Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Interfaces in Perl5 at The Perl Conference 2019...
Search
Kenta Kobayashi
June 17, 2019
Technology
3.3k
0
Share
Interfaces in Perl5 at The Perl Conference 2019 in Pittsburgh
Kenta Kobayashi
June 17, 2019
More Decks by Kenta Kobayashi
See All by Kenta Kobayashi
Perlの生きのこり - YAPC::Fukuoka 2025
kfly8
0
2.1k
プロジェクトの空気を読んで開発してくれるPerlのAIツールがほしい
kfly8
2
910
Perlの生きのこり - エンジニアがこの先生きのこるためのカンファレンス2025
kfly8
4
3.1k
Tシャツに書かれたコードを読む
kfly8
0
1.5k
Introduce Sub::Meta
kfly8
0
100
研修はイベントでなくコミュニティ作り
kfly8
0
2.3k
明日からできる新人のオンボーディングガイド
kfly8
0
900
メンター成長のためのふりかえり会
kfly8
0
1.4k
経験から効率よく学習する
kfly8
0
480
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Diagnosing performance problems without the guesswork
elenatanasoiu
0
160
TypeScript Compiler APIとPHP-Parserを活用し、TypeScriptとPHPで型を共有する
shuta13
0
350
AI Adaptable なテストを整える工夫 / Ways to Make Your Tests AI-Adaptable
bitkey
PRO
2
210
Platform Engineering as a Product: Criteria for Improvement and Multi-Tenant Design
kumorn5s
0
490
PHP と TypeScript の型システム比較:AI 時代の「型」は誰のためにあるのか? #frontend_phpcon_do / frontend_phpcon_do_2026
shogogg
1
240
ルールやカスタム機能、どう使う?理想の出力を引き出すために今知りたいIBM Bob 5つの機能
muehara
1
310
Ruby::Boxでできること、Refinementsでできること
joker1007
3
380
Claude Codeを組織で使いこなす— サーバサイドAIエージェント運用の実践知
techtekt
PRO
0
190
エンジニアは生成AIと どのように向き合うべきか? ことばの意味という観点から
verypluming
3
340
JJUG CCC 2026 Spring AI時代の開発こそ標準化を武器に! ― 方式・プロセス・プラットフォームの標準化
s27watanabe
2
690
Databricks 月刊サービスアップデート 2026年05月号
tyosi1212
0
200
新規ゲーム開発におけるAI駆動開発のリアル
202409e2
0
2.1k
Featured
See All Featured
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
34
9.3k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
133
19k
Leveraging LLMs for student feedback in introductory data science courses - posit::conf(2025)
minecr
1
270
How to Ace a Technical Interview
jacobian
281
24k
A brief & incomplete history of UX Design for the World Wide Web: 1989–2019
jct
2
390
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
tammyeverts
49
3.5k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
659
62k
Self-Hosted WebAssembly Runtime for Runtime-Neutral Checkpoint/Restore in Edge–Cloud Continuum
chikuwait
0
560
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
38
2.9k
Accessibility Awareness
sabderemane
1
130
The Hidden Cost of Media on the Web [PixelPalooza 2025]
tammyeverts
2
320
Applied NLP in the Age of Generative AI
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.3k
Transcript
Interfaces in Perl5 kobaken a.k.a @kfly8 The Perl Conference 2019
#TPCiP
me • kobaken a.k.a @kfly8 • leader Gotanda.pm • orgnize
YAPC::Tokyo 2019
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
I ❤ Perl
Interfaces in Perl5
DBI
my $dbh = DBI->connect(...); my $items = $dbh->selectrow_arrayref(…);
Unified Interface independent of datastore
Unified Interface provides values
Limitation makes value
Agenda 1.DEMO & Features 2.Goal 3.Example: TODO app 4.Internal 5.Performance
Function::Interface is Java-like interface
DEMO
Features of Function::Interface 1.Typed interface definition 2.Check at compile time
What is Goal ?
To maintain large Perl apps
Interface is good for large apps
1. Be easier to fix implementation
2. Stable dependencies
Goal • To maintain large apps. • Interface is good
for large apps 1. Easy to fix implementation 2. Stable Dependencies
Example: TODO app
Case: “Inheritance”
package TodoRepository; use parent qw(DBI); sub new { my $class
= shift; $class->connect(…); }
package TodoRepository; … sub select { my ($self, $user_id)
= @_; $self->selectall_arrayref( ‘SELECT * FROM todos WHERE user_id = ?’, $user_id ); }
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new;
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new(…); sub my_todo_list
{ my $self = shift; my $todos = $repo->select($self->user_id); return $self->render($todos); }
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table Unstable Dependencies
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new; sub evil_method
{ $repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new; sub evil_method
{ $repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); } Too many features
easy to test?
my $mock = mock TodoRepository => ( select => sub
{ … } ); my $app = TodoApp->new; test $app->my_todo_list;
my $mock = mock TodoRepository => ( select => sub
{ … } ); my $app = TodoApp->new; test $app->my_todo_list; messy to test
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
“Role” case
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select);
package TodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has dbh
=> ( isa => ‘DBI::db’ );
package TodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has dbh
=> ( isa => ‘DBI::db’ );
package TodoRepository; … sub select { my ($self, $user_id) =
@_; $self->dbh->selectall_arrayref( ‘SELECT * FROM todos WHERE user_id = ?’, $user_id ); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ );
package TodoApp; … sub my_todo_list { my $self = shift;
my $repo = $self->todo_repo; my $todos = $repo->select($self->user_id); return $self->render($todos); }
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface NOT!
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface more stable
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); } Necessary and sufficient features
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
easy to test?
package TestTodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); sub select
{ … }
package TestTodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); sub select
{ … } Be easier to test
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
no problem at all?
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select); sub surprised_method { ..
do anything }
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select); sub surprised_method { ..
do anything } Implementation reusable
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select);
select($id) ? select(id => $id) ? select({ id => $id
}) ?
select($id) # => arrayref of Todo ? # => iterator
of Todo ?
select($id) # => arrayref of Todo ? # => iterator
of Todo ? Ambiguous interface input / output
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
“Function::Interface” case
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
sub surprising_method { … do anything }
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
sub surprising_method { … do anything }
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
package TodoRepository; use TodoTypes; use Function::Interface::Impl qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has
dbh => ( … ); method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]) { … }
package TodoApp; use Moo; use TodoTypes; has todo_repo => (
isa => ImplOf["TodoRepositoryInterface"], ); sub my_todo_list { … }
Looks Good!
Internal
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implmented
4.interface type
1. function implementation
Function::Parameters • subroutine signatures • developed by MAUKE
use Function::Parameters; use Types::Standard -types; fun add(Int $a, Int $b)
{ return $a + $b }
my $info = Function::Parameters::info(\&add); $info->positional_required; # => Int $a, Int
$b
Function::Return • specify function return types • created by myself
sub add :Return(Int) { 3.14 } add(); # ERROR! Invalid
type
my $info = Function::Return::info(\&add); $info->types; # => Int
Appendix about Function::Return
sub multi :Return(Num, Str) { 3.14, ‘message' } my ($pi,
$msg) = multi();
sub multi :Return(Num, Str) { 3.14, ‘message' } my ($pi,
$msg) = multi(); my $count = multi(); # ERROR!
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
2. function interface
Function::Interface • Keyword::Simple • PPR
Deparse fun hello() :Return(Str);
sub BEGIN { Function::Interface::_register_info({ package => ‘HelloInterface', keyword => ‘fun',
subname => ‘message', params => [], return => [&Str()]} ); }
my $info = Function::Interface::info(“HelloInterface”); $info->functions; # => hello(Str $msg) :Return(Str)
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
3.check if interface is implemented
use Function::Interface::Impl qw( FooInterface BarInterface BazInterface );
F::Parameters#info F::Return#info F::Interface#info
F::Parameters#info F::Return#info F::Interface#info
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
use Function::Interface::Types; my $type = ImplOF[‘FooInterface’]; # Foo is implements
of FooInterface my $foo = Foo->new; $type->check($foo);
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
Performance
F::I::Impl runs at compile time
F::Return has `no_check` option
Let’s benchmark
F::P + F::R + F::I F::P + F::R no_check +
F::I F::P + F::R no_check F::P Case1 Case4 Case2 Case3
F::P + F::R + F::I F::P + F::R no_check +
F::I F::P + F::R no_check F::P 360653.77/s 1499189.22/s 1499189.22/s 1499189.22/s Case1 Case4 Case2 Case3
$BTF $BTF $BTF $BTF
Conclusion
Features of F::Interface 1.Typed interface definition 2.Check at compile time
Goal • To maintain large apps. • Interface is good
for large apps 1. Easy to fix implementation 2. Stable Dependencies
Internal • function implementation • Function::Parameters + Function:\:Return • function
interface • Keyword::Simple + PPR • compare meta infos at compile time
Performance • The same speed as using only F::Parameters •
Function::Interface::Impl runs at CHECK phase • Function::Return has `no_check` option
Questions?
Thank you!