Grandeur and Decadence of EU OSS Policy

Transcript

1. Stéfane Fermigier Co-founder & Executive Board Member @ APELL // Co-founder & Co-Chairman @ CNLL // Co-founder @ Euclidia // Founder & CEO @ Abilian Grandeur and Decadence of EU OSS Policy How can we rekindle the fl ame?
2. • Founded in 2020 • Members = European Industry associations mostly representing the commercial open source ecosystem in their respective European nation states • Current members are: France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, UK, Netherland, Italy. • + Associate members: currently OpenForum Europe
3. Introduction: A Drama in Three Acts
5. F/OSS and Digital Sovereignty according to the Commission (2020) In its Oct 2020 open source plan, the Commission notes that "the open source model has an impact on Europe's digital autonomy. It is likely to give Europe a chance to create and maintain its own independent digital approach to the digital giants in the cloud and allow it to retain control over its processes, information and technology." https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/informatics/open-source-software-strategy_en
7. EC: Study on the impact of Open Source Software and Hardware (2021) • Estimates that open source software contributes between €65 to €95 billion to the European Union’s GDP and promises signi fi cant growth opportunities for the region’s digital economy. • To reap these bene fi ts, the researchers point to a need for a profound culture switch and signi fi cant investments in open technologies.
8. https://cnll.fr/news/2022-survey-the-open-source-market-in-france-europe/
9. Source: EC study on the Impact of OSS/OSH (Sept. 2021)
11. APELL as a Think Tank - 2 Workshop Reports • The OSS development model is vital to achieve open, sustainable, and innovative digitalization. • Regulations should protect innovation, meet security and reliability expectations, and prevent uncontrollable platform e ff ects. • Current regulatory drafts, like the draft Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) include many obstacles and challenges for the open source development model, which might lead to a massive decrease of innovation and business activity in the European IT sector. • The cause for this might be that the European Commission (EC) does not fully understand open source, causing additional concerns. https://www.apell.info/2023/09/08/apell-conference-report-helsinki-2023/
12. Introducing our speakers Jean-Paul Smets Astor Nummelin Carlberg Milisav Radmanic VP, Univention 
 OSBA board member Founder and CEO, Nexedi 
 Co-chairman, Euclidia Executive Director, OpenForum Europe 
 Management board member, APELL Stefane Fermigier Founder and CEO, Abilian 
 Co-president, CNLL 
 Management board members, APELL
13. Rapid.Space ©2023 CC BY-ND 2.0 Libre Software in 🇪🇺 in 2023 1 Jean-Paul Smets CEO Nexedi – www.nexedi.com – one of the TOP-3 libre software creators in 🇪🇺 CEO Rapid.Space – www.rapid.space – fully open 5G edge cloud created in 🇪🇺 President of Libre Endowment Fund – afs.one repository of libre in 🇪🇺 co-president of EUCLIDIA – European Cloud Industrial Alliance +33 629 02 44 25
14. Rapid.Space ©2023 CC BY-ND 2.0 Libre in 🇪🇺 – biased against independent creators 2 Cost to cloudify libre software: 1.6 M€ / 24 months SNC / EUCS / CRA / PLD / LPM / Chat Control / SRE / UPC / NIS2 / DSA / AI Act 20 K€ / 3 months in 🇨🇳 0 € / 0 month in 🇯🇵 🇺🇸 Preference for libre software created by civil servants CRA / Cloud au Centre / European Initiative for Digital Commons and NGOs Censorship of libre software AI Act
15. Rapid.Space ©2023 CC BY-ND 2.0 Hopes for libre in 🇪🇺 – foster independent creation 3 Turn OECD's "developer payer" principle into an exception Diversity matters for resilience, security and competitivity Deregulate or new versions of EUCS / SNC / CRA / PLD / SRE / NIS2 Define problems rather than impose solutions Deregulate or new versions of EUCS / SNC / SRE whenever IPR disallow subsidiarity Deregulate or new versions of CRA / PLD / NIS2 / AI Act / Chat Control
16. Supplementary material
17. We need to do more, now • Enforce existing regulations “encouraging”, “preferring” or “mandating” the use of F/OSS in the public administration, add missing ones • French MP Philippe Latombe: “The State must by default use free software. The only constraint that the State understands is the normative one, i.e. when it’s imposed by the Parliament.” • Finance both innovative and maintenance work, using the proper fi nancial tools • Promote the F/OSS ecosystem, including the EU business sector
18. Proposed strategic plan (1/5) Establish speci fi c Open Source strategies at EU-level, and in each EU country, focussed on boosting economic growth, innovation and digital sovereignty • OSPOs everywhere + network of OSPOs • Engagement with the F/OSS EU business ecosystems should be explicit in their mission • One of the OSPOs’ KPIs should be to explicitly increase the proportion of F/OSS in IT purchasing by the public administration they are working for
19. Proposed strategic plan (2/5) Prioritising Open Source in software procurement by the public and private sectors in a way that it becomes impossible to create insurmountable vendor dependence • Ensure that proper, direct contractualisation with F/OSS SMEs is possible and regularly activated • Ensure that large support contracts, which are usually awarded to large IT companies, provide enough value to SME that create and maintain the software they support
20. Proposed strategic plan (3/5) Promote investment in OSS • Increase the proportion of F/OSS (and OSH…) projects in R&D and Innovation fi nancing and make it easier for SMEs to participate • more general tax incentives for Open Source contributions • Increasing public funding of speci fi c and strategic Open Source projects, particularly for small and medium-sized companies, through existing programmes and new initiatives
21. Proposed strategic plan (4/5) Education and training Place Open Source at the heart of digital skills strategies and computer science education across Europe, with the aim of boosting innovation in the long term
22. Proposed strategic plan (5/5) Level the playing fi eld for F/OSS • Promote F/OSS, either speci fi cally (e.g. directories of existing solutions and technologies) or in the context of existing promotion schemes for the tech sector (e.g. “La French Tech”) • Increase awareness around F/OSS in the education and higher education curricula • Ensure adequate legal frameworks: interoperability requirements, public procurement regulations, no software patents, GDPR, etc. • Keep the in fl uence of “big tech” companies at bay with proper regulations and by being present in the relevant standardisation bodies