Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
異常検知の評価指標って何を使えばいいの? / Metrics for one-class cl...
Search
Kon
October 19, 2018
Science
7.4k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
異常検知の評価指標って何を使えばいいの? / Metrics for one-class classification
https://netadashi.connpass.com/event/100334/
Kon
October 19, 2018
More Decks by Kon
See All by Kon
Numerai はいいぞ / An encouragement of Numerai
yohrn
0
3.3k
M5 Forecasting 参加報告 / 143rd place solution of M5 Forecasting Accuracy
yohrn
1
1.5k
AutoML はお好きですか? / 8th place solution of AutoWSL 2019
yohrn
1
3.6k
3rd Place Solution of AutoSpeech 2019
yohrn
0
520
自然言語処理初心者が AutoNLP に挑戦した話 / 8th place solution of AutoNLP 2019
yohrn
0
990
AutoML パッケージの開発を円滑に進めたい / How to develop AutoML package
yohrn
1
3.7k
機械学習の再現性 / Enabling Reproducibility in Machine Learning Workshop
yohrn
9
3.1k
35th ICML における異常検知に関する論文紹介 / Deep One-Class Classification
yohrn
0
9.8k
機械学習の公平性と解釈可能性 / Fairness, Interpretability, and Explainability Federation of Workshops
yohrn
5
2.7k
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
From Prediction to Understanding: Causal Discovery for Data Science and AI Applications
sshimizu2006
0
280
AlgorithAlgorihms for Decision Making
mickey_kubo
0
140
機械学習 - K近傍法 & 機械学習のお作法
trycycle
PRO
1
1.6k
バランスって大事だね
akasan
1
130
YouTubeにおける撤回論文の参照実態 / metascience-meetup2026
corgies
3
340
「遂行理論の未来」(松島斉教授最終講義記念セッションの発表資料)
shunyanoda
0
990
Massey Ratings for Match Outcome Prediction in Table Tennis: Evidence of Greater Stability than the ITTF World Ranking
konakalab
0
140
AI bij literatuuronderzoek in de wetenschap
voginip
0
250
Tensor Factorization Meets Deformed Information Geometry: Convex Relaxation under Deformed Algebra
gkazunii
0
140
[第67回 CV勉強会@関東] CV × Scientific Figures / kantoCV 67th CVPR 2026
lychee1223
0
190
20260722【JAWS-UG東京 ランチタイムLT会 #37④】AWS Well-Architectedフレームワークに沿った回答をするAIエージェントを作ってみた
nozakijcom
1
140
O(log n)-Approximation Algorithms for Bipartiteness Ratio
tasusu
0
170
Featured
See All Featured
How to Align SEO within the Product Triangle To Get Buy-In & Support - #RIMC
aleyda
2
1.8k
Lessons Learnt from Crawling 1000+ Websites
charlesmeaden
PRO
1
1.6k
Noah Learner - AI + Me: how we built a GSC Bulk Export data pipeline
techseoconnect
PRO
0
410
Kristin Tynski - Automating Marketing Tasks With AI
techseoconnect
PRO
0
490
Navigating Algorithm Shifts & AI Overviews - #SMXNext
aleyda
1
1.6k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
55
10k
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
38
3k
Groundhog Day: Seeking Process in Gaming for Health
codingconduct
0
320
Navigating the Design Leadership Dip - Product Design Week Design Leaders+ Conference 2024
apolaine
2
410
Beyond borders and beyond the search box: How to win the global "messy middle" with AI-driven SEO
davidcarrasco
3
220
WENDY [Excerpt]
tessaabrams
12
39k
職位にかかわらず全員がリーダーシップを発揮するチーム作り / Building a team where everyone can demonstrate leadership regardless of position
madoxten
69
64k
Transcript
Netadashi Meetup #7 Oct 19, 2018 異常検知の評価指標って何を使えばいいの?
Yu Ohori (a.k.a. Kon) NS Solutions Corporation (Apr 2017 -
) • Researcher • Data Science & Infrastructure Technologies • System Research & Development Center • Technology Bureau @Y_oHr_N @Y-oHr-N #SemiSupervisedLearning #AnomalyDetection #DataOps
学習を終えたらモデルの性能を評価しなければならない Chapman, P., et al., "CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-by-step data mining
guides," 2000. 3
不均衡データの場合,評価指標に F 値を使う事が多い 適合率(precision)と 再現率(recall)の調和平均で表される評価指標 実ラベル Y 混同行列 (confusion matrix)
正常 pos: +1 異常 neg: -1 予測ラベル f(X) 正常 pos: +1 true positive (tp) false positive (fp) 異常 neg: -1 false negative (fn) true negative (tn) 4
新規性検知の評価指標は F 値を使えばいいの? 新規性検知の場合,異常標本を一つも入手できない事がある このとき,F 値(正確に言うと適合率)は算出できない いいえ 5
F 値に似た Lee-Liu metric と呼ばれる評価指標がある 適合率と再現率の幾何平均の二乗の定数倍で表される 評価指標 実ラベル Y 混同行列
(confusion matrix) 正常 pos: +1 異常 neg: -1 予測ラベル f(X) 正常 pos: +1 true positive (tp) false positive (fp) 異常 neg: -1 false negative (fn) true negative (tn) Lee, W. S, and Liu, B., "Learning with positive and unlabeled examples using weighted Logistic Regression," In Proceedings of ICML, pp. 448-455, 2003. 6
新規性検知の評価指標は Lee-Liu metric を使えばいいの? ベイズの定理より式変形することで適合率が消える したがって,明示的に適合率を求めることなく算出できる https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/192530/metrics-for-one-class-classification はい 7