web Technologies (1019888BNR)
signer
PRO
0
3.7k
Stewardship and Sustainability of Urban and Community Forests
pwiseman
0
400
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
59
6.8k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
528
40k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
55
8.2k
Designing Powerful Visuals for Engaging Learning
tmiket
1
470
The Invisible Side of Design
smashingmag
301
52k
Building AI with AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
1.1k
Transcript
Design Systems & Component Based Frontend
Bilal Çınarlı Frontend Architect Software Engineer @Adidas @bcinarli github.com/bcinarli bcinarli.com
None
Harmony from Intuit, GEL – Global Experience Language from BBC,
Material from Google, Lightning from Salesforce, AirBNB’s Visual Language, Joystick from EA, Fluent from Microsoft, Plasma from WeWork, Polaris from Shopify, Lonely Planet, Swarm from Meetup, Canvas from Hubspot …and aDL from Adidas
What is a design system?
A collection of reusable components, guided by clear standards, that
can be assembled together to build any number of applications.
None
A design system is a combination of style, components, and
voice.
It is scalable at any level
Provides consistency between different pages and applications
With the set of rules and guides, increases the efficiency
Enhances the teamwork and eases the on-boarding of new members
http://bit.do/yarnds
http://bit.do/adl_
Components
Components support levels of abstraction in an application. It is
layered and feature-based.
Individual components provide decoupling which leads to better unit testings
and stability.
Design system and Components combine mostly in UI layer where
your presentation occurs
Besides, components can also communicate with the data layer while
rendering our content.
…and with the standardisation, it improves quality.
None
How Popular Libraries Think?
Build encapsulated components that manage their own state, then compose
them to make complex UIs.
Components define areas of responsibility in your UI that let
you reuse these sets of UI functionality.
It’s an abstraction that allows us to build large-scale applications
composed of small, self-contained, and often reusable components.
But the mainly, they should have a responsibility over a
single part.
None
How to Organise?
Define your folder structure based on their functionalities
Think of everything is sort-of a pluggable component. In most
cases, when you remove it, you should expect no traces left.
// DON’T . !"" controllers | !"" cart.js | #""
checkout.js !"" models | !"" cart.js | #"" checkout.js #"" views !"" cart.pug #"" checkout.pug // DO . !"" cart | !"" index.js | #"" template.pug #"" checkout !"" index.js #"" template.pug
…and tests are a part of your components.
// add test specs . !"" cart | !"" index.js
| !"" test.spec.js | #"" template.pug #"" checkout !"" index.js !"" test.spec.js #"" template.pug
Separate config and scripts away from your components.
. !"" config | !"" index.js | #"" server.js !""
scripts | !"" build.sh | #"" post-install.sh !"" test | !"" index.js | #"" setup.spec.js !"" cart | !"" index.js | !"" test.spec.js | #"" template.pug #"" checkout !"" index.js !"" test.spec.js #"" template.pug
Keep HTML and CSS separate in your source code and
never inline manually
// DON’T <p style="margin: 10px 0; padding: 0;">Hello World! </p>
// DO .content-text { margin: 10px 0; padding: 0; } <p class="content- text">Hello World!</p>
Always think about specificity in CSS, try to avoid creating
specific selectors
// DON’T #main .article .title span { font-size: 32px; font-weight:
bold; } // DO .main-article-title { font-size: 32px; font-weight: bold; }
Do not write the code you are going to overwrite
// DON’T .content { display: flex; max-width: 1280px; margin: 0
auto; } .article { width: 900px; } .supplementary { width: 380px; } @media screen and (min-width: 48.0625em) and (max-width: 64em) { .article { width: 644px; } } @media screen and (max-width: 48em) { .content { flex-direction: column; } .article, .supplementary { width: 100%; } } // DO .content { max-width: 1280px; margin: 0 auto; } @media screen and (min-width: 48.0625em) { .content { display: flex; } .article { flex: 1; } .supplementary { width: 380px; } }
A way to unify different frameworks?
Web components are a set of web platform APIs that
allow you to create new custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML tags to use in web pages and web apps.
Custom components and widgets build on the Web Component standards,
will work across modern browsers, and can be used with any JavaScript library or framework that works with HTML.
<script type="module" src=“components/nav/app- drawer“></script> <app-drawer raised class=“indigo">raised</app-drawer>
<script> class AppDrawer extends HTMLElement {...} window.customElements.define('app-drawer', AppDrawer); </script> <app-drawer></app-drawer>
Good part, all JS frameworks outputs to HTML. Theoretically, we
can use any popular JS library to create Web Components
What is more?
Having self-contained, reusable components helps to turn you app to
micro frontends
… that can have independent deployment, build, coding
… leads to autonomous teams
… and you can have a shell that orchestrates which
micro frontend to load
… with the “Best Friend of Frontend"
Your components should not know what the dependencies are in
behind the curtains you are using.
It should only aware of which functions are available for
a particular action.
Every dependency comes with a technical debt for the future.
Thank you @bcinarli