enables an organism to respond to a changing environment by changing its behavior. ! Whatever has a mind RESPONDS to STIMULI. ! The task of psychology is describing these stimulus-response pairs.
enables an organism to respond to a changing environment by changing its behavior. ! Whatever has a mind RESPONDS to STIMULI. ! The task of psychology is describing these stimulus-response pairs. ! When that is complete, we can predict and control behavior.
enables an organism to respond to a changing environment by changing its behavior. ! Whatever has a mind RESPONDS to STIMULI. ! The task of psychology is describing these stimulus-response pairs. ! When that is complete, we can predict and control behavior. Case 1: The Sphex Digger Wasp.
dumb unconditioned responses, but having a mind means you can also learn new things. ! Learning is forming new stimulus-response pairs by ASSOCIATION. ! When we learn a new (conditioned) response can replace an old (unconditioned or natural) response to a stimulus.
dumb unconditioned responses, but having a mind means you can also learn new things. ! Learning is forming new stimulus-response pairs by ASSOCIATION. ! When we learn a new (conditioned) response can replace an old (unconditioned or natural) response to a stimulus. Case 2: Pavlov’s dog.
mind means being able to learn on your own. ! Operant conditioning uses rewards and punishments to shift an organisms spontaneous responses in one direction or another.
mind means being able to learn on your own. ! Operant conditioning uses rewards and punishments to shift an organisms spontaneous responses in one direction or another. ! By using the right reward/punishment scheme an organism can learn to do many new things.
mind means being able to learn on your own. ! Operant conditioning uses rewards and punishments to shift an organisms spontaneous responses in one direction or another. ! By using the right reward/punishment scheme an organism can learn to do many new things. Case 3: The Skinner Box.
limit itself to the study of things that can be observed by all and measured objectively. ! First-person accounts of our own “inner experience” may make for good literature, but they are not science.
limit itself to the study of things that can be observed by all and measured objectively. ! First-person accounts of our own “inner experience” may make for good literature, but they are not science. This approach is alive and well in the social sciences.
translated into talk about observable behavior, otherwise it is meaningless. ! Philosophical problems with understanding minds are a result of mistakes in our use of language.
translated into talk about observable behavior, otherwise it is meaningless. ! Philosophical problems with understanding minds are a result of mistakes in our use of language. Can we really stop talking about feelings, beliefs, intentions, desires, thoughts, plans, etc. and still make sense of human behavior?
inner worlds, we are nothing but what we do in the world. ! All of our behavior is caused by forces outside of us – evolution programmed us, stimuli move us, conditioning teaches us to do new things.
inner worlds, we are nothing but what we do in the world. ! All of our behavior is caused by forces outside of us – evolution programmed us, stimuli move us, conditioning teaches us to do new things. Should we really treat people like “blank slates” entirely determined in their actions by outside forces?