Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Types and Refactoring
Search
Penelope Phippen
July 21, 2014
Technology
3
210
Types and Refactoring
A talk about types and refactoring I gave at Brighton Ruby 2014.
Penelope Phippen
July 21, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Penelope Phippen
See All by Penelope Phippen
Introducing Rubyfmt
penelope_zone
0
600
How RSpec Works
penelope_zone
0
6.8k
Quick and easy browser testing using RSpec and Rails 5.1
penelope_zone
1
100
Teaching RSpec to play nice with Rails
penelope_zone
2
160
Little machines that eat strings
penelope_zone
1
120
What is processor (brighton ruby edition)
penelope_zone
0
140
What is processor?
penelope_zone
1
380
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
penelope_zone
0
290
Agile, etc.
penelope_zone
2
250
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Agent Skill 是什麼?對軟體產業帶來的變化
appleboy
0
180
建設DXを支えるANDPAD: 2025年のセキュリティの取り組みと卒業したいセキュリティ
andpad
0
120
形式手法特論:SMT ソルバで解く認可ポリシの静的解析 #kernelvm / Kernel VM Study Tsukuba No3
ytaka23
1
720
Escape from Excel方眼紙 ~マークダウンで繋ぐ、人とAIの架け橋~ /nikkei-tech-talk44
nikkei_engineer_recruiting
0
150
プラットフォームエンジニアリングはAI時代の開発者をどう救うのか
jacopen
8
4.2k
Phase05_ClaudeCode入門
overflowinc
0
810
CyberAgentの生成AI戦略 〜変わるものと変わらないもの〜
katayan
0
280
スケールアップ企業でQA組織が機能し続けるための組織設計と仕組み〜ボトムアップとトップダウンを両輪としたアプローチ〜
tarappo
3
300
ABEMAのバグバウンティの取り組み
kurochan
1
150
事例から紐解くSHIFT流QA支援 ~大規模プロジェクトの品質管理支援、QA組織立ち上げ~ / 20260320 Nozomu Koketsu
shift_evolve
PRO
0
110
Phase01_AI座学_基礎
overflowinc
0
1.6k
頼れる Agentic AI を支える Datadog のオブザーバビリティ / Powering Reliable Agentic AI with Datadog Observability
aoto
PRO
0
250
Featured
See All Featured
Build your cross-platform service in a week with App Engine
jlugia
234
18k
From Legacy to Launchpad: Building Startup-Ready Communities
dugsong
0
180
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
378
71k
Building AI with AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
810
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
348
40k
Site-Speed That Sticks
csswizardry
13
1.1k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
35
3.4k
How to build a perfect <img>
jonoalderson
1
5.3k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
183
10k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
659
61k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
515
110k
The B2B funnel & how to create a winning content strategy
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
310
Transcript
Types & Refactoring
a!/samphippen
Types
I think type systems are great!
I think dynamic languages are great!
I think thinking about types in dynamic languages is great!
RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUBYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
No type systems here
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
No explicit type systems here
What is a type?
Concrete implementation of some data and behaviour
Class
1.class # => FixNum
(1.0).class # => Float
What is a typeclass?
A set of methods satisfied by many types
Interface
(1+1.0).class # => Float (1.0+1).class # => Float
But also things like
Positive Int + Positive Int # => Positive Int
some_collection.count
String Hash Array
Form a typeclass (or interface) under count with no args
Methods that return consistent interfaces are great
The problem
We’re not forced to return a single interface
If interface is inconsistent, code must check types further down
For example returning nil
nil is not type classed the same as your object!
pony = Pony.find_by(:key => value) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“pony was nil” end
The if is a subtle form of type checking.
Type checking is the antithesis of OO
Can we get a consistent interface?
Refactoring
Null object
class Pony def horse_power 0.5 end end
Pony.find_by( :key => value ) || NullPony.new
class NullPony def horse_power 0 end end
Decides default for horse_power at define time
May or may not be what you want
Maybe
Steal ideas from functional programming!
Decide defaults at run time
Maybe is a type class
#map(&blk) -> maybe #value_or(x) -> Object
class Just def initialize(value) @value = value end def map(&blk)
def value_or(x) Just.new(blk.call(@value)) @value end end end
class Nothing def map(&blk) self end def value_or(x) x end
end
Map until done with transforms
use maybe.value_or(“something”)
Recap
Methods that return nil are almost always inconsistently typed
Use a null object to replace a nil if you
know defaults at define time
Use maybe if you want to set defaults at run
time
RSpec RSpec ! ! RSpec 3
tinyurl.com/ sambr2014
Let’s have some questions a!/samphippen
[email protected]