Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Interfaces in Perl5 at The Perl Conference 2019...
Search
Kenta Kobayashi
June 17, 2019
Technology
3.4k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Interfaces in Perl5 at The Perl Conference 2019 in Pittsburgh
Kenta Kobayashi
June 17, 2019
More Decks by Kenta Kobayashi
See All by Kenta Kobayashi
Perlの生きのこり - YAPC::Fukuoka 2025
kfly8
0
2.1k
プロジェクトの空気を読んで開発してくれるPerlのAIツールがほしい
kfly8
2
1k
Perlの生きのこり - エンジニアがこの先生きのこるためのカンファレンス2025
kfly8
4
3.2k
Tシャツに書かれたコードを読む
kfly8
0
1.5k
Introduce Sub::Meta
kfly8
0
110
研修はイベントでなくコミュニティ作り
kfly8
0
2.3k
明日からできる新人のオンボーディングガイド
kfly8
0
910
メンター成長のためのふりかえり会
kfly8
0
1.4k
経験から効率よく学習する
kfly8
0
490
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
オートロックマンションなのに、各部屋は施錠なし!? 攻撃者が組織内ネットワークで大暴れする理由 / The Front Door Is Locked, but the Rooms Are Wide Open: Why Attackers Move Freely Inside Enterprise Networks
nttcom
1
1.6k
AIコーディングの次。コードレビューと理解負荷を解消して組織の開発生産性を高める
moongift
PRO
2
2.3k
20260608_Codexの可能性_ノンプログラマー向け_大城追記
doradora09
PRO
0
780
関東Kaggler会発表資料
takoi
1
200
QAエンジニア起点で進める、SmartHRにおける信頼性向上について
kaomi_wombat
1
120
Flutterをカメラで動かしたかった話
sony
1
130
【CEDEC2026】コードレビュー支援ツール開発から学ぶ:LLMを用いた業務システムの実践的な運用設計と誤出力対策
cygames
PRO
0
630
toio・myCobotでフィジカルAIっぽいことを行うための検討(とりあえず調査) / フィジカルAI LT(IoTLTによる開催)
you
PRO
0
300
AWS ネットワーク構築でハマった(ハマりかけた) 5選とそこから得た教訓
nagisa53
4
200
DatadogのBits Chatが開発組織にもたらしたもの / What Bits Chat Has Brought Us
sms_tech
0
120
認知負荷をGemini で溶かす — GKE 基盤「Orbit」における AI エージェントの実践
sansantech
PRO
1
270
Redmine 7.0 新機能・機能強化解説(OSC2026京都ダイジェスト版)
vividtone
1
210
Featured
See All Featured
Ecommerce SEO: The Keys for Success Now & Beyond - #SERPConf2024
aleyda
1
2.1k
The Limits of Empathy - UXLibs8
cassininazir
1
600
svc-hook: hooking system calls on ARM64 by binary rewriting
retrage
2
450
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
270
14k
Digital Projects Gone Horribly Wrong (And the UX Pros Who Still Save the Day) - Dean Schuster
uxyall
1
2.3k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
304
22k
The Organizational Zoo: Understanding Human Behavior Agility Through Metaphoric Constructive Conversations (based on the works of Arthur Shelley, Ph.D)
kimpetersen
PRO
0
400
Prompt Engineering for Job Search
mfonobong
0
400
Gemini Prompt Engineering: Practical Techniques for Tangible AI Outcomes
mfonobong
2
480
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
57
7.1k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
275
41k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
52
6k
Transcript
Interfaces in Perl5 kobaken a.k.a @kfly8 The Perl Conference 2019
#TPCiP
me • kobaken a.k.a @kfly8 • leader Gotanda.pm • orgnize
YAPC::Tokyo 2019
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
I ❤ Perl
Interfaces in Perl5
DBI
my $dbh = DBI->connect(...); my $items = $dbh->selectrow_arrayref(…);
Unified Interface independent of datastore
Unified Interface provides values
Limitation makes value
Agenda 1.DEMO & Features 2.Goal 3.Example: TODO app 4.Internal 5.Performance
Function::Interface is Java-like interface
DEMO
Features of Function::Interface 1.Typed interface definition 2.Check at compile time
What is Goal ?
To maintain large Perl apps
Interface is good for large apps
1. Be easier to fix implementation
2. Stable dependencies
Goal • To maintain large apps. • Interface is good
for large apps 1. Easy to fix implementation 2. Stable Dependencies
Example: TODO app
Case: “Inheritance”
package TodoRepository; use parent qw(DBI); sub new { my $class
= shift; $class->connect(…); }
package TodoRepository; … sub select { my ($self, $user_id)
= @_; $self->selectall_arrayref( ‘SELECT * FROM todos WHERE user_id = ?’, $user_id ); }
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new;
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new(…); sub my_todo_list
{ my $self = shift; my $todos = $repo->select($self->user_id); return $self->render($todos); }
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table Unstable Dependencies
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new; sub evil_method
{ $repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use TodoRepository; my $repo = TodoRepository->new; sub evil_method
{ $repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); } Too many features
easy to test?
my $mock = mock TodoRepository => ( select => sub
{ … } ); my $app = TodoApp->new; test $app->my_todo_list;
my $mock = mock TodoRepository => ( select => sub
{ … } ); my $app = TodoApp->new; test $app->my_todo_list; messy to test
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
“Role” case
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select);
package TodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has dbh
=> ( isa => ‘DBI::db’ );
package TodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has dbh
=> ( isa => ‘DBI::db’ );
package TodoRepository; … sub select { my ($self, $user_id) =
@_; $self->dbh->selectall_arrayref( ‘SELECT * FROM todos WHERE user_id = ?’, $user_id ); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ );
package TodoApp; … sub my_todo_list { my $self = shift;
my $repo = $self->todo_repo; my $todos = $repo->select($self->user_id); return $self->render($todos); }
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface NOT!
TodoApp TodoRepository DBI TODO table TodoRepositoryInterface more stable
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); }
package TodoApp; use Moo; has todo_repo => ( is =>
‘ro’, does => ‘TodoRepositoryInterface’ ); sub evil_method { $todo_repo->do(“ANY QUERY!!!!”); } Necessary and sufficient features
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
easy to test?
package TestTodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); sub select
{ … }
package TestTodoRepository; use Moo; with qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); sub select
{ … } Be easier to test
Problems of “Inheritance” case 1.Unstable dependencies 2.Too many features 3.messy
to test
no problem at all?
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select); sub surprised_method { ..
do anything }
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select); sub surprised_method { ..
do anything } Implementation reusable
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Moo::Role; requires qw(select);
select($id) ? select(id => $id) ? select({ id => $id
}) ?
select($id) # => arrayref of Todo ? # => iterator
of Todo ?
select($id) # => arrayref of Todo ? # => iterator
of Todo ? Ambiguous interface input / output
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
“Function::Interface” case
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
sub surprising_method { … do anything }
package TodoRepositoryInterface; use Function::Interface; use TodoTypes; method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]);
sub surprising_method { … do anything }
Problems of “Role” case 1.Implementation reusable 2.Ambiguous interface input /
output
package TodoRepository; use TodoTypes; use Function::Interface::Impl qw( TodoRepositoryInterface ); has
dbh => ( … ); method select(UserID $user_id) :Return(ArrayRef[Todo]) { … }
package TodoApp; use Moo; use TodoTypes; has todo_repo => (
isa => ImplOf["TodoRepositoryInterface"], ); sub my_todo_list { … }
Looks Good!
Internal
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implmented
4.interface type
1. function implementation
Function::Parameters • subroutine signatures • developed by MAUKE
use Function::Parameters; use Types::Standard -types; fun add(Int $a, Int $b)
{ return $a + $b }
my $info = Function::Parameters::info(\&add); $info->positional_required; # => Int $a, Int
$b
Function::Return • specify function return types • created by myself
sub add :Return(Int) { 3.14 } add(); # ERROR! Invalid
type
my $info = Function::Return::info(\&add); $info->types; # => Int
Appendix about Function::Return
sub multi :Return(Num, Str) { 3.14, ‘message' } my ($pi,
$msg) = multi();
sub multi :Return(Num, Str) { 3.14, ‘message' } my ($pi,
$msg) = multi(); my $count = multi(); # ERROR!
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
2. function interface
Function::Interface • Keyword::Simple • PPR
Deparse fun hello() :Return(Str);
sub BEGIN { Function::Interface::_register_info({ package => ‘HelloInterface', keyword => ‘fun',
subname => ‘message', params => [], return => [&Str()]} ); }
my $info = Function::Interface::info(“HelloInterface”); $info->functions; # => hello(Str $msg) :Return(Str)
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
3.check if interface is implemented
use Function::Interface::Impl qw( FooInterface BarInterface BazInterface );
F::Parameters#info F::Return#info F::Interface#info
F::Parameters#info F::Return#info F::Interface#info
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
use Function::Interface::Types; my $type = ImplOF[‘FooInterface’]; # Foo is implements
of FooInterface my $foo = Foo->new; $type->check($foo);
requirements 1.function implementation 2.function interface 3.check if interface is implemented
4.interface type
Performance
F::I::Impl runs at compile time
F::Return has `no_check` option
Let’s benchmark
F::P + F::R + F::I F::P + F::R no_check +
F::I F::P + F::R no_check F::P Case1 Case4 Case2 Case3
F::P + F::R + F::I F::P + F::R no_check +
F::I F::P + F::R no_check F::P 360653.77/s 1499189.22/s 1499189.22/s 1499189.22/s Case1 Case4 Case2 Case3
$BTF $BTF $BTF $BTF
Conclusion
Features of F::Interface 1.Typed interface definition 2.Check at compile time
Goal • To maintain large apps. • Interface is good
for large apps 1. Easy to fix implementation 2. Stable Dependencies
Internal • function implementation • Function::Parameters + Function:\:Return • function
interface • Keyword::Simple + PPR • compare meta infos at compile time
Performance • The same speed as using only F::Parameters •
Function::Interface::Impl runs at CHECK phase • Function::Return has `no_check` option
Questions?
Thank you!