Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

The nightmare behind the cross platform mobile ...

Marco Grassi
March 27, 2015

The nightmare behind the cross platform mobile apps dream

Black Hat Asia 15

Marco Grassi

March 27, 2015
Tweet

More Decks by Marco Grassi

Other Decks in Research

Transcript

  1. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style The  nightmare  behind   the  cross  platform   mobile  apps  dream Marco  Grassi   @marcograss   [email protected] Sebastián  Guerrero   @0xroot   [email protected]
  2. Agenda •Background  introduction   •What  Cross-­‐platform  Frameworks  are  out  there?

      •Concerns   •The  uniform  attack  surface   •Code  formats  and  code  retrieval   •Runtime  manipulation  and  dynamic  analysis   •Some  examples  of  vulnerabilities  in  the   frameworks   •Conclusions
  3. Who  are  we? Marco  Grassi   Mobile  Security  Researcher  

    NowSecure Sebas  Guerrero   Mobile  Security  Researcher   NowSecure
  4. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style Background  intro
  5. Background The  mobile  market  is  fragmented.  Developers  want  their  app

     on   multiple  platforms,  at  least  iOS  and  Android.   This  caused  a  growth  in  the  number  of  tools  and  frameworks   available  for  cross  platform  development  (code  reuse  between   multiple  platforms)  with  different  technologies.
  6. Background Those  frameworks  usually  achieve  code  portability  by  leveraging  

    HTML5  technology  or  interpreters  with  bindings  on  the  native  code   platform,  to  expose  the  API  of  the  underlying  system  in  a  way  as   platform  independent  as  possible.   The  result  is  that  lot  of  code,  if  not  all,  can  be  reused.
  7. Background So  far  everything  seems  great,  we  can  code  once

     and  run  in  every   platform!   But  how  is  the  quality  of  the  code  of  these  frameworks?   Do  they  introduce  security  vulnerabilities  if  we  use  them?   Are  those  vulnerabilities  shared  by  all  the  applications  using  the  same   framework?
  8. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style What  Cross-­‐platform   Frameworks  Are  Out   There?
  9. Cordova  /  PhoneGap •Mobile  development  framework  to  write  Mobile  

    applications  using  web  technologies  such  as   HTML5,  Javascript  and  CSS3.   •Cordova  is  the  Opensource  core,  PhoneGap  is   owned  by  Adobe  which  leverages  Cordova.   •Cordova  leverages  a  “bridge”  between  javascript   and  native  code,  to  invoke  native  methods  from   javascript  code.   •OpenSource  -­‐  https://cordova.apache.org/
  10. Cordova  /  PhoneGap •Some  history  of  known  vulnerabilities  and  CVEs

      •Great  job  by  David  Kaplan  and  Roee  Hay  of  IBM   Security  Systems   •CVE-­‐2014-­‐3500,  CVE-­‐2014-­‐3501,  CVE-­‐2014-­‐3502,   all  related  to  Android  Intents  somehow   “mistrusted”  leading  to  XAS,  bypasses  and  leak  of   data.
  11. •Cross  platform  game  creation  system,  including  the   major  mobile

     platforms.   •You  can  develop  the  game  with  Mono,  so  in  .NET   •http://unity3d.com/
  12. Adobe  AIR •Very  popular  cross  platform  runtime,  not  only  on

      mobile  but  also  on  desktop.  Used  both  in  apps  and   games.   •You  can  develop  your  project  with  Adobe  Flash  or   ActionScript.
  13. Adobe  AIR •Lot  of  CVE,  maybe  mainly  because  they  are

     shared   with  Adobe  Flash  Player  for  Desktop  browsers   •In  this  context  (cross  platform  application),  those   vulns  are  less  relevant  because  you  don’t  run   remote/untrusted  code  like  in  the  browser,  you   just  execute  code  shipped  within  your  application.   (if  you  don’t  do  strange  things)
  14. Titanium  Appcelerator •Open  source  -­‐  http://www.appcelerator.com/   •You  can  develop

     your  native  mobile  application  in   javascript   •The  javascript  runs  on  a  interpreter  and  uses   native  UI  and  functionalities   •The  IDE  is  Eclipse  based
  15. •SDK  to  develop  2d  games  and  apps     •You

     write  Lua  code  using  bindings  to  C++  and   OpenGL
  16. Kony  Framework •Platform  to  develop  cross  platform  applications.   •Native

     Mobile  Applications  can  be  written  in  Lua  or   Javascript.
  17. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style Concerns
  18. Concerns •Code  reuse  implies  uniform  attack  surface   between  apps

     using  the  same  framework.     •Vulnerabilities  and  attacks  can  be  reused  among   different  apps.   •The  code  is  stored  in  high  level  languages  or  byte   code.  This  makes  reverse  engineering  process   easier  or  non-­‐existent  as  we  will  see  soon.
  19. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style Code  Format:  Some   Examples  On  How  To   Retrieve  The  Code  
  20. With  great  portability… …  often  comes    great   meta

     datas  and  easy   reverse  engineering.
  21. Cordova  /  PhoneGap •Almost  all  the  code  is  written  in

     javascript,  the  UI  is   developed  in  HTML5  and  CSS3.   •The  code  by  default  it’s  just  bundled  in  plain  text   inside  of  the  mobile  app,  so  retrieving  it  and   reversing  is  trivial
  22. Cordova  /  PhoneGap •On  iOS  the  Cordova  code  is  bundled

     as  a  resources,   or  in  a  www/  subfolder  of  the  app  bundle   •On  Android  it’s  usually  bundled  in  the  assets/   folder  of  the  apk
  23. Cordova  /  PhoneGap ➜ assets tree . ├── OpenSans-Light.ttf ├──

    OpenSans-Regular.ttf ├── defappratepack.json ├── deflanpack.json ├── defpermissions.json └── www ├── akbank.lib.js ├── cashflow_dummy.js ├── cordova.android.js ├── cordova.js ├── index.html ├── index_cashflow.html
  24. Titanium  Framework •Real  code  is  written  in  JavaScript.   •Load

     asset  data  at  runtime  through  the   AssetCryptImpl  class.   •Assets  range  are  defined  in  a  HashMap  within  the   initAssets  class.   •Assets  bytes  are  contained  in  a  CharBuffer  defined   in  the  initAssetsBytes.  
  25. Titanium  Framework • One  python  script  to  rule  them  all:

      • Parse  the  code  looking  for  the  ‘initAssets’  method:   • .method  private  static  initAssets()Ljava/util/Map;   • Apply  some  regular  expression  to  spot  the  HashMap  containing  all  the  assets:   • 'invoke-­‐direct  \{(v[0-­‐9]+),  (v[0-­‐9]+),  (v[0-­‐9]+)\},  Lcom/******/*****/ AssetCryptImpl\$Range;-­‐><init>\(II\)V’   • Repeat  the  same  process  for  the  Ljava/util/Map  call:   • 'invoke-­‐interface  \{(v[0-­‐9]+),  (v[0-­‐9]+),  (v[0-­‐9]+)\},  Ljava/util/Map;.*’   • Once  all  the  ranges  have  been  retrieved,  its  time  to  extract  the  assets  bytes:   • start_init_assets  =  ".method  private  static  initAssetsBytes()Ljava/nio/ CharBuffer;"   • const_string  =  'const-­‐string  v1,  "'  
  26. Titanium  Framework • But  the  assets  are  encrypted…  NO  PROBLEM,

     DO  YOU  EVEN  REVERSE   ENGINEERING,  BRO?!?   • The  crypto  is  described  in  the  JNI  function   ‘Java_org_appcelerator_titanium_TiVerify_filterDataInRange’  in  ‘libtiverify.so’   byte[]  filterDataInRange(byte[]  bytes,  int  offset,  int  count)  {          SecretKeySpec  key  =  new  SecretKeySpec(bytes,  bytes.length  -­‐  0x10,  0x10,  "AES");          Cipher  cipher  =  Cipher.getInstance("AES");          cipher.init(Cipher.DECRYPT_MODE,  key);          return  cipher.doFinal(bytes,  offset,  count);   }
  27. Titanium  Framework •Yeah,  OK,  enough  theory,  show  me  some  real

     sh*t.   [+]  Extracting  "xxx/ui/checkDeposit/DepositLandingPage.js"   [+]  Extracting  "xxx/ui/transfers/TransferApprovedPage.js"   [+]  Extracting  “shared/xxx/gbapi/checkDepositHistoryResponse.js"   …   ./xxx/modules:   total  40   -­‐rw-­‐r-­‐-­‐r-­‐-­‐    1  sebas    staff    1560  Mar    9  03:09  BalanceHelper.js   -­‐rw-­‐r-­‐-­‐r-­‐-­‐    1  sebas    staff    1618  Mar    9  03:09  StepUpServiceWrapper.js   -­‐rw-­‐r-­‐-­‐r-­‐-­‐    1  sebas    staff    5675  Mar    9  03:09  UserContext.js   -­‐rw-­‐r-­‐-­‐r-­‐-­‐    1  sebas    staff    1703  Mar    9  03:09  events.mod.js
  28. •If  Lua  is  used,  the  code  is  stored  inside  a

      “konyappluabytecode.o.mp3”  (wut) Kony  Framework ➜ assets file konyappluabytecode.o.mp3 konyappluabytecode.o.mp3: Lua bytecode, version 5.1 •Can  be  decompiled  with  OSS  decompilers
  29. •.NET  code,  trivial  to  reverse  if  not  obfuscated,  lot  

    of  good  quality  decompilers  out  there,  like  ILSPY.   •You  can  find  the  code  in  the  assets/  folder  in   Android  for  example.
  30. Adobe  AIR •You  can  find  the  .swf  file  in  the

     assets/  folder  on   Android   •Trivial  to  reverse  if  not  obfuscated,  some   decompilers  available
  31. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style Enough  with  static   analysis  attacks..   What  about  dynamic?   Runtime  Manipulation
  32. Runtime  attacks,  leveraging  the   shared  codebase •Like  we  said

     before,  apps  using  those  frameworks   share  most  of  the  code.   •This  fact  comes  handy  also  for  runtime  attacks.  We   can  deploy  a  runtime  attack  and  use  it  against  all   applications  that  leverage  the  same  framework   with  little  or  without  any  change!
  33. Can  I  have  it  for  free  Adobe?   In  App

     items  for  free! 1. Reverse  engineer  the  Adobe  AIR  code   2. Spot  implementation  of  in  app  purchases  on   Android   3. Verify  it’s  shared  between  multiple  apps   4. Develop  a  runtime  attack  to  make  the  purchases   appear  legitimate  when  they  are  not   5. ???   6. PROFIT!
  34. Reversing  and  spotting  the  shared  code •Very  well  known  trivial

     code  copy  pasted  from   Google’s  examples  that  can  be  found  in  almost  all   the  apps  using  In  app  purchases  on  Google  Play
  35. Develop  a  runtime  attack • Leverage  a  framework  to  patch

     verifyPurchase  to   return  always  true  and  other  small  mods  (with   Xposed  framework  for  example)   • if  the  app  doesn’t  check  signatures  server  side  for   the  purchase  (which  almost  none  do)  we  are  done   • For  more  informations  on  runtime  attacks  on  iOS   or  Android:  ZeroNights  ’14  -­‐  Steroids  For  Your   App  Security  Assessment  -­‐  https:// speakerdeck.com/marcograss/steroids-­‐for-­‐your-­‐ app-­‐security-­‐assessment
  36. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style Some  examples  of   vulnerabilities  in  the   frameworks
  37. A  tale  about  chained  vulns  in  Cordova • CVE-­‐2014-­‐3500  XAS

     via  Android  Intent  URLs.   • CVE-­‐2014-­‐3501  Whitelist  Bypass  for  Non-­‐HTTP   URLs.   • CVE-­‐2014-­‐3502  Apps  can  leak  data  to  other  apps   via  URL  Loading.  
  38. CVE-­‐2014-­‐3500 • Cordova-­‐based  applications  use  a  WebView  to  renders  the

      website  requested,  via  the  ‘CordovaWebView’  activity,  through   the  ‘loadUrl()’  function.   • If  the  url  provided  is  ‘  about:blank'  or  ‘javascript’  it  will  be   loaded  via  ‘loadUrlNow(url)’  method.  Otherwise  the  register  v0   will  triggered  after  a  call  to  ‘getProperty(“url”,  null)’.   • In  such  case,  the  ‘url’  parameter  is  taken  from   ‘getIntent().getExtra()’,  which  can  be  provided  externally.  
  39. CVE-­‐2014-­‐3500 ➜    ~    adb  shell  am  start  -­‐a

     android.intent.action.VIEW  -­‐c  android.intent.category.DEFAULT       -­‐e  url  file:///sdcard/test/test.html  -­‐n  packageName/.vulnerableActivity  
  40. CVE-­‐2014-­‐3500 • Pretty  similar  to  the  previous  one,  the  ‘errorurl’

     parameter  can   be  passed  via  Intent  extras  in  ‘CordovaActivity’.   • The  ‘errorurl’  will  be  rendered  by  the  WebView  when  a  network   request  fails.   • The  parameter’s  content  must  either  be  in  the  whitelist  or  be   part  of  URI  scheme  file.  Otherwise  it  will  not  be  triggered.  
  41. CVE-­‐2014-­‐3501   • The  framework  overrides  Android’s  ‘shouldInterceptRequest()’   method,

     to  ensure  that  the  WebView  only  allows  requests  to   URLs  in  the  configured  whitelist.   • The  mechanism  is  only  configured  for  HTTP/S  or  the  file  URI,   being  possible  to  bypass  it  through  other  protocols  like  WS/S  
  42. CVE-­‐2014-­‐3502   • Cordova  overrides  ‘shouldOverrideUrlLoading()’.  If  the  scheme  is

      not  handled  by  the  function  will  be  launched  in  the  default   viewer.   • If  an  attacker  calls  the  WebView  to  load  a  new  URL   (location.href),  ‘shouldOverrideUrlLoading()’  will  be  called.   Independently  of  the  whitelist  validation.   • It’s  possible  to  force  Cordova  to  launch  a  URL  using  the  default   viewer.  
  43. Adobe  AIR’s  EncryptedLocalStorage   API “The  EncryptedLocalStore  class  (ELS)  provides

     an  encrypted   local  storage  mechanism  that  you  can  be  use  as  a  small  cache   for  an  application's  private  data.  ELS  data  cannot  be  shared   between  applications.  The  intent  of  ELS  is  to  allow  an   application  to  store  easily  recreated  items  such  as  login   credentials  and  other  private  information.”  -­‐  Adobe   documentation
  44. Adobe  AIR  WTF   On  Android,  the  data  stored  by

     the  EncryptedLocalStorage  class  are   not  encrypted.   Adobe  basically  rely  on  the  fact  that  application  private  folder  are  not  accessible  by  an  attacker   thanks  to  Android  uid/gid  separation  between  apps.  As  we  will  see  this  assumption  is  not  valid. So  basically  a  developer  expects  to  store  data   encrypted  but….
  45. Adobe  AIR  WTF   Instead  the  implementation   of  the

     “EncryptedStorage”  is   just  a  Base64  Encoding!   Probably  lot  of  others   platform  specific  quirks   around  the  code  base…
  46. Small  parenthesis…  adb  backups • Functionality  introduced  in  Android  4.0.

      • If  you  have  physical  access  to  the  phone  and  you  can   activate  usb  debugging,  you  can  backup  to  your   computer  the  content  of  the  private  application  folder   that  have  the  flag  “allowBackup”  set  to  true  in  their   AndroidManifest.xml   • If  the  flag  is  omitted,  the  default  value  is  true.
  47. Adobe  AIR  WTF   The  Adobe  AIR  applications  by  default

     have  the  flag  allowBackup   unset,  so  the  default  value  of  true  kicks  in.   This  allows  an  attacker  without  root  to  backup  the  content  of  the   private  folder  of  the  Adobe  application  with  adb backup and   retrieve  those  unencrypted  supposedly  private  informations.
  48. Titanium  Broken  Default  HTTPS So  the  applications  developed  by  this

     framework  are  often   vulnerable  by  MiTM.  Why?   By  default  the  framework  doesn’t  validate  the  certificate  on   Android!
  49. Titanium  Broken  Default  HTTPS If  the  developer  doesn’t  specify  a

     pinning  for  his  certificate,  the   framework  simply  leverage  dummy  classes  called   “NonValidatingSSLSocketFactory  /  NonValidatingTrustManager”  and   so  on.   So  the  result  is  that  if  you  rely  on  the  defaults  (which  pretty  much   everyone  does),  the  SSL  validation  is  completely  skipped,  allowing  an   attacker  to  MiTM  traffic  even  without  a  trusted  certificate!
  50. Titanium  Broken  Default  HTTPS You  can  use  their  APIs  to

     pin  your  own  certificate  to   workaround  this  issue,  but  it  will  require  to  pin  every  single   cert  you  use.
  51. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style Conclusions
  52. Conclusions   • Security  is  not  taken  too  much  seriously.

      • Mechanisms  used  to  protect  the  application’s  assets   are  not  good  enough.  (so  your  IP  is  at  risk!)   • Few  hours  and  some  minion  bottles  of  vodka  were   necessary  to  find  these  issues.  What  could  possibly  go   wrong  if  we  dedicate  more  time?
  53. • Click  to  edit  Master  text  styles   — Second

     level   • Third  level   — Fourth  level   » Fifth  level Click  to  edit  Master  title  style Next  Steps
  54. To  the  infinity  and  beyond   • Automatic  framework  recognition

     and  develop   instrumentation  to  trace  also  interpreted  execution.   • Merge  all  the  code  extractors  in  one  unique  utility.   • Find  more  vulnerabilities  in  the  framework  cores.   • Suggestions?