$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
MongoDB for Analytics
Search
John Nunemaker
PRO
May 04, 2012
Programming
21
2.3k
MongoDB for Analytics
Presented at MongoSF on May 4th, 2012.
John Nunemaker
PRO
May 04, 2012
Tweet
Share
More Decks by John Nunemaker
See All by John Nunemaker
Atom
jnunemaker
PRO
10
4.3k
MongoDB for Analytics
jnunemaker
PRO
11
1k
Addicted to Stable
jnunemaker
PRO
32
2.8k
MongoDB for Analytics
jnunemaker
PRO
16
30k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
61
9.6k
Why NoSQL?
jnunemaker
PRO
10
970
Don't Repeat Yourself, Repeat Others
jnunemaker
PRO
7
3.5k
I Have No Talent
jnunemaker
PRO
14
1k
Why MongoDB Is Awesome
jnunemaker
PRO
18
4.5k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Claude Codeの「Compacting Conversation」を体感50%減! CLAUDE.md + 8 Skills で挑むコンテキスト管理術
kmurahama
1
430
TUIライブラリつくってみた / i-just-make-TUI-library
kazto
1
400
tparseでgo testの出力を見やすくする
utgwkk
2
250
Python札幌 LT資料
t3tra
4
810
大体よく分かるscala.collection.immutable.HashMap ~ Compressed Hash-Array Mapped Prefix-tree (CHAMP) ~
matsu_chara
2
220
愛される翻訳の秘訣
kishikawakatsumi
3
330
20251127_ぼっちのための懇親会対策会議
kokamoto01_metaps
2
450
【Streamlit x Snowflake】データ基盤からアプリ開発・AI活用まで、すべてをSnowflake内で実現
ayumu_yamaguchi
1
120
FluorTracer / RayTracingCamp11
kugimasa
0
240
複数人でのCLI/Infrastructure as Codeの暮らしを良くする
shmokmt
5
2.3k
手が足りない!兼業データエンジニアに必要だったアーキテクチャと立ち回り
zinkosuke
0
760
S3 VectorsとStrands Agentsを利用したAgentic RAGシステムの構築
tosuri13
6
350
Featured
See All Featured
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
88
4.9k
Test your architecture with Archunit
thirion
1
2.1k
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
0
300
コードの90%をAIが書く世界で何が待っているのか / What awaits us in a world where 90% of the code is written by AI
rkaga
57
37k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
55
9.4k
JAMstack: Web Apps at Ludicrous Speed - All Things Open 2022
reverentgeek
1
280
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
Collaborative Software Design: How to facilitate domain modelling decisions
baasie
0
92
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
47
7.9k
世界の人気アプリ100個を分析して見えたペイウォール設計の心得
akihiro_kokubo
PRO
63
35k
職位にかかわらず全員がリーダーシップを発揮するチーム作り / Building a team where everyone can demonstrate leadership regardless of position
madoxten
47
33k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
Transcript
GitHub John Nunemaker MongoSF 2012 May 4, 2012 MongoDB for
Analytics A loving conversation with @jnunemaker
None
Background How hernias can be good for you
None
None
1 month Of evenings and weekends
1 year Since public launch
13 tiny servers 2 web, 6 app, 3 db, 2
queue
7-8 Million Page views per day
None
None
None
None
Implementation Imma show you how we do what we do
baby
Doing It (mostly) Live No aggregate querying
None
None
get('/track.gif') do track_service.record(...) TrackGif end
class TrackService def record(attrs) message = MessagePack.pack(attrs) @client.set(@queue, message) end
end
class TrackProcessor def run loop { process } end def
process record @client.get(@queue) end def record(message) attrs = MessagePack.unpack(message) Hit.record(attrs) end end
http://bit.ly/rt-kestrel
class Hit def record site.atomic_update(site_updates) Resolution.record(self) Technology.record(self) Location.record(self) Referrer.record(self) Content.record(self)
Search.record(self) Notification.record(self) View.record(self) end end
class Resolution def record(hit) query = {'_id' => "..."} update
= {'$inc' => {}} update['$inc']["sx.#{hit.screenx}"] = 1 update['$inc']["bx.#{hit.browserx}"] = 1 update['$inc']["by.#{hit.browsery}"] = 1 collection(hit.created_on) .update(query, update, :upsert => true) end end end
Pros
Pros Space
Pros Space RAM
Pros Space RAM Reads
Pros Space RAM Reads Live
Cons
Cons Writes
Cons Writes Constraints
Cons Writes Constraints More Forethought
Cons Writes Constraints More Forethought No raw data
http://bit.ly/rt-counters http://bit.ly/rt-counters2
Time Frame Minute, hour, month, day, year, forever?
# of Variations One document vs many
Single Document Per Time Frame
None
{ "t" => 336381, "u" => 158951, "2011" => {
"02" => { "18" => { "t" => 9, "u" => 6 } } } }
{ '$inc' => { 't' => 1, 'u' => 1,
'2011.02.18.t' => 1, '2011.02.18.u' => 1, } }
Single Document For all ranges in time frame
None
{ "_id" =>"...:10", "bx" => { "320" => 85, "480"
=> 318, "800" => 1938, "1024" => 5033, "1280" => 6288, "1440" => 2323, "1600" => 3817, "2000" => 137 }, "by" => { "480" => 2205, "600" => 7359,
"600" => 7359, "768" => 4515, "900" => 3833, "1024"
=> 2026 }, "sx" => { "320" => 191, "480" => 179, "800" => 195, "1024" => 1059, "1280" => 5861, "1440" => 3533, "1600" => 7675, "2000" => 1279 } }
{ '$inc' => { 'sx.1440' => 1, 'bx.1280' => 1,
'by.768' => 1, } }
Many Documents Search terms, content, referrers...
None
[ { "_id" => "<oid>:<hash>", "t" => "ruby class variables",
"sid" => BSON::ObjectId('<oid>'), "v" => 352 }, { "_id" => "<oid>:<hash>", "t" => "ruby unless", "sid" => BSON::ObjectId('<oid>'), "v" => 347 }, ]
Writes {'_id' => "#{sid}:#{hash}"}
Reads [['sid', 1], ['v', -1]]
Growth Don’t say shard, don’t say shard...
Partition Hot Data Currently using collections for time frames
Bigger, Faster Server More CPU, RAM, Disk Space
Users Sites Content Referrers Terms Engines Resolutions Locations Users Sites
Content Referrers Terms Engines Resolutions Locations
Partition by Function Spread writes across a few servers
Users Sites Content Referrers Terms Engines Resolutions Locations
Partition by Server Spread writes across a ton of servers,
way down the road, not worried yet
GitHub Thank you!
[email protected]
John Nunemaker MongoSF 2012 May 4,
2012 @jnunemaker