Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Types and Refactoring
Search
Penelope Phippen
July 21, 2014
Technology
210
3
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Types and Refactoring
A talk about types and refactoring I gave at Brighton Ruby 2014.
Penelope Phippen
July 21, 2014
More Decks by Penelope Phippen
See All by Penelope Phippen
Introducing Rubyfmt
penelope_zone
0
610
How RSpec Works
penelope_zone
0
6.8k
Quick and easy browser testing using RSpec and Rails 5.1
penelope_zone
1
110
Teaching RSpec to play nice with Rails
penelope_zone
2
180
Little machines that eat strings
penelope_zone
1
130
What is processor (brighton ruby edition)
penelope_zone
0
140
What is processor?
penelope_zone
1
390
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
penelope_zone
0
290
Agile, etc.
penelope_zone
2
260
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
プロダクト開発から業務改善コンサルまで。事業全体へ「染み出す」ことで広がるエンジニアの可能性
ham0215
0
130
AWS Security Agent といっしょに脅威モデリングをやってみよう
amarelo_n24
0
110
FinOps × AIエージェントで実現する コストインシデントの自動調査
oasis1994liveforever
0
150
AIソロプレナー時代に2ヶ月で20人増員した事業創造会社の開発組織の話
miyatakoji
0
680
SONiCのLinuxベースを活かしたZabbix監視
sonic
0
180
LayerXにおけるセキュリティ管理の現在地と次の一手
tosho
0
210
ACE-Step-1.5で見る 音楽生成AIのしくみと“破綻だけ直す”Retake機能の開発【zennfes spring 2026 登壇資料】
personabb
1
500
2026TECHFRESH畢業分享會 - Lightning Talk - 資料也要 CI/CD? 用 Airbyte 自動化資料同步
line_developers_tw
PRO
0
1.1k
AIエージェントが名古屋の猛暑からあなたを守る
happysamurai294
0
130
白金鉱業Meetup_Vol.24_「AIエージェントは分けるほど良い」は本当か? / Is it true that “the more you divide AI agents, the better”?
brainpadpr
1
400
「エンジニア進化論」2028年の開発完全自動化、エンジニアはどう進化するか
cyberagentdevelopers
PRO
6
5.3k
GitHub Copilot 最新アップデート – 「一歩先」の実践活用術
moulongzhang
4
1.2k
Featured
See All Featured
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
333
25k
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
csswizardry
28
2.7k
Abbi's Birthday
coloredviolet
2
8.1k
Technical Leadership for Architectural Decision Making
baasie
3
410
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
96
14k
Winning Ecommerce Organic Search in an AI Era - #searchnstuff2025
aleyda
1
2k
Fantastic passwords and where to find them - at NoRuKo
philnash
52
3.7k
Leadership Guide Workshop - DevTernity 2021
reverentgeek
1
300
How To Speak Unicorn (iThemes Webinar)
marktimemedia
1
490
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
76
5.2k
brightonSEO & MeasureFest 2025 - Christian Goodrich - Winning strategies for Black Friday CRO & PPC
cargoodrich
3
730
Agile Actions for Facilitating Distributed Teams - ADO2019
mkilby
0
210
Transcript
Types & Refactoring
a!/samphippen
Types
I think type systems are great!
I think dynamic languages are great!
I think thinking about types in dynamic languages is great!
RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUBYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
No type systems here
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
No explicit type systems here
What is a type?
Concrete implementation of some data and behaviour
Class
1.class # => FixNum
(1.0).class # => Float
What is a typeclass?
A set of methods satisfied by many types
Interface
(1+1.0).class # => Float (1.0+1).class # => Float
But also things like
Positive Int + Positive Int # => Positive Int
some_collection.count
String Hash Array
Form a typeclass (or interface) under count with no args
Methods that return consistent interfaces are great
The problem
We’re not forced to return a single interface
If interface is inconsistent, code must check types further down
For example returning nil
nil is not type classed the same as your object!
pony = Pony.find_by(:key => value) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“pony was nil” end
The if is a subtle form of type checking.
Type checking is the antithesis of OO
Can we get a consistent interface?
Refactoring
Null object
class Pony def horse_power 0.5 end end
Pony.find_by( :key => value ) || NullPony.new
class NullPony def horse_power 0 end end
Decides default for horse_power at define time
May or may not be what you want
Maybe
Steal ideas from functional programming!
Decide defaults at run time
Maybe is a type class
#map(&blk) -> maybe #value_or(x) -> Object
class Just def initialize(value) @value = value end def map(&blk)
def value_or(x) Just.new(blk.call(@value)) @value end end end
class Nothing def map(&blk) self end def value_or(x) x end
end
Map until done with transforms
use maybe.value_or(“something”)
Recap
Methods that return nil are almost always inconsistently typed
Use a null object to replace a nil if you
know defaults at define time
Use maybe if you want to set defaults at run
time
RSpec RSpec ! ! RSpec 3
tinyurl.com/ sambr2014
Let’s have some questions a!/samphippen
[email protected]