Group 10 Slides

Group 10 Slides

Transcript

1. Unify Jintao Lin Mihir Kamble Sebastian Castellanos Naho Shioyama Rose Hedderman
2. Issue Tracker Stats Jintao Lin: 7 Mihir Kamble: 10 Sebastian Castellanos: 9 Naho Shioyama: 9 Rose Hedderman: 11 Total Commits: 157
3. Unit Test Stats Jintao Lin: 2 Mihir Kamble: 1 Sebastian Castellanos: 3 Naho Shioyama: 1 Rose Hedderman: 2
4. Our Models • University ◦ Location, Phone #, Website, Cost of Attendance, Colleges, Acceptance Rate, Avg. SAT/ACT, Student Population, Private or Public • Location ◦ Number of Schools, Avg. In-State Tuition, Avg. Out-of-State Tuition, Avg. Cost of Living, Universities in State • College ◦ University, Location, Majors Offered, Acceptance Rate, Minors Offered, Rank
5. Database Structure
6. Demonstration + Unit Testing
7. Critiques of Our Website • What did we do well? ◦ The relationship among our pages was implemented well. • What did we learn? ◦ For this project, we expanded our knowledge of many programming languages, such as HTML and CSS. We also had to learn database structure and how hosting a website works. • What can we do better? ◦ There is always room for improvement. We can improve the design and layout to enhance user experience. We can also incorporate additional data. • What puzzles us? ◦ Implementation of other methods in the organization of our information. (i.e. pagination)
8. Group 11 Critiques • What did they do well? ◦ Our team was impressed by the image gallery at the home page and the overall layout. • What did we learn from their website? ◦ We learned from their website the capabilities that comes with a search bar. • What can they do better? ◦ One thing they can improve upon is reducing the time it takes to load information. • What puzzles us about their website? ◦ We were puzzled by the incorporation of multiple search bars. ◦ Venues goes to Albums